Semantics. He wanted to dominate everywhere he could project his military power. Including the America's.
I hope you are not one of those National Socialist sympathizers.
Politics, Politics, Politics
- Thread starter falcondfw69
- Start date
Semantics. He wanted to dominate everywhere he could project his military power. Including the America's.
I hope you are not one of those National Socialist sympathizers.
Amandy
Female
worlds #1 economy? I don't think so...maybe you don't know but all national debt of US in on chinese hands...they also have so many corporations.... if China only would it could destroy your economy in just a second...
military power? Chinese and Russia have powerful armies and above all they have more disciplinated troops.
science and technology are well advanced in Russia and China.
P.S.: when there's trouble in the world syscom3 you are not called to help....you elect yourself "defender of peace" and "help" other countries.
military power? Chinese and Russia have powerful armies and above all they have more disciplinated troops.
science and technology are well advanced in Russia and China.
P.S.: when there's trouble in the world syscom3 you are not called to help....you elect yourself "defender of peace" and "help" other countries.
Amandy
Female
It's not semantics. He didnt' want to rule the entire world but he just wanted to affirm the Aryan people superiority but he was respectful towards white people (Jews and Russian excepted).
He offered peace to UK because he didn't want a "fratricide" war.
just for the records: if I were a National Socialist symphatizer I wouldn't be here
If the Chinese call in the debt, they would lose instant access to their #1 market. They know it. We know it. And the bankers know it.
The Chinese and Russians have more disciplined troops? How do you come to that conclusion?
If the Russians and Chinese have such great science, how come the world comes to the US and Europe?
Capitalism thrives on the supply & demand theory, thus there has to be a poor class and rich class, otherwise, goods & services would have much less value.
We left true capitalism some time ago, so I won't argue that the capitalism we have now is not bad. With the huge amounts of money now influencing our legislation, I see our government headed more toward a Plutocracy, which has been one of my major complaints with our government of late.
Because this is the politics room.
I've never been able to think properly with a hard on, sysco ...
I'm a typical heterosexual male, my brain relocates every time it happens.
Last edited:
I prefer simply cutting off the head of the SNAKE ... had they done that in 1941 with Hitler, imagine the lives that would have been saved. In a high tech, world war, aircraft carriers would last just a couple weeks, at best. I'd show our nuke sub ******* ... some bad ass machines, there.
I take issue with that chart, not just because it is obviously partisan, but because of the placement of Nazis. Nazi is short for "National Socialist", and,in spite of their antipathy towards communists, are much closer on the scale to communists.
A "Kochsucker" is how a liberal who thinks that George Soros is an "aww shucks" well-meaning middle class political activist who contributes spare change to liberal political groups thinks of wealthy conservative political donors and their supporters.
Or if any of the plots to take him out had worked. If you have a chance, watch "Hitler's Bodyguard" on AHC, there were plenty of chances.
You're too tight, bm ... lighten up! But, if you really dislike it, take it down ... you are the man with the "powers" !
And another thing- of the hundreds of thousands of German soldiers that died on the Western Front during WW1, he got gassed and still survived.
It isn't offensive and it didn't violate any rules. Us conservatives do believe in the 1st Amendment
