Immigration

And as a moderate liberal you still failed to answer my question. I mean if the ceo of walmart makes idk for example lets say an annual salary of 10 million i mean should the lowly cashier which i am sure you would consider a have not make like what 500k a year.....i mean how small should the gap be.

again logic should apply here...something you and 2bi seem to have none of....no one is saying a cahier should be making the same as the CEO of a company....but both of you seem to have a problem with the amount of handouts we give to those people.....if they were paid a decent LIVING wage to begin with...they wouldn't need those benefits!

lets look at wal mart since you brought it up...…..how much money are they worth and how much did they make last year.....A BUNCH...and yet the gov gives them a subsidy for hiring low educated workers...we give them a lot of money!
and to go along with that......the workers do not make enough to live on without some kind of housing help and food stamps!

YOU DON'T SEE SOMETHING WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?

why are we giving money to both parties?

Wal Mart is going to hire the cheap labor even if we didn't give them money to do so
they wouldn't have such a huge profit margin if they paid a living wage and we could cut out paying both parties!
 
America's poor becoming more destitute under Trump: U.N. expert




By Stephanie Nebehay,Reuters

GENEVA (Reuters) - Poverty in the United States is extensive and deepening under the Trump administration whose policies seem aimed at removing the safety net from millions of poor people, while rewarding the rich, a U.N. human rights investigator has found.
Philip Alston, U.N. special rapporteur on extreme poverty, called on U.S. authorities to provide solid social protection and address underlying problems, rather than "punishing and imprisoning the poor".

While welfare benefits and access to health insurance are being slashed, President Donald Trump's tax reform has awarded "financial windfalls" to the mega-rich and large companies, further increasing inequality, he said in a report.
U.S. policies since President Lyndon Johnson's war on poverty in the 1960s have been "neglectful at best," he said.
"But the policies pursued over the past year seem deliberately designed to remove basic protections from the poorest, punish those who are not in employment and make even basic health care into a privilege to be earned rather than a right of citizenship," Alston said.


Almost 41 million people or 12.7 percent live in poverty, 18.5 million in extreme poverty, and children account for one in three poor, he said. The United States has the highest youth poverty rate among industrialized countries, he added.



Its citizens live shorter and sicker lives compared to those living in all other rich democracies, eradicable tropical diseases are increasingly prevalent and it has the world's highest incarceration rate ... and the highest obesity levels in the developed world," Alston said.
However, the data from the U.S. Census Bureau he cited covers only the period through 2016, and he gave no comparative figures on the extent of poverty before and after Trump came into office in January 2017.

The Australian, a veteran U.N. rights expert and New York University law professor, will present his report to the United Nations Human Rights Council later this month.

It is based on his mission in December to several U.S. states, including rural Alabama, a slum in downtown Los Angeles, California, and the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico.

A U.S. official in Geneva, asked for comment, told Reuters: "The Trump Administration has made it a priority to provide economic opportunity for all Americans."
"SHAMEFUL STATISTICS"

Citing "shameful statistics" linked to entrenched racial discrimination, Alston said that African Americans are 2.5 times more likely than whites to live in poverty and their unemployment rate is more than double. Women, Hispanics, immigrants, and indigenous people also suffer high rates.
At least 550,000 people are homeless in America, he said.

"The tax reform will worsen this situation and ensure that the United States remains the most unequal society in the developed world," Alston said. "The planned dramatic cuts in welfare will essentially shred crucial dimensions of a safety net that is already full of holes."



The tax overhaul, which sailed through the Republican-controlled U.S. Congress in December, permanently cut the top corporate rate to 21 percent from 35 percent. Tax cuts for individuals, however, are temporary and expire after 2025.
Trump has said they will lead to more take-home pay for workers and has touted bonuses some workers received from their employers as evidence the law is working.

Alston dismissed allegations of widespread fraud in the welfare system and criticized the U.S. criminal justice system. It sets large bail bonds for a defendant seeking to go free pending trial, meaning wealthy suspects can afford bail while the poor remain in custody, often losing their jobs, he said.

"There is no magic recipe for eliminating extreme poverty and each level of government must make its own good-faith decisions. At the end of the day, however, particularly in a rich country like the United States, the persistence of extreme poverty is a political choice made by those in power," he said.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/americas-poor-becoming-more-destitute-under-trump-u-110313048.html
 
Unfiltered: ‘Raising wages [doesn’t] ******* jobs. It's just a thing rich people say to poor people.’


When Nick Hanauer was just 7, his ******* made sure he and his brother knew every aspect of the family business. Afterschool and summer vacation activities included doing small jobs at the family’s Seattle-based pillow and down comforter company, Pacific Coast Feather. “I’m pretty deeply acquainted with what that kind of work is and what it’s like,” says Hanauer, “but I’ve [also] worked sort of doing all kinds of jobs in a variety of companies.”

Today, Hanauer is a self-made billionaire. He made his money as a serial entrepreneur and venture capitalist and has also created a broad array of companies ranging from e-commerce software to biotechnology. Hanauer’s business acumen has allowed him to become one of the wealthiest Americans — the so-called 1 percent — but it has also made him an unlikely champion of the poor and a passionate advocate for the advancement of economic equality in the U.S.

“If you’re a middle-class person and feel like the country has left you behind, that is an objective truth. That didn’t happen by accident.”


Hanauer is aware that some form of economic inequality is an essential part of a healthy economy. “That’s not in dispute,” he says. The question, however, is how much of it should exist. In the late 1970s, the richest 1 percent of Americans shared only about 8 percent of the national income. By 2007, however, that number had grown to almost 23 percent, while the income share of the bottom 50 percent had fallen from about 20 percent to about 12 percent in 2015.

“It doesn’t take a mathematical genius to see that if that trend continues, we will no longer have really a capitalist economy or a democracy,” notes Hanauer. He believes there are multiple factors contributing to the probleme: trickle-down tax policies, dwindling overtime pay and decreasing wages. “There is no excuse for any company in America to pay their workers so little that they need food stamps, and Medicaid and rent assistance,” explains Hanauer. “This is bulls***.”

“That’s not capitalism. That’s socialism for the rich.”

According to Hanauer, all businesses share the same “econo-erotic fantasy”: “My customers will all be rich and be paid a lot by their employers. My workers, sadly, will not be paid a lot, so my margins are very high. I’ll exist in this world where my workers need food stamps, sadly, but my customers are wealthy enough to both buy my stuff and pay the taxes that will fund the food stamps.” Hanauer appreciates the appeal of the fantasy, but there is one problem: “If everybody gets that deal, then you have no economy anymore.” However, Hanauer believes this crisis is a direct result of “policies enacted by governments from both the right and left.”

When President Trump signed the GOP tax bill on December 20, 2017, he touted it as the coming of “jobs, jobs, jobs.” And while Republicans have said that the bill will benefit the middle class and spark job growth by giving corporations permanent tax cuts, Hanauer says that those claims are far from the truth. “Rich people no more create jobs than farmers create tomatoes. The economy generates jobs, not rich people,” he explains. “The more money consumers have, the more jobs that are created, because people buy things and people like me are required to hire people in order to meet that demand.”

In order for those consumers to get the money needed to buy the products, they would have to have that money in the first place — which is why Hanauer believes every state should institute a $15 minimum wage, which he successfully lobbied for in the state of Washington. “The idea that raising wages kills jobs lies in the face of all common sense. If people don’t have any money, who will buy the stuff?” And even though Hanauer was one of the first investors in Amazon, he holds Jeff Bezos to the same standard he would to any CEO who runs a successful business empire. “Until we collectively raise standards so that we require Jeff Bezos to pay his workers enough to get by without food stamps, it’s not his obligation to do that unilaterally,” he says. “Certainly, that’s not what Walmart is doing, or Walgreens, or any of his competitors … and I think that’s a problem.”

The availability of overtime is another area Hanauer believes should be a key labor protection for the middle class: In 1975, more than 65 percent of salaried American workers earned time-and-a-half pay for every hour worked over the week’s allotted 40 hours. By 2013, however, only 11 percent of salaried workers qualified for overtime pay — which means employees can be made to work over 40 hours a week without getting paid their time and a half.

Hanauer says this causes more jobs to be taken out of the economy and a softening of the labor market, making it harder for workers to negotiate higher wages. He explains, “If you do that 30, 40, or 50 million times across the economy, you have turned three jobs at 40 hours a week into two jobs at 60 hours a week, millions of times. That’s a way to … take 20 million jobs out of the economy.”

Ultimately, Hanauer believes people should call their elected representatives and demand policies that create wage-and-overtime increases and reject cutting taxes for wealthy corporations, “[Don’t] get conned by this trickle-down nonsense that raising wages kills jobs — It doesn’t. It’s just a thing rich people say to poor people to keep rich people rich and poor people poor.”

“It’s a lie. Don’t believe it.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/unfilter...ng-rich-people-say-poor-people-184825813.html
 
no one is saying they should....but they should be paid enough that gov does not have to subsidize the wages with housing and food subsidies either

Maybe so but how. Not to many employers are gonna pay someone 18 or 20 dollars an hour to sweep a floor.
 
that's called being a SCAB....a freeloader on the backs of others that have worked and paid for the wages and benefits that you are getting for free!

You have no idea what your talking about. Its called a professional position. We have a union workforce i dont work in the shop i work in a professional office position.
 
again logic should apply here...something you and 2bi seem to have none of....no one is saying a cahier should be making the same as the CEO of a company....but both of you seem to have a problem with the amount of handouts we give to those people.....if they were paid a decent LIVING wage to begin with...they wouldn't need those benefits!

lets look at wal mart since you brought it up...…..how much money are they worth and how much did they make last year.....A BUNCH...and yet the gov gives them a subsidy for hiring low educated workers...we give them a lot of money!
and to go along with that......the workers do not make enough to live on without some kind of housing help and food stamps!

YOU DON'T SEE SOMETHING WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?

why are we giving money to both parties?

Wal Mart is going to hire the cheap labor even if we didn't give them money to do so
they wouldn't have such a huge profit margin if they paid a living wage and we could cut out paying both parties!

I dont see walmart being a living wage type job....never have. People should asprire for bigger and better things
 
then pay your janitors a living wage....you can't have it both ways!

If you have no skill and no education then you shouldnt expect to make 20 dollars an hour. Just not how the world works.

Just what we want is a country full of janitors making 20 an hours ....America would go backwards in terms of civilization.

No incentive for education and to better yourself if you can make 20 bucks an hour sweeping a floor.
 
then who sweeps the floors?
you really are being ...or already are...a friggn idiot!

There will always be someone who needs a job and thats who will take those jobs. Then they move on to a better job.

Just like i did when i worked in fast food as a kid. I finished school and got a better job and etc etc.
 
The same people that sweep them now.

but wait...we are paying and subsidizing their wages....can't have that!
like talking to a fucking rock
Janitors sanitation workers...all jobs no one wants..but we have to have....and they also are entitled to a living wage...they can pay the CEO's millions and can't pay a janitor who cleans up after their sorry ass 20 bucks an hour?
not allot of logic there
 
Back
Top