Let them "******* you" it will be more fun for everyone.
1. Anyone who does not realize that would have a serious problem.As long as everyone understands and agrees that the "forsing" is a consensual part of the experience, all is well.
REAL ******* is *******.
I also stated in my prior post "let them" ******* you.
Our kind of play..yummy
True
If they did not realize that previously, they are now aware of it and may seek the help they need.
MOOT.
Not at all. However, you might wish to consider the real reason YOU felt the need to state your points #1, 2 and 3.
Unless you have obtained definitive responses to that effect from everyone who has read the post, this statement is currently untrue. However, should you seriously consider the advice I offered in my response to your point #4, perhaps one may.
Logically, you should try to stand up straight and hear the "pop".
Thus, I'm sorry for you, as you apparently have not yet heard the "pop".
"you might consider the real reason you wrote the post"True
If they did not realize that previously, they are now aware of it and may seek the help they need.
MOOT.
Not at all. However, you might wish to consider the real reason YOU felt the need to state your points #1, 2 and 3.
Unless you have obtained definitive responses to that effect from everyone who has read the post, this statement is currently untrue. However, should you seriously consider the advice I offered in my response to your point #4, perhaps one may.
Logically, you should try to stand up straight and hear the "pop".
unbeknownst to favorite critic this was a "suggestion" Is there anyone else who was very confused about that?
",Why do you think people are stupid? Do you think because I said "let them ******* you" someone will without regard for their own safety let anyone ******* them under any circumstances. This assumes the actor has no brains.A suggestion made without consideration for the safety of the person you made it to.
Your "suggestion": "Let them "******* you" it will be more fun for everyone.",
while encouraging the poster to go ahead and make his fantasy real, didn't take into account that his idea of fun might be simply being told to get on his knees, open his mouth and suck dick, whereas their idea of fun might be to hold him down and yank out all his teeth before skull fucking him.
That might be his idea of a fun time as well, but perhaps not.
Therefore, my "suggestion": "As long as everyone understands and agrees that the "forsing" is a consensual part of the experience, all is well.
REAL ******* is *******.
seemed rather timely, in case in his excitement to follow your suggestion, Alanm neglected to determine if those he makes the request of to "*******" him are of the same understanding as to what "*******" meant.
Of course, this is such an obvious thing to do when one has fantasies about being "******" or raped that no one ever complains that that wasn't what they thought would happen or they didn't mean for it to be like this, because everyone always does the obvious and plans for their safety.
I think my original post was in context. I do not think a 'disclaimer" would have changed much. Moreover, "explaining" that being ****** is "*******" would be more for the ******* than the victim since the victim never expects it. The ******* would be the one to warn if they don't understand the difference. I think the explanation in reference to my post was unnecessary and pissed my point. it was not to allow rapists to ******* you. And that is what he was warning about. Hey I have an idea why don't we make this a site that is so fraught with warnings that there is absolutely no way to enjoy it. if the word "*******" is ever used in any context let's make it all about being the smart one and everyone else being stupid children. I seriously think that the people doing the warning, not considering context, make themselves look foolish and then defend their position by making it look like the original author doesn't realize or care that "******* is *******". Give me a break. I still say "let them ******* you" because black males have that right. And if you so not know someone and you allow them to abuse you, you are being uncareful and stupid. But shall I taint every fun exciting comment with a warning or disclaimer? Seriously? And please don't give me one more "holier than thou" answer because if you do, I swear I will tear my hair out. (pubic and otherwise)
Didn't say it wasn't in context, it seemed flippant.
In context of your stated positions regarding the "rights" of black men, and the tone of you comment, what I was warning about was if he was going to follow your advice, he make sure that they were in agreement with the limits of what he was seeking.
Feel free to skip any posts that you disagree with.
Since I have no way to know whether the original author realizes or even cares about safety, appearing foolish for expounding safety sounds like a cheap cost to pay. Especially, as this is open forum and there are others not blessed with your experience and exceptional knowledge who may also read this.
If black males have the "RIGHT" to ******* someone to do something then .... (continued in next point)
...... how do you reconcile this with the "RIGHT" of black men to *******?
You don't need to, there will be some of us who will do it for you if it appears warranted. That's what is nice about open forums, everyone gets to give their input on the subject, read and accept or disregard what they wish.
Some guys look good bald, maybe you're one of the lucky ones.
