The Power and Dominant Biological Evolution of a Bull and the release of power and submission in a cuckold relationship.
(under draft)
Someone had written to me asking if I could write on the biological and sociological science behind the power of a Bull and cuckold relationships. The following is that dissertation long overdue on the subject.
In Matt Ridley’s book ‘The Red Queen’ provides a whole discourse on the biological evolution of human nature and its ultimate purpose in which all human activities lead through out the struggle of life to survive, suceed in their endeavors, and most importantly of all reproduce. Human beings are a product of evolution and their environment, both nature and nurture.
Some may think that human beings are naturally monogamous, but they’re also just as naturally adulterous. In Ridley’s book he deacribes how anthropologist, and sociologists conducted research in finding comparisons for humans with other animals that share our highly social habits: such as with colonial birds, monkeys, and dolphins. As we shall see, the lesson they teach is that we are designed for a system of monogamy plagued by adultery.
Though Ridley says that women are less inclined toward casual sex, that doesn’t mean they aren’t promiscuous. But their promiscuity often has a purpose.
For examples, Ridley looks to the ******* kingdom—specifically to the phenomenon of adultery among colonial birds. Like many human beings, female colonial birds divide men into two different categories:
1. Providers (cucks)
2. Lovers (Bulls, Studs)
“When a female mates with an attractive male, he works less hard and she works harder at bringing up the young,” Ridley writes. “It is as if he feels that he has done her a favor by providing superior genes and therefore expects her to repay him with harder work around the nest. This, of course, increases her incentive to find a mediocre but hardworking husband and cuckold him by having an affair with a superstud next door.”
Ridley closes his discussion of this topic with a crude summary of the hunter-gatherer rules that he claims still exist deep in the minds of women: “It began with a woman who married the best unmarried hunter in the tribe and had an affair with the best married hunter, thus ensuring her children a rich supply of meat. It continues with a rich tycoon’s wife bearing a baby that grows up to resemble her beefy bodyguard. Men are to be exploited as providers of parental care, wealth, and genes.”
WHY WOMEN GET TO CHOOSE
Biologically hardwired info their DNA make-up and instinctually, the goal for female animals is to find a mate with the genetic makeup necessary to be a good provider or a good *******. Males have to be the agressors.
Consider, for example, the question of marriage proposals. In no society on earth do they usually come from the woman or her family. Even among the most liberated of Westerners, men are expected to ask and women to answer.
Male animals by nature have a goal of locating as many wives and mothers as possible. The reason for these disparate goals is investment. The gender that invests the most in children (by carrying a fetus for months, for instance) is the one that has the least to gain from extra mating. On the other hand, the gender that invests the least in children has the most extra time to spend searching for additional mates. These different goals lend a scientific authority to something every man who’s entered a singles club immediately learns: Males compete for the attention of females.
The evolutionary pressure is on the male to perfect displays that make the female well disposed toward him and sexually aroused so that he can be certain of mating.” Ridley examines the mating habits that revolve around peacock tails, deer antlers, swallow tailfeathers, and the colors of butterflies and guppies.
The bottom line is that “females choose; and their choosiness is inherited; they prefer exaggerated ornaments; (i.e. men with nice cars or other items to show off their wealth but also men with large cocks to demonstrate their sexual prowess for delivering the pleasure). That much is now uncontroversial.”
For many women, high heels, push-up bras, tight clothing, and waxed body hair are just part of being fashionable and attractive. If you want to be successful with women, you have to be willing to carry a similar burden. It may feel unnatural or uncomfortable sometimes, but wearing clothes that distinguish you from the herd conveys confidence, leadership and individuality (as long as the clothes aren’t wearing you). As Ridley puts it, “There is no preference for the average.”
And all of this leads us back to the qualities and attributes of a Bull whether with elephants, seals, or human males. They have a high amount of testosterone, very aggressive, competive and alphas or natural doninant leaders. While they may be too much trouble for a woman to maintain a monagamous stable providing relationship with these men make suitable and satisfying lovers. Hence it makes more practical sense that a woman find a man who is more a beta, would not be as aggressive or competitive to bed as many women, want to provide for his mate and thus she is able to cuck him to her suitability for a homeostatic life of survival and reproduction.
