NO I WILL NOT

I realize some of you guys have this fantasy. They have done studies on what kinds of porn turn men in. They attached electrodes to measure their response to different kinds of porn. Big surprise the men who professed to be the most homophobic were stimulated most by Gay Porn.

So now let's deal with reality. A while back we had the situation you describe happen to us. We met a couple and started to play around. Soon it was the three of on the bed. Her husband didn't join us for some reason. We lost track of him. My husband was fucking her doggie and I was under her licking, them. When he filled her pussy, it got all over my face. Then we got the shock of our lives! Once our eyes could focus the husband was standing there in harder and hose, no panties. He motioned for my husband to suck his cock. My husband who is fluent in English said no. His wife came over and blew him.

This will come as a surprise, but neither of us had any physical or emotional damage. Actually we thought it was hot!

I guess what I'm saying is what's the big deal? Seriously I blow off homophobes as soon as they go into their rant. It's nothing to do with sex. It's the attitude, and not knowing what will set this person off, male or female.
Why would you want your desire to be the desire of other men? Why would you refuse to accept that not everyone is interested in gayish activities? Why wouldn't you want to respect other people's choices? And why would it be homophobic for a man to not want another man to sexually touch him? Sex is an adult thing and a consensual one. We're on an adult site. We may not like someone's orientation but we're not here to judge but to educate ourselves, share knowledge or experience on black-and-white sexual fantasies or topics, and/or get physical with like-minded people for just a ******* or intimacy. Here, to each their own, and we should respect that.
 
Why would you want your desire to be the desire of other men? Why would you refuse to accept that not everyone is interested in gayish activities? Why wouldn't you want to respect other people's choices? And why would it be homophobic for a man to not want another man to sexually touch him? Sex is an adult thing and a consensual one. We're on an adult site. We may not like someone's orientation but we're not here to judge but to educate ourselves, share knowledge or experience on black-and-white sexual fantasies or topics, and/or get physical with like-minded people for just a ******* or intimacy. Here, to each their own, and we should respect that.
The answer to your first question is simple. They were born that way. Sexual orientation is genetic. A good question to ask yourself is when did you decide you were heterosexual? You didn't you were born that way. Unfortunately, many homosexual individuals are pressured to conform to religious beliefs of others. Abortion is the same issue. Religious groups have ****** everyone to accept their religious beliefs so that they can go to Heaven or wherever. I have no idea what kind of signals you might be giving off if other people are touching you. My husband has never had that problem. However, when you denigrate others for their genetic homosexual desires that is homophobic. What's confusing is the rest of your statement. Where you seem to say that anything someone else does in the bedroom is OK. I realize after Abortion this is a hot button for conservatives. Unfortunately, they are going to attempt to take away rights for gay people. It's sad that we all can't live like the second half of your statement.
 
The answer to your first question is simple. They were born that way. Sexual orientation is genetic. A good question to ask yourself is when did you decide you were heterosexual? You didn't you were born that way. Unfortunately, many homosexual individuals are pressured to conform to religious beliefs of others. Abortion is the same issue. Religious groups have ****** everyone to accept their religious beliefs so that they can go to Heaven or wherever. I have no idea what kind of signals you might be giving off if other people are touching you. My husband has never had that problem. However, when you denigrate others for their genetic homosexual desires that is homophobic. What's confusing is the rest of your statement. Where you seem to say that anything someone else does in the bedroom is OK. I realize after Abortion this is a hot button for conservatives. Unfortunately, they are going to attempt to take away rights for gay people. It's sad that we all can't live like the second half of your statement.
My first question was
Why would you want your desire to be the desire of other men?
Your answer is
The answer to your first question is simple. They were born that way. Sexual orientation is genetic.
Your first statement in response to this post and to which I replied in the first place is
I realize some of you guys have this fantasy. They have done studies on what kinds of porn turn men in. They attached electrodes to measure their response to different kinds of porn. Big surprise the men who professed to be the most homophobic were stimulated most by Gay Porn.

Conclusions, from all this, 1. I don't understand your answer and, 2. You're not addressing the concern of the post.

The author of the post states that he doesn't want to have anything to do with gay activities, meaning his sexual orientation is heterosexuality, that is his desires are toward women, and I presume biological women. On top of this, he doesn't like the tricking attitude or rather dishonest attitude of guys hiding behind their female partners to try and engage in sexual activities with him. My question again is, isn't that a personal choice of his that you have to respect, the same way you want people to respect the choice of your gay *******? As a second question, is such a choice of his homophobic, and if so, could elaborate on why?

On your assertion related to some kind of studies you referred according to your statement below
They have done studies on what kinds of porn turn men in. They attached electrodes to measure their response to different kinds of porn. Big surprise the men who professed to be the most homophobic were stimulated most by Gay Porn.
Have you looked into those studies, their design, premises, targets, objectives, goals, etc, etc to understand if there are no flaws that would make those studies' results very questionable?

You confidently wrote
Sexual orientation is genetic.
Since we always learn something, I'm inclined to ask you if you have a link to those studies that concluded that sexual orientation was genetic. I would like to understand your assertion and know more about the genes that are responsible for human sexual orientation.
 
So the implication is that the original poster was raped by a gay man how ****** him to let him suck his cock! Seriously you couldn't stop that? My husband has never had anyone ******* him to accept a blow job! However, every year tens of thousands of women are raped by heterosexual men! All this anti-gay crap is political bullshit. Now that the supreme court is made up of mostly religious zealots and have outlawed abortion the next target is taking away rights from gay and trans people. It has nothing to do with gay men ******* you. Why would they waste time dealing with someone who isn't interested when there are so many others who are interested.

So you want to understand more about the studies on sexual orientation. There is a very easy solution to that. Simply choose your favorite search engine. If you don't have a favorite just use The Google! For your convenience, here are a few of the many links.







We are all different. No one is out to push their sexuality on anyone else, well except for heterosexual males on women! What is the purpose of stirring up hate against others you don't even know. If anyone has anything to fear from sexual predators it's women!
 
The author of the post states that he doesn't want to have anything to do with gay activities, meaning his sexual orientation is heterosexuality, that is his desires are toward women, and I presume biological women. On top of this, he doesn't like the tricking attitude or rather dishonest attitude of guys hiding behind their female partners to try and engage in sexual activities with him. My question again is, isn't that a personal choice of his that you have to respect, the same way you want people to respect the choice of your gay *******?

Not wanting to engage in homosexual activities doesn't make you homophobic, I don't think anyone in this thread has accused anyone of being homophobic based solely on that. Neither is not liking people who try to manipulate men through their dishonestly and using a woman as "bait." Both of those are just setting personal boundaries, which anyone and everyone is perfectly entitled to do with no judgement. That's his personal choice, and it happens to be mine as well. When it gets to homophobia is when you start denigrating people whose boundaries don't line up with yours. That part isn't ok. There is nothing wrong with homosexuality or bisexuality.

The problem with the manipulation is not the homosexuality, it's the lack of respect for other people's boundaries. The kind of guys who pull that ******* are what the late, great Charlie Murphy famously called: Habitual Line Steppers (HBL). HBLs are exclusive to no sex, gender, race, religion, creed, sexual orientation or nationality. No one like a HBL, no one wants to tolerate HBL behavior and if this was a thread about HBLs who just so happened to want to engage in homosexuality there would be a lot less push back.
 
So the implication is that the original poster was raped by a gay man how ****** him to let him suck his cock! Seriously you couldn't stop that? My husband has never had anyone ******* him to accept a blow job! However, every year tens of thousands of women are raped by heterosexual men! All this anti-gay crap is political bullshit. Now that the supreme court is made up of mostly religious zealots and have outlawed abortion the next target is taking away rights from gay and trans people. It has nothing to do with gay men ******* you. Why would they waste time dealing with someone who isn't interested when there are so many others who are interested.

So you want to understand more about the studies on sexual orientation. There is a very easy solution to that. Simply choose your favorite search engine. If you don't have a favorite just use The Google! For your convenience, here are a few of the many links.







We are all different. No one is out to push their sexuality on anyone else, well except for heterosexual males on women! What is the purpose of stirring up hate against others you don't even know. If anyone has anything to fear from sexual predators it's women!
Once you start citing woke academic papers authored by way less than a "neutral observer" you lose all credibility. Titles like "Are Homophobic People Really Gay and Not Accepting It?" are lurid examples of the pushy homosexual agenda which is exactly what started this thread. Everyone's gay and wants to suck dick the only question is whether they own up it or not, right? :ROFLMAO:

Oh wait, wait that makes me a queen AND a hater right? Pointing out truth?
 
So the implication is that the original poster was raped by a gay man how ****** him to let him suck his cock! Seriously you couldn't stop that? My husband has never had anyone ******* him to accept a blow job! However, every year tens of thousands of women are raped by heterosexual men! All this anti-gay crap is political bullshit. Now that the supreme court is made up of mostly religious zealots and have outlawed abortion the next target is taking away rights from gay and trans people. It has nothing to do with gay men ******* you. Why would they waste time dealing with someone who isn't interested when there are so many others who are interested.

So you want to understand more about the studies on sexual orientation. There is a very easy solution to that. Simply choose your favorite search engine. If you don't have a favorite just use The Google! For your convenience, here are a few of the many links.







We are all different. No one is out to push their sexuality on anyone else, well except for heterosexual males on women! What is the purpose of stirring up hate against others you don't even know. If anyone has anything to fear from sexual predators it's women!
First, when it comes to scientific statements or findings, I prefer reading and analyzing the original article, not reviews or speculation citing the same article. Reviews are great as a first glance into others' analyses and opinions. The only scientific article mentioned here is the one on PubMed. Unfortunately, it's just an abstract that can't bring much. However, a single study of 35 vs 29 men is a very weak one to draw the conclusion that all men have hidden homosexual desires. By the way, nowhere you have cited research papers that demonstrate that homosexuality was linked to a gene or group of genes. So for now, let's put aside your idea that homosexuality is naturally inherited.

Second, related to the above-mentioned article and your statement on homophobia, I believe any good discussion should always start with a common ground as to the definitions of the main concepts used or debated. So, what is homophobia? It appears to me that there is a new trend in changing the definition of a certain number of words to fit a certain of thinking or doing. A few examples are sex, gender, and women. Homophobia is one of them.

Doesn't the prefix "homo" mean identical, same type, or kind? I guess we would agree on that. Doesn't the suffix "phobia" mean fear? Here too we would agree. So, homophobia would mean the fear of your kind. Examples would include a human fearing another human, a heterosexual fearing another heterosexual, a homosexual fearing another homosexual, a woman fearing another woman, etc. Nowhere, the term homophobia means hatred of the same kind. The suffix most appropriate would have misia which would have led to homomisia. Even so, this would have meant not liking one of the same kind, it wouldn't be specific as in heterosexuals not liking gays or lesbians, as they are sexually of different kinds. My point is another term should be designed that express that sort of dislike. The idea that homophobia is the hatred of homosexuals was the opinion of the psychologist George Weinberg, who believed that hatred comes primarily from fear. Now, that hatred might originate from fear doesn't mean that heatred equals fear.

On the hate of homosexuals. That some human beings literally hate other human beings is undeniable. Racism of any kind is a mere example of that. Some people say it's irrational. I would say it rather stems from a place of superiority complex or disdain, among other reasons. However, is it rational to call hate the attitude of not liking something on someone or in their behavior? Would be hate if a ******* doesn't like the rude attitude of his ******* toward women? Would be had if a teacher doesn't like that one of his/her students has low grades? By the same token, is not liking homosexuality (men engaging in sex with each other, women engaging in sex with each other) is an expression of hate from parents towards their ******* or *******. The observation is simple: a certain category of people tend to bring forth hate when it's about homosexuals but are keen on dissociating a person from their behavior or belongings when it comes down to other aspects of life. Isn't that bias?

Finally, and that's the most important principle we have and can agree on, you choose to be what you want to be sexually, it's your choice and anyone has to respect that. Conversely, you have to respect other people's sexual preference, as long as it's geared toward adults, without labeling them as haters.
 
Obviously, this has nothing to do with some guy forsing you to let him suck your dick. That simply doesn't happen. Why would anyone want to suck a soft dick! Then again if your dick gets hard then maybe you are homosexual!

When you start talking about the Woke governor who creates laws that solve problems that simply don't exist. Of course, there is no way you can possibly have an "intelligent" discussion with someone who doesn't read below the headlines and will simply blow off any scientific information if it disagrees with whatever you might have pulled out or your ass. Actually, you probably just parroted what the Woke governor or some radio talk show host pulled out of his ass, like Alex Jones! This is simply an effort to denigrate others and make them appear sub-human so that you can take away their rights as a human. I recall a while back that a Republican politician was calling for shooting gay people! At least you haven't gone that far! Gay people are just as human as you are. They have no impact on your life even if you do have this irrational fear that someone is going to suck your dick. It's not going to happen. They are entitled to live their lives in peace with all the rights that you have. They are not second-class citizens.

Why not just let people live their lives as they see fit. They have no impact on you other than maybe showing you that you are living a lie!
 
@VegascplXXX, you said
They are entitled to live their lives in peace with all the rights that you have. They are not second-class citizens.
Can you quote a single post or comment that treated bi or homosexuals as second-class citizens?

And when you say about gays that
They have no impact on you other than maybe showing you that you are living a lie!
doesn't this stem from a place of superiority and desire to ******* your views onto others?
 
@VegascplXXX, you said

Can you quote a single post or comment that treated bi or homosexuals as second-class citizens?

And when you say about gays that

doesn't this stem from a place of superiority and desire to ******* your views onto others?
Constantly going into whiny bitch mode about something that has never happened and likely never will is another way of saying this person is sub-human. Taking 50% of the Math books out of schools because someone thinks there is some reference to homosexuality says you think these people are inferior. There is a massive effort on the part of conservatives to take away gay marriage which includes over 100 rights we all take for granted means these people are somehow not good enough to have the same rights as Christians. These comments are all part of that process to take away rights from people who are homosexual does indeed make them second class citizens.

What is superior is making others conform to your religious beliefs. My religious belief is that abortion is part of women's health care. Why aren't my religious beliefs respected? Isn't that being superior? It pisses me off that 10-year-old ******* victims are ****** to give birth putting their lives in danger. How is it possible that a 10-year-old baby if she survives is ready to be a mom. Now that we have to conform to the beliefs of Catholics the lives of many young girls will be destroyed all so that Catholics can go to heaven. There is little doubt that the Catholic church is the biggest sexual abusers of children worldwide. That to me is a much bigger concern than some fictious guy who might want to suck your soft dick even that is extremely unlikely to happen.
 
Lately on these sites... Noticing some of these couples requiring that their hub/bf or whatever the fuck they wanna call it now suck someone's dick. I know this is 2022. Y'all can do y'all ting.... But I WILL NOT. WILL NOT. Call it what you want but it's cemented. Don't come at me with all the non sense. Bring your chick drop her off blindfold her watch take pictures but STAY your distance and watch a Real Man handle a real slut. I know some of these couples will quote me or take action👌🏿. Please do👊🏿🍫😜
I don't see any problems with that. I think all types of Black Bulls are fascinating and interesting. Strictly straight flexible, bi. The important thing is to speak clearly to each other at the beginning and be respectful
Personally I'm a true and complete cuck and I love all situations: from drop my wife and disappear to fluffing him or clean up his cock. Simply I respects the Bull's desires and I do what he wants
 
Last edited:
Oh wow. I didn't know this post was going to turn into some people making fake alleged statements about me. I don't know any of you people. I said what I said and that's it. I'm not homophobic not even a bit. I just choose to only whine and fuck with women. That's my personal prerogative. If you feel offended oh well 🤷🏿‍♂️. But don't be lying about me because I don't know you. Not today not ever or not tomorrow. Sorry but we are all entitled to our opinions so people of the world don't be so sensitive to what someone else thinks or choose to stand on. That's the beauty of life. We are different and I accept that! Now if you would excuse me. I am still trying to leave some mixed babies in somebody's gf wife or a single sub or sum ahaha Where y'all @👀✊🏿💆🏿‍♂️
 
Constantly going into whiny bitch mode about something that has never happened and likely never will is another way of saying this person is sub-human. Taking 50% of the Math books out of schools because someone thinks there is some reference to homosexuality says you think these people are inferior. There is a massive effort on the part of conservatives to take away gay marriage which includes over 100 rights we all take for granted means these people are somehow not good enough to have the same rights as Christians. These comments are all part of that process to take away rights from people who are homosexual does indeed make them second class citizens.

What is superior is making others conform to your religious beliefs. My religious belief is that abortion is part of women's health care. Why aren't my religious beliefs respected? Isn't that being superior? It pisses me off that 10-year-old ******* victims are ****** to give birth putting their lives in danger. How is it possible that a 10-year-old baby if she survives is ready to be a mom. Now that we have to conform to the beliefs of Catholics the lives of many young girls will be destroyed all so that Catholics can go to heaven. There is little doubt that the Catholic church is the biggest sexual abusers of children worldwide. That to me is a much bigger concern than some fictious guy who might want to suck your soft dick even that is extremely unlikely to happen.
Lady or gentleman, whoever it is who is interacting with me under @VegascplXXX, to my knowledge this is an adult/sexual life forum, not a political one, and nowhere in this thread did you read from me about a political issue. There's only one point to which I wanted to draw your attention to, which is a basic human social interaction principle to which we can all agree. That is

respect others' sexual preferences the same way you would want others to do toward you

The other point to add to this is related to being honest and not using unhealthy tricks. Whatever you choose, when interacting or approaching anyone with the goal of meeting up for sex, as @paolacpl wrote it well

The important thing is to speak clearly to each other at the beginning and be respectful

Now, I'm done with this "fruitful" conversation. To each their own. There are plenty of people in the world that are dying of a lack of food or suffering from a lack of basic human living conditions. Those are better issues that need more focus than trying to please the ego of someone who is free to live their sexual orientation but is seeking verbal approval or praise from others for their choice.
 
Back
Top