Love that sentiment!!!
Is it really ok to let bulls cum inside?
- Thread starter justlikeit86
- Start date
proper attitude!
What I like to hear
If you want this experience, find the right Dom or Bull. Take your time. Flirt and seduce him. Let him seduce you. Let your husband find his place both in your new lifestyle, and in the room you find yourself in.
Develop a relationship with this Bull. Can you trust him? Is he the one? If so, then let nature take its course. Make sure everyone gets tested. Share the test results together - all three of you - over dinner or drinks. Once everyone is satisfied, order drinks. Give in to it. Give in to him. Let the new Bull know he now has rights consistent with what you have and have not discussed.
Don't worry about your husband. He is already down the rabbit hole with you. He is committed. He has already become a cuckold. Make love to your new Bull and enjoy this new chapter in your life. Lose yourself in this Bull sexuality and power. And, quite frankly, let your husband lose himself in the new world this Bull and other bulls are going to provide you both. Let it happen. Sit back and enjoy the experience. Watch carefully, and bear witness to your husband's actions and his transformation from - in theory, a "man" - to a cuckold and . . . whatever else he becomes. What he chooses to do will be dictated by your husband's psychology, sexuality and to a lessor extent by the Bull's influence and demands.
Sweetheart, just enjoy it and let it all happen naturally. It is a beautiful experience.
justlikeit86
Female
The first time he came inside her was when she met him met alone in his bed and he whispered in her ear "can I stay inside" she said just the words in her ear almost made her cum......the alone meeting was way more passionate with kissing and as she put it lovemaking.
She told me that she always heard from me during our fantasy days that she should feel someone cum inside her that deep....so she whispered back "yes" She told me just telling him the word yes made her cum.
He did cum deep inside her and they shared that moment together without anyone but the two of them alone in his bed....she said it was heaven......so obviously the wives get something really special when they feel a man different than their husband planting his seed deeper inside her for her to take home.
She told me that she always heard from me during our fantasy days that she should feel someone cum inside her that deep....so she whispered back "yes" She told me just telling him the word yes made her cum.
He did cum deep inside her and they shared that moment together without anyone but the two of them alone in his bed....she said it was heaven......so obviously the wives get something really special when they feel a man different than their husband planting his seed deeper inside her for her to take home.
Yes...let them Cum inside.
There's no better feeling than being pumped full of black seed
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2011/may/08/lazar-greenfield-semen-antidepressant-women
"So there's a deeper bond between men and women than St Valentine would have suspected, and now we know there's a better gift for that day than chocolate."
"His team found that women whose partners didn't use condoms were less depressed. They also found that depressive symptoms and suicide attempts were higher among women who used condoms regularly compared to those who didn't. Moreover, the women who didn't use condoms became more depressed the longer they went without having sex. Gallup suggested this was because semen contains oestrogen and prostaglandins which have been linked to lower levels of depression, and oxytocin which promotes social bonding."
"I want to make it clear that we are not advocating that people abstain from using condoms. Clearly an unwanted pregnancy or a sexually transmitted disease would more than offset any advantageous psychological effects of semen."
"Seminal plasma evolved to control and manipulate the female reproductive system so as to work toward the best interests of the donor – the male." He suggested that the possible antidepressant properties of semen may promote bonding between the sexual partners, and that was to the male's reproductive advantage."
So, semen is in many ways a ******* used by the more dominant men - bulls - to draw us in and addict us to their sexuality.
leanncarter
Couple
we have a regular bull and he always cums inside
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/quilted-science/201208/surprising-stowaway-in-semen
"Yes, you read that right: seminal fluid, increasingly recognized for its numerous functions beyond a simple transport device for spermatazoa, contains a hormone that can cause ovulation."
"Ovulation Inducing Factor acts when it enters a female’s system in male ejaculate and is absorbed into the bloodstream, hijacking the the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis (i.e. the body’s coordinated hormonal regulation system) and causing a hormonal chain reaction. This chain reaction is essentially the same one triggered every month in human females by Nerve Growth Factor, an identical molecule that binds to receptors on the ovaries, causing the release of Follicle Stimulating Hormone and resulting in the cyclical ripening and release of an egg from the ovary."
"may have major implications for the science of sexual selection and the evolutionary biology of human mating. Maybe it’s just me, but “ovulation-inducing seminal fluid” rings of multi-male competition (very much in line with the evolutionary biology of the human phallus), and thus sounds like a male reproductive strategy that would have evolved in a promiscuous species, rather than a monogamous pair-bonding species."
". . . female humans have concealed ovulation, but male humans appear to be able to detect when women are ovulating anyway . . ."
"Yes, you read that right: seminal fluid, increasingly recognized for its numerous functions beyond a simple transport device for spermatazoa, contains a hormone that can cause ovulation."
"Ovulation Inducing Factor acts when it enters a female’s system in male ejaculate and is absorbed into the bloodstream, hijacking the the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis (i.e. the body’s coordinated hormonal regulation system) and causing a hormonal chain reaction. This chain reaction is essentially the same one triggered every month in human females by Nerve Growth Factor, an identical molecule that binds to receptors on the ovaries, causing the release of Follicle Stimulating Hormone and resulting in the cyclical ripening and release of an egg from the ovary."
"may have major implications for the science of sexual selection and the evolutionary biology of human mating. Maybe it’s just me, but “ovulation-inducing seminal fluid” rings of multi-male competition (very much in line with the evolutionary biology of the human phallus), and thus sounds like a male reproductive strategy that would have evolved in a promiscuous species, rather than a monogamous pair-bonding species."
". . . female humans have concealed ovulation, but male humans appear to be able to detect when women are ovulating anyway . . ."
Exactly.
That should be the Biggest concern more than 'should he, yes or no?'
Besides getting a full test done, I play bare with ONE hotwife and she insists that I cum inside of her. She gets visibly upset when I try to pull out.
she calls it 'DADDY'S JUICE'
Attachments
leanncarter
Couple
that's what great about having a bull you trust and is safe as in std not fixed
Cumming inside a women is the way Nature intended. I'm too grown to be chasing after a bunch of casual encounters, although there are a few women here I would Love to meet
(looking at you, @hotwife2b ).
I much prefer that strong connection /bond over sport fucking. Attraction is as much mental as physical. I get harder and bigger, I last longer, and I cum more powerful...
But that's just Me
(looking at you, @hotwife2b ).
I much prefer that strong connection /bond over sport fucking. Attraction is as much mental as physical. I get harder and bigger, I last longer, and I cum more powerful...
But that's just Me
leanncarter
Couple
we would not have it any other way we love what we have
https://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-05/come-again-science-semen-part-deux
Mmmmm. ". . . no studies have been conducted on the anti-depressant properties of semen received by women or men during oral or anal sex."
Mmmmm. ". . . no studies have been conducted on the anti-depressant properties of semen received by women or men during oral or anal sex."
Attachments
My wife and her two regular weekly bulls, they are all tested regularly and play condom free. The bulls can shoot their sperm anywhere they choose. Myself I'm in a condom during sex. How I envy those two.
Wet and Ready: An Exploration of Fluid Bonding
The sharing of bodily fluids (male semen or female lubrication/ejaculation) can be an erotic, emotional, and a prominent bonding experience for many couples. This act, known as fluid bonding, is generally referred to as condom-less penetration. Also known as “going raw” or “barebacking”, having condom-less sex has many implications for relationships.
From an evolutionary procreation perspective, the sexual reward and pleasure released from orgasm can reinforce the desire to copulate, resulting in the strengthening of bonds. Neurotransmitters such as oxytocin (the ‘cuddle hormone’) and prolactin, increase during orgasm for both men and women (Carmichael et. al, 1987). Reaching an orgasm during intercourse can therefore bring feelings of closeness, trust, and love between two partners. The euphoric state post-orgasm can also strengthen the bond of many relationships.
Evolution of Fluids in the Mainstream
The term “cum” has evolved from a male centered context to be more gender inclusive. Johnsdotter (2001) mentions that in many erotic narratives, the word “cum” is a new contextual device to signify female wetness, lubrication and arousal. She argues that it was only in the 1990s when this linguistic term extended beyond the male discharge of semen. Furthermore, the glamorization of fluid is prominent in both pornography and the bedroom. The popular pornographic categories of creampies and facials and advertisements of female ejaculation classes show an obsession with the eroticization of these fluids. However, the fascination for bodily fluids and the desire for fluid bonding have many implications for condom usage and sexual health.
The condom use pattern can commonly be seen as follows: in casual encounters or uncommitted hook-ups, condoms are (usually) used for protection. As trust and exclusivity is built, the relationship progresses, and there is often a shift to alternative forms of contraception (if the couple is heterosexual). Eventually, the monogamous couple phases out the use of condoms. This is a common pattern in both hetero and homo contexts (although not much solid research is done on lesbian relationships). This implies that condom use is often only a temporary form of contraception – before a relationship is established and “real” sex can begin.
This lens however assumes the end goal of sex is penetration and orgasm, when in reality; sex does not always end in orgasm for both partners every single time. In addition, fluid is not necessarily an indicator of orgasm. Not all females are able to ejaculate from orgasm, and males can orgasm with little or no seminal fluid expelled (Roehrborn et. al, 2010). Many couples can engage in pleasurable sex without orgasm, and not all types of sex are penetrative. Many lesbians, transgender individuals, or those who identify as queer, may lack the anatomy or desire, to engage in insertion or penetration behaviours. Who is to say that their sex is not ‘real’, pleasurable, and bonding because there is no insertion of a body part?
Fluid Bonding as a Symbol of Trust and Commitment
As previously stated, the practice of fluid bonding is often metaphorically symbolized to be a statement of a couple’s mutual trust in a committed relationship. This attitude is shown to be alive and well in the West when we look at research of a nationally representative sample of young adults. Higgins (2007), found that western men reported that condoms reduce physical pleasure. Furthermore, both genders believed that the magnitude of the relationship and condom practices both affected pleasure attitudes. In fact, it found that women were a bit more likely to report disliking condoms (Higgins, 2007). Condoms, therefore, seem to have a socially ingrained stigma of representing a “lack of trust”, “lack of commitment” or “lack of intimacy” between two partners. Because it is not “ideal” sex, and does not promote fluid bonding, condoms can be seen to inhibit the emotional development of a relationship. Condoms appear to represent both a metaphorical and physical barrier between two people.
These attitudes have dangerous implications for sexual health. In sexual health education, there is often an assumption that there is no resistance to condoms. As such, contraceptive negation skills are not usually taught. This acknowledges a gap in the sexual education system. Yes, condoms should be used, but how does one pick the right fit, size, and type in the aisle at the drugstore? Who brings it? What do you say when one partner makes excuses or doesn’t want to use one? In disease model sexual health education, the simple message of “use protection” dismisses the extra barriers that one may encounter when using condoms. Furthermore, with society, pornography, and media pushing the desirability of raw sex – along with the popular belief that condoms inhibit pleasure – many believe that sex is not “real” unless it is without a condom.
Furthermore, the desire of fluid bonding to be the “ultimate indicator” of a real relationship has many dangerous implications. The belief that sex is penetrative and ends in orgasm is not applicable to all sexual relationships (lesbian intercourse, queer folks, transgendered couples), and perhaps we should consider sex as a spectrum- not necessarily penetrative or orgasmic, but pleasurable and intimate between two human bodies. The reality is, there is no “real” way to have sex or define a relationship- it is ultimately between two individuals. Fluid bonding can be a powerful tool to strengthen a relationship, but by no means should it be considered a gold standard.
Sex does not have to be a race and does not have to have a end goal, or “finish”. Sex can be intimate, pleasurable, and fun, with or without orgasms, ejaculation or fluid bonding. Most importantly, sex is whatever sex is to the couple. In order to shift our attitudes, greater sexual health education is required. Sexual health educators should provide a greater in-depth breakdown of realistic scenarios and how these could be implemented in regards to condom usage. Many should be encouraged to try a variety of types, sizes, and lubricants before succumbing to a societal dislike of condoms. Furthermore, greater exposure to different types of sex acts that are gender and queer-inclusive will challenge the standard narrative. After all, in the end, aren’t we all just trying to get some?"
The sharing of bodily fluids (male semen or female lubrication/ejaculation) can be an erotic, emotional, and a prominent bonding experience for many couples. This act, known as fluid bonding, is generally referred to as condom-less penetration. Also known as “going raw” or “barebacking”, having condom-less sex has many implications for relationships.
From an evolutionary procreation perspective, the sexual reward and pleasure released from orgasm can reinforce the desire to copulate, resulting in the strengthening of bonds. Neurotransmitters such as oxytocin (the ‘cuddle hormone’) and prolactin, increase during orgasm for both men and women (Carmichael et. al, 1987). Reaching an orgasm during intercourse can therefore bring feelings of closeness, trust, and love between two partners. The euphoric state post-orgasm can also strengthen the bond of many relationships.
Evolution of Fluids in the Mainstream
The term “cum” has evolved from a male centered context to be more gender inclusive. Johnsdotter (2001) mentions that in many erotic narratives, the word “cum” is a new contextual device to signify female wetness, lubrication and arousal. She argues that it was only in the 1990s when this linguistic term extended beyond the male discharge of semen. Furthermore, the glamorization of fluid is prominent in both pornography and the bedroom. The popular pornographic categories of creampies and facials and advertisements of female ejaculation classes show an obsession with the eroticization of these fluids. However, the fascination for bodily fluids and the desire for fluid bonding have many implications for condom usage and sexual health.
The condom use pattern can commonly be seen as follows: in casual encounters or uncommitted hook-ups, condoms are (usually) used for protection. As trust and exclusivity is built, the relationship progresses, and there is often a shift to alternative forms of contraception (if the couple is heterosexual). Eventually, the monogamous couple phases out the use of condoms. This is a common pattern in both hetero and homo contexts (although not much solid research is done on lesbian relationships). This implies that condom use is often only a temporary form of contraception – before a relationship is established and “real” sex can begin.
This lens however assumes the end goal of sex is penetration and orgasm, when in reality; sex does not always end in orgasm for both partners every single time. In addition, fluid is not necessarily an indicator of orgasm. Not all females are able to ejaculate from orgasm, and males can orgasm with little or no seminal fluid expelled (Roehrborn et. al, 2010). Many couples can engage in pleasurable sex without orgasm, and not all types of sex are penetrative. Many lesbians, transgender individuals, or those who identify as queer, may lack the anatomy or desire, to engage in insertion or penetration behaviours. Who is to say that their sex is not ‘real’, pleasurable, and bonding because there is no insertion of a body part?
Fluid Bonding as a Symbol of Trust and Commitment
As previously stated, the practice of fluid bonding is often metaphorically symbolized to be a statement of a couple’s mutual trust in a committed relationship. This attitude is shown to be alive and well in the West when we look at research of a nationally representative sample of young adults. Higgins (2007), found that western men reported that condoms reduce physical pleasure. Furthermore, both genders believed that the magnitude of the relationship and condom practices both affected pleasure attitudes. In fact, it found that women were a bit more likely to report disliking condoms (Higgins, 2007). Condoms, therefore, seem to have a socially ingrained stigma of representing a “lack of trust”, “lack of commitment” or “lack of intimacy” between two partners. Because it is not “ideal” sex, and does not promote fluid bonding, condoms can be seen to inhibit the emotional development of a relationship. Condoms appear to represent both a metaphorical and physical barrier between two people.
These attitudes have dangerous implications for sexual health. In sexual health education, there is often an assumption that there is no resistance to condoms. As such, contraceptive negation skills are not usually taught. This acknowledges a gap in the sexual education system. Yes, condoms should be used, but how does one pick the right fit, size, and type in the aisle at the drugstore? Who brings it? What do you say when one partner makes excuses or doesn’t want to use one? In disease model sexual health education, the simple message of “use protection” dismisses the extra barriers that one may encounter when using condoms. Furthermore, with society, pornography, and media pushing the desirability of raw sex – along with the popular belief that condoms inhibit pleasure – many believe that sex is not “real” unless it is without a condom.
Furthermore, the desire of fluid bonding to be the “ultimate indicator” of a real relationship has many dangerous implications. The belief that sex is penetrative and ends in orgasm is not applicable to all sexual relationships (lesbian intercourse, queer folks, transgendered couples), and perhaps we should consider sex as a spectrum- not necessarily penetrative or orgasmic, but pleasurable and intimate between two human bodies. The reality is, there is no “real” way to have sex or define a relationship- it is ultimately between two individuals. Fluid bonding can be a powerful tool to strengthen a relationship, but by no means should it be considered a gold standard.
Sex does not have to be a race and does not have to have a end goal, or “finish”. Sex can be intimate, pleasurable, and fun, with or without orgasms, ejaculation or fluid bonding. Most importantly, sex is whatever sex is to the couple. In order to shift our attitudes, greater sexual health education is required. Sexual health educators should provide a greater in-depth breakdown of realistic scenarios and how these could be implemented in regards to condom usage. Many should be encouraged to try a variety of types, sizes, and lubricants before succumbing to a societal dislike of condoms. Furthermore, greater exposure to different types of sex acts that are gender and queer-inclusive will challenge the standard narrative. After all, in the end, aren’t we all just trying to get some?"
How long has he been seeing your wife?
Its really great she has a man in her life. What role do you serve in their encounters?
Whose requirement are the condoms?
Yes it feels amazing but please don’t bareback a random guy and lady’s be honest if you are or not on BC.
