A bull fucking both couple's assholes

Er, no. What it actually refers to, and this is where many poster's perspective is wrong, is homosexuality, not gay. It seems the term gay has become confounded with homosexuality and homosexual activities, but being gay actually refers more to mannerisms and effeminacy on a full-time lifestyle basis. Cucks who participate in their wife's cheating (even if agreed upon) by cleaning up another man's cum or fully engaging sexually with another man including anal sex and allowing the man to cum inside him, is engaging in homosexuality, and to refer to him as being 'gay' is a misnomer.

I prefer sex with another man because I find the dynamic far more satisfying than with a woman. I am not 'gay', but I am 'homosexual', which is the correct term to use for a man who engages in sex with another man. When it comes to women, I prefer to keep them at a platonic arms length.
That may be your definition, but it's not the common usage/ understanding.

"Gay

Refers to a man who has a romantic and/or sexual orientation towards men. Also a generic term for lesbian and gay sexuality - some women define themselves as gay rather than lesbian. Some non-binary people may also identify with this term."

Source: https://www.stonewall.org.uk/list-lgbtq-terms

I also know plenty of men, very masculine, bear types, who are obviously attracted to all things masculine; broad shoulders, big strong hands, hairy arms, hairy chest, facial hair, deep voices, etc. and have no interest in seeking or being effeminate in any way, and they absolutely consider themselves gay. Gay night clubs and gay bathhouses are full of very masculine men (not saying there aren't effeminate ones as well, just saying that in popular use, gay is understood to refer to homosexuality, not effeminate behavior.

But even if the difference you purpose were technically correct, I'm not trying to argue about etymology. My point was simply that bisexuality exists, and it's a spectrum, not an absolute. Calling men who are attracted to women but have situationally been open to male/male contact, or even men who are attracted to both men and women "gay," is incorrect, just as "homosexual" would be. The prefix homo- means "same." If you entertain the idea of sex with both sexes, that's called "bisexual," not "gay," and the degrees to which someone may be bisexual, and the types of bisexual activity that appeal to different people, vary greatly from person to person. The word "gay" does not apply to the open-minded, or those with somewhat fluid sexual orientations. In common parlance, it's understood to mean "homosexual."
 
And the much more important point has less to do with the words chosen than the intention behind them. No person or either sex should be ridiculed or shamed for his/her/their sexual orientation. The intention behind slapping the label "gay" on anyone who experiments with or thinks about encounters that aren't 100% hetero, is clearly intended to put everyone who's not 100% straight in a category of their own. Being 100% straight is 100% ok. But trying to "other" all those who aren't 100% straight is a transparent attempt to separate and establish superiority. Nobody would care about making that distinction if they didn't think there was something wrong with the other group. They'd just say, "that's not my thing," and go on about their business. Live and let live shouldn't be such a complicated, difficult concept to grasp, imho.
 
Siendo una pareja swinger bisexual e interracial sin jamás sentirnos inferiores ni humillación la única cosa que ha podido superar la suprema experiencia de estar los dos juntos siendo penetrados por más de 7 personas al mismo tiempo por horas que desde la experiencia podemos decir que es suprema para nosotros lo único que ha sido mucho más grande es recibir ese misma cantidad de personas pero que sean chicas trans uffff al menos para nosotros no hemos tenido nada más caliente que esas cosas
 

Attachments

  • Ff9M7VSWYAAQYm2.jpg
    Ff9M7VSWYAAQYm2.jpg
    180.9 KB · Views: 40
  • 63435304_013_9e70.jpg
    63435304_013_9e70.jpg
    235.1 KB · Views: 32
  • 1000030339.jpg
    1000030339.jpg
    20.8 KB · Views: 24
  • nT_7ku2xdi6qntcqefdn7nar2u3_600.jpg
    nT_7ku2xdi6qntcqefdn7nar2u3_600.jpg
    55.7 KB · Views: 32
  • 759_1000.jpg
    759_1000.jpg
    76.4 KB · Views: 44
  • 2778121-1676416820-f75aca3a3afb65b2c9afc2769e90a28b.jpg
    2778121-1676416820-f75aca3a3afb65b2c9afc2769e90a28b.jpg
    71.6 KB · Views: 46
  • 00000910.jpg
    00000910.jpg
    89.6 KB · Views: 45
  • DbW9y5FV4AEC67T.mp4.gif
    DbW9y5FV4AEC67T.mp4.gif
    6 MB · Views: 38
  • images-1.jpeg
    images-1.jpeg
    26.5 KB · Views: 34
  • 385_1000.gif
    385_1000.gif
    492.2 KB · Views: 37
  • 3714774-74bbae1a19937fbe64ca16c5d9b44645.jpg
    3714774-74bbae1a19937fbe64ca16c5d9b44645.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 42
  • GEI6FGXWFEPGH_name-of-titlepornstars-guy-on-the-left-seems-to-be-joachim-kessef-1708967985.jpg
    GEI6FGXWFEPGH_name-of-titlepornstars-guy-on-the-left-seems-to-be-joachim-kessef-1708967985.jpg
    69.2 KB · Views: 48
Back
Top