You sure do have an obsession with gun rights don't you, Alanm? With over 60% of gun deaths related to suicides, you'd think you'd support better background checks, more restrictive access of guns by mentally ill/unstable individuals. Yet Republicans have ignored and cut back on mental illness health care for years. You want to take the heat OFF guns, invest more in care for the menally ill, depression, etc ... the only reason gun suicides don't make the news is its less news worthy than reporting homicides ... period! Mental illnesses should be treated the same as any other type of health problem, yet they aren't.
This comment just proves you know NOTHING about depression, Alanm ... nothing at all. Before you continue making ridiculous statements like THIS to platform your opinion on the topic, I'd strongly suggest you do some research on clinical depression. This kind of comment only indicates to me that you're clinically ignorant on the topic. Sorry!As far as people who fall into a depression and decide to commit suicide....i dont see any way to solve that problem. people who get depressed need to either get help before they get to that point or hope they have friends or family that can notice a change and get them some help.
that's Trumps problem... the media IS doing their job!..... He loved it back during the republican Primary... he got almost 4 times the press than any of the other republican candidates... and it cost him nothing!if the media did their job, Trump would win in a landslide..
This comment just proves you know NOTHING about depression, Alanm ... nothing at all. Before you continue making ridiculous statements like THIS to platform your opinion on the topic, I'd strongly suggest you do some research on clinical depression. This kind of comment only indicates to me that you're clinically ignorant on the topic. Sorry!
This comment just proves you know NOTHING about depression, Alanm ... nothing at all. Before you continue making ridiculous statements like THIS to platform your opinion on the topic, I'd strongly suggest you do some research on clinical depression. This kind of comment only indicates to me that you're clinically ignorant on the topic. Sorry!
....No, you certainly didn't say you knew anything about depression, which is why you shouldn't oppose stricter background checks, which is exactly one of the things Hillary has indicated ... certainly she isn't wanting to take ALL YOUR little "pop toys" you rednecks cherish so dearly.......i never claimed to know anything about depression. Doesnt matter how depression works my point is no gun law is gonna solve the problem. if it is lets hear it. YOU made the statement that 60 percent of suicides are gun related and that more background checks and restrictive access to guns would help and my point is what could you do for someone who is depressed and never committed a crime and decides to buy a gun and go on a rampage.....NOTHING.
....I'm not sure what led you to that comment ... I own several guns. Just because I don't agree with your position on ownership of assault style weaponry doesn't mean I know nothing about them. Exactly what is it that leads you to that charge, oh political forum guru? Are you saying that because I "don't know ******* about guns", I shouldn't own guns? How many people can take a semi-automatic ******* apart, clean it, and reassemble it?Oh and by the way you never seem to have a problem voicing your opinion on ******* you know nothing about.....like guns!
....No, you certainly didn't say you knew anything about depression, which is why you shouldn't oppose stricter background checks, which is exactly one of the things Hillary has indicated ... certainly she isn't wanting to take ALL YOUR little "pop toys" you rednecks cherish so dearly.
Its funny, the conservatives & NRA don't want to restrict certain types of guns and they object to stricter background checks, but they have no serious solutions to responsible gun ownership other than EVERYONE should own and carry a gun then the bad guys will be reluctant to use theirs ... its LOGIC like that is the very reason the Republicans fucking have Donald Trump ... exactly.
....If someone has been diagnosed with clinical depression, whether they are on medications or not, the records would indicate that and a more in-depth background check taken. There are a host of other advantages but something says you don't "give a rat's ass" ... you cherish your frik'n gun so dearly. With the paranoia you've expressed about government in general, I suspect you sleep with our frik'n guns, don't you?
....I'm not sure what led you to that comment ... I own several guns. Just because I don't agree with your position on ownership of assault style weaponry doesn't mean I know nothing about them. Exactly what is it that leads you to that charge, oh political forum guru?
.....ok, so we should take a similar position regarding "license check points" with cars ... why have license check points to catch the unlicensed drivers.stricter background checks dont do anything if your not diagnosed.
I'm impressed (not) ... looking at her face and age, and the quality of this film, I'd say that's late 90's circa; right?Hillary Clinton's edict to her state department employees on cyber security
.....ok, so we should take a similar position regarding "license check points" with cars ... why have license check points to catch the unlicensed drivers.
.....Yes, there are a lot of untreated depressants out there, BUT, many of them have been diagnosed with depression and have simply refused to pursue treatments for a host of reasons including obtaining certain jobs, the negative and misunderstood image of being a depressant, negative effects of the medications, etc. If a person is diagnosed as being HIV positive, they go into a record bank, so should those diagnosed as depressants. The fact that they don't pursue treatment shouldn't mean we ignore their sickness; and we should be aware when one of them is doing something that endangers others ... like purchasing an assault weapon.
Nice try but she specifically says in the video, "we as State Department employees..." which dates it as 2009 - 2013.I'm impressed (not) ... looking at her face and age, and the quality of this film, I'd say that's late 90's circa; right?
Plus, one thing to keep in mind with the computer technology, it improves and advances by the DAY ... imagine the knowledge everyone has NOW that they didn't have about computer technology 10-15 years ago?
Then of course there was her personal memo to the State Department ordering them not to use personal email....her words:
The point should be obvious to you. She's a fucking hypocrite. She was repeatedly telling her staff they must use state department servers for their email while she was paying some doofus who now pleads the fifth to set up her private server in her bathroom closet.what's your point?... a whole lot of people didn't use the gov email system... Rice and Powell are two of the bigger names... but under Bush there were 22 employees using the RNC server... which allowed them to delete what they wanted... AND DID!
Your using the "logic" of a four year old....Johnny did it too!!! By your "logic" any ******* would get off scott free cause....OJ did it too!!!
Ah yes....the sweet sound that tells you you've won the argument with a liberal....when they start calling you nameswrong again there dufus!