Why give unprotected oral but require protected sex?
- Thread starter MrDavid73
- Start date
Pregnancy is the obvious answer
Married women playing discreetly can't take that risk
Ideally yes. Trust is also important through if you have regular meets with the same guy.
Very lucky if your hubby is ok with it.
funtime46112
Female
It woukd be pregnancy for me but I'm good with pull out
The risk of transmission (at least when it comes to HIV) is far less than unprotected sex.
For our regular bulls they take my wife bare. They get tested just like my wife does for everyones benefit.
If we meet a new man he wraps it up.
If we meet a new man he wraps it up.
Herpes is contagious both orally and by intercourse, by either party. Its very common STD and its incurable. I'll spare the forum the pics of oral herpes, but its worth seeing as its usually around the lips and nasty ass stuff. Know your partners AND don't be afraid to briefly discuss STDs before having sex ... it tells your perspective partner that you're respectful & careful. 
Guess you didn't read the previous post at all
Happened my first time as well. It was casual flirting then lead to a lunch date in the end I didn't think about birth control or STDs just wanted to fuck him. I've been much more cautious since then testing first.
And you obviously didn't comprehend my post
Comprehended out just fine but apparently scientific facts just fly over your head.
You don't have to be so emotional about it. My logic was that why take the risk of oral bare and wraping up when it's time for sex you're still at a risk. So if you're going to go bare one way you might as well do it all the way
Because there are fewer risks with just oral. Risks increase with vaginal and even more with anal. It's that simple. It's like saying if you kiss you might as well go all the way.
Also, throwing out the word emotional doesn't make someone emotional. It's a way to get some emotional reaction out of someone.
I love the taste
Similar threads
