Most likely a study will not be done by biased scientist because they will come to the same results as this non scientist person. If they came and presented the same results to the mainstream, the a large portion of the public would reject inoculation procedure, and look for other ways to fight the virus, thus forsing the govts that are administering this experimental medicine, or supporting the companies doing so, to stop what they are doing.
By requiring someone that is on your side to dislrove themselves is not going to happen, hed probably get fired for trying to report his findings
The study was conducted by a questionnaire. There is no science behind the any of it. Also science has dis-proven that the covid vaccine makes anyone magnetic.
This survey, of a purely statistical and sociological nature,
As stated by the association. Meaning it has no relevant scientific evidence or proof to back their claims up. No real time or participant proof study was ever carried out just a questionnaire,
You see, the typical dose for a COVID-19 vaccine is less than a milliliter, which is not enough to allow magnets to be attracted to your vaccination site even if the vaccine was filled with a magnetic metal.
Here is a link to the materials used to make up three vaccines
Find interim clinical considerations for the use of COVID-19 vaccines for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States.
www.cdc.gov
When you actually read the associations website and some of their so called facts. Its plain to see they have a lot of mis-information and dis-information.
According to the study these were the only requirements to take part.
1,That a panel of 200 individuals living or working in Luxembourg would be interviewed.
2.That this panel would be divided into 2 groups. The first would be composed of 100 individuals vaccinated in Luxembourg and the second of 100 unvaccinated individuals for comparison purposes.
3.That each of these groups should have 50 women and 50 men.
4.That only active individuals would be selected to participate in the study due to the fact that they are much more constrained to vaccination than inactive individuals.
5.That the location of the study would be the Belle-Étoile shopping centre and the route d'Arlon in Strassen.
6.That the variables retained would therefore be sex, age, occupation, number of injections, the pharmaceutical origin of the injections, the date of the injections, the magnetic attraction, the emission-reception of an electric field and the town of residence of the respondent.
7.It should also be noted that for practical reasons, only people wearing short-sleeved or sleeveless clothing would be interviewed
I'm afraid the study is bogus and has no scientific evidence or proof that the SAR's Covd 2 vaccine makes anyone suffer from magnetism. Its just not possible for numerous scientifically proven reasons. Their claims that 22 of 29 participants in their survey were those who had received one of the vaccines, displayed magnetism to certain metal objects, and those who were not vaccinated had zero magnetism effect to metal objects, all these claims has been rejected due to a simple fact that they cannot and have refused to replicate their study under observation by the scientific community.
To quote one expert.
"Al Edwards, an associate professor in biomedical technology from the University of Reading in England, also told
Newsweek that there is "absolutely no way" that magnets can stick to people's arms as a result of an injection.
"There is
nothing magnetic in vaccine formulations, most of what is injected is extremely pure water, plus some simple salts to make the injection less painful, and an absolutely tiny amount of vaccine," he said.
But, it would appear that your assertion that an injection only results in pain is baseless, narrow-minded, and just plain wrong. The known record reveals that an injection can lead to immense pleasure, and can alleviate all pain.
