@flsubboy4u I'm sorry, you will have to cite the New England Journal of Medicine with your research on white genes because I am positive the not only would everyone on this site be blown away with your knowledge, but the entire world would love to know why you have been hiding this profound science from all of us. Your "analogy" and you should probably look that up, since you used it wrong. Again, you went from jerking off all over your computer screen to trying to defend a point that makes no sense. For someone who claims to be intelligent and knowlegeable about science, there is no similarity between "submissive" and "recessive" genes. In fact, its so idiotic that you should be beat over the head with a punnet square.
If you want to end an argument, then just bring out the citations and end the argument. The problem is that you are now throwing out names of Journals that do not support your claims whatsoever. By name dropping them, you prove my point that you have no idea what you are talking about. You may have studied science in college, but you never walked into the debate class. You need hard facts to back up such outrageous claims that the "white race" is a "recessive gene."
Again, this is a completely racist comment. You are completely backwards in thinking and you need to remove head from rectum. What is the point you are trying to make? Maybe if you started simply with a hypothesis that made sense, we could all follow you. If you are saying you hope that hatred, bigotry and ignorance is wiped from the face of the earth, and that anyone that supports or expouses the Nazi dogma should no longer exist, then I agree with you and support your point. But if you are trying to say anything else, you are just being a complete A-hole.
There is nothing wrong with people with white skin and there is nothing wrong with people with black skin. What is wrong is people who make the color of people's skin the defining characteristic of whether or not a person is worth anything.
If you want to end an argument, then just bring out the citations and end the argument. The problem is that you are now throwing out names of Journals that do not support your claims whatsoever. By name dropping them, you prove my point that you have no idea what you are talking about. You may have studied science in college, but you never walked into the debate class. You need hard facts to back up such outrageous claims that the "white race" is a "recessive gene."
Again, this is a completely racist comment. You are completely backwards in thinking and you need to remove head from rectum. What is the point you are trying to make? Maybe if you started simply with a hypothesis that made sense, we could all follow you. If you are saying you hope that hatred, bigotry and ignorance is wiped from the face of the earth, and that anyone that supports or expouses the Nazi dogma should no longer exist, then I agree with you and support your point. But if you are trying to say anything else, you are just being a complete A-hole.
There is nothing wrong with people with white skin and there is nothing wrong with people with black skin. What is wrong is people who make the color of people's skin the defining characteristic of whether or not a person is worth anything.