WHICH SPOUSE DO YOU PREFER TO DO THE TALKING?

BlackVulcan

Male
Gold Member
It's most often true that, in online communication with couples, it's the husbands (or boyfriends) who are the Gatekeepers, which is their right, of course. Hubbies should be protective of their wives, since, in this kinky corner of the swinger lifestyle where cuckolds, stags, and hotwives abide, the wives are the ones being shared (and in rare cases, impregnated) with bulls, and black men.

So, the Questions are: As a single black male interested in meeting a sexy white wife for kinky sex, which spouse do you prefer to deal with, the Husband, or the Wife herself? Does it even matter to you?

The automatic Follow-up Question is: Does it annoy you to learn that sometimes a husband pretends to be the wife here online, or sometimes it's really just a homosexual male wanting to know how you would sexually use a wife he never had in the first place?




Screen Shot 2024-01-20 at 3.57.24 PM.pngScreen Shot 2024-01-20 at 3.57.35 PM.pngScreen Shot 2024-01-20 at 3.57.45 PM.png
 
Last edited:
Me personally I prefer to speak with the wife first because there has to be a physical attraction on both parts initially. Once that's established the main communication should be with the husband. Discussing expectations, boundaries etc. Her input is important but without him being onboard it can't proceed any further. Now as to being contacted by men pretending to be in a relationship or pretending to be a woman. That's annoying, just be upfront and honest. I'm pretty sure that everyone can find what they're looking for without being deceptive and wasting someone's time.
 
Me personally I prefer to speak with the wife first because there has to be a physical attraction on both parts initially. Once that's established the main communication should be with the husband. Discussing expectations, boundaries etc. Her input is important but without him being onboard it can't proceed any further. Now as to being contacted by men pretending to be in a relationship or pretending to be a woman. That's annoying, just be upfront and honest. I'm pretty sure that everyone can find what they're looking for without being deceptive and wasting someone's time.
Very well said.
 
Again, it's about entering what should ordinarily be the husband's province ( unless serious cuck games are being played ), and he has the right to set boundaries, and make his presence felt in the best interests of his wife. But I find it a turn-off if the hubby is too verbal. Whether he thinks he's some sort of porno director, giving instructions on how to move so that he captures the best angle on camera, or he decides to do a half-assed play-by-play commentary, I'd rather he not. Sure, the entire encounter is more for them than for the visitor. Still, accommodation should be granted to all parties involved. I don't want to hear him, is basically what I'm saying. Before and after chatting is fine. During the deed, let's just focus on her.
 
Last edited:
Again, it's about entering what should ordinarily be the husband's province ( unless serious cuck games are being played ), and he has the right to set boundaries, and make his presence felt in the best interests of his wife. But I find it a turn-off if the hubby is too verbal. Whether he thinks he's some sort of porno director, giving instructions on how to move so that he captures the best angle on camera, or he decides to do a half-assed play-by-play commentary, I'd rather he not. Sure, the entire encounter is more for them than for the visitor. Still, accommodation show be granted to all parties involved. I don't want to hear him, is basically what I'm saying. Before and after chatting is fine. During the deed, let's just focus on her.
So true, he can observe or even join in but I hate "cheerleaders" or "coaches" I want to hear her moans rather than his deep voice " you like that BBC baby".... LMAO
 
So true, he can observe or even join in but I hate "cheerleaders" or "coaches" I want to hear her moans rather than his deep voice " you like that BBC baby".... LMAO
"Oh! Is he in your ass, now, baby? Is he in your slutty little ass? Huh? Tell me, baby! Are you being a good little whore for all that hard black dick? Talk to him, babe. Tell him how much you love that black beef! It's what's fer dinner, right, babe? Tell him how you've just been craving it all week. My little nasty whore wife. This is so fuckin' hot! We gotta--"
His wife and me together: "SHADDUP!!!!"
 
"Oh! Is he in your ass, now, baby? Is he in your slutty little ass? Huh? Tell me, baby! Are you being a good little whore for all that hard black dick? Talk to him, babe. Tell him how much you love that black beef! It's what's fer dinner, right, babe? Tell him how you've just been craving it all week. My little nasty whore wife. This is so fuckin' hot! We gotta--"
His wife and me together: "SHADDUP!!!!"
You forgot the most used phrase "FUCK YEA"... lol
 
I think it's good if you write directly to me, the wife. My husband isn't here either, and he doesn't know anything about my double life.

But if you prefer, you can of course also write to my husband.
Ahhh! Deutschland in the haus! Willkommen, schöne verheiratete Frau! Ich bin zutiefst erregt von dir.

I would prefer to communicate with you, a wife, directly. However, I am not into duplicity in any form. I am an honest man, desiring no drama. So, I suppose I would wish to inform your husband of my interest in you. But I wouldn't want to get you in trouble by leaking your secret either.
 
Whenever I’ve been active with the 5 white gfs who cuckolded me I handled communication with Sir and arrangements. Usually the first time we all met in the bar would be the first time she and Sir met.
 
Ahhh! Deutschland in the haus! Willkommen, schöne verheiratete Frau! Ich bin zutiefst erregt von dir.

I would prefer to communicate with you, a wife, directly. However, I am not into duplicity in any form. I am an honest man, desiring no drama. So, I suppose I would wish to inform your husband of my interest in you. But I wouldn't want to get you in trouble by leaking your secret either.
hi stranger, BIG man. thanks for your reply. can we write "privately" or do you prefer to keep it public?
 
It's most often true that, in online communication with couples, it's the husbands (or boyfriends) who are the Gatekeepers, which is their right, of course. Hubbies should be protective of their wives, since, in this kinky corner of the swinger lifestyle where cuckolds, stags, and hotwives abide, the wives are the ones being shared (and in rare cases, impregnated) with bulls, and black men.

So, the Questions are: As a single black male interested in meeting a sexy white wife for kinky sex, which spouse do you prefer to deal with, the Husband, or the Wife herself? Does it even matter to you?

The automatic Follow-up Question is: Does it annoy you to learn that sometimes a husband pretends to be the wife here online, or sometimes it's really just a homosexual male wanting to know how you would sexually use a wife he never had in the first place?
As it should be
 
I don't care who does the talking as long as they adhere to one rule and that rule is:

.The wife must be completely uninhibited to express and enjoy herself sexually however she desires in order to ensure the best possible experience!

I have never had a problem either! Now I have turned down numerous invites from couple's because it seemed like they had all kinds of hangups, insecurities, weird rules and so forth so when it starts sounding wack then I respectfully let them know that I'm not gonna be a good fit for them but what I don't do is make plans then decide "this meet is probably going to be wack" and no show! When we chat and it sounds like it's not going to be good then I am quick to be honest and say that it's not my thing!

But I don't have a preference with who is doing the talking! In fact I feel like the more cool that I am with hubby the better the atmosphere and opportunities to bang his wife into oblivion!♠️
 
I don't care who does the talking as long as they adhere to one rule and that rule is:

.The wife must be completely uninhibited to express and enjoy herself sexually however she desires in order to ensure the best possible experience!

I have never had a problem either! Now I have turned down numerous invites from couple's because it seemed like they had all kinds of hangups, insecurities, weird rules and so forth so when it starts sounding wack then I respectfully let them know that I'm not gonna be a good fit for them but what I don't do is make plans then decide "this meet is probably going to be wack" and no show! When we chat and it sounds like it's not going to be good then I am quick to be honest and say that it's not my thing!

But I don't have a preference with who is doing the talking! In fact I feel like the more cool that I am with hubby the better the atmosphere and opportunities to bang his wife into oblivion!♠️
Honesty is one of the most important elements in any interaction, and it forms the foundation of all worthwhile relationships. And rightfully, honesty can only be repaid in kind, same as respect, loyalty, friendship, love, etc.

Good on you for refusing to proceed when you detect red flags. Many guys too often let their little head overrule their larger head in those situations. And that's when drama has a chance to steal the stage.

As I said, the husband is the gatekeeper. I don't mind dealing with him exclusively at the outset. However, once that gate is opened, I prefer to have the most interaction with the Mrs, not the man at the gate. I am not averse to forming a friendship with the Mister. I have done that. But I don't like a husband who imposes his presence throughout, to the ironic extent of becoming intrusive.
 
Honesty is one of the most important elements in any interaction, and it forms the foundation of all worthwhile relationships. And rightfully, honesty can only be repaid in kind, same as respect, loyalty, friendship, love, etc.

Good on you for refusing to proceed when you detect red flags. Many guys too often let their little head overrule their larger head in those situations. And that's when drama has a chance to steal the stage.

As I said, the husband is the gatekeeper. I don't mind dealing with him exclusively at the outset. However, once that gate is opened, I prefer to have the most interaction with the Mrs, not the man at the gate. I am not averse to forming a friendship with the Mister. I have done that. But I don't like a husband who imposes his presence throughout, to the ironic extent of becoming intrusive.
I have dealt with numerous women themselves only from start to finish telling me that "yes my husband and I have been in the lifestyle for years" or "yes we are in an open relationship"! There has been times where later on in the back of my mind I have thought have I ever been finessed and bamboozled out my BBC by a cheating woman because I only dealt with her?

I tell you what though if I did get finessed I can tell you that at least a couple of them had to have pregnancy scares the way I used to super soak that cervix!🤣😂
 
Back
Top