I also agree with this. I'd be pleased to see my wife with black men if that's what she wanted. From there, the decision to go bareback or not would be hers (and theirs!). Given that she's unprotected, it doesn't take a genius to see that if she were to ever do this, result might be having black babies.
While having black babies isn't the goal (at least, not for me), I can accept it as a result.
You bring up a good point, being that making a baby is not your goal but a risk that you accept. I can understand people that post really radical things on this topic, that the fantasy is a major turn on etc. But to me the real value of this thread is when posts have been relatively 'real'. I am sure that most of the ubber-subbie posts wanting this as a goal are purely fantasy driven, which is fine. But reality and fantasy are different things, and frankly need to be.
As I have previously written, if our wives take us up on the offer to allow them to have extra marital relationships and sex then we ought to expect that we will have
no say in that relationship. If we expect to control her relationship with her lover then we are guilty of 'topping from the bottom'. I don't really want to get into a debate about the connections (or lack) of cuckoldry and submissiveness. Some may not agree, but to me there is an implied submissive role assumed when we ask our wives to open their sex to another man. When we ask our women to be with other men while we remain fully faithful to them, we are essentially giving them a total green light to act as a single woman. I think a lot of men here want to think that they can be okay with this, while simultaniously expecting to have a say in their wife's extra marital relationships. Accept that you will have
no say in your wife's relationships or
do not offer her the freedom in the first place.
The above stated, know that sex really does mean different things to men and women. I could be wrong, and would very much like for the women of the forum to post on this tangent, but I truly believe that for a lot of women sex and the chance of procreation are
always linked. I am not saying that women always want to get pregnant when they have sex. Rather, I think that women are
much more attuned to the possibility that
any sexual encounter can lead to all the promise and complications that are pregnancy. Men really do not view that possibility with the same sense of reality that women do, IMHO.
So when a woman has sex with a man, I believe, she always is cognisant of the always present chance that she will be permenantly connected with you though procreation. The chance may be slight, and lowered by using birth control. But I think that women always think (at least in passing) about the fact that they are opening themselves up in the deepest sense to this man that is inside of them. Is it really surprising that when the man that they love lowers himself to a beta role while promoting another man to a sexual Alpha role that she could easily open herself up to the seed of the Alpha man? Even if they are still using birth control, and pregnancy is not planned, it is my supposition that whenever a woman opens her sex to a man she is implying that she is open to the
possibility of pregnancy.