Politics, Politics, Politics

Trump's wall can pay for itself....or rather Mexico can pay for it by buying the electricity it produces if we go with the proposal from Gleason Partners....a border wall covered in solar panels. Trump will protect our Southern border and satisfy the Eco Green Weenies in one broad stroke!

https://www.apnews.com/aadd30183663...-bids-include-tourist-attraction,-solar-panel
800.jpeg
 
Trump's wall can pay for itself....or rather Mexico can pay for it by buying the electricity it produces if we go with the proposal from Gleason Partners....a border wall covered in solar panels. Trump will protect our Southern border and satisfy the Eco Green Weenies in one broad stroke!

https://www.apnews.com/aadd30183663...-bids-include-tourist-attraction,-solar-panel
800.jpeg
wh5ffpA.gif
As Nationalist, i support green issues as a matter of energy independence for the nation and to avoid health issues and cost for our fellow citizens.
The sad thing is we are stuck with the lesser of two evils, coal or nuclear at present. I pick coal, until solar of something else advances enough to replace it.
Coal pollutes the air, but nuclear can destroy the water, land, and air for decades or 100's of years with just one fuckup(think Japan or Ukraine). Never mind the waste that Nuclear produces.
 
Last edited:
Here goes our privacy on the internet ...

http://oakridgeobserver.com/2017/04/05/trump-quietly-repeals-internet-privacy-protection-laws/
http://money.cnn.com/2017/04/03/technology/internet-privacy-law-trump/index.html

And over 70% of voters do NOT want our privacy violated. Looks like Big Money crossed someone's palms AGAIN. But, since when has this new administration listened to the will of the people ... fuck the people!
Support Senator Rand Paul's push to repeal these bills, he has been fighting this since the day he set foot in office.
This should be an across the isle supported issue of congress people who support our
Bill of Rights.
Along with repealing the Federal Reserve that has been robbing us since 1913.
 
you do know that more people die of some kind of pollution here than anything else!

Air Pollution Kills More Than 5 Million People Around the World Every Year
http://time.com/4219575/air-pollution-deaths/
As i said the lesser of two evils.
The places people are dying from air pollution are places with little to no regulation on it and are over crowded.
Think China and India, they have almost no rules and they still burn mainly coal.
Were we do a mix of coal, oil, and natural gas.
Not to mention China and India, for their land mass, are over crowed/populated.
This is why pot smoking and VR(think matrix) tech need to be pushed, in order to ******* the masses in these countries and get them to stop fucking themselves into extinction.
China, India and Africa are the biggest offenders of over population. Africa is not as much of problem(because they are not industrialized, except they can't seem to feed themselves), but India and China are industrialized and a way way bigger problem.

Nixon was an a hole for sharing fertilizer technology with India and China, this allowed them to double their population, then you add industrial advancement and Boom!!!
You have the biggest polluters in world history, yes really.


As i said for us(U.S.) it is the less of two evils, or i guess we could go back tot the 1800's living until solar or something else advances enough.
But that will not happen because the iPhone generation and industrial generation will never give up their gadgets, live with out hot water, or ect ect.
 
Last edited:
Study: More than 6 million could die early from air pollution every year

Another study published this week looked closely at air quality in the United States. The research, published in Environmental Health Perspectives, found that even miniscule increases in the amount of air pollution particles were linked to a 3% increase in overall deaths and an estimated 10% increase in the risk of death due to heart disease in the United States.

"These tiny chemical particles we breathe can get past the body's immune system and penetrate deep into the lungs and bloodstream, and they are not naturally removed from the body's airways," said epidemiologist George Thurston, a professor of population health and environmental medicine at NYU Langone Medical Center, and an author of the study.

Lelieveld said that air pollution solutions have to be on a country-by-country basis. In the United States and Europe, it could be most beneficial to take measures to lessen the impact of agricultural emissions. In Asia, researchers said, implementing better control over small burning sources and upgrades to new technology would go a long way.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/16/health/air-pollution-deaths-rising/index.html


Air pollution causes 200,000 early deaths each year in the U.S.

Researchers from MIT’s Laboratory for Aviation and the Environment have come out with some sobering new data on air pollution’s impact on Americans’ health.

The group tracked ground-level emissions from sources such as industrial smokestacks, vehicle tailpipes, marine and rail operations, and commercial and residential heating throughout the United States, and found that such air pollution causes about 200,000 early deaths each year. Emissions from road transportation are the most significant contributor, causing 53,000 premature deaths, followed closely by power generation, with 52,000.

http://lae.mit.edu/air-pollution-causes-200000-early-deaths-each-year-in-the-u-s/

Air pollution
Air pollution is a broad term applied to any chemical, physical (particulate matter), or biological agent that modifies the natural characteristics of the atmosphere.

atmosphere is a complex, dynamic natural gaseous system that is essential to support life on planet earth.

Stratospheric ozone depletion due to air pollution has long been recognized as a threat to human health as well as to the earth's ecosystems.
Worldwide air pollution is responsible for large numbers of deaths and cases of respiratory disease.

Enforced air quality standards, like the Clean Air Act in the United States, have reduced the presence of some pollutants.
While major stationary sources are often identified with air pollution, the greatest source of emissions are actually mobile sources, principally the automobile.

There are many available air pollution control technologies and urban planning strategies available to reduce air pollution; however, worldwide costs of addressing the issue are high.

The most immediate method of improving air quality would be the use of bioethanol fuel, biodiesel, solar energy, and hybrid vehicle technologies.

The World Health Organization estimates that 4.6 million people die each year from causes directly attributable to air pollution.
Many of these mortalities are attributable to indoor air pollution.

Worldwide more deaths per year are linked to air pollution than to automobile accidents.
Research published in 2005 suggests that 310,000 Europeans die from air pollution annually.

Direct causes of air pollution related deaths include aggravated asthma, bronchitis, emphysema, lung and heart diseases, and respiratory allergies.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/terms/air_pollution.htm
 
I hope this guy is on his way out soon! (Ryan)
he has done nothing but come up with ideas to fuck the country and make his friends rich!
he surely sees and knows it... when he announces he is going home he is met with protests... last time the police were involved right in front of his own house!.... his only comment..... needs a better privacy fence!

he came up short again on his health care plan... and congress is going out for 2 weeks now
 
Last edited:
Congress Must Stop Raiding Social Security

Few things make Americans more upset than a threat to the Social Security program that they have spent years paying into. That is why a Facebook video of Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., raising a point of order against the 2015 budget deal has been viewed more than 76 million times. That vote, taken in the dead of night, would have stopped a $150 billion transfer from the Social Security trust fund to the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) system, which was, and still is, going bankrupt. Some of us in the Senate wanted to reform SSDI and put it on a stable fiscal path. But instead, the majority of senators thought it would be easier to steal $150 billion from the Social Security trust fund, thus

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/f01e98d7-f611-3151-a1a3-749821a80682/ss_congress-must-stop-raiding.html
 
Here goes our privacy on the internet ...

http://oakridgeobserver.com/2017/04/05/trump-quietly-repeals-internet-privacy-protection-laws/
http://money.cnn.com/2017/04/03/technology/internet-privacy-law-trump/index.html

And over 70% of voters do NOT want our privacy violated. Looks like Big Money crossed someone's palms AGAIN. But, since when has this new administration listened to the will of the people ... fuck the people!

And you are surprised by this? Our government does this all the time. What I want to know is why your were not angry about it when Obama rammed ACA through with out the people behind it - because it benefited you perhaps??

This was my TOP complaint about the ACA, regardless of all it's other flaws my main position was that it did not have the majority support from the voters.

My point being, that no matter how good the bill may sound, if it does not have the majority of the voting population behind it, then it should never reach congress. If we continue to allow the government to do this, and push laws through that the majority does not want, then we are no longer a democracy - but rather a dictatorship.
 
The poster boy for the establishment, this snake in the grass works for big Pharma, just as much as Hillary would have.
He is toast and it was part of the plan, Growdy and others have been gunning for this turd since day one and they have an opening to over throw this speaker of the house establishment hack.

Buckle for 2018 Mac, Democrats are going to get their best opening to take Ryan's district since for ever and most Republicans(unless they out him in the primary) will not lift a finger to help him.
 
Last edited:
This too:
320sw0sw7847.gif SYRIA

Are we supposed to believe that right when President Assad of Syria, who took Aleppo and got help from Russia — and allegedly from the U.S. — in beating back the ISIS boogeymen, suddenly and out of the blue decided to attack his own citizens with “chemical weapons” so that fraudulent media can run atrocity photos of dead children to use against him? There would be zero strategic advantage for Assad to do this.

When I first saw this story, I thought I was reading the satirical publication The Onion.

C8vHiBrVwAA64Ix.jpg
 
suddenly and out of the blue decided to attack his own citizens with “chemical weapons”
yes it's not like he hasn't done it before.... he just felt safe in doing it this time since our new adm announced they would let the Syrian people decide on him

but now "Donnie" has changed his mind after watching the movie
maybe he is trying to impress someone with his "compassion"?
But I'm sure once the boss (Vladimere) calls and tells him to shuy up it will be all over!
 
Steve Bannon: Kushner Is a ‘Cuck’

The Daily Beast (RSS) 6 hours ago .


Donald Trump’s chief strategist Stephen Bannon has called the president’s senior advisor and *******-in-law Jared Kushner a “cuck” and a “globalist”

during a time of high tension between the two top aides, several Trump administration officials told The Daily Beast. The fighting between Kushner and Bannon has been “nonstop” in recent weeks, according to sources who spoke on condition of anonymity. It’s been an “open secret” that Bannon and Kushner often clash “face-to-face,” according to senior officials. One official said Bannon has lately complained about Kushner trying to “shiv him and push him out the door” and likened him to a fifth column in the White House. “[Steve] recently vented to us about ...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/781a8e5e-2bc8-3263-b2f6-72be4932e215/steve-bannon-calls-jared.html

well as much as I dislike any of the trumps.... I'd bang his *******!
 
So, detailed reports of the actions of people’s everyday lives.

Is this still not “spying”?

Jake Tapper?

News:

The intelligence reports at the center of the Susan Rice unmasking controversy were detailed, and almost resembled a private investigator’s file, according to a Republican congressman familiar with the documents.

“This is information about their everyday lives,” Rep. Peter King of New York, a member of the House Intelligence committee said. “Sort of like in a divorce case where lawyers are hired, investigators are hired just to find out what the other person is doing from morning until night and then you try to piece it together later on.”

On the House Intelligence Committee, only the Republican chairman, Devin Nunes of California, and the ranking Democrat Adam Schiff, also of California, have personally reviewed the intelligence reports. Some members were given broad outlines.

Nunes has consistently stated that the files caused him deep concern because the unmasking went beyond the former national security adviser Mike Flynn, and the information was not related to Moscow.

____________
I’m certain that it’s going to come out that there was more than just “unmasking” in international intelligence reports. They ordered the IC to directly spy. I’m sure of that.

And it’s going to come out soon enough.

This whole thing is falling apart

9985ce4ae9845021917312f70b2b683bc8c77984_1_600x325.jpg
 
Last edited:
Here goes our privacy on the internet ...

http://oakridgeobserver.com/2017/04/05/trump-quietly-repeals-internet-privacy-protection-laws/
http://money.cnn.com/2017/04/03/technology/internet-privacy-law-trump/index.html

And over 70% of voters do NOT want our privacy violated. Looks like Big Money crossed someone's palms AGAIN. But, since when has this new administration listened to the will of the people ... fuck the people!
Surely you realize this so called repeal of our internet privacy means there is exactly NO CHANGE to your internet privacy. You have never lived under the privacy regulations being rejected. They have never gone into effect. It was a last minute regulation put out by the FCC in December, after the election, which was not yet in effect.

To top it off, the proposed FCC regulations didn't protect you from the people who have been and are continuing to hoard your private info...people like Google and Facebook. The proposed rules ONLY blocked your ISP from dipping its toes in the same collecting of your private data that Google and Facebook do every day....and make a ******* ton of money off of by targeting ads at you.

So why didn't we hear crying and moaning about internet privacy for the 8 years of the Obummer administration? Suddenly when Congress and Trump decide to maintain the status quo that existed during all 8 years of Obummer...oh the humanity!!!

You say it looks like "Big Money crossed someone's palms AGAIN" That may well be true....suggest you look back and figure out how much money Goggle & Facebook gave to Obummer & his cronies to get them to block your ISP from competing with them on targeted ad revenue.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/larryd...t-your-privacy-in-the-slightest/#16c197798b14
 
Last edited:
Here's how the NEW privacy law reads:

WEBSITE INFORMATION
...The Website collects & stores information that is generated automatically as you navigate through the Website. This aggregate information is collected site-wide, and includes anonymous website statistics. The Website also employs browser cookies to store users' preferences and record session information. "Cookies" are bits of information that are stored by your browser on your had drive. This technology allows for the storage of user preferences, user ID & password, if applicable, and removers you when you take action on the Website. You can turn off the "cookie" function through most stand browser, however, the majority of the features on the Website may not function properly.
...In addition, when you visit the Website, our system automatically collects information such as your web request, Internet Protocol (IP) address, numbers assigned to your computer by your Internet Service Provider (ISP), browser type, browser language, domain names, referring and exit pages and URLs, platform type, number of clicks, clear gifs, internet tags, landing pages, pages viewed and the order of these page views, the amount of time spent on particular pages, network traffic monitoring, active scripting, the date & time of your request and the unique identity of your browser. This information is used to analyze trends, administer the Website, improve the design of the Website, track user movement, and otherwise enhance the services provided.

Other Information
...We may retain any data you provide to us in an email or other inquiry, to track the types of questions we receive, analyze trends, administer the Website and services we offer, improve the design of the Website, and track user movement, and otherwise enhance the service we provide.


Disclosure and Use of Information
...We will comply with any subpoenas, court orders or other legal process for any of the information about you in our possession, and we may use such information to establish or exercise our legal rights, or to defend against legal claims. We reserve the right to disclose your personal information, including data on which pages you have visited, to third parties if we feel it necessary to protect our systems, Website, business, users or others.


...In addition, information about you in our possession may be disclosed as part of any merger, acquisition, sale of company assets, or transition of service to another provider, as well as in the unlikely event of insolvency, bankruptcy, or receivership in which your personal information would be transferred as one of the business assets of the company. We do not guarantee that any entity receiving such information in connection with one of these transactions will comply with all terms of this policy nor shall Company be liable for any security breaches that may occur after the transfer of information.

...We may, at our discretion, disclose your personal information, when deemed necessary or appropriate, to law enforcement or authorized government organizations, to protect our rights or the rights of others, to prevent identity theft and harm to persons or property, to fight fraud, to ensure the integrity of our business, or to otherwise protect the right, property, or safety of Company and our employees or others.

Folks I think the VPN services are going to become quite popular. Time to buy stock in them, maybe!

https://qz.com/948506/how-to-pick-a-vpn-to-keep-your-internet-browsing-secure-and-private/
https://www.extremetech.com/computi...ices-popping-gop-congress-kills-privacy-rules
Where in the world did you get this? You seem to not understand the difference between a law and a website's terms of service. You say this is how the "NEW privacy law" reads....then cut & paste what appears to be a website's terms of service. News flash....those website terms of service would still be in effect even if Trump didn't block the FCC privacy regulation. The FCC regulation only impacted your ISPs ability to do...exactly what that website could and can still do.

For your edification, the "New privacy law" is much more simple and straightforward than all that legalese you posted. The entire text of the new law is:

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to “Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other Telecommunications Services” (81 Fed. Reg. 87274 (December 2, 2016)), and such rule shall have no ******* or effect.
 
Back
Top