DOOFUS remarks regarding Debacle Joe are simply statements of fact.
Wake Up, America! Wake Up! PLEASE!!
- Thread starter Drillher4me
- Start date
- Status
DOOFUS remarks regarding Debacle Joe are simply statements of fact.
If Dems don’t win they fault the system - such sore LOSERS !!!!!!
sure....we are the ones still fighting to overturn last election....when all the courts and etc tell the slob he is a loser....but his fans belevie him
your facts.....and those are not considered facts by anyone but you.....since you and most other trump followers know nothing of politics....no one is interested in your "facts"
stick with your leggos .....you can handle them
That's not an answer, is Rittenhouse guilty?
And why else would they be trying to follow the jury bus?
I think you are adding more into that bus deal than there actually was...if there was an issue arressts would have been made
and rittenhouse was not entirely innocent
judge just prevented him from serving time
judge just prevented him from serving time
They were trying to dox jurors, and there's no two ways about it...
And you're wrong, Rittenhouse was found "not guilty" by a jury of his peers... The correct answer is that he is NOT guilty... In that case, the opinion of people who were not on the jury, simply does not matter... You can disagree with it all day and night, and that's your right, but you're required to not only accept, but respect the decision of the jury.
You have no game in the insult department.....rather pitiful.....
more of your stupidity.......go back to your cows....you can bullshit them
Says "Mr. Copy n Paste" 5 o'clock news is my church guy
Sure thing Pigeon chess
I could go into all the ways the judge steered the jury to that conclusion....but I think you know and are in denial
you lead a very lonely life don't you.....but then when you are stupid a lot of people ignore you
How? Please list specific ways in which you can prove that. Or is it just your opinion?
The president (in title only) called Rittenhouse a "white supremacist" in a tactic designed by his puppet masters with the goal of swaying potential jurors... Was he justified in spouting that nonsense? Or should he have withheld any comments in the spirit of impartiality?
NEVER saw a clearer case of self-defense in my entire life - textbook case of self-defense.
Retreating and being attacked defended himself against multiple attackers - turns out all of them were felons and or had long criminal records - hope they give him a medal.
- Status
