Thoughts about white female racism

I find this to be an interesting post but I may not understand the true context of it. I grew up in a racist south where it was openly prevalent. The girls I knew, the white ones, could show signs of disdain and hostility towards Blacks as a natural occurrence and think nothing of it. Now realize I'm going back to my teens and I'm sure things, hopefully anyway, have changed dramatically. But these same openly racist white girls could be heard on occasion whispering among themselves about Blacks, usually the football players, about how muscular and athletic they were, were the rumors of large dicks and sexual stamina true, how it would feel to suck their cocks and to fuck them and how great the sex would be. They had sort of a Doctor Jekyll Mister Hyde personality. Looking back I wish I would have said something, Yes they had beautiful cocks, Yes they were fantastic lovers but most of all they were really awesome guys, just as nice as any other person regardless of their skin tone, even though I did love their deep rich darkness, but I wasn't that brave. I was just a shy, quiet, lanky white girl who was afraid of the consequences should it be discovered that she was enamored with Blacks. Though white female racism was obvious, their was always a lust for Blacks rumbling beneath the surface.
 
What about an asian person fetishizing a black person? Is this also racism? Or is it even more racist to hinder people of different ethnic backgrounds from lusting on each another?

If don't see necessarily racism as a motive if a couple doesn't greet a person they had sex with on the street. This can happen any dude as couples may be afraid that a conersation could get sexual in a public place.

I'm not an expert in American politics and culture, but I have the impression that this discussion here is is more about conflicting visions on how to interact with people of other ethnic backgrounds than genuine racism:

There are people who see achievements based on priciples while others see "brands" in order to categorize people acvording to their wishes.

In my opinion there is too much drama in this discussion. As long as everyone is here on this site based on their own free will and people treat each other with a minimum amount of respect, I don't see major arguments for devisive talk. Live and let live.

In my ‘pseudo-article’ I commented that “the attraction that I awakened in some of my young, many black lovers wasn't based only in my individual self, but in my group identity (race, age, social class)”. And later I talked about “black, Hispanic and Asian women living in Western countries who have a clear predilection for white men and I would say that, in this case, the racial bias is created by the circumstance that men in the top of social hierarchy are mainly Caucasian and therefore they link white masculinity with power”.

In short, I have reflected about sexual attraction towards a person based on his group indentities and not the qualities of that person as an indididual. This may be a fetish, but I don’t consider it racism by itself. What is racism is another type of assumed beliefs that do not disappear just because a black penis enters a white vagina. That is what this conversation is about.

Finally, since your first message you have been utterly offensive. You quoted me and said “i’ts really hard to tell whether these people anonymously pushing for identity politics are pseudo-intellectuals holding a useless humanities degree or if they are from the ‘alt-right’ trying to stir up mutual hatred between individuals of different ethnic backgrounds and sexes”.

So according to you I was ‘a pseudo-intellectual holding a useless humanities degree’ or a nazi trying to create racial hatred. Please, don’t pretend to be the respectful and out-of-drama person here.
 
Monica's whole Vibe has been off lately. Her vocabulary has changed up. her word choice is totally different. Maybe hanging out with black guys has rubbed off on her LOL

half the stuff I'm reading doesn't even sound like the same person

Monica’s whole life has changed lately, and she is very tired of the feedback she finds in the ‘interracial sex online community’. When you add a picture of your naked body, you receive applauses; when you mention your recent pregnancy you receive obscene comments about ‘black breeding’; when you try to make an intellectual reflection on certain existing issues in the lifestyle, an avalanche of offended people appears claiming that you have said things that you have not said. This is exhausting and the message for any woman who visits this site is clear.

There is a structural problem when the mere mention of something that everyone knows exists unleashes such hysterical avalanche of messages. A structural problem that has much to do with the dissonance between the practices and dynamics associated with this lifestyle and the ideologies of many people who visit this website.

These are the reasons of my online break. Another important cause is to discover that a person I have considered a friend is a false identity, a growing suspicion that was finally confirmed. Situations that create a state of paranoia that feeds suspicion messages like the one you just wrote and make this forum uncomfortable.
 
Last edited:
Don't feel too bad, gaslighting and condescension is how he responds to anyone that disagrees

I don't consider these people have disagreed with me, as they just put words in my mouth that I never said. “Gaslighting and condescension” is presenting oneself as a victim of a feminazi conspirancy against the white cis man, while calling the other person “a pseudo-intellectuals holding a useless humanities degree” or a nazi. You have an obvious problem interpreting what is written in this thread.

It is easy to be condescending to those who confuse the classic dialectic created by Plato with Hegel's dialectics, a contradiction between ideas that serves as the determining factor in human relationships, and the idea that "if person A argues that 2 + 2 = 5 and person B says that 2 + 2 = 4, I am seriously doubting that the right answer is 2 + 2 = 4.5". The synthesis of the classic dialectic is not a compromise between thesis and antithesis, but the refutation of the thesis. The supposed intellectual superiority of someone who states these nonsense is insufferable.

In any case, all these politically correct concerns about mutual respect in a forum full of sexual fantasies based on humiliation and despotic power relations between individuals are too psychotropized for my personal taste.
 
Last edited:
Dear Monica,

When I wrote the comment you are referring to I simply wanted to point out a general observation that I have made on several occasions. It was you who immediately drew dotted lines between your online presence on this site on the one hand and my comment on the other hand just based on negative assumptions and without giving the benefit of the doubt.

If you have felt there was any room for interpretation you simply could have asked.

However, after reading some of your articles afterwards, I recognize that you try to build up an intellectual aura for your online presence on this adult website. This could be the reason why you are assuming that the comment was directed to you although it clearly wasn’t.

As you obviously see yourself as an intellectual others can expect a clear terminology and a clear line of thinking without too much contradictions from your side. Sadly quotes like these are giving a bitter impression of the level of intellectual “honesty” you are willing to apply in an artificial confrontational “discussion”:

“So according to you I was ‘a pseudo-intellectual holding a useless humanities degree’ or a nazi trying to create racial hatred.”

In this quote you reassemble two wrong statements into one sentence. First one is the inaccurate allegation that I meant you of being a pseudo-intellectual when I entered this discussion and in the second one you insinuate that I would consider the possibility that you could also be a “Nazi”.
The only thing that you are “proving” with this mess is Godwin’s law.

Although I despise both the Alt-Right and Nazis, these terms do not have the same meaning. A person from the Alt-Right can be considered a white identitarian nationalist who wants (bad enough) to segregate people across ethnic lines, while a Nazi is a subject who wants to erase the existence of ethnicities it doesn’t like anywhere.

Coming back to the relevant passage my original quote:

“It’s really hard to tell whether these people anonymously pushing for identity politics are pseudo-intellectuals holding a useless humanities degree or if they are from the “alt-right” trying to stir up mutual hatred between individuals of different ethnic backgrounds and sexes.”

The underlying principle is that person A judges person B overwhelmingly on the logic “you are X, therefore you think / act Y”. Based on this “logic” an individual’s real thoughts and actions don’t count as this is already pre-determined by definition based on its group-affiliation.

Mixing this “logic” with the expression of positive experiences a person articulates about other persons – even with a reference to more generalized common attributes – is where the confusion (more accurately: intellectual dishonesty) comes into play.

In my opinion there is a big difference between a priori generalizations based on preconceptions and ex post statements regarding accumulated patterns based on experiences someone has enjoyed.

Finally I recommend you to read some of the comments the user “Sharebare” (he stated in this post that he is a fan of you and he sees a lot of potential in you) has written on this adult website. For instance:
https://www.blacktowhite.net/threads/help-for-refugees.144579/page-3#post-2147324

Or other threads like these:
https://www.blacktowhite.net/threads/the-ending-of-white-race.131432/#post-1905794
https://www.blacktowhite.net/threads/black-ruled-world-nazism.35059/

When you read this kind of stuff you can’t tell whether it was written by perverts, insane people who really believe this or Alt-Right trolls who want to gain political traction by pushing the “white genocide” narrative.

Sadly (pseudo-)intellectuals indirectly and sometimes even directly support these kinds of misguided “discussions” by pushing identitarian viewpoints one the one hand and by their loud silence in verbal exchanges like the one mentioned above on the other hand.

What is the result? People reading this are losing mutual trust / respect and begin to segregate. If someone doesn’t want the Alt-Right and other supremacist movements to win, it could make sense considering not to play their game.

I hope that my main points are understood correctly despite my mediocre skills in English language. If there is still room left for interpretation, feel free to ask in civilized manner.
 
Dear Monica,

When I wrote the comment you are referring to I simply wanted to point out a general observation that I have made on several occasions. It was you who immediately drew dotted lines between your online presence on this site on the one hand and my comment on the other hand just based on negative assumptions and without giving the benefit of the doubt.

If you have felt there was any room for interpretation you simply could have asked.

This conversation does not make sense. Firstly, you made that 'general observation' from a text that I have written, so you clearly considered my opinions an example or paradigm of such views you scorn. Probably, you didn't even read the text that opens this thread, but the final messages when I argued with the other guy. Secondly, in all of your messages you have been attributing to me that ideology linked to 'identity politics'. Even at the beginning of a message, you deny that you were talking about me when you criticized identity politics and you concluded the message by accusing me of some beliefs based on identity politics.

The distinction between alt-right and nazism is totally irrelevant to this subject.

It is you who has 'directly support these kinds of misguided discussion by pushing identitarian viewpoints', when you have linked my answers with the fact you are a white male. I have never talked about white males in this text, but white women with racist views having sex with black men. Moreover, if some white women feel alluded it's their problem. Honesly, I have better ways of wasting my Christmas time.
 
I have liked Monica's posts and miss her media output. There are few, honest women who have posted as Monica has done on this site or any site. I may not always agree with Monica but I enjoy an honest woman's posts.

Someone wrote "Monica has been off lately . . ." we are human and are going through life facing its many challenges so if we appear to be "off" that would be one reason why. For my part I accept Monica for who she is and what she wants for herself.

On this site there should be no bullying or harassment. Yet, some people may take my posts or your posts or in this case, Monica's posts the wrong way. Don't try to read something into someone's posts that isn't there.
 
Last edited:
There used to be a 'Stormfront Ladies' sort of group on Fetlife which was, unsurprisingly, dedicated entirely to interracial sex. I believe that racism in white women is invariably the result of an inner conflict between their narcissistic and masochistic psychological elements - the more racist she is, the more degrading the interracial sex she craves.

A similar rule of thumb also applies to feminists who have a notable tendency for lusting after what they simultaneously rage against politically. I mean, just read Dworkin's 'Intercourse' and tell me that book ultimately isn't a rather edgy piece of erotica. To understand these kinds of dualities within people is to understand why human behaviour is so often contradictory and counter-effective.
 
General notice: the following words are not directed to anyone in person unless explicitly mentioned. The author of this post is neither a US citizen nor a native speaker. As language itself is not always perfect, there could be some room left for interpretation. Please give the benefit of the doubt and simply ask in such a situation. Thank you.

@ethnomasochist
I appreciate your unagitated approach to describe the kink of interracial sex which may also include some elements of domination and submission. There is maybe some truth in it as sexual phantasies could be seen as kind of a counterbalance valve to the real world sometimes.

It would be interesting which conclusions Mr. Freud would draw if he would live today.

However, we should also bear in mind that not all humans tend to have the same vision. As I wrote earlier, there are people who see achievements based on principles while others see "brands" in order to categorize people according to their wishes.

A white female lusting on black NFL players could do this on the basis of stereotypes, rumours and projections but also on the basis of positive personal experience or the general observation that people who are good in sports are also good in bed.

I personally would not call her a “racist” just on the grounds of this observation and I think politicizing it would be counter-productive.
 
Not sure what your point is. You know this is an interracial sex/fetish site, right? Are you trying to infer a serious social commentary from my post?
 
If you take a look at the typical 'porn genres', almost all involve the transgression of a social norm about sex (heterosexuality, age difference, racial taboos, marital fidelity,etc). People find the breaking of a sexual taboo disturbingly exciting, and hence the high number of conservative people watching interracial porn. In countries where there has been no strict racial segregation, or in social environments with a great racial diversity and a liberal views on sex, the sexual encounter between a white woman and a black man does not have such a strong meaning.

Fact is – I have never found so many alt-right/racist/tradicionalist supporters in other communities of alternative forms of sex. In my old tumblr almost the 20% of the blog followers fell into that category, and there were a clear bias in the countries of the visitors of my wordpress blog. But, of course, the fact that interracial porn is almost synonymous with 'white woman and black man' and this white, male overreaction does not occur with 'black woman and white man' doesn't prove anything and is irrelevant. The fact that the options of a white woman to date white men is reduced when it’s known their relationships with black men, as she's considered 'defiled' or 'damaged', doesn’t prove anything and is also irrelevant.

Of course, we can ignore facts and live in a state of denial, showing an agressive/hysterical reaction every time someone on this site mentions something obvious. Everybody knows that all black men are NFL players and a dark skin is an 'achievement based on principles'.
 
Last edited:
If you take a look at the typical 'porn genres', almost all involve the transgression of a social norm about sex (heterosexuality, age difference, racial taboos, marital fidelity,etc). People find the breaking of a sexual taboo disturbingly exciting, and hence the high number of conservative people watching interracial porn. In countries where there has been no strict racial segregation, or in social environments with a great racial diversity and a liberal views on sex, the sexual encounter between a white woman and a black man does not have such a strong meaning.

Fact is – I have never found so many alt-right/racist/tradicionalist supporters in other communities of alternative forms of sex. In my old tumblr almost the 20% of the blog followers fell into that category, and there were a clear bias in the countries of the visitors of my wordpress blog. But, of course, the fact that interracial porn is almost synonymous with 'white woman and black man' and this white, male overreaction does not occur with 'black woman and white man' doesn't prove anything and is irrelevant. The fact that the options of a white woman to date white men is reduced when it’s known their relationships with black men, as she's considered 'defiled' or 'damaged', doesn’t prove anything and is also irrelevant.

Of course, we can ignore facts and live in a state of denial, showing an agressive/hysterical reaction every time someone on this site mentions something obvious. Everybody knows that all black men are NFL players and a dark skin is an 'achievement based on principles'.
Please do not be disheartened. Your comments are highly valued by some of us.
 
this is an observation from an old fart. So take as you will. This is based on a small personal servey of friends who are or were in interracial marriages. These include black males / white females, black males / Asian females, black males Indian females, white males / black females, white males / asian females, white males / indian females, and white males / latin females and white males / South American females. Sorry in the last two groups I don’t have any friends that are black males led.

I admit these groups are small. The relationships that are black male led in the dating phase are almost shock value in nature as in look at my my other is not the same colour as me. Once they are married they have the same additude for the first year or two. Once the rest of us stop paying attention to the colour difference they seem to get up set at being just another married couple. At this point they seem to find some thing else to try and shock the rest of us.

The white male led group once married seems to except they are just another married couple get on with it faster. It’s time to have a job and complain about the weather and pay tax’s.

Yes i admit my survey group is small. Just an observation. I am throwing two of the guys from each of the groups as they are each a horn dog. Both Dave who is black and John who is white are on their fifth marriage to a blonde wife. Four if you count the fact they each married their second wife twice. For Dave is second wife is also his fifth wife and for John his second wife is his fifth wife.
 
Dear Monica, please note that my response is neither against you as a person nor the virtual appearance that you are trying to establish here on this adult website. I just want to talk with you about some of your conclusions that seem to be overgeneralized in my opinion.

In countries where there has been no strict racial segregation, or in social environments with a great racial diversity and a liberal views on sex, the sexual encounter between a white woman and a black man does not have such a strong meaning.

I just checked Porn Hub Insights 2018 Year in Review, which was released on December 11, 2018. The empirical data of this report is huge and it offers very interesting insights. I will not post a link here as this is possibly against the site rules of B2W, but you can find it very easily on your own anyway.

When you walk through this vast amount of data you will not really find a lot – If any – empirical data that supports your thesis that certain porn consumption habits are caused by racicts attitudes in general. Maybe it is the case for a very narrow segment that is so small that is irrelevant in terms of statistics in a sample size as large as Porn Hub.

Ironically the top search team / genre throughout the western world is “lesbian”, which most people don’t consider to be very “taboo” anymore. In many countries you see the clear pattern that people are rather searching terms / genres that relate to their nationality.

In the rather sexually liberal country of France with a large community of North African immigrants one of the top search term is “beurette”, which is some kind of a stereotype for women from North African, while the top search term in North Africa is “arab” and in almost all other African countries it is “ebony”.

Fact is – I have never found so many alt-right/racist/tradicionalist supporters in other communities of alternative forms of sex. In my old tumblr almost the 20% of the blog followers fell into that category, and there were a clear bias in the countries of the visitors of my wordpress blog.

Lumping together traditionalists with racists and alt-righters is intellectual dishonest and proves rather a bias from your side towards "traditionalists" than a bias of "traditionalists" towards people of different ethnical backgrounds.

Mentioning your tumblr is mere anecdotal evidence with no informative value you can project on the wider society. Compare this to the overwhelming empirical data of Purn Hub Insights. Furthermore, did the thought also cross your mind that some of these interracial fetish accounts – especially when migration-related themes are involved – could be alt-right trolling based on the “if you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside” tactic?

The fact that the options of a white woman to date white men is reduced when it’s known their relationships with black men, as she's considered 'defiled' or 'damaged', doesn’t prove anything and is also irrelevant.

What is your point? There are lots people here on this website who want to get into a relationship with a female that is engaged into sex with black men. This obvious demand does not suggest that women who had sex with black men in the past are considered “damaged”. It’s rather quite the opposite.

Of course, we can ignore facts and live in a state of denial, showing an agressive/hysterical reaction every time someone on this site mentions something obvious.

About which facts are you talking? Your facts or facts based on provable empirical data? What you are misrepresenting as “aggressive/hysterical” reaction sadly seems to be rather an expression of your unwillingness to debate with people who disagree on certain aspects of your personal conclusions you are presenting here as facts.

Everybody knows that all black men are NFL players and a dark skin is an 'achievement based on principles'.

Nobody in this thread has said that “all black men are NFL” players (a priori preconception), but the assumption is obvious that someone has to be very good in football in order to get into a team on an NFL level. And if there are on average more black men in the NFL than on average in the whole population, I don’t see this as a negative if someone mentions this observation.
 
Last edited:
One of the seemingly inexplicable paradoxes of the IR lifestyle is the existence of many white, underlyingly racist women having sex with black men. Progressive media has always encouraged this kind of sex, considered as the way to achieve racial armony. If racism is based on prejudice and derogatory stereotypes that keep individuals segregated, and sex is the most intimate act between individuals, hence interracial sex will destroy racism. However, factual evidence shows that not only in the increasingly multicultural societies racial indetities are not diluting, but also many white women are becoming more conservative, even if they are into an interracial marriage and have mixed children.

“What is wrong with white women?” Moira Donegan asked at the Guardian after November’s midterm elections. “Why do half of them so consistently vote for Republicans, even as the Republican party morphs into a monstrously ugly organization that is increasingly indistinguishable from a hate group?”

View attachment 2310227

Identity politics are based on the idea that some social groups (women, racial minorities) are more vulnerable to forms of oppression by virtue of their identity, and they should struggle all together to gain empowerment and achieve a more equal society. "Progressives sometimes expect white women, as a group, to support the interests of people of color of all genders — after all, women know what discrimination feels like." The identity politics have replaced the Marxist concept of class struggle, but they haven’t worked at it was expected. From the perspective of gender policies and intersectionality, this fact may be hard to understand, since leftist only consider the relations between identities from the dialectics of the oppressor and the oppressed. However, human relationships are far more complex than this simple dichotomy.

"How often do we see white women showing support for black penis but not black lives?" Kyla Jenee Lacey wonders. "When people say they can’t be racist because they have a black baby, I laugh, as if the insertion of black penis into white vagina or white penis into black vagina is some magical act that wipes you clean of all your racism."

When I have self-evaluated about this issue after two years of almost exclusive sex with black men, I have come to the conclusion that my racial consciousness as a white woman had actually increased.

I grew up in a rural region of an almost white country and maybe I met my first black person when I was around 10 years old. Identity is based on the existence of a 'us' and a 'them'. Hence, it is built on antagonism and, therefore, in those circumstances being white was not an identity. It was something neutral. It was ‘normal’.

But I was attracted to the otherness. Blacks have always been some kind of enigma and my first IR experience blew my mind. My black Dom always remarked the racial difference with his comments: 'come here, white slut' or 'suck my black dick'. The adjetives 'white' and 'black' were enough to change the entire formulation of the sexual intercourse: we were not a man and women having sex, I was a white woman on her knees sucking a black man's cock. I was submitting on behalf of my race.

I was hooked to this new form of sex. Masculinity and femininity, blackness and whiteness, dominance and submission; identities confronting, creating a scenario based on inequality and hierarchies. With the time, I talked with my Dom, I began to understand what means being a black person in a white society. These conversations made me more racially sensitive. However, this kind of sex reinforced my racial consciousness.

In sexual terms, I'm a bratty submissive. I behave in the limit of disobedience without actually crossing the line for a spanking. Being always in the edge increased sexual tension and provided my former Dom excuses for his 'punishments'. He had strong political views about race, we often disagreed. Many times he spanked me 'to teach me black respect' and I had to apology through oral sex. I have never felt more white than worshiping a black phallus, and with the time I projected this racial consciousness on my political ideas. Whenever a conflict arises between two racial identities, I defend the views and interests of 'my' group if it does not imply a moral transgression.

But nobody has just one identity. Intersectionality is an analytic framework created by the African American feminist Kimberlé Crenshaw, who stated that group identitties do not exist separately from each other but are interwoven together. The experience of being a black woman cannot be understood in terms of being black and of being a woman considered independently. Crenshaw's thesis are consistent when the oppressor / oppressed dichotomy always presents the same sense, in other words, when you are always the opressor or the oppressed.

The cuckold-hotwife-bull triangle implies the existence of an underlying hierarchy related to sexual and racial identities, and patriarchal values about wife's modesty and fidelity. The Bull is clearly at the top playing a dominant role, the cuckold husband is at the bottom, and the hotwife may play as a switch, being dominant with the hubby and submissive with her Bull. This is the reason why for the Bull this situation can be empowering since it subverts the structural domination of the white patriarchy, and destroys one of the barriers erected to keep compartmentalized the two racial groups: the sexual access of the black man to the white womb.

Racism has much to do in these synergies. Stereotypes created to subdue can be a double-edged sword. Black men are stereotypically perceived as sexually agressive and hypermasculine, which may be a disadvantage in social interactions, but also may be advantageous in the sexual sphere. They make a white man acknowledge black males as Alphas and see the cuckold role as his natural place, something that frees his wife from the subordinate position that is traditionally attributed to her.

During the brief period I was a ‘hotwife’ before my divorce, I developed an unusual sadistic behavior with my husband. In my sex with my black lover, I expressed my white identity, in my sex with my white husband, my feminine identity prevailed. In some way, I never felt more feminist and liberated as a woman that when I talked to him about my sex with my black Dom. The paradox was that this ‘liberation’ came from my submission to a black man.

When I analyzed the relationship with my black Dom through the prisms of intersectionality, I discovered I was also playing a switch role with him. All groups possess varying amounts of penalty and privilege in one historically created system. White women are penalized by their gender but privileged by their race. Depending on the context, an individual may be an oppressor, a member of an oppressed group, or simultaneously oppressor and oppressed.

With my black lovers I was developing a behavior traditionally associated with the male gender: I used my white privilege to objectify them, I fetishized their penises, and my interest in them were only sexual. They did the same with me using their male privilege. I also discovered that the attraction that I awakened in some of my young, black lovers wasn't based only on my individual self, but in my group identity (race, age, social class). Something verbalized when they called me ‘milf’, ‘white slut’, 'cheating wife', or even ‘Christian whore’ in case of Muslims.

This mutual fetishization based on identities and privileges is full of paradoxes. Identity is ambiguous because it is in a constant state of negotiation and interpretation: ever changing, always contested, sometimes contradictory, and continuously repositioned by the specificities of place, time, and the identities of “the other”. As any person has different identities based on sex, race, ethnicity, age or social class, depending on which one stands out and how the conflict is formulated, it may acquire one meaning or another. By claiming a particular identity, other self-identifications are overshadowed or suppressed.

Identity is not an essence, but a positioning. Most of Queen of Spades remain loyal to their race, because their white identity is stronger than their female identity and don't see white men as their enemies. Maybe the key question is if 'racial consciousness' and ‘racially unempathetic’ are synonymous with racist. But there is something out of question. If attraction is based on feelings, sex may be the most intimate act between individuals; but if attraction is based on physical and personality attributes linked to identities, “just because you fuck black people doesn’t mean you fuck with black people”.

View attachment 2307647
Nice pic
 
Dear Monica, please note that my response is neither against you as a person nor the virtual appearance that you are trying to establish here on this adult website. I just want to talk with you about some of your conclusions that seem to be overgeneralized in my opinion.



I just checked Porn Hub Insights 2018 Year in Review, which was released on December 11, 2018. The empirical data of this report is huge and it offers very interesting insights. I will not post a link here as this is possibly against the site rules of B2W, but you can find it very easily on your own anyway.

When you walk through this vast amount of data you will not really find a lot – If any – empirical data that supports your thesis that certain porn consumption habits are caused by racicts attitudes in general. Maybe it is the case for a very narrow segment that is so small that is irrelevant in terms of statistics in a sample size as large as Porn Hub.

Ironically the top search team / genre throughout the western world is “lesbian”, which most people don’t consider to be very “taboo” anymore. In many countries you see the clear pattern that people are rather searching terms / genres that relate to their nationality.

In the rather sexually liberal country of France with a large community of North African immigrants one of the top search term is “beurette”, which is some kind of a stereotype for women from North African, while the top search term in North Africa is “arab” and in almost all other African countries it is “ebony”.



Lumping together traditionalists with racists and alt-righters is intellectual dishonest and proves rather a bias from your side towards "traditionalists" than a bias of "traditionalists" towards people of different ethnical backgrounds.

Mentioning your tumblr is mere anecdotal evidence with no informative value you can project on the wider society. Compare this to the overwhelming empirical data of Purn Hub Insights. Furthermore, did the thought also cross your mind that some of these interracial fetish accounts – especially when migration-related themes are involved – could be alt-right trolling based on the “if you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside” tactic?



What is your point? There are lots people here on this website who want to get into a relationship with a female that is engaged into sex with black men. This obvious demand does not suggest that women who had sex with black men in the past are considered “damaged”. It’s rather quite the opposite.



About which facts are you talking? Your facts or facts based on provable empirical data? What you are misrepresenting as “aggressive/hysterical” reaction sadly seems to be rather an expression of your unwillingness to debate with people who disagree on certain aspects of your personal conclusions you are presenting here as facts.



Nobody in this thread has said that “all black men are NFL” players (a priori preconception), but the assumption is obvious that someone has to be very good in football in order to get into a team on an NFL level. And if there are on average more black men in the NFL than on average in the whole population, I don’t see this as a negative if someone mentions this observation.
Not all heros wear capes, thank you for consistently refuting this foolishness
 
If you take a look at the typical 'porn genres', almost all involve the transgression of a social norm about sex (heterosexuality, age difference, racial taboos, marital fidelity,etc). People find the breaking of a sexual taboo disturbingly exciting, and hence the high number of conservative people watching interracial porn. In countries where there has been no strict racial segregation, or in social environments with a great racial diversity and a liberal views on sex, the sexual encounter between a white woman and a black man does not have such a strong meaning.

Fact is – I have never found so many alt-right/racist/tradicionalist supporters in other communities of alternative forms of sex. In my old tumblr almost the 20% of the blog followers fell into that category, and there were a clear bias in the countries of the visitors of my wordpress blog. But, of course, the fact that interracial porn is almost synonymous with 'white woman and black man' and this white, male overreaction does not occur with 'black woman and white man' doesn't prove anything and is irrelevant. The fact that the options of a white woman to date white men is reduced when it’s known their relationships with black men, as she's considered 'defiled' or 'damaged', doesn’t prove anything and is also irrelevant.

Of course, we can ignore facts and live in a state of denial, showing an agressive/hysterical reaction every time someone on this site mentions something obvious. Everybody knows that all black men are NFL players and a dark skin is an 'achievement based on principles'.
Pretending that you are smart because you learned some big words in college and parrot others thoughts from the books you read.
Nothing original.

Wow
You are not impressive, at all.
 
Last edited:
Monica's whole Vibe has been off lately. Her vocabulary has changed up. her word choice is totally different. Maybe hanging out with black guys has rubbed off on her LOL

half the stuff I'm reading doesn't even sound like the same person
 
Back
Top