I haven't read a single topic on love, however love and sex have become two very different spheres
- Thread starter Shogun5
- Start date
"In sociology, variables are usually subtle when they faced with facts"
"sharp variable"
?????
"sharp variable"
?????
You know what you're talking about ?????
It seems like verbiage
Love ....LMAO!
This original post comes off as being intellectually foolish , you give off the vibe of being a academic leftist .
Last edited:
I think most women can't completely separate sex from some degree of emotional connection.
maybe i should talk in french
it is a wrong vision of the human relation, it is against the reason of human existence.
ButtholeEater
Male
I'm a lover, it's hard for me to separate love and sex.
Who are you to decide the reason for human existence?
ButtholeEater
Male
I personally think it's love
.First, what a great honor
One of the most charming, beautiful and elegant queen comments on my remarks however there is an immense misunderstanding, it is not exclusively me who decide about the reason for human existence. It is an universal reason, it is a reason which is founded unanimously by the philosophers and scientists.For my opinions, I keep them for myself and I make sure to not deraille from my peincipes, and it is the opposite of what I literally do by coming in this forum.
It's human
! but you still have to be fair .The only thing I hope now is to express myself well in English.
A
Ajlan7
Guest
Well agree with you
There was a time when you first fell in love then you had sex however world is getting updated
There was a time when you first fell in love then you had sex however world is getting updated
There is no agreed upon reason for existence or meaning of life.
Clearly you don't keep them to yourself since you're here passing judgement on other people.
I thought a lot about telling you otherwise but Sorry it's not true.
You can't just say something like this is true just because it's your personal belief, if you're quoting philosophers and scientists, present your evidence.
Otherwise take this virtue signaling bullshit elsewhere.
A
Ajlan7
Guest
I agree with her this is a website for BBC and sex only don't post something related to love if you really want then go somewhere else
Shuffle, Shuffle, Shuffle – Now that I’m on my soapbox, I will say that I have absolutely no sociological or psychological background. However, in pursuing my degree, I did lean heavily on sociology in supporting my primary degree.
Defining a differential between sex and love is quite easy. Prostitutes have been doing it ever since the barter system was established. Slaves and Masters did it frequently, and doubt if there was love on either side, she was the victim, he was the one getting relief.
The reverse is true too. You can love someone intensely but not have sex with them. Combat wounded remain married to their wives – or even get married – with both parties understanding they can’t have sex. People with medical conditions (both men AND women) remain together with sex effectively zero as well.
Hence, the two issues aren’t tied together. But I will say that one enhances the other. If you love someone, you’ll probably end up having sex with them.
That being said, the established social norm of a monogamous relationship is losing ground; for one reason only – the advent of the Birth Control Pill.
Throughout history, men have been having affairs, enjoying mistresses and what have you without a second thought, they can’t get pregnant. If the woman did fall pregnant, then (if it was an affair on her part) then the husband unknowingly raised the baby. If he was a nobleman, then the boy would be raised, and freely acknowledged as a Bastard (see Game of Thrones for examples). But if the girl was just a simple peasant, then she was left to her own resources. Look up ‘baby farming’ in the 1800 for examples of this in the US, Australia and GB.
So, we have one side of society having sex for fun, and the other running scared over unwanted pregnancy. This led to another development, widespread belief. It behooved the men (who ran everything) not to worry about the peasants running around having the fun they were having. After all, the men (who ran everything) could afford Bastard children, the peasants couldn’t. Either way, no one wanted to raise another man’s baby. So the condemnation of sex, coupled with the concept of women actually enjoying sex, became frowned upon within the Western Churches. Whew.
Now two concepts are coming together. On one hand, we have The Pill. On the other hand, we have a diminished reliance on religion. One the third hand (?) women are becoming more self-aware, confident and able to have affairs as they are now outside of the home in professional settings. Women are now enjoying sex as much, if not more than their male counterparts. ((SHOCKING!))
Add to this the increase in pornography catering to women; more sexual encounters in general and affairs in general on mainstream movies and television and the dalliances of Hollywood/Washington blasted throughout the media all contribute to put the idea in our heads. “Hey, they’re doing it… That guy in accounting is cute… Hubby is out of town….”.
Also, the factors outlined above; Pill, Less Reliance on Religion; Women becoming more self-aware, all contribute to fantasies. Where they had been kept unvoiced, people are becoming more inclined to discuss fantasies, which leads to discussion and probably exploration.
So, to answer the question, can one have sex without love? Of course. I like my Black playmate, we don’t love each other. But we’re having fun nonetheless. And isn’t that what it’s all about anyway?
Donna
Defining a differential between sex and love is quite easy. Prostitutes have been doing it ever since the barter system was established. Slaves and Masters did it frequently, and doubt if there was love on either side, she was the victim, he was the one getting relief.
The reverse is true too. You can love someone intensely but not have sex with them. Combat wounded remain married to their wives – or even get married – with both parties understanding they can’t have sex. People with medical conditions (both men AND women) remain together with sex effectively zero as well.
Hence, the two issues aren’t tied together. But I will say that one enhances the other. If you love someone, you’ll probably end up having sex with them.
That being said, the established social norm of a monogamous relationship is losing ground; for one reason only – the advent of the Birth Control Pill.
Throughout history, men have been having affairs, enjoying mistresses and what have you without a second thought, they can’t get pregnant. If the woman did fall pregnant, then (if it was an affair on her part) then the husband unknowingly raised the baby. If he was a nobleman, then the boy would be raised, and freely acknowledged as a Bastard (see Game of Thrones for examples). But if the girl was just a simple peasant, then she was left to her own resources. Look up ‘baby farming’ in the 1800 for examples of this in the US, Australia and GB.
So, we have one side of society having sex for fun, and the other running scared over unwanted pregnancy. This led to another development, widespread belief. It behooved the men (who ran everything) not to worry about the peasants running around having the fun they were having. After all, the men (who ran everything) could afford Bastard children, the peasants couldn’t. Either way, no one wanted to raise another man’s baby. So the condemnation of sex, coupled with the concept of women actually enjoying sex, became frowned upon within the Western Churches. Whew.
Now two concepts are coming together. On one hand, we have The Pill. On the other hand, we have a diminished reliance on religion. One the third hand (?) women are becoming more self-aware, confident and able to have affairs as they are now outside of the home in professional settings. Women are now enjoying sex as much, if not more than their male counterparts. ((SHOCKING!))
Add to this the increase in pornography catering to women; more sexual encounters in general and affairs in general on mainstream movies and television and the dalliances of Hollywood/Washington blasted throughout the media all contribute to put the idea in our heads. “Hey, they’re doing it… That guy in accounting is cute… Hubby is out of town….”.
Also, the factors outlined above; Pill, Less Reliance on Religion; Women becoming more self-aware, all contribute to fantasies. Where they had been kept unvoiced, people are becoming more inclined to discuss fantasies, which leads to discussion and probably exploration.
So, to answer the question, can one have sex without love? Of course. I like my Black playmate, we don’t love each other. But we’re having fun nonetheless. And isn’t that what it’s all about anyway?
Donna
I agree men and women can have meaningless fun sex , there was a book with the concept of the zipless fuck. Hugging anyone with meaning is more emotional than recreational sex. If i give a bj the cock will not love me nor will i love it , same goes for pussy licking. Prostitutes of both sexes do not fall in love with each and every client.. It is difficult to know what other cultures or times are like since no one keeps records about these type of things but I know my grand mom and her mom fucked who they pleased. Often in good relationships sex runs out eventually but not love. I prefer having sex with just a few women who i am also emotionally intimate with but i would pick intimacy over sex if i had to choose one
Similar threads
