"Something" is working, since she s still smiling. wow!
My man, OSP, I agree!Raylene, this pic reminds me of an article in Vanity Fair, about one of the heiresses of the Rothschild family (one of the great European financial dynasties), who was a dedicated lover of modern jazz and particularly Thelonius Monk. She supported him through thick and thin, because of his genius, he also exhibited what we now call Bi-Polar characteristics, so he was not very stable and resorted to self medication..with her wealth, she didn't care one bit what proper white society thought..proves again, love transcend color, or cultures..osp
PERFECT!!!Yeah. Anytime from the early 60s to early 70s.Bullet bras were the rage in the 60s but many younger women worn under garments like this slut had on.
You can tell by looking at the woman's underwear the time frame of the porn. What style of bar she wears and if she had a thong or garters and panty style.
You like the REALLY old porn?
A super rare 1930s IR threeway
NO BIRTH CONTROL BACK THEN! Plus, most sex ended with the man coming inside of the woman. That or one might pull out to try and not knock her up. Rubbers were rare (they exists but were ******* bladders or intestines- jokingly called fish skins) and there was no pill.
her expression seem quite content than "ruined"...just me!another ruined white girl, lol!
View attachment 198153
Raylene all jokes aside..this stuff is viable and valuable from a legitimate historical standpoint. No way are they going to teach this in any university or college. But there is the kernel of a PHD in history in this material..there will be some goofy reactions..but I think it could lead to thesis on race, sex and gender studies..race (laws limiting black contact-sexual more's of the periods-women who CHOSE to knowingly share their bodies with Black Men)..something to think about..osp
Damn, Raylene, that what we use to call a Tom Thumb wedding..hell back in the day, I was in one, but not with a white girl..they were popular in small towns and churches ..grandfather was an AME pastor, so had to be in one..so cute! what do you think? maybe the 1880s?
View attachment 219561
Looks photoshopped...
The hand of the babe in the right should have felt good for the brotha...great to have two babes at once!
i agree! there's more to this than just some sexy photos. as i've found this stuff over the last several years, i've come to realize somebody really needs to study this seriously and systematically.Raylene all jokes aside..this stuff is viable and valuable from a legitimate historical standpoint. No way are they going to teach this in any university or college. But there is the kernel of a PHD in history in this material..there will be some goofy reactions..but I think it could lead to thesis on race, sex and gender studies..race (laws limiting black contact-sexual more's of the periods-women who CHOSE to knowingly share their bodies with Black Men)..something to think about..osp
... there's more to this than just some sexy photos. as i've found this stuff over the last several years, i've come to realize somebody really needs to study this seriously and systematically.