Getting Permission to Post Photos

[hungteacher]

I dont think there is enough discussion about this topic at all. I see way too many profiles on this site that are posting photos that they have no business posting.
There are profiles that just steal photos and videos from the internet and post them on their profile. Just go to the media section and the most frequent poster is using copyrighted videos from the internet. Please stop!!

I don't get it. We are capable of doing our own searches for porn, we don't need you to steal it for us.
Whats the motivation to do so? Do you need that much attention, that you are just willing to steal photos and videos that don't belong to you?

And then there are the guys that post photos of women that have NO IDEA that they are being posted online. This is just WRONG!!
Come on guys...seriously?? You need to stop.
No one's photo should be posted online without their EXPRESS permission.
Yes that means if you are dating a girl, you do not have the right to post her photo. So dont do it.
Its ok that you have a profile. Its ok that you have a fantasy.
Its really ok. Like thats why you are here.
But do not post a photo of any woman unless she KNOWS!! And I mean, she knows about this site, she knows you are posting, she knows that she will get attention and she knows that you are asking for feedback.

This isn't a form of cheating, its a form of betrayal. Its 10X worse!! So stop doing it.

Thank you for this PSA.

 

[ProgVixenCpl]

Consent is sexy. Embrace it.

 

[hungteacher]

Consent is sexy. Embrace it.

thank you for the comment
Hope you guys feel more comfortable to share more about you

 

[ctcougar]

We have had photos copied and reposted from other sites which is why we have limited what and where we post.

 

[hungteacher]

We have had photos copied and reposted from other sites which is why we have limited what and where we post.

I am very sorry to hear that. And thats why we need to promote this message more. We need to teach everyone, especially men that stealing photos is a REALL BAD thing to do. Its not ok. Its not, "no one gets hurt" Its just the worst thing you could ever do to someone. So if you do it - you are a REALLY BAD PERSON.

 

[ctcougar]

I am very sorry to hear that. And thats why we need to promote this message more. We need to teach everyone, especially men that stealing photos is a REALL BAD thing to do. Its not ok. Its not, "no one gets hurt" Its just the worst thing you could ever do to someone. So if you do it - you are a REALLY BAD PERSON.

What we do in many cases is to check if a person's photos are posted elsewhere on the Internet using tineye or Google images. If someone's supposed pics are posted all over the Net we just move on as if they lie about photos we assume they lie about everything else.

 

[hungteacher]

What we do in many cases is to check if a person's photos are posted elsewhere on the Internet using tineye or Google images. If someone's supposed pics are posted all over the Net we just move on as if they lie about photos we assume they lie about everything else.

The biggest problem I see is that most people in general are good people, so what happens is these INCELS bully good people into sharing photos and other information that they arent truly comfortable sharing with people they dont know. This doesnt happen as often on this site, im glad to say, but it happens a lot on other sites.

I have female friends that are harassed and bullied all the time to show photos. They use the word "verify" to get people into compromising situations. There are some good posts on here about verifying. And this site also offers verification, which I like a lot. In your circumstance, I can understand any trepidation to verify with a website.

But that means you can verify with a bull privately. There are apps that allow for end to end encryption, which means you can delete messages on both ends at ANY time. So if you share a photo, you can delete it immediately. I prefer to do video cam chats and phone calls, because im less concerned about how people look, and more concerned about if they are ready to take the next step.

I speak to a lot of really great couples, but they are not ready to make this a reality and that's important to know. I think expectations need to be clear. And because of my experience level, I can help a couple see what they should do next, if they arent ready for the real thing yet.

 

[MacNfries]

Your complaint in this thread addresses a lot of issues all rolled into one complaint, but they're not all illegal.

• Copy write infringements​

• Falsely identifying as the person(s) shown in the photos posted​

• Obtaining a "permission" from the person represented in the photo(s) but not copy written​

• Posting photo(s) found on the "free" internet for discussion and enjoyment​

• Posting photo(s) found on the "free" internet for profit & ownership​

​

Anyone with an ounce of brain understands the difference/legalities of each of these points.
I'll be the first to admit I post a lot of photos I find on the internet that aren't my personally produced photos. There's no law that says I can't, actually.
That said, a lot of pay websites post photos of individuals with their website logo stamped on them, NOT because they are expressing ownership of the photos, but to get more activity drawn to their website. So nothing illegal about posting photos found off the "free" internet.
Also, there are LEGAL issues and there are Website RULES/Restrictions. One gets you fined, sued, and possibly imprisoned, the other simply gets you kicked off the website you've used to acquire the photos if they've posted a notice NOT to copy & use their photos elsewhere.
This website does pretty good at stopping copy written material from being posted, or used to misrepresent the ID of the poster. However, if a person was to complain to this website as to their personal photos being posted ON this website, the website would promptly remove it. Its not THEIR job to scout the internet to find the information behind the photos posted HERE. And no illegalities unless the photos represent individuals UNDER the legal age being posted, or photos of illegal topics lie *******, *******, etc.
Maybe YOU can request that the administration appoint you their special moderator and give you a moderator badge and you can go scout the internet for the infringements you think you've found. Then you can zap it down, and maybe even get the poster banded for "eternity" as well.
Here ya go, Marshal Dillon ... Don't expect any pay or a side arm.

PS ... would have given you an FBI badge, but THAT would be illegal .... LOL​

 

[hungteacher]

Your complaint in this thread addresses a lot of issues all rolled into one complaint, but they're not all illegal.

• Copy write infringements​

• Falsely identifying as the person(s) shown in the photos posted​

• Obtaining a "permission" from the person represented in the photo(s) but not copy written​

• Posting photo(s) found on the "free" internet for discussion and enjoyment​

• Posting photo(s) found on the "free" internet for profit & ownership​

​

Anyone with an ounce of brain understands the difference/legalities of each of these points.
I'll be the first to admit I post a lot of photos I find on the internet that aren't my personally produced photos. There's no law that says I can't, actually.
That said, a lot of pay websites post photos of individuals with their website logo stamped on them, NOT because they are expressing ownership of the photos, but to get more activity drawn to their website. So nothing illegal about posting photos found off the "free" internet.
Also, there are LEGAL issues and there are Website RULES/Restrictions. One gets you fined, sued, and possibly imprisoned, the other simply gets you kicked off the website you've used to acquire the photos if they've posted a notice NOT to copy & use their photos elsewhere.
This website does pretty good at stopping copy written material from being posted, or used to misrepresent the ID of the poster. However, if a person was to complain to this website as to their personal photos being posted ON this website, the website would promptly remove it. Its not THEIR job to scout the internet to find the information behind the photos posted HERE. And no illegalities unless the photos represent individuals UNDER the legal age being posted, or photos of illegal topics lie *******, *******, etc.
Maybe YOU can request that the administration appoint you their special moderator and give you a moderator badge and you can go scout the internet for the infringements you think you've found. Then you can zap it down, and maybe even get the poster banded for "eternity" as well.
Here ya go, Marshal Dillon ... Don't expect any pay or a side arm.

View attachment 4243237 PS ... would have given you an FBI badge, but THAT would be illegal .... LOL​

Hey Mac

I didnt check the posts you make, and im sure that you aren't posting copyrighted material. I know you have really high ethical standards.

This is for Everyone Else:
Posting a meme or using the gif's this site has available to post for reactions are obviously protected and not violating copyright, but there are several profiles on this site that post Stolen Videos and Photos from people.

Yes, it is a copyright violation to repost a models photo on a different site without giving credit or attribution to where you found the photo or who the Model is? If you are STEALING photos and not telling people where you got it from, that is a CLEAR copyright violation. And yes, it is illegal. Will anything be done about it, probably not since EVERYONE is stealing stuff. But it's not the right thing to do.

If you re-post Youporn on this site, and you do not tell people that it's not yours and you got it from YouPorn, yes, you are violating the copyright of YouPorn, the same for YouTube, etc.

Content creators have copyright the minute they publish their work. The fact that you and a million other people STEAL it does not make it LESS ILLEGAL or a Violation of Copyright law. You are violating it. Just be aware that you are doing it. No one can stop you. But you should know what you are doing and don't fool yourself into thinking that its not wrong.

If a video is Shared or Re-Shared on the original platform it was created or published that does not violate the copyright, since the creator gets the credit. That's all copyright law is there to do - protect the rights of the creator to make sure that ANYONE that sees the content knows who created it.

So if you see a photo or a video and you dont know WHERE IT CAME FROM? thats why copyright law exists, those posts should be taken down and the profiles that continue to post STOLEN material should just stop.

 

[hungteacher]

Your complaint in this thread addresses a lot of issues all rolled into one complaint, but they're not all illegal.

• Copy write infringements​

• Falsely identifying as the person(s) shown in the photos posted​

• Obtaining a "permission" from the person represented in the photo(s) but not copy written​

• Posting photo(s) found on the "free" internet for discussion and enjoyment​

• Posting photo(s) found on the "free" internet for profit & ownership​

​

Anyone with an ounce of brain understands the difference/legalities of each of these points.
I'll be the first to admit I post a lot of photos I find on the internet that aren't my personally produced photos. There's no law that says I can't, actually.
That said, a lot of pay websites post photos of individuals with their website logo stamped on them, NOT because they are expressing ownership of the photos, but to get more activity drawn to their website. So nothing illegal about posting photos found off the "free" internet.
Also, there are LEGAL issues and there are Website RULES/Restrictions. One gets you fined, sued, and possibly imprisoned, the other simply gets you kicked off the website you've used to acquire the photos if they've posted a notice NOT to copy & use their photos elsewhere.
This website does pretty good at stopping copy written material from being posted, or used to misrepresent the ID of the poster. However, if a person was to complain to this website as to their personal photos being posted ON this website, the website would promptly remove it. Its not THEIR job to scout the internet to find the information behind the photos posted HERE. And no illegalities unless the photos represent individuals UNDER the legal age being posted, or photos of illegal topics lie *******, *******, etc.
Maybe YOU can request that the administration appoint you their special moderator and give you a moderator badge and you can go scout the internet for the infringements you think you've found. Then you can zap it down, and maybe even get the poster banded for "eternity" as well.
Here ya go, Marshal Dillon ... Don't expect any pay or a side arm.

View attachment 4243237 PS ... would have given you an FBI badge, but THAT would be illegal .... LOL​

Since you asked about which profile, I will tag them here
@Emelia
All of their posts are STOLEN from the internet. (I don't know what the "Free" Internet") is referring to? So that does make me question what you are talking about. There is something called Common Use and then there is Public Domain. Those are the only 2 categories that allow people to freely use content, except that you are supposed to tell people where you got the content from, that is the law.

Unless something is designated as Common Use, it's not free to use and you still have to tell people where you found it.
If you are on YouTube, you will get banned ASAP if you use material that is not Common Use, because it is copyright violation.
This site is more a community site, so it has less stringent rules than a content site, but still, it's just courtesy to tell people the Source of where you got content from.

Since we are a community, its just being a good neighbor, you know?

Also, I have no idea how to talk to the people who run this site. LOL, call me a digital idiot.

 

[MacNfries]

Since we are a community, its just being a good neighbor, you know?

4 Easiest Ways to Tell if an Image is Copyrighted | drumBEAT Marketing

I looked at the first 4-5 pages of videos posted by Emelia and I didn't see any copyright material in the videos posted.
How do YOU know those are copyright videos? Are you saying simply because Emelia didn't make the videos that they should not have been posted?
Usually there warnings about using the videos & photos off the internet if they are copyrighted.
Emelia posts a a lot of videos & photos and is NOT making any profit from the postings. No violations there. No royalties, etc.
Normally, if videos & photos on a website are copyright ... the photos & videos for the "free look" on the website will show you copyright photos that are smaller with little words written all over the photos.
Also, because of the competition on similar websites, the websites often give you a few copyright free photos but not the ENTIRE set of photos; you have to join their websites to get the full set.

I have no idea how to talk to the people who run this site.

Pretty simple, actually. At the top of this page, in the blue area you'll see words ...

• Home
• Forums
• What's new
• Media
• Members
• Dating
• Chat 12

Search profile posts | BlacktoWhite - Amateur Interracial Community - Cuckold Sex Forum

Tap on the Members, then look up to left and see members again in small letters just above Search Profile Posts.
I just assumed, with your SN being hungteacher, that you were internet savvy.

 

[hungteacher]

4 Easiest Ways to Tell if an Image is Copyrighted | drumBEAT Marketing

I looked at the first 4-5 pages of videos posted by Emelia and I didn't see any copyright material in the videos posted.
How do YOU know those are copyright videos? Are you saying simply because Emelia didn't make the videos that they should not have been posted?
Usually there warnings about using the videos & photos off the internet if they are copyrighted.
Emelia posts a a lot of videos & photos and is NOT making any profit from the postings. No violations there. No royalties, etc.
Normally, if videos & photos on a website are copyright ... the photos & videos for the "free look" on the website will show you copyright photos that are smaller with little words written all over the photos.
Also, because of the competition on similar websites, the websites often give you a few copyright free photos but not the ENTIRE set of photos; you have to join their websites to get the full set.


Pretty simple, actually. At the top of this page, in the blue area you'll see words ...

• Home
• Forums
• What's new
• Media
• Members
• Dating
• Chat 12

Search profile posts | BlacktoWhite - Amateur Interracial Community - Cuckold Sex Forum

Tap on the Members, then look up to left and see members again in small letters just above Search Profile Posts.
I just assumed, with your SN being hungteacher, that you were internet savvy.
View attachment 4247289

LOL. When it comes to women and giving them pleasure, im a recognized expert. When it comes to websites, I should be wearing a dunce cap. thanks for the help and also thanks for the laugh.

 

[hungteacher]

4 Easiest Ways to Tell if an Image is Copyrighted | drumBEAT Marketing

I looked at the first 4-5 pages of videos posted by Emelia and I didn't see any copyright material in the videos posted.
How do YOU know those are copyright videos? Are you saying simply because Emelia didn't make the videos that they should not have been posted?
Usually there warnings about using the videos & photos off the internet if they are copyrighted.
Emelia posts a a lot of videos & photos and is NOT making any profit from the postings. No violations there. No royalties, etc.
Normally, if videos & photos on a website are copyright ... the photos & videos for the "free look" on the website will show you copyright photos that are smaller with little words written all over the photos.
Also, because of the competition on similar websites, the websites often give you a few copyright free photos but not the ENTIRE set of photos; you have to join their websites to get the full set.


Pretty simple, actually. At the top of this page, in the blue area you'll see words ...

• Home
• Forums
• What's new
• Media
• Members
• Dating
• Chat 12

Search profile posts | BlacktoWhite - Amateur Interracial Community - Cuckold Sex Forum

Tap on the Members, then look up to left and see members again in small letters just above Search Profile Posts.
I just assumed, with your SN being hungteacher, that you were internet savvy.
View attachment 4247289

So to provide a counter argument to your "what is ok to post and not ok"

So yes, the fact that Emelia does not have permission from the content creators to post the content that is a violation of copyright law. It is not acceptable to take content from one hosting site and post it on another hosting site without permission. It would be the same as someone stealing content that was posted on this site and then posting it on another site, lets say a dating site to pose as a woman. What's the difference?

I will also ask you, why is Emelia posting so much content on this site that isn't original? Was he asked to do this? It seems like a huge waste of time in my opinion. It does not make this site better at all. I much prefer if all the content was original since it would add to the authenticity of the site and the profiles. In fact it would weed out the Spam and Fakes if people only posted content that was them or had permission to post.

Your argument that there was no monetary gain is not a legal defense, since taking content that includes the likeness of "other" people that you do not have a legal release from, means that you are engaging in cyber-bullying as well as what is now considered "revenge porn" and there are legal ramifications if you are not careful.

My advice for anyone that is looking to post content. Just post content you create or that you have permission from the creator to post. If its on the internet already, watch it, enjoy it, but why do you need to Rip it from one site and post it on another site? Thats just shady behavior and speaks to your character or lack thereof. This happens all the time on Insta, and again, people have a lot of time to waste and also have zero-confidence in their own skills and abilities that they need to REPOST other people's stuff.

 

[MacNfries]

I really suggest you spend some time on Copyright Law if its this big of a concern. I don't think you have the full understanding of the purpose of copyright laws. I've been posting photos taken from the internet practically since the internet began in the old Prodigy days of the '90s. Never once have I had a complaint regarding photos I've posted. If the photo or the website has a concern with copying their photos & vids, they let you know. Just because a website puts their website stamp on a photo doesn't necessarily make it copyright protected. And no one is posting photos & videos claiming they belong to them, or representing themselves as the one in the photos & videos.

4 Easiest Ways to Tell if an Image is Copyrighted | drumBEAT Marketing
Photo Copyright 101: Is it Legal to Use Photos from the Internet? | EyeEm

Usually I've found that taking a photo from an advertisement is often a copyright violation. You'll often see the copyright sign or when you try to save the photo, it won't save in the jpg or bmp formats.
One way to avoid getting into a spat over copyright that's not properly marked is to post a disclaimer notice ahead of the photo. I have a thread specific to web photos with story boards attached to them, and the first thing on that thread is a disclaimer notice.

 

[hoping hubby]

I really suggest you spend some time on Copyright Law if its this big of a concern. I don't think you have the full understanding of the purpose of copyright laws. I've been posting photos taken from the internet practically since the internet began in the old Prodigy days of the '90s. Never once have I had a complaint regarding photos I've posted. If the photo or the website has a concern with copying their photos & vids, they let you know. Just because a website puts their website stamp on a photo doesn't necessarily make it copyright protected. And no one is posting photos & videos claiming they belong to them, or representing themselves as the one in the photos & videos.

4 Easiest Ways to Tell if an Image is Copyrighted | drumBEAT Marketing
Photo Copyright 101: Is it Legal to Use Photos from the Internet? | EyeEm

Usually I've found that taking a photo from an advertisement is often a copyright violation. You'll often see the copyright sign or when you try to save the photo, it won't save in the jpg or bmp formats.
One way to avoid getting into a spat over copyright that's not properly marked is to post a disclaimer notice ahead of the photo. I have a thread specific to web photos with story boards attached to them, and the first thing on that thread is a disclaimer notice.

Frankly you both could be schooled on copyright law, but you more so Mac. Much of what HungTeacher has told you is correct. There's no need to officially copyright a picture. The person who snaps the shutter has the copyright to that image from the first nanosecond...unless there's a legal agreement where they are taking the photos for someone/some other entity who would then own the copyright or he/she later sells the rights. It might help you if you read the articles you posted. Your first article states:

–it’s not yours. Although not all images have been “officially” copyrighted, at the creation of an image, the snap of a picture, the work has immediately become copyrighted and the owner is the only person with a legal right to distribute, replicate, or display the work.

It doesn't matter if you see a copyright sign or the site has or has not blocked downloading as a jpg etc. etc. Copying pictures you don't own is copyright violation. The fact you get away with it....and I get away with it...and a few billion other people get away with it doesn't make it a non-violation. The simple fact is for the vast majority of pictures posted in forums all over the net, there isn't adequate damages for the copyright holder to bother pursuing a claim. Many copyright suits are civil suits for damages, although under certain criteria, there can be federal criminal charges pressed which could potentially put a person in prison for up to 10 years such as: (18 U.S.C. § 2319)

Also a disclaimer notice isn't going to help you unless you're making a legitimate legal claim such as a fair use reason for posting the work you don't own. Without the proper legal basis, your disclaimer could actually serve as evidence you knowingly were posting a photo you don't own the rights to in violation of copyright law.

Here's a good example of a blatant copyright violation by you. This is from post 121 in the who wants to fuck Sarah Palin thread:

Now ... who has some HOT pics of Taylor Swift ... I'm talking shots of her personal playground & her glory road? I bet I could cum in this bitch a half dozen times before losing my erection. Her personality, mannerisms, looks, everything ... simply stunning! I'd take her right on top of a table, in the middle of the food court of our new shopping mall on the busiest day of Christmas shopping.


View attachment 161499View attachment 161500

Something told me when I saw this that Ole MacnLies probably wasn't there taking either of these pictures....much to your chagrin. Sure enough, didn't take much of a search to find the picture on the right is officially copyrighted having been taken by Jason Merritt with the rights owned by Getty Images. Something also tells me you likely didn't pay Getty Images the $175 minimum cost to obtain the rights to the photo.

Musician Taylor Swift arrives at the 52nd Annual GRAMMY Awards -...

Musician Taylor Swift arrives at the 52nd Annual GRAMMY Awards - Salute To Icons Honoring Doug Morris held at The Beverly Hilton Hotel on January 30, 2010 in Beverly Hills, California.

www.gettyimages.com

Is Getty Images going to come after you for your violation, very unlikely. Taylor could in theory come after you for defamation for posting her pictures on a porn site, but sadly she won't bother with you....you can always jerky your meat dreaming she would!

Disclaimer: I do not own the rights to Taylor Swift's tits or the pictures of them reposted here. These tits are posted under fair use as edumacation material for Ole MacnLies

 

[hungteacher]

Frankly you both could be schooled on copyright law, but you more so Mac. Much of what HungTeacher has told you is correct. There's no need to officially copyright a picture. The person who snaps the shutter has the copyright to that image from the first nanosecond...unless there's a legal agreement where they are taking the photos for someone/some other entity who would then own the copyright or he/she later sells the rights. It might help you if you read the articles you posted. Your first article states:

–it’s not yours. Although not all images have been “officially” copyrighted, at the creation of an image, the snap of a picture, the work has immediately become copyrighted and the owner is the only person with a legal right to distribute, replicate, or display the work.

It doesn't matter if you see a copyright sign or the site has or has not blocked downloading as a jpg etc. etc. Copying pictures you don't own is copyright violation. The fact you get away with it....and I get away with it...and a few billion other people get away with it doesn't make it a non-violation. The simple fact is for the vast majority of pictures posted in forums all over the net, there isn't adequate damages for the copyright holder to bother pursuing a claim. Many copyright suits are civil suits for damages, although under certain criteria, there can be federal criminal charges pressed which could potentially put a person in prison for up to 10 years such as: (18 U.S.C. § 2319)

Also a disclaimer notice isn't going to help you unless you're making a legitimate legal claim such as a fair use reason for posting the work you don't own. Without the proper legal basis, your disclaimer could actually serve as evidence you knowingly were posting a photo you don't own the rights to in violation of copyright law.

Here's a good example of a blatant copyright violation by you. This is from post 121 in the who wants to fuck Sarah Palin thread:



View attachment 4248779View attachment 4248780

Something told me when I saw this that Ole MacnLies probably wasn't there taking either of these pictures....much to your chagrin. Sure enough, didn't take much of a search to find the picture on the right is officially copyrighted having been taken by Jason Merritt with the rights owned by Getty Images. Something also tells me you likely didn't pay Getty Images the $175 minimum cost to obtain the rights to the photo.

Musician Taylor Swift arrives at the 52nd Annual GRAMMY Awards -...

Musician Taylor Swift arrives at the 52nd Annual GRAMMY Awards - Salute To Icons Honoring Doug Morris held at The Beverly Hilton Hotel on January 30, 2010 in Beverly Hills, California.

www.gettyimages.com

Is Getty Images going to come after you for your violation, very unlikely. Taylor could in theory come after you for defamation for posting her pictures on a porn site, but sadly she won't bother with you....you can always jerky your meat dreaming she would!

Disclaimer: I do not own the rights to Taylor Swift's tits or the pictures of them reposted here. These tits are posted under fair use as edumacation material for Ole MacnLies

thank you

Don't jump down @MacNfries throat, he is a good person and a positive member of this community. I am glad that I am not the only one that knows at least a little about copyright law. No, I am not an expert, and I'm also not an attorney. So anything I say should not be construed as legal advice. But knowing that you are doing something wrong, from an ethical point of view is a good thing to know.

Mac, you may not be realizing that harm isn't direct on the internet. If you are a woman, who has given permission to one person to post your photo and everyone steals it - that woman's entire life is ruined. I feel strongly about this because a member of congress had her life ruined because some douche of an ex husband decided to post a naked photo of her online. She was a Congresswoman! Had he no shame?

I don't understand why anyone needs to REPOST photos?? Like what satisfaction do you get from that? It's not original, it's not even interesting. I'm not sure why the site moderators for b2w don't take down @Emelia profile. He must be costing them a fortune in bandwidth and storage capacity.

I commented on another thread entitled, "posing as a woman" and frankly, most of the posts since I read that thread, are men posing as women. There was one husband who says in his thread. "My wife has no idea that I'm on this site." Yet, he is posting nude photos of her. Guys, seriously...Like does right and wrong ever enter your brains??? Or are you just hollow shells of human beings.

this site is supposed to celebrate women, but if we post photos and content we do not have permission to post - we are degrading women, not celebrating them.

Here's an easy rule to remember - if you have no permission, don't post it. Don't worry about the law, don't worry about if its in the public domain or not - if you didn't create the content and you dont have permission from the people in it - dont post it, dont repost it and dont steal it from another site. We aren't in an academic setting, but what @MacNfries what you explained you are doing would be considered plagiarism in another setting.

 

[hoping hubby]

If you are a woman, who has given permission to one person to post your photo and everyone steals it - that woman's entire life is ruined.

If you are a woman (or a man) who has given permission to one person to post naked photos of yourself online and don't expect it to be stolen millions of times....you're a moron.

I feel strongly about this because a member of congress had her life ruined because some douche of an ex husband decided to post a naked photo of her online. She was a Congresswoman! Had he no shame?

Not sure which Congresswoman you're referring to, but this isn't a good example of your previous point. It sounds from your description that she didn't give any permission to post her photo online (if she did, refer to point #1). Technically, the ex probably had copyright having taken the photo. The crime here is revenge porn if he posted his copyrighted picture of her without her permission. The guy's a douche, but not a particularly relevant example for your copyright concerns. Now the millions of copies of her picture floating around the web would be a good example....I just hope for the sake of my eyes this wasn't Pelosi or MadMax!

I don't understand why anyone needs to REPOST photos?? Like what satisfaction do you get from that? It's not original, it's not even interesting. I'm not sure why the site moderators for b2w don't take down @Emelia profile. He must be costing them a fortune in bandwidth and storage capacity.

If Emelia's posts aren't interesting to you, you can easily block his profile. I'd venture a guess that such content has drawn many people to come to or stay with this site, so site moderators aren't likely to care....hell you've got site moderators like the bigblackbullshitter76 who has pages and pages of material in his media section that he has stolen off the web.

Here's an easy rule to remember - if you have no permission, don't post it. Don't worry about the law, don't worry about if its in the public domain or not - if you didn't create the content and you dont have permission from the people in it - dont post it, dont repost it and dont steal it from another site. We aren't in an academic setting, but what @MacNfries what you explained you are doing would be considered plagiarism in another setting.

Worrying about copyright violations of porn on the internet may be an admirable goal, but I'm afraid you're a few decades too late. That horse got out of the barn long ago....became wild and repopulated the entire planet with equine.

Of course if you feel so strongly, you can create your own site and police it to your heart's content.

 

[MacNfries]

Don't jump down @MacNfries throat, he is a good person and a positive member of this community.

I appreciate the compliment. However, you need to know hoping hubby has "little man" syndrome issues. His enjoyment on this site is following me around on the threads and making sarcastic comments & de-valuing anything I post. Not much different than Donald Trump narcissism. I've put up with him for over five years now.
He simply can't help being what he is .... an ASSHOLE!

Also note, in my comments I provide my sources ... asswipes like H-H provide smartass remarks.. Ne never starts a thread, simply butts in (uninvited) to a conversation and applies sarcasm to any liberal view made. He's a natural born jerk with the best of him running down the inside of his mom's legs when he was conceived.

........... "Oh my. looks like a copyright violation to me ... but so factual".

 

[hoping hubby]

I appreciate the compliment. However, you need to know hoping hubby has "little man" syndrome issues. His enjoyment on this site is following me around on the threads and making sarcastic comments & de-valuing anything I post. Not much different than Donald Trump narcissism. I've put up with him for over five years now.
He simply can't help being what he is .... an ASSHOLE!

Also note, in my comments I provide my sources ... asswipes like H-H provide smartass remarks.. Ne never starts a thread, simply butts in (uninvited) to a conversation and applies sarcasm to any liberal view made. He's a natural born jerk and the best of him ran down the inside of his mom's legs when he was conceived.

View attachment 4250307

Thanks Mac for showing hungteacher how wrong he was about you when he said: he is a good person and a positive member of this community.

However, if I were trying to be an asshole, I'd have pointed out how idiotic you made yourself look in your first post in this thread. It's copyRIGHT, not copywrite...you may have just set a new precedent for homophone horse hockey

In case you're unsure, the first 10 amendments are not called the Bill of Writes either...

Your complaint in this thread addresses a lot of issues all rolled into one complaint, but they're not all illegal.

• Copy write infringements​

• Falsely identifying as the person(s) shown in the photos posted​

• Obtaining a "permission" from the person represented in the photo(s) but not copy written​

• Posting photo(s) found on the "free" internet for discussion and enjoyment​

• Posting photo(s) found on the "free" internet for profit & ownership​

​

Anyone with an ounce of brain understands the difference/legalities of each of these points.
I'll be the first to admit I post a lot of photos I find on the internet that aren't my personally produced photos. There's no law that says I can't, actually.
That said, a lot of pay websites post photos of individuals with their website logo stamped on them, NOT because they are expressing ownership of the photos, but to get more activity drawn to their website. So nothing illegal about posting photos found off the "free" internet.
Also, there are LEGAL issues and there are Website RULES/Restrictions. One gets you fined, sued, and possibly imprisoned, the other simply gets you kicked off the website you've used to acquire the photos if they've posted a notice NOT to copy & use their photos elsewhere.
This website does pretty good at stopping copy written material from being posted, or used to misrepresent the ID of the poster. However, if a person was to complain to this website as to their personal photos being posted ON this website, the website would promptly remove it. Its not THEIR job to scout the internet to find the information behind the photos posted HERE. And no illegalities unless the photos represent individuals UNDER the legal age being posted, or photos of illegal topics lie *******, *******, etc.
Maybe YOU can request that the administration appoint you their special moderator and give you a moderator badge and you can go scout the internet for the infringements you think you've found. Then you can zap it down, and maybe even get the poster banded for "eternity" as well.
Here ya go, Marshal Dillon ... Don't expect any pay or a side arm.

View attachment 4243237 PS ... would have given you an FBI badge, but THAT would be illegal .... LOL​

 

[MacNfries]

However, if I were trying to be an asshole, I'd have pointed out how idiotic you made yourself look in your first post in this thread. It's copyRIGHT, not copywrite...

"trying to be an asshole" .... you don't have to try, H-H. It comes natural to you, the loneliest person on this website.
.... now buzz off and quit following me around the website. You're simply being a disturbance.