damn the whacko's are out in full bloom today
Trump 2016 Or Hillary?
- Thread starter WhiteGuyintoThis
- Start date
this could cover you latin...
.
.
Yes you and subhub are.....
Well for starters they increased the national debt more than George H.W. Bush did. Bill Clinton signed the NAFTA treaty which was did nothing for our economy and was the start of exporting manufacturing jobs. Then there was the trade agreement with China that gave China permanent normal trade relations and allowed China to gain admission to WTO. President Clinton talked long and loud about all the good it was going to do to the U.S. economy. Clinton said the pact would increase jobs and reduce the federal trade deficit. The reality? Since the pact was signed the United States has lost about a third of its manufacturing jobs, about 5.6 million. In 2000 our trade deficit with China was 83 Billion, by 2009 it hit 227 billion. Wages have stagnated, 14 trillion dollars has been dumped into the economy in stimulus packages, and we have had the highest unemployment in decades. Did I mention that the Chinese government has donated millions to the Clinton Foundation and other Clinton causes?
Nice try, but it was Clinton that negotiated the trade pact with China that was the primary cause of job loss in the United States
It is true nobody has ever reduced the federal debt. A few politicians have done some accounting sleight of hand a nd claimed that they have reduced the debt but in reality it has steadily increased
I can't say that I am impressed with Trump but if Hillary gets in the Clinton's would likely the first politicians in this country that became billionaires from all the fees they collect from people and countries that want favors
There is no argument that President Bush left a lot to be desired, however the only positive thing I can say about President Obama is that when you compare the two Bush doesn't look so bad
This myth has been floating around for years, it simply isn't true. Picture of Reagan in his pajamas was taken the day before the bombing. He did not continue golfing when he received word of the attack. If you are going to spout inaccuracies you should at least check with snopes
I haven't given up entirely on the hamster
Alanm does bring up a good point. However I am sure she would blame Reagan
It's a nice theory but take a look at France, they have some of the toughest gun control laws there are and look what has happened and what is likely to happen again. In this country Chicago has some of the toughest gun control laws in the United States and have 10 or more people shot on a weekend isn't all that rare. If you go across the state of Illinois to East St. Louis they have the highest homicide rate in the country and Illinois has some of the toughest gun control laws in the country
Getting permitted for a fully automatic weapon always been very rare and I would imagine even rarer in the past few years. You can't go to any firearms store and just buy a fully automatic weapon
how can it not be true..., you just said he was golfing... and continued to golf after he got the news!
Interesting that you mention duck hunting. In England (I don't think they were ever used here) they had large gauge shotguns that were usually 1 or 2 gauge that were mounted in a boat called a punt, they were called punt guns. Most were single barrel but there were some double barrel ones. They were used by commercial hunters to ******* water fowl. I have read that as many as 200 ducks or more could be killed with one shot. So pretty much anything today would pale in comparison to these monsters. Hopefully no one gets the bright idea to use one of these on people
He stopped golfing when he got word of the attack. Check your facts and quit trying to do an end run with the truth
