Wake Up, America! Wake Up! PLEASE!!
- Thread starter Drillher4me
- Start date
- Status
I've never said anything like this before, neither on this thread or elsewhere, so I'll just say it once and I trust you'll understand EXACTLY what I mean ..... You (TwoBiFour) & Latin4BBC ..... your level of humanity & intelligence (rather "the lack of both") is so lacking and appalling, not unlike your moral lacking leader, leaves me with no fewer words than say "Why don't you both just get lost and retreat unto your Trumpian Lost World of Idiots!"
P.S.
I WAS INTENDED TO TELL YOU TO GO F-U-C-K YOURSELVES .... BUT LIKE "YOUR DONALD" .... I WON'T ....
YOU'VE BOTH BEEN BRAIN FUCKED ENOUGH BY YOUR LEADERLESS BRAINLESS LEADER!
YOU GUYS WILL "NEVER WAKE UP!"
GOD HELP AMERICA .... !!!! (I sincerely mean this!)
YOUR COUNTRY NEEDS GOD'S HELP MORE NOW THAN ANY TIME IN ITS HISTORY AND YOU'RE BOTH
TOO BLIND TO SEE IT!
Last edited:
Proving my point every day.
Keep the hate flowing bro, you do it so well.
I will say this, you are correct that our country needs help, but it's not from God, nor is it from the liberal left. People like yourself is the primary cause of the chaos we have now. Those of you that feel "entitled" simply because you breath. Filled with hate and envy because you don't have what others have. Why don't you actually try to engage instead of insult? Your reply has no substance, no refutable dialog, only hate and disdain. YOU my friend, are part of the problem.
And by the way - you have said this before, several times in fact - simply start at the beginning and read your own replies.
Proving my point every day.
Keep the hate flowing bro, you do it so well.
I will say this, you are correct that our country needs help, but it's not from God, nor is it from the liberal left. People like yourself is the primary cause of the chaos we have now. Those of you that feel "entitled" simply because you breath. Filled with hate and envy because you don't have what others have. Why don't you actually try to engage instead of insult? Your reply has no substance, no refutable dialog, only hate and disdain. YOU my friend, are part of the problem.
And by the way - you have said this before, several times in fact - simply start at the beginning and read your own replies.
YADA! YADA! YADA!
------------------------
This was made a Hit by the trio Peter, Paul & Mary
Also was a hit by Joan Baez several years later
(Just in case you might be able to read, enjoy & understand the lyrics!)
Enjoy "Blowing in the Wind"
How many roads must a man walk down
Before you call him a man?
How many seas must a white dove sail
Before she sleeps in the sand?
Yes, 'n' how many times must the cannon balls fly
Before they're forever banned?
The answer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind
The answer is blowin' in the wind
Yes, 'n' how many years can a mountain exist
Before it's washed to the sea?
Yes, 'n' how many years can some people exist
Before they're allowed to be free?
Yes, 'n' how many times can a man turn his head
And pretend that he just doesn't see?
The answer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind
The answer is blowin' in the wind
Yes, 'n' how many times must a man look up
Before he can see the sky?
Yes, 'n' how many ears must one man have
Before he can hear people cry?
Yes, 'n' how many deaths will it take till he knows
That too many people have died?
The answer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind
The answer is blowin' in the wind
Of course you don't want to hear it, you are incapable of discussing anything other than your own hatred.
Here is a song for you
Last edited:
It just simply amazes me - that if you don’t support the left’s point of view - they feel perfectly entitled to call you stupid and insult you - it’s like they firmly believe that their view is the only intelligent one - they get soooooooo angry if anyone says anything contrary to what they think - unfortunately for them - they live in America where there is freedom of speech - and people are entitled to disagree and voice their own individual view whether they wanna hear it or not!!!
NEVER!
Driller might be right. God Help us. The ignorance of these followers is amazing. I laugh when I hear white people say "all white people are racists." They are so GD stupid, one they do not know who they are and two just admitted to being racists.
Funny thing is you liberal, socialist dont see it. You heard it out of their own mouths if you listened to any of the videos. But that means nothing to your kind. You cannot admit your precious Hillary, Bill, and Barack were all saying the same thing that Trump is. The only difference is unlike your liberal icons, he is doing something about it.
Last edited:
Why has not one prominent liberal come out and condemn the likes of Maxine and all the other haters. The liberals have you non thinking for yourselves and no common sense people right where they want you...Again. I haven't watch the news since I've been home but in this day and age with surveillance cameras everywhere they don't have any footage? Not one "bomb" exploded. You cannot be that ignorant. But then again after watching some of the youtube clips I am going to have to say I think so.
Last edited:
Sorry one bomb did explode. It was the one filled with DESPERATION.
With all the nay saying, insults and brainless, senseless insults flying about, from both sides I must admit, the real hope at the time I started this thread was that hopefully someone would say "Hold it! Where's there's smoke there's most probably a fire! Let's wake up! Take a serious second look at reality and what's at risk for not only Americans but for the world! I trust the below will perhaps shed a some light on my intent and hope for the future!
President Trump says he plans to withdraw from a nonproliferation treaty that I signed with Ronald Reagan.
It’s just the latest victim in the militarization of world affairs.
By Mikhail Gorbachev
Mr. Gorbachev is the former president of the Soviet Union.
Over 30 years ago, President Ronald Reagan and I signed in Washington the United States-Soviet Treaty on the elimination of intermediate- and shorter-range missiles. For the first time in history, two classes of nuclear weapons
were to be eliminated and destroyed.
This was a first step. It was followed in 1991 by the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, which the Soviet Union signed with President George H.W. Bush, our agreement on radical cuts in tactical nuclear arms, and the New Start Treaty, signed by the presidents of Russia and the United States in 2010.
There are still too many nuclear weapons in the world, but the American and Russian arsenals are now a fraction of what they were during the Cold War. At the Nuclear Nonproliferation Review Conference in 2015, Russia and the United States reported to the international community that 85 percent of those arsenals had been decommissioned and, for the most part, destroyed.
Today, this tremendous accomplishment, of which our two nations can be rightfully proud, is in jeopardy. President Trump announced last week the United States’ plan to withdraw from the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty and his country’s intention to build up nuclear arms.
I am being asked whether I feel bitter watching the demise of what I worked so hard to achieve. But this is not a personal matter. Much more is at stake.
A new arms race has been announced. The I.N.F. Treaty is not the first victim of the militarization of world affairs. In 2002, the United States withdrew from the Antiballistic Missile Treaty; this year, from the Iran nuclear deal. Military expenditures have soared to astronomical levels and keep rising.
As a pretext for the withdrawal from the I.N.F. Treaty, the United States invoked Russia’s alleged violations of some of the treaty’s provisions. Russia has raised similar concerns regarding American compliance, at the same time proposing to discuss the issues at the negotiating table to find a mutually acceptable solution. But over the past few years, the United States has been avoiding such discussion. I think it is now clear why.
With enough political will, any problems of compliance with the existing treaties could be resolved. But as we have seen during the past two years, the president of the United States has a very different purpose in mind. It is to release the United States from any obligations, any constraints, and not just regarding nuclear missiles.
The United States has in effect taken the initiative in destroying the entire system of international treaties and accords that served as the underlying foundation for peace and security following World War II.
Yet I am convinced that those who hope to benefit from a global free-for-all are deeply mistaken. There will be no winner in a “war of all against all” — particularly if it ends in a nuclear war. And that is a possibility that cannot be ruled out. An unrelenting arms race, international tensions, hostility and universal mistrust will only increase the risk.
Is it too late to return to dialogue and negotiations? I don’t want to lose hope. I hope that Russia will take a firm but balanced stand. I hope that America’s allies will, upon sober reflection, refuse to be launchpads for new American missiles. I hope the United Nations, and particularly members of its Security Council, vested by the United Nations Charter with primary responsibility for maintaining international peace and security, will take responsible action.
Faced with this dire threat to peace, we are not helpless. We must not resign, we must not surrender.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/25/opinion/mikhail-gorbachev-inf-treaty-trump-nuclear-arms.html
Mikhail Gorbachev is the former president of the Soviet Union.
This article was translated by Pavel Palazhchenko from the Russian.
------------------------------
Mikhail Gorbachev: A New Nuclear Arms Race Has BegunPresident Trump says he plans to withdraw from a nonproliferation treaty that I signed with Ronald Reagan.
It’s just the latest victim in the militarization of world affairs.
By Mikhail Gorbachev
Mr. Gorbachev is the former president of the Soviet Union.
Over 30 years ago, President Ronald Reagan and I signed in Washington the United States-Soviet Treaty on the elimination of intermediate- and shorter-range missiles. For the first time in history, two classes of nuclear weapons
were to be eliminated and destroyed.
This was a first step. It was followed in 1991 by the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, which the Soviet Union signed with President George H.W. Bush, our agreement on radical cuts in tactical nuclear arms, and the New Start Treaty, signed by the presidents of Russia and the United States in 2010.
There are still too many nuclear weapons in the world, but the American and Russian arsenals are now a fraction of what they were during the Cold War. At the Nuclear Nonproliferation Review Conference in 2015, Russia and the United States reported to the international community that 85 percent of those arsenals had been decommissioned and, for the most part, destroyed.
Today, this tremendous accomplishment, of which our two nations can be rightfully proud, is in jeopardy. President Trump announced last week the United States’ plan to withdraw from the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty and his country’s intention to build up nuclear arms.
I am being asked whether I feel bitter watching the demise of what I worked so hard to achieve. But this is not a personal matter. Much more is at stake.
A new arms race has been announced. The I.N.F. Treaty is not the first victim of the militarization of world affairs. In 2002, the United States withdrew from the Antiballistic Missile Treaty; this year, from the Iran nuclear deal. Military expenditures have soared to astronomical levels and keep rising.
As a pretext for the withdrawal from the I.N.F. Treaty, the United States invoked Russia’s alleged violations of some of the treaty’s provisions. Russia has raised similar concerns regarding American compliance, at the same time proposing to discuss the issues at the negotiating table to find a mutually acceptable solution. But over the past few years, the United States has been avoiding such discussion. I think it is now clear why.
With enough political will, any problems of compliance with the existing treaties could be resolved. But as we have seen during the past two years, the president of the United States has a very different purpose in mind. It is to release the United States from any obligations, any constraints, and not just regarding nuclear missiles.
The United States has in effect taken the initiative in destroying the entire system of international treaties and accords that served as the underlying foundation for peace and security following World War II.
Yet I am convinced that those who hope to benefit from a global free-for-all are deeply mistaken. There will be no winner in a “war of all against all” — particularly if it ends in a nuclear war. And that is a possibility that cannot be ruled out. An unrelenting arms race, international tensions, hostility and universal mistrust will only increase the risk.
Is it too late to return to dialogue and negotiations? I don’t want to lose hope. I hope that Russia will take a firm but balanced stand. I hope that America’s allies will, upon sober reflection, refuse to be launchpads for new American missiles. I hope the United Nations, and particularly members of its Security Council, vested by the United Nations Charter with primary responsibility for maintaining international peace and security, will take responsible action.
Faced with this dire threat to peace, we are not helpless. We must not resign, we must not surrender.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/25/opinion/mikhail-gorbachev-inf-treaty-trump-nuclear-arms.html
Mikhail Gorbachev is the former president of the Soviet Union.
This article was translated by Pavel Palazhchenko from the Russian.
Google is your friend
Ridiculous
But you should know this
- Status
