Excuse me, not all Republicans are racist idiots, consider blacks to be "subhuman" or believe that women shouldn't have a choice when it comes to having babies.
Many just believe in fiscal responsibility and in preserving individual rights.
Celebrating Obama's Win
- Thread starter wife4black
- Start date
Excuse me, not all Republicans are racist idiots, consider blacks to be "subhuman" or believe that women shouldn't have a choice when it comes to having babies.
Many just believe in fiscal responsibility and in preserving individual rights.
Politics in America are cyclical. Newsweek was shoveling dirt on the grave of the Republican Party after the 2008 election yet 2010 happened (and Newsweek is no longer circulating a print edition, go figure). 4 years is a long time in politics and things never stay static.
sugarfoot6972
Male
It looks like I'm in the minority here but I agree with you completely, we've given the whites enough chance to really screw this country up (I am white by the way) An intelligent, caring and perceptive Black man with a extremely intelligent Black Woman at his side has an excellent chance at making this the kind country it should be, .
sugarfoot6972
Male
This is one white man who is with you 100%!!
sugarfoot6972
Male
You couldn't be more right!
sugarfoot6972
Male
Again NiggDick you got it right, a Black has never made a death threat against a white president, whites ( and I am one) are intimidated by an intelligent Black man and Woman in the White House
"Far right extremism"- Romney's message was almost singulalrly focused on the economy, if talking about getting the economy going again and adding jobs to the economy is your idea of "far right extremism" then you, like the genius who made the orginal post really don't know what you're talking about.
It's a shame that you wandered off from the village, they really need their idiot back.
bbwneedbigdick
Male
hahahahah
Paul Ryan, his running mate, is 100% pro-choice and is against abortion in the case of ******* and ******* (1).
Both Romney and Ryan support overturning Roe V Wade (2).
Under the "values" section of his website, Romney's campaign states that the candidate "believes that the right next step is for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade -- a case of blatant judicial activism that took a decision that should be left to the people and placed it in the hands of unelected judges." Link
(1)
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/...tion-muddle/r17rZMdK7AyttwRPGmoUeP/story.html
(2)
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...tion-and-contraception-moderate-in-new-tv-ad/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/30/mitt-romney-roe-v-wade_n_2042922.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/opinion/if-roe-v-wade-goes.html?_r=0
bbwneedbigdick
Male
Fiscal responsibility is one thing, but it is how Republicans define "preserving individual rights" that is interesting. Taking away funding for Planned Parenthood, wanting to overturn Roe V Wade, is this what you mean by preserving individual rights?
Look, I have NO problem for people who believe abortion is wrong for themselves personally. But I DON'T think those people have the right to say what a woman does or doesn't do with her body. End of story!
bbwneedbigdick
Male
You can't just walk into a pharmacy and demand some birth control. You need to have a prescription. Which implies going to the doctor, spending money on a co-pay, and hopefully your insurance will cover the rest! But what if your insurance doesn't agree with why you went to the doctor (which would have happened under a Romney administration)? What about for the women who DON'T have insurance and so therefore can't go to a doctor, and instead, rely on Planned Parenthood (which is being defunded by Republicans)?
bbwneedbigdick
Male
So not only do Republicans want to take away birth control, abortions, but then they want to cut back on the social safety net for these mothers. Brilliant planning! Absolutely brilliant!
bbwneedbigdick
Male
You're missing a key piece here:
Within the next four years at least two spots on the Supreme Court will be up for grabs. One of the judges is like 80 and the other has been battling cancer and probably won't make it.
You don't think Romney would appoint conservative judges? Because that is exactly what he would do. And what do you think those judges would do for women's rights to choose?
You're asking the wrong person, I'm pro-life...and conservative, and a Republican.
bbwneedbigdick
Male
Clearly. And so is Romney. And you betcha Roe V Wade would eventually be overturned under his administration. All of this above points to his "right wing extremism" that you denied Romney had, where he focused mostly on issues related to the economy. Maybe he did focus a lot on the economy, and jobs, and the whatnot. But he also has a very sick social agenda that would set back women's rights. That is fine you are pro-life. I accept that. But don't vote that denies the right for other women to choose. Thanks.
You're welcome. And what choice does the baby have?
Again that's the difference. I don't concern myself with what racists have to say about me. I'm bigger than that. What will getting all irate over what some people on a website say about your ethnic group accomplish? Not a damn thing. I have more important goals to pursue than to donate energy or time to reading about a thing that I know already exists in this world. You obviously like being bitter, angry and ignorant, because you go on these sites and come to forums with a chip on your shoulder. You can talk your slang and carry on in a verbal machismo fashion, but it's still whining, you're still bitching so grab a tampax. On my worse day you couldn't get at me on your best day. So just keep "making" white people call you n*****r because you think it makes you a big man and I'll just keep calling you n****r because you are truly an ignorant person.
Then I would refer to the United Nations Charter on Human Rights
What that does that have to do with the Constitution of the United States of America?
Similar threads
