So, now you went right past the liberal thing and straight to race?
♥
It was frequent mistake often made by black men new to the lifestyle.It really was with the opening clueless comment.
WTF?!
You made a racist statement when the issue was liberals.
You forgot New York, Houston, SanFran and Los Angeles.
I missed this post just as you missed the CSPAN link in my post.C-SPAN is now serving koolaid on it's own videos?
What Fact Checkers are acceptable to you?
How about yourself? What if you yourself went to CSPAN and actually saw the footage before someone else 'doctored' it?
Try it.
cs.pn/2NIvJ8c ,exact moment at 17:14
You want truth, or do you want to just pass along garbage that makes you feel good?
When you post publicly, and someone responds to your post or opinion in kind, that's not trolling.
And he's probably following you because in spite of your politics, your wife is like, from central casting of Pawgs of America. Can't deny that.
That wasn't aimed at you. @TiffandBryan posted the edited video. I was responding to that.I missed this post just as you missed the CSPAN link in my post.
I always seek truth.
I wasn't referring to that opinion as trolling. I know what trolling is.
My husband doesn't post on this site, but thanks.
This phenomenon of "fact checking" has already lost its political weight if you ask me, it's become abundantly clear that the 2 words 'fact checking" might as well be replaced with the 2 words "damage control" . I've picked up on how this deception of "fact checking " works and its actually very simplistic, what these sites will do is "fact check" a claim, with the inevitable desired result of the claim being false. the way they achieve this is they will slightly alter the original claim to get the desired result, I'll give an example, "Claim" "hunter biden is a crackhead, there was a crackpipe found in his hotel room"Snopes and several other fact check sites are well known for lies and nothing more than leftist run propaganda hubs , not some kind of gatekeepers of truth as Google run search engines would want people to believe.
Examples.
Do You Trust Snopes? You Won't After Reading This.
The big players in the GMO and agrochemical industry – Monsanto, Bayer, Dow, Syngenta, DuPont – are engaging in an extensive public relations, advertising, lobbying and political campaigning to make sure that genetically engineered crops (GMOs), and the chemical pesticides they require, continue...foodbabe.com
Snopes Offers Bizarre Biden Cover In ‘Fact-Check’ On POTUS Forgetting Defense Secretary’s Name
Snopes on Tuesday assigned a “Mixed” true-and-false rating to the claim that President Joe Biden forgot the name of Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin at one point during a speech he gave o…www.truenewshub.com
Snopes mounts magic mask theory to save Joe Biden from shame
President Joe Biden just blundered a big one, as Joe Biden is wont to do, and issued an executive order that put most all American citizens into face masks. And then he went out and about without his own face mask. Oops. Hypocrisy at its finest. Elitism at its ugliest. Or is it?www.washingtontimes.com
‘Fact Checkers’ twisting themselves in knots to cover for Biden’s lies
The so-called “fact-checkers” in the mainstream media had a field day during the Trump administration, with the Washington Post tallying 30,573 misleading claims over the last four years.
https://newspunch.com/snopes-lying-*******-democrat/
Here is the complete unedited Biden video ---> https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4889597/user-clip-context-biden-n-word
bless your heart
........your confusing/conflating "The big switch" with Civil war times. but its nice to see you read my post, especially the part about "magic" and since you believe in magic I'll tell you something I heard through the grape vine, I heard that if you say the words "Big Switch" 3 times fast in the mirror that jussie smollett will appear on a unicorn and take you through an all access tour of wakanda. you might as well give it a whirl......
When I say 'fact check', I mean go to the source. Send me a doctored up video with cspan on it. I'm not going to Snopes, I'm going to the CSPAN archives (1985 in this case) and pulling the source and checking it out myself.This phenomenon of "fact checking" has already lost its political weight if you ask me, it's become abundantly clear that the 2 words 'fact checking" might as well be replaced with the 2 words "damage control" . I've picked up on how this deception of "fact checking " works and its actually very simplistic, what these sites will do is "fact check" a claim, with the inevitable desired result of the claim being false. the way they achieve this is they will slightly alter the original claim to get the desired result, I'll give an example, "Claim" "hunter biden is a crackhead, there was a crackpipe found in his hotel room"
Fact Check........False
of course most consumers will simply look at true/false then never read the description, which is part of the deception, you'll read a description of hunter being accused of ******* use, accused of smoking crack with no evidence of it then at the very end of the article it will say there was a pipe found in his room,.......but..............it was a "prohibited chemical" pipe, so you see he dosen't really smoke crack and the ppl claiming that are just hurling accusations that aren't true,.........that's how the trick of 'fact checking"/"damage control" sites work. its to slightly alter the original claim into something it never was, then of course pronounce it as being false.
I don't really think many ppl take fact checking sites seriously anyway, those sites are really nothing more than a political "pocket knife" if you will, that is provided to the left wing liberal base to try to use in debates as if to say "Im right your wrong, the "fact checkers said so" The irony of that is those same ppl who use this "pocket knife' are largely ignored and laughed at, l'll give an analogy, we recently had the grammy's the other night, and as predicted they yet again set a record low for viewership, the show was uneventful, delivered in bad taste, and to sum it up was pathetic, as evidenced by its record low viewership. Those same ppl who are into "fact checkers" are the same ppl who watched the grammys and thought it was inspirational and cool, the same liberal hivemind living in they're own little world, never understanding that they're being laughed at and made fun of when they turn and walk away...
Let me help you, you seem to have a lot of questions.bless your heart
as far as the states that wanted to succeed..........I don't know I was hoping you could tell me,...... I was hoping you could tell me which ones they were and who it was within those states that had that desire..as far as flags on cars??? couldn't really tell you, maybe I could if the car also had "registered democrat" or "registered republican" sticker to go with it I could tell, but I've yet to see that........, there is something that I can tell you though. "The big switch" is exactly what I have already described it to be in my previous post.....
Lower taxes and smaller government. That was before Bush.
Youi're talking about conservative in the political field.....I thought we were talking about personal values......big difference....
Hmmm, Well I live in a red state and have not qualified for any stimulus checks so state cant be broke. Yet blue states which have above mentioned cities in them you know homicide leading cities in the country all received stimulus checks and every other government funding.
