well dimwit.....and you just keep going out of your way to earn that title........44million does not make what he says factual newsThe woman they want to head up the “DISINFORMATION Board” - is on record saying the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian “DISINFORMATION” - how bout dat !!!!
Ya just can’t make this shite up !!!!!!
Wake Up, America! Wake Up! PLEASE!!
- Thread starter Drillher4me
- Start date
- Status
well again there dimwit....guess you haven't heard of the FCC
well dimwit ....the reason it smacks of marksism is because it is so closely linked to the republican partyrepublicans are a lot closer to marxism than dem ever thought to be
Red Republicans and Lincoln’s Marxists - John C. Carleton
Red Republicans and Lincoln’s Marxists. Tenth Communist Party USA convention in Chicago, May 1938. Portraits of Lincoln, Lenin and Stalin flanked the stage, while the Party’s leader spoke. ThePolitiFact | Top Republicans push theories about 'mobs ...
Top Republicans push theories about 'mobs' and 'Marxism' in vandalism of Douglass statue New York Frederick Douglass portrait by George K. Warren (National Archives Gift Collection, via The ..U.S. Republican party had its roots in Marxism | Letter to ...
The Republican Party was actually organized and started by a Marxist by the name of Alvin Bovay. He was the head of the National reform Association. He also was editor of Young America
guess now we know why he bought twitter
The billionaire is set to acquire Twitter , its primary communications network for which he made a $44 billion bid on April 14.
This offer, at a price of $54.20 per Twitter share, was accepted by the board of directors of the social network.
Both parties are now working out the details of the transaction. It is not completely certain that the operation will be finalized. Questions about financing, mainly through a leveraged buyout, have been raised.
In the meantime, Musk, who has become one the biggest influencers on Twitter with more than 86.6 million followers, must now also deal with the consequences of his activity on the social network.
A New York judge has just rejected his request to ditch a settlement reached in September 2018 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
That agreement was supposed to end an investigation into a tweet that caused the price of Tesla shares to fall, a company of which he is the chief executive officer.
According to this agreement, Musk was fined $20 million, with an additional $20 million in financial penalties for Tesla.
The serial entrepreneur also had to give up his title as Tesla's chairman, and a lawyer for the high-end electric vehicle manufacturer had to pre-approve his stock-related Tesla tweets before they were published.
That position was quickly dubbed the "Twitter sitter" by the media, a moniker which has stuck.
After accepting these terms, the billionaire recently escalated hostilities with the SEC, which he accuses of harassment and violating his free speech rights.
It should be noted that it is in the name of the principles of free speech that Musk has said he wants to acquire Twitter.
"As Musk states, '[e]conomic duress is an equitable doctrine which comes into play upon the doing of a wrongful act which is sufficiently coercive to cause a reasonably prudent person faced with no reasonable alternative to succumb to the perpetrator's pressure,'" Judge Lewis Liman wrote in his ruling on April 27.
"But Musk's argument that the SEC acted wrongfully amounts to one sentence: 'In 2018, the SEC took advantage of the position in which it put Mr. Musk'."
"That conclusory assertion is insufficient to sustain a finding of economic duress," Liman said.
And then added: "Musk was not ****** to enter into the consent decree; rather, "for [his] own strategic purposes, [Musk], with the advice and assistance of counsel, entered into these agreements voluntarily, in order to secure the benefits thereof, including finality."
The judge insisted that "Musk cannot now seek to retract the agreement he knowingly and willingly entered by simply bemoaning that he felt like he had to agree to it at the time but now — once the specter of the litigation is a distant memory and his company has become, in his estimation, all but invincible —wishes that he had not."
Elon Musk Loses an Important Battle
The billionaire is set to acquire Twitter , its primary communications network for which he made a $44 billion bid on April 14.
This offer, at a price of $54.20 per Twitter share, was accepted by the board of directors of the social network.
Both parties are now working out the details of the transaction. It is not completely certain that the operation will be finalized. Questions about financing, mainly through a leveraged buyout, have been raised.
In the meantime, Musk, who has become one the biggest influencers on Twitter with more than 86.6 million followers, must now also deal with the consequences of his activity on the social network.
A New York judge has just rejected his request to ditch a settlement reached in September 2018 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
That agreement was supposed to end an investigation into a tweet that caused the price of Tesla shares to fall, a company of which he is the chief executive officer.
According to this agreement, Musk was fined $20 million, with an additional $20 million in financial penalties for Tesla.
The serial entrepreneur also had to give up his title as Tesla's chairman, and a lawyer for the high-end electric vehicle manufacturer had to pre-approve his stock-related Tesla tweets before they were published.
That position was quickly dubbed the "Twitter sitter" by the media, a moniker which has stuck.
After accepting these terms, the billionaire recently escalated hostilities with the SEC, which he accuses of harassment and violating his free speech rights.
It should be noted that it is in the name of the principles of free speech that Musk has said he wants to acquire Twitter.
"As Musk states, '[e]conomic duress is an equitable doctrine which comes into play upon the doing of a wrongful act which is sufficiently coercive to cause a reasonably prudent person faced with no reasonable alternative to succumb to the perpetrator's pressure,'" Judge Lewis Liman wrote in his ruling on April 27.
"But Musk's argument that the SEC acted wrongfully amounts to one sentence: 'In 2018, the SEC took advantage of the position in which it put Mr. Musk'."
"That conclusory assertion is insufficient to sustain a finding of economic duress," Liman said.
And then added: "Musk was not ****** to enter into the consent decree; rather, "for [his] own strategic purposes, [Musk], with the advice and assistance of counsel, entered into these agreements voluntarily, in order to secure the benefits thereof, including finality."
The judge insisted that "Musk cannot now seek to retract the agreement he knowingly and willingly entered by simply bemoaning that he felt like he had to agree to it at the time but now — once the specter of the litigation is a distant memory and his company has become, in his estimation, all but invincible —wishes that he had not."
...Welcome to B2W, Bwc ... I like your description of the political situation, "shitswirling vortex", I'll have to use that sometime. Up until 5-6 years ago I would tend to agree with your description of politics ... "big guys telling us what we should & shouldn't do", but its become a lot more serious these days. Our country is in a real crisis. One political party (you figure it out) has taken it on itself to destroy any sense of a common American narrative. IE: campaigns of demonizing dissent, shredding norms & boundaries, embracing politics of white resentment & fear, delegitimizing the very idea of knowable facts like Obama's birth certificate, making ordinary election a seedbed of distrust, and referring to the sacking of the US Capitol as an innocent visit by tourists. Our crisis is that one party & x-President has decided to become ideological extremists, scornful of compromise, unpersuaded by conventional understanding of FACTS, or the evidence of science, and dismissive of the legitimacy of its own political opposition. And except for a handful of that party's members, practically ALL are willing to attack their own government rather than rise up and challenge those who wish to take the US Constitution & its democratic government structure down. A party who's willing to forfeit over 250 years of democratic history to remain in control of the government, people & country be damned.
...What's happened in the past 20 or so years with this party baffles many people, even some of that party's own legislators. A growing number of their party members have decided to leave politics rather than oppose those who wish to change this country to eventually run dictatorship. Confronting it doesn't make one a partisan, it makes them a patriot and many in that party simply don't have the GUTS to take it on. We don't have to look very far to see the results of countries who's governments have taken that direction.
...I really encourage you to look more deeply into that "shitswirling vortex" as now is the time to do what is right for the country. Otherwise, your children & grandchildren are destined to live an entirely different type of life than either of us can imagine. This is OUR TIME to stand up and fight for our country. We can't become the generation that the future will look back and say "we were too coward to fight".
Last edited:
- Status
