Trump 2016 Or Hillary?

[MacNfries]

....

WhiteGuy, I don't mind your taking a position with my posts, I really don't, BUT, to take my words and change them and fit them into a quote box that indicates that I said them, I really prefer you would not do that. I'd appreciate it if you would delete your #41 post or at least if you're going to use my quote, change it BACK to what I said. What you've done is quite unethical and unprofessional, even as a joke.
Would you please change it back or delete your post, please ... much appreciated.
Mac

ps ... and the change you made, the correct word you should have used is except not accept.

 

[Bigwhtcockslut]

Bill Maher has previously called businessman Donald Trump a racist for some of his criticism of President Barack Obama, and he was pressed on that claim by Larry King in an interview set to air Tuesday afternoon on Hulu.com.
So is Donald Trump a racist? Not an overt one. As he has said many times, ‘The black people love me.’ ‘The blacks love me.’ And, by the way, they love being called ‘the blacks,’ also. So he’s one of those racists who doesn’t know he’s a racist, but yes, he is.”

He is establishing himself as the poster adolescent for the segment of the American public that just can't, or won't, accept that the country is no longer run entirely by rich white men like him. In the hateful campaign to define President Barack Obama as "other" in some way—absurd insistences that he is Muslim, not American, or a socialist—Donald trumps the crowd.

Also of comfort are Trump’s business partners who kicked him to the curb rather than be associated with his rank remarks. What’s sad is that despite such overt racism and intemperate remarks, Trump is polling well among Republican Party primary voters.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/81920.html#ixzz3ichu2rci
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs...donald-trumps-racist-hassling-of-barack-obama

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2015/07/06/no-one-has-to-like-donald-trump/

http://money.cnn.com/2015/07/08/media/trump-jonathan-capehart-real-racist/index.html


Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign has always been criticized for its sleight of hand racism and her determination to secure white votes and encourage black voters not to vote in favor of Obama out of racial solidarity. This is nothing new her campaign attempted to identify the president as a Muslim sympathizer and connote images of him as an undercover terrorist agent, anti white, anti American, anti Christian, and someone to be suspicious of. All of which are noted in her approach to his endorsement by Minister Farrakhan the 1960s notion of pro-black meaning anti white. The truth is it has been eight years since Clinton has engaged in a racial smear campaign and Americans have simply forgotten about her antics. Likewise, the issue of role race in the 2008 presidential campaign which was constantly in play at the time is a distant memory.

“Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s statement that “Senator Obama’s support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again” is a backhanded use of the race card. It’s also a fallacy. Now is the time for Mrs. Clinton to realize that both logic and justice demand that she start unifying the Democratic Party rather than continuing to divide it along racial lines.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/10/opinion/l10elect.html?_r=0

…the Clinton camp resorted to increasingly blatant race- and Muslim-baiting. … [Obama] who responded with repeated reassurances that he did not ask for the [Farrakhan] endorsement, did not accept it, and in fact was not a deranged anti-Semite. That wasn't enough for Clinton, who demanded that Obama "denounce" Farrakhan, which he did. There several articles that speak to the issue of race and Clinton’s use of both indirect and direct racism in her campaign. Likewise, she never publicly denounced Geraldine Ferraro’s racist statement against Obama despite the fact that she insisted he denounce Farrakhan’s endorsement of the president in which the minister made no comments racial or otherwise. It seems there is some truth concerning the racist undertones in her politics and previous campaign practices.

http://theweek.com/articles/567774/hillary-clinton-needs-address-racist-undertones-2008-campaign

…the image of the Clinton campaign sowing racial discord did bubble to the surface following a series of comments made this past week.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/12/obama-camps-memo-on-clint_n_81205.html


In grim times, a bitter Hillary clings to bitter voters who in grim times supposedly cling to guns, religion and antipathy to people who aren’t like them. Mining that antipathy, the New York senator has been working hard to get the hard-working white voters of hardscrabble Appalachia so she can show that a black man can’t yet be elected president.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/14/opinion/14dowd-1.html



http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/19/us/politics/19obama.html?pagewanted=2

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/13/skin-deep-resentment/

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/13/us/politics/13dems.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/08/weekinreview/08mabry.html?_r=0


http://money.cnn.com/2015/07/08/media/trump-jonathan-capehart-real-racist/index.html

Democrats have been a purely anti-white hate group for over 40 years now, they have no moral authority to lecture anyone on racism.
Hillary knows her party is nothing but mindless bigots who think they can do anything they want to white people and get away with it, and that is why she laughs at felony charges laid out against her by the fbi, or the fact that she lost white women voters not even a year into her campaign.

The Democrats stopped caring about white people in the 60s, and now the majority of their core supporters are fascists "of color" like yourself.

 

[MacNfries]

Democrats have been a purely anti-white hate group for over 40 years now, they have no moral authority to lecture anyone on racism.

Care to give proof & links to your rant?

Hillary knows her party is nothing but mindless bigots who think they can do anything they want to white people and get away with it, and that is why she laughs at felony charges laid out against her by the fbi

Hillary's been charged with a felony? When? Could you show us proof of that felony charge?

 

[Bigwhtcockslut]

Care to give proof & links to your rant?


Hillary's been charged with a felony? When? Could you show us proof of that felony charge?

What links would you find acceptable? I have loads of them from everywhere imaginable.

Hillary used her private email address to store classified conversations and data as the frickin Secretary of State. People in government positions with much less responsibility and power rot in jail for years for taking selfies in front of operational military equipment.

 

[Torpedo]

I don't see either one being on ticket. Trump's only real talent is self promotion, but then again that is how Obama got elected. The only way I see Trumps running is if Hillary does get the nomination then Trump will run as an independent. In reality Trump is a lot closer to the Clinton's than he is to the Republican party. Trump should be able to draw off enough Republican votes to ensure a Hillary win. But if Hillary doesn't get the nod Trump will go back to being loud and obnoxious out of politics

What everyone seems to be overlooking is not what is on Hillary's mail server but what isn't. Government and many corporate servers do an incremental backup. It requires a lot of storage space but it allows a look at what was on the servers at anyone of those increments. It makes it nearly impossible to delete anything without leaving tracks. Even without backups deleted items can often be recovered. However if you are concerned that some of your communications could put your ass in a sling you simply use your own mail server or even your desktop or other computer acting as a server. Step one you delete the incriminating emails and any of information that can get you into trouble. Step two back up your hard drive (backup programs typically do not save deleted items) step three format your hard drive. Step four write your entire drive, the are several programs available that will write a drive with a phrase or random letters. Repeat step step three and four at least one more time. Just formatting a hard drive will nor guarantee your information is gone. A format can be reverted to a previous format. Once the drive is clean load your sanitized backup onto the drive and all the incriminating stuff never even happened. Do it right and the NSA is unlikely to be able to get the deleted stuff back

 

[MacNfries]

Democrats have been a purely anti-white hate group for over 40 years now ...
Hillary knows her party is nothing but mindless bigots who think they can do anything they want to white people and get away with it, and that is why she laughs at felony charges laid out against her by the fbi

What links would you find acceptable? I have loads of them from everywhere imaginable.

Why not just surprise me .... show me this PROOF you have that Hillary's been charged with a felony or that Democrats have been "purely anti-white hate group for over 40 years" ... something without a Republican website smell would be really nice. Mac

 

[Chungcheng21]

Donald Trump is a character....he won't win the Republican nomination.

 

[MacNfries]

Donald Trump is a character....he won't win the Republican nomination.

.....What Trump's after ..... ................, and nothing more!

 

[Bigwhtcockslut]

View attachment 641152 .....What Trump's after .....View attachment 641153 ................View attachment 641154, and nothing more!

That is literally the only reason the Democratic party still exists, so...

If Trump really wanted money he would just run as a Democrat promising to "stick up for the little guy" and tens of millions of retards would break open their children's piggy banks to give to "the Donald" for parroting the same old Democratic party BS that every post Roosevelt Democrat crook has been saying in every campaign.

 

[Bigwhtcockslut]

Why not just surprise me .... show me this PROOF you have that Hillary's been charged with a felony or that Democrats have been "purely anti-white hate group for over 40 years" ... something without a Republican website smell would be really nice. Mac

Imagine if Democrats were restricted to only using sources friendly to Republicans if they wanted to prove something about Republicans... Do you even understand how stupid your conditions are?
Do you understand how stupid you would have to be to insist the Democrats aren't anti-white when you say "whites are losing their grip on this country" and then you directly equate that with Democrats gaining power? Which party do you think black racists vote for? Which party do you think Chicano supremacists vote for? Which party do you think Asian supremacists vote for? How can Democrats not be anti-white when they literally rely on literally every anti-white faction to vote for them in droves?

 

[Torpedo]

The Clinton's and the Obama's get along about as well JFK and LBJ. I wasn't particularly surprised to hear that Obama has endorsed Biden. What Hillary did was illegal with her email server but she is hardly alone. It has just came out that Ambassador Caroline Kennedy did it and I have heard that Jeb Bush did it. Whether Hillary gets indicted will depend on how many cans of worms everyone wants opened. Hillary isn't electable and I would be very surprised is she got the nomination. If Biden declares her campaign will likely fade away.

I was surprised how much Trump came up in the polls, but I quite sure his star will fade. However he does have ties with the Clintons and if Hillary did get the Democratic nod, he would run as an independent. That would split the Republican vote and give Hillary the win.

As to the Republican candidate I would take bets on anyone

 

[Torpedo]

View attachment 641152 .....What Trump's after .....View attachment 641153 ................View attachment 641154, and nothing more!

Trump has money. He craves the spotlight, just as much or maybe even more than Obama does. Trump does have a higher entertainment value than Obama, but he has had more time to work on his act.

 

[MacNfries]

.........

And, TRUMP gets a very important endorsement ....



You know what they say ... "Birds of a feather flock together"

 

[Torpedo]

View attachment 645593 .........View attachment 645594

And, TRUMP gets a very important endorsement ....

View attachment 645595

You know what they say ... "Birds of a feather flock together"

Equating Trump with the KKK is a bit of a stretch. If Duke did come out in favor of Trump I am reasonable certain it is an endorsement that Trump didn't seek. Then there is the possibility that Duke actually hates Trump and the best way Duke could damage Trump would be to endorse him. I am reasonably sure that Duke is well aware that his views aren't very main stream or popular.

 

[MacNfries]

Imagine if Democrats were restricted to only using sources friendly to Republicans if they wanted to prove something about Republicans... Do you even understand how stupid your conditions are?

Do you realize how stupid your comment is? Why would one want a party to take the opposition's view or points in proving or validating their OWN comments?
You said (I didn't) "that Hillary's been charged with a felony and that Democrats have been "purely anti-white hate group for over 40 years"
I just asked you to provide the valid sources proving your comment. Now why would I want you to pull Republican conjectures to prove your points? You're the one making the accusations ... NOT ME!
OR, you could simply say, at the start of your post "IN MY OWN OPINION" and that would be sufficient. Either way is ok ... just validate your comments.

 

[MacNfries]

Equating Trump with the KKK is a bit of a stretch. If Duke did come out in favor of Trump I am reasonable certain it is an endorsement that Trump didn't seek.

You can google the comments as well as I ... and I didn't say Trump would seek or approve of the Duke's comment. I just say David Duke said them ... that's not hard to understand or prove, right? Quit twisting the posts, Torp.
Interesting, however, how flies seem to congregate at the source ...
Actually, I'm finding Trump more entertaining than Michele Bachman ... and that's an accomplishment.
Just a suggestion, instead of trying to find fragments of conjecture & faults in my posts, you might try spending more time stating your own position.

Oh, and vulture capitalists NEVER get enough money ... its ALL about money because, to them, that reflects their POWER. Trump has no desire to put up with the headaches of the Presidency for a mire $400,000 a year. He wipes his butt with that "change" each day.

 

[Torpedo]

You can google the comments as well as I ... and I didn't say Trump would seek or approve of the Duke's comment. I just say David Duke said them ... that's not hard to understand or prove, right? Quit twisting the posts, Torp.
Interesting, however, how flies seem to congregate at the source ... View attachment 645612
Actually, I'm finding Trump more entertaining than Michele Bachman ... and that's an accomplishment.
Just a suggestion, instead of trying to find fragments of conjecture & faults in my posts, you might try spending more time stating your own position.

Oh, and vulture capitalists NEVER get enough money ... its ALL about money because, to them, that reflects their POWER. Trump has no desire to put up with the headaches of the Presidency for a mire $400,000 a year. He wipes his butt with that "change" each day.

If he thought he could win Trump would run. He has money but the Presidency is power like not even Warren Buffett of Bill Gates can wield. Men like Soros, Trump, Buffett and others of their ilk crave power as much as money. I am quite familiar with vultures, I spent a good part of my life working for one. The thing you don't seem to grasp is that there are plenty of Vultures on both sides of the fence. The party funding and the PAC money that both sides get does not come from change jars in convenience stores.

 

[blackmeat]

I'm for trump because he's not scared to speak his mind. When Hillary makes her speeches, she sounds like a robot. You can tell she's reading and not talking , like you or I would. How about all those emails Hillary? Trump said we need to close the border. People mad because he said ******* dealers ******* and murders flood the US. Not sure what's not true about it? Ok vote now

The problem with "trump" is while he speaks his mind, what he speaks is not in the best interest of the U.S. citizens, especially from a constitutional context. He simply is not a respectable political candidate. He, like Romney (who had REAL and MORE political experience), will endure a similar outcome. That's a LOT of money being thrown away by a "billionaire," but I'm just a U.S. citizen.

 

[falcondfw69]

Neither (In answer to the original question).

 

[SL65]

Neither. If those are our only two choices we are in more trouble than we already are.