What? Pill isn't 100% safe, condom is unless you somehow manage to fuck it up and that requires special talent, outside breaking it.The pill is safe unless it breaks.Nothing is
! To read the instructions and stick with them would be a start. ;p
Well it somehow happened!!!
- Thread starter Kivi003
- Start date
You have no idea what you're talking about. Read the stats and statements by the companies who create and sell those products!
I mean your a beta and her bulls an alpha, it’s natural for the beta to bring up the bulls offspring when the beta can’t be a man. It happens a lot with animals. Becuase the the bull is white you’ll be able to pretend to the world/family that’s it’s yours so as long as you and the wife are good than it’ll all work out as you’ll love the kid as if it’s your own.
If you are going to be breeding, better to stick with black bulls.
In the BNWO, I agree. All white women should be black bred.
https://gyazo.com/f295527428a3ee6463f3eef22062a634
Uhhuh buddy. "Stats and statements by the companies who create and sell those products!!!!!" is pretty stupid statement on its own. Why would a company sell a product and be like "oh yeah, there's no 100% guarantee this works. Try your luck." There's hundreds of other different products that have been proven dogshit yet the company itself "assured" that the said product works.
Sure, the pills are effective - which I never denied btw - but they aren't 100% proof unlike condoms.
Last edited:
After the fact realization. Big head should have been doing the thinking a long time ago-
Please, please, please stop your disinformation campaign! i am going to cite two paragraphs from the same source your websearch shows:
(A)
[source: www.nhs.uk/conditions/contraception/male-condoms/]
(B)
[source: www.nhs.uk/conditions/contraception/combined-contraceptive-pill/]
The progestogen-only pill is just as effective as the combined hormone pill, and with 99% among the most reliable contraceptives.
The female condom is even worse than the male condom with an effectiveness of only 95%!
See https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/contraception/the-pill-progestogen-only/ and https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/contraception/female-condoms/
Accept the facts!
If your wife intends to keep the baby, DO NOT put your name as the ******* on the birth certificate. Instead, through an attorney, get a court mandated paternity test on the bull. Let him pay baby support for the next 22 years.
Good point.
During the Clinton years and his choice for cabinet allowed defective condos be given to HS students. (11% was considered the norm, and these were worse)
https://gyazo.com/f295527428a3ee6463f3eef22062a634
Uhhuh buddy. "Stats and statements by the companies who create and sell those products!!!!!" is pretty stupid statement on its own. Why would a company sell a product and be like "oh yeah, there's no 100% guarantee this works. Try your luck." There's hundreds of other different products that have been proven dogshit yet the company itself "assured" that the said product works.
Sure, the pills are effective - which I never denied btw - but they aren't 100% proof unlike condoms.
I have no idea what current numbers are, but if it’s made be humans, there is a failure rate.
First of all, CONGRATULATIONS,
Second of all, it is her responsibility and your responsibility to let her give birth to the Bull’s baby, it would a violation of BNWO to deny his seed the right to grow. Don’t be a bitch about it. You know she wants to deliver his baby
Second of all, it is her responsibility and your responsibility to let her give birth to the Bull’s baby, it would a violation of BNWO to deny his seed the right to grow. Don’t be a bitch about it. You know she wants to deliver his baby
Don’t be selfish. The bulls baby has a right to be born and live and move BNWO forward.
Also, your wife wants that baby whether she says so or not. Don’t be such a fussy little cuck.
The f*ather is white. Lol
Ah, what a shame
Yeah then the guy who doesn't want the baby abandons the mom and nobody wants a single mom with a half-black baby, it's just facts. You can go on Tinder right now and see how many single mothers you see there. Especially those with a mixed kid. Nobody wants to play other people's save game unless they got ******* on their own or can't have their own for reasons. Now you got a single mom who needs benefits (burdening the system more) to care for the kid. Good job.
Of course you have your own opinion but my guess is that you are a youngster, say, early or mid twenties, am i correct? See, men who are in their thirties or fourties often have chi!dren on their own with a Woman from a former relationship and most do not date or marry a gal half their age. Many of the Women available have chi!dren from an earlier relationship too. That does not prevent people from having relationships in this day and age, it's not even exceptional.
Except you are wrong. Men always prefer the younger partner. Men in their 30s or early 40s date mid 20s who don't necessarily have *******.Of course you have your own opinion but my guess is that you are a youngster, say, early or mid twenties, am i correct? See, men who are in their thirties or fourties often have chi!dren on their own with a Woman from a former relationship and most do not date or marry a gal half their age. Many of the Women available have chi!dren from an earlier relationship too. That does not prevent people from having relationships in this day and age, it's not even exceptional.
I would change it to “similar age or younger”.
KungPowChicken
Male
It also makes the second more likely
Similar threads
