MrUKBlack100
Male
Never changed anything. What you said is a white racist talking point.
So let me take a wild guess. You’ll concede that blacks are better at bouncing balls, running fast, and brute strength and also funny, but not that smart. Asians are human calculators and are therefore good at science. They’re smart, but can’t think individually and aren’t creative.
But whites are really the genetically chosen ones.
What a surprise
The people who have the best mix of genes and abilities to make them the natural leaders of the world. Their genetics makes them overall dominant, even if they do make a few small concessions to other races here and there
Right ?
Never called you a fascist. Don't put words in my mouth. I'm saying you are coming with a fascist argument. And facts means nothing without context
It's a fact that more ppl die in cars than are killed by crocs. But that does not mean I'd rather be in room with a croc than a car ? Nope
We never really drill down to the nuts and bolts that need to be asked of ppl like yourself and you kind of like that.
You can always claim ideological martyr status for being shouted down as being iconoclasts in the
public square and pretend that marginalized trash are actually hidden gems of knowledge only they and a select few others can see
You know that as long as you act civilized and talk about “science” and "genes" and "IQ" you can still sneak around the halls of Academia and be safe. In fact, you can slip it into a conversation at the cocktail parties, “By the way, I am a race realist” unlike “by the way, I'm a racist”.
Do you even know what a scientific fact is ?
A scientific fact is that rain water freezes at 0°C at a pressure of 1 bar.
There’s no human choice involved. It’s observable and reproducible anywhere by anybody in the exact same way.
In natural science, only one single significant deviation is enough to render the claim at least disputable, at worst invalid.
And how about white people ? They're certainly less genetically diverse than Blacks, but they obviously have genetic variance between say… Scandinavians and Italians or Anglo Saxons and Spaniards… but evidently, those genetic differences are somehow never linked to intelligence.
Why don't you theorize on which group of White people are the least intelligent.
No !
That's only used for talking about black ppl. Right ?
Who are the genetically dumber and disadvantaged Whites ? If there is enough genetic difference for whites to have different hair color, eye color and different average height, then why not intelligence ?
The answer is because this is not science, it’s politics and to ask that question doesn't serve the political goals of racist Whites.
You don’t want to face the idea that you might belong to the dumbest group of White people in your little hierarchy. So you theorize that “Whiteness” simply makes all Whites just as capable, and all Blacks equally disadvantaged
And I bet you don't talk like that when it comes to white people inventions.
See when whites do good, all of a sudden guys like you probably run around bragging "We invented the light bulb" blah now when it comes to the bad ? "Hey !! I was never part of it !!"
But if you think science can settle moral questions, then you need only look at the different scientific opinions over something like climate change / global warming to see how there is no one scientific opinion on any moral issue
Really ? So a person like who believes blk ppl on average are less intelligent would nonetheless be able to fairly evaluate black job applicants, or potential tenants, or loan applicants
Yeah right
Don't put words in my mouth. I'm just disagreeing with you.
So why in neurology does no one take IQ seriously ?.
Neurologists who have a better understanding of how the brain works because they spend decades of their lives studying it have little to no use for it, but to the public at large it is so important.
Alfred Binet created the IQ test’s to see which children weren’t profiting from the Parisian school
system, not so that they could be labelled stupid but so new educational programs could be created to help those children.
He was afraid that his tests would be misused for nepharious reasons, and Alfred must have been psychic because once the certain people got a hold of it, it took on a whole new meaning.
And if IQ is so important not drive their arguments to their conclusions that is :
Why aren't they demanding that everything is based on IQ ?
President elections ? Just give them an IQ and whoever scores highest get's the gig. Drivers licences ? Passports ?All jobs based on IQ ?
But they never do because they know deep down no one can be baked to number
Serial Killer Ted Bundy apparently had an IQ in the 140's, genius level in your world. But I guess a man who used to slit women from throat to vagina is intelligent. He's a superior being right ?
Once again. Don't put words in my mouth. You are assuming that we think like white racists.
If we had a blk hospital and a white person needed treatment. We would treat that white person, and we wouldn’t use whites as Guinea pigs in blk hospitals, the same way whites use blks as guinea pigs in white hospitals
We would not fight harder to save a blk life in blk hospitals the way whites fight harder to save a white life in white hospitals
We would not rip your CV's and resumes the same way whites rip up CV's and resume of blk ppl
We would not allow a blk Police f.orce to b.lo.w the Brains out of unarmed white ppl and walk free. The same way white ppl allow a white police f.orce to b.lo.w the brains out of blk ppl n walk free.
Black ppl could never treat white ppl. The way whites have treated blk ppl
God just didn’t make us that way. He just didn’t give us that heart.
Last edited:
