For those of you who fear a Ted Cruz Presidency ....

[Hand Solo]

Well,
1. I think you would not be here, like the rest of us, if you didn't have at least a little perv in you. lol
2. If people are really saying that, they are maroons. Unfortunately, even as much as we try, we cannot legislate against stupidity.

Sort of like when descendants of immigrants think it´s totally OK to prevent other folks from elsewhere from coming here. Such an effed up concept.

Like if you visit someone´s house, make yourself at home and determine it´s your job to answer when the doorbell rings and decide who is and who isn´t allowed to come in for a visit just like you.

I don´t get it...but then if i had a time machine and some TnT? bye-bye Columbus, you dirty rotten asshole!!!

 

[Hand Solo]

Sort of like when descendants of immigrants think it´s totally OK to prevent other folks from elsewhere from coming here. Such an effed up concept.

Like if you visit someone´s house, make yourself at home and determine it´s your job to answer when the doorbell rings and decide who is and who isn´t allowed to come in for a visit just like you.

I don´t get it...but then if i had a time machine and some TnT? bye-bye Columbus, you dirty rotten asshole!!!

Wow! sorry to all for that unwarranted outburst...def a bit overboard, lol. . i´m better now...well, for me.

 

[falcondfw69]

I wonder how the Cruz naysayers are feeling after Iowa? And the Trump supporters? The Hillary supporters must be shaking in their boots with how well Sanders did.

 

[Alanm]

All those acclimates and still considered one of the biggest assholes in Washington.
Too bad he's not a natural citizen and not legally eligible to become President.

I like Ted Cruz.....Canadian or not he makes the most sense of any candidate on either side.

 

[MacNfries]

I like Ted Cruz.....Canadian or not he makes the most sense of any candidate on either side.

Why?
I want to make sure we're talking about the same Ted Cruz ... the one that denies FEMA assistance to New Jersey after a major hurricane, then demands it when emergency assistance is needed in Texas? The one that reads Green Eggs & Ham on the Senate floor and damages the Nation's credit rating while trying to shut down the government and wants to do it AGAIN? The one that has tried 62 times to rescind the ACA with no alternative? The one who is the most disliked Senator in Washington and has caused fragmentation of a once proud Republican party? The one that signed a "no new tax" pledge with Grover Norquist, a non-elected, non-government official of Washington, making it impossible for a 2-party system to sit down and work out solutions to the country? The one that constantly plugs "authenticity" yet isn't authentic himself? The one who takes his orders from Jim Demint and the Heritage Foundation? The one that stands on the Senate floor and calls other Senate members liars? The one responsible for dragging the Republicans to single-digit popularity in Washington ... never before heard of in history?
THAT Ted Cruz? Heck, he's no different from TRUMP ... playing off ideological comforting of pissed off voters who feel they have no where else to turn. He's a radical nut case, just like Sarah Palin, and couldn't negotiate the price of a new car from a car salesman.
for sending us Ted Cruz ... NOT! He's already caused this country "billions of dollars" in his gameful stupidities.

 

[falcondfw69]

I want to make sure we're talking about the same Ted Cruz ... the one that denies FEMA assistance to New Jersey after a major hurricane, then demands it when emergency assistance is needed in Texas?

I already explained that one. It is about paying for it. It is about being outside the agency's budget vs. within the agency's budget. Stop hammering a dead cow. It's dead already and we have enough hamburger for the winter.

The one that reads Green Eggs & Ham on the Senate floor and damages the Nation's credit rating while trying to shut down the government and wants to do it AGAIN?

The two are totally separate and distinct incidents. STOP WITH THE HALF-TRUTHS!!!!!

The one that has tried 62 times to rescind the ACA with no alternative?

In this case, STOP WITH THE LIES!!! The attempts were made by the House Of Representatives. Ted Cruz is a Senator.

The one who is the most disliked Senator in Washington and has caused fragmentation of a once proud Republican party?

If you stand on principle, it is very easy to become disliked and hated when so many of your colleagues are dirty.

The one that signed a "no new tax" pledge with Grover Norquist, a non-elected, non-government official of Washington, making it impossible for a 2-party system to sit down and work out solutions to the country?

Again, he is standing on principle. A LOT of Congress could learn from his good example.

The one that constantly plugs "authenticity" yet isn't authentic himself? The one who takes his orders from Jim Demint and the Heritage Foundation?

Proof of either?

The one that stands on the Senate floor and calls other Senate members liars?

If they don't want to be called it, don't do what he is calling them.

The one responsible for dragging the Republicans to single-digit popularity in Washington ... never before heard of in history?

Number 1, I would like to see proof that Congress's rating has never been that low before.
Number 2, God he must be such a powerful person to drag down, by himself, the rating of such an already low rated group of public servants.

THAT Ted Cruz? Heck, he's no different from TRUMP ... playing off ideological comforting of pissed off voters who feel they have no where else to turn. He's a radical nut case, just like Sarah Palin, and couldn't negotiate the price of a new car from a car salesman.

for sending us Ted Cruz ... NOT! He's already caused this country "billions of dollars" in his gameful stupidities.

Why would he want the endorsement of a pseudo-conservative like Palin, when he can get the endorsement of a true conservative, like Col. Allan West?

Proof of the amount of money Cruz has "cost" this country? It's so easy to make crap up. Like, Mac cost this forum millions of dollars in memberships with his acidity, lies, and half-truths.

Again, you offer only slander, lies, and half-truths to fit your narrative. And why would you even care who Ted Cruz is or who the Republican party runs in the general? Especially since you are such a flaming liberal Socialist? Why would it matter?

There is only one reason you are pushing Trump. Because you know what a joke he is and you know either Hillary or Bernie will beat him like a drum. The reason you try to spread your hate-speech about Ted Cruz, even thought you have no affiliation with or interest in the Republican party, is because you know he will absolutely crush either Hillary or Bernie in the general.

You claim to want me to stop addressing you and I told you how to accomplish that. Stop addressing me, stop the lies, and slander, and half-truths and I will have no reason to address you. I guess you just couldn't help yourself.

 

[MacNfries]

Number 1, I would like to see proof that Congress's rating has never been that low before.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...e-digit-approval-rating-for-congress-too-high
http://www.gallup.com/poll/156662/Congress-Approval-Ties-Time-Low.aspx
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/09/congress-approval-rating_n_4069899.html

Why would he want the endorsement of a pseudo-conservative like Palin, when he can get the endorsement of a true conservative, like Col. Allan West?

Who said anything about "endorsements"? Reading required here.

There is only one reason you are pushing Trump. Because you know what a joke he is and you know either Hillary or Bernie will beat him like a drum. The reason you try to spread your hate-speech about Ted Cruz, even thought you have no affiliation with or interest in the Republican party, is because you know he will absolutely crush either Hillary or Bernie in the general.

Where have I been pushing Trump? I could care less whether Trump is the GOP elective or Cruz or Rubio or anyone else. As far as any current running GOP candidate beating Hillary ... THAT is to be proven in the fall. Hang around!

You claim to want me to stop addressing you and I told you how to accomplish that. Stop addressing me, stop the lies, and slander, and half-truths and I will have no reason to address you. I guess you just couldn't help yourself.

For one, I told you IF you couldn't address me without NAME CALLING ... and second, this post is NOT addressing you, I was responding to Alanm . Again, READING Required, here ... I'll give you One Thousand Dollars if it shows I addressed YOU, and thirdly, you WON'T tell me what to do or not do. I said I would address you IF you addressed me ... again, Reading Required. I have no intention of addressing YOU if your comment is not directed or about me ... comprende'? (read that carefully and slowly for comprehension, ok?)

 

[MacNfries]

 

[falcondfw69]

For one, I told you IF you couldn't address me without NAME CALLING ... and second, this post is NOT addressing you, I was responding to Alanm . Again, READING Required, here ... I'll give you One Thousand Dollars if it shows I addressed YOU, and thirdly, you WON'T tell me what to do or not do. I said I would address you IF you addressed me ... again, Reading Required. I have no intention of addressing YOU if your comment is not directed or about me ... comprende'? (read that carefully and slowly for comprehension, ok?)

Correct. Reading Comprehension required. Look at the list of things you need to do to stop getting me to address you. You lied and told half-truths. As far as telling you what to do, you asked how to get me to stop addressing you and I have told you over and over how to do it. You are like the little kid who doesn't want to be punished. You say "Daddy, how can I get you to stop punishing me?". I say "well, *******, just don't do that and follow the rules. They ain't changed since you was born.". And you promptly go back to doing "that". Conclusion: you like the punishment and the attention.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...e-digit-approval-rating-for-congress-too-high
http://www.gallup.com/poll/156662/Congress-Approval-Ties-Time-Low.aspx
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/09/congress-approval-rating_n_4069899.html

Only the middle one shows the questioning methodology used. We both know you can skew a poll any way you want by asking the same question in a slightly different manner, but I take your point. Thank you.

Who said anything about "endorsements"? Reading required here.

Maybe I did read it too fast. My apologies. But my point is still a valid one.

Where have I been pushing Trump? I could care less whether Trump is the GOP elective or Cruz or Rubio or anyone else. As far as any current running GOP candidate beating Hillary ... THAT is to be proven in the fall. Hang around!

You have been defending Trump rather vigorously, but, as you say, the proof will be this fall.

As for your graphic, again, #2 is impossible, because that is SENATOR Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. The votes were taken by the House. And I find it interesting that there is no source listed on the meme or graphic.

 

[Freffy]

Queen Elizabeth II would be the perfect US Head of State

 

[MacNfries]

Look at the list of things you need to do to stop getting me to address you. You lied and told half-truths. As far as telling you what to do, you asked how to get me to stop addressing you and I have told you over and over how to do it. You are like the little kid who doesn't want to be punished. You say "Daddy, how can I get you to stop punishing me?". I say "well, *******, just don't do that and follow the rules. They ain't changed since you was born.". And you promptly go back to doing "that". Conclusion: you like the punishment and the attention.

You've really got mental issues, falcond, and I"m serious. Still, that does not give you the right or authority to SET CONDITIONS to posters who are NOT posting responses to YOU.

Only the middle one shows the questioning methodology used. We both know you can skew a poll any way you want by asking the same question in a slightly different manner, but I take your point. Thank you.

Now WHY does THIS not surprise me any? Face it, your paranoia has convinced you that the media just simply hates Republicans, right? This is the reason why I have provided fewer and fewer attachments/references ... because it matters not, you and your delusional party simply deny-deny-deny and just keep on repeating your mistakes. Sort of like the Wizard Of Oz when the curtain is pulled back and Dorothy see's who is speaking ... "never mind the man behind that curtain" so says the Wizard in the microphone.

You have been defending Trump rather vigorously, but, as you say, the proof will be this fall.

"defending Trump rather vigorously" ... LOL, surely you have some proof of that????? There may an issue or two I've agreed (my opinion) with Trump, but to say i'm "defending him rather vigorously?" Again, its your delusionary, state of mind that you are obviously in. I keep telling you to see your doctor and get back on medication. You truly are an ill person. You know, IF you had "Obamacare" (((giggles))), preventive & psychiatric care would be covered under the health plan at 100%, no deductibles or co-insurances and you could afford to get back on your medications. You need to check that out.

As for your graphic, again, #2 is impossible, because that is SENATOR Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. The votes were taken by the House. And I find it interesting that there is no source listed on the meme or graphic .

Actually, I thought the graphic was really cute ... the fact is that these Benghazi hearings, ACA votes in the House, and lowering of the US credit rating (all Republican antics because they've done nothing else for the country), cost the tax payers ... a huge amount of money. And it would be one thing to have 2 or 3, or even 4 votes and move on, but not Republicans ... 9 Benghazi committee hearings, 62 ACA congressional votes ... and it continues and continues. Never ends ... sort of like your continued harassment of me. And WHY does it continue, because they have NOTHING ELSE to do so they try to draw attention AWAY from their dysfunctional Congress ... the one that ran on 'jobs, jobs, jobs'.

What Republicans have accomplished in the House & Senate ........ "scratching their balls"

 

[falcondfw69]

Something for everyone to consider:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ted-cruz-natural-born-illinois_us_56b10542e4b0a1b96203f393

 

[MacNfries]

Something for everyone to consider:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ted-cruz-natural-born-illinois_us_56b10542e4b0a1b96203f393

And who died and made the Illinois Board Of Elections GOD? The ONLY ONE that can legitimize Cruz's eligibility is the Supreme Court ... unless, of course the Illinois Board of Elections somehow supercedes the US Supreme Court authority. You wouldn't have something on THAT would you?

 

[Angiebaby8]

.....Cruz is NOT a "natural born citizen" of the US. In fact, when he was born in Canada, in 1970, both his parents held citizenships with CANADA.
.....Cruz, himself, calls himself a "naturalist" to the Constitution, so his own beliefs disqualify HIMSELF. What he believes and what he's requesting is the same thing that disqualifies him. In the Constitution, Cruz has a problem with "birthright citizenship", has problems with the 2nd Amendment, has a problem with Gay Rights BUT, doesn't have the same problem with staying true to the definition of a Natural Born Citizen? Kind of a "fair weather" politician, actually. The definition of Natural Born comes from the British Common Laws of the 1780's-1790's ... timely for when the Constitution was being written and by who was writing them. The British could define Natural Born IF you dared ask them.
.....Let's face it, Ted Cruz simply plays fast & loose with the interpretations of the Constitution when it Benefits HIM ... if he's a true "naturalist" to the writings of the Constitution as he SAYS HE IS, then he's disqualified himself as being eligible to run for President.
In Ted Cruz's situation, it is so deservingly, just called .... KARMA!
The ONLY ones that can NOW determine if he is truly eligible to be PRESIDENT is the Supreme Court.
However, I'd love Cruz or Trump, either one, to be the GOP selection for the General Election. It gives the voters a nice, clean, distinctive LINE from which to choose.

View attachment 757054

ps ... Cruz sponsored 97 bills and got HOW MANY passed? Anyone can sponsor a shitload of bills to draw attention to himself.
His signing off on 62 different attempts to appeal Obamacare disqualifies him as logical, and his holding the government budget hostage and purposely damaging the US credit rating but failing at accomplish what he wanted it to do, THEN wanting to do it all over again, should have resulted in his being removed from the Senate for being insane . He has cost the US government "$billions" in his stupidity ... and unlike Obama, HIS were done ON PURPOSE.

He's simply a Tea Party nut case! Main stream Republicans hate him as much as Obama and Democrats. He and his T-P are the primary reason Republicans have accomplished NOTHING in Washington and have a single digit popularity rate right now. With Cruz, it is "His Way Or The Highway" ... he even has signed the Grover Norquist (a private citizen just like us) "no new tax" pledge.

Gotta disagree with u Mac on the citizenship issue

 

[MacNfries]

Cruz defines himself as a "naturalist" ... and if so, the very fact that he wasn't born in the US makes him ineligible. So is he a naturalist or is he a natural born citizen? If he legitimizes himself for POTUS, then he's not a naturalist, and that puts a whole bunch of ISSUES that Cruz has argued against because he said he WAS a naturalist ... like "same sex marriage" back on the table.

 

[falcondfw69]

You've really got mental issues, falcond, and I"m serious. Still, that does not give you the right or authority to SET CONDITIONS to posters who are NOT posting responses to YOU.

Is it really that hard for you not to lie, slander, or tell half-truths?

Now WHY does THIS not surprise me any? Face it, your paranoia has convinced you that the media just simply hates Republicans, right? This is the reason why I have provided fewer and fewer attachments/references ... because it matters not, you and your delusional party simply deny-deny-deny and just keep on repeating your mistakes. Sort of like the Wizard Of Oz when the curtain is pulled back and Dorothy see's who is speaking ... "never mind the man behind that curtain" so says the Wizard in the microphone.

What the F is your issue? I admitted you proved your point. You can't even take praise. Pathetic.

I keep telling you to see your doctor and get back on medication. You truly are an ill person. You know, IF you had "Obamacare" (((giggles))), preventive & psychiatric care would be covered under the health plan at 100%, no deductibles or co-insurances and you could afford to get back on your medications. You need to check that out.

You know, I had the opportunity to get on Obamacare through my employer and turned it down. Why pay $400+ per month for a plan that doesn't even cover 1/3 of what I need? I would rather pay cash and take the cash discount my doctor offers. I have explained this to you before, but obviously, you are too thick to grasp the concept.

You seem to be inordinately concerned with my mental health. One of these days, you are going to pull out the mental card on someone with true mental problems and they are going to go off on you or worse, justifiably. You bandy about these labels not caring or knowing who you are addressing. One of these days, you will regret your opinionistic, narcissistic, arrogant ways.

No, actually most of Congress did not run on jobs, jobs, jobs. They ran on Tea Party principles, including repealing Obamacare (excuse me, ACA. Will you please make up your mind what you want to call it?), and they have been a great disappointment.

 

[MacNfries]

Gotta disagree with u Mac on the citizenship issue

That's fine, Angie ... just take a few sentences to explain WHY you disagree. But, please be sure to understand what a "naturalist" means, and then how the requirements for the POTUS are written.

 

[falcondfw69]

Cruz defines himself as a "naturalist" ... and if so, the very fact that he wasn't born in the US makes him ineligible. So is he a naturalist or is he a natural born citizen? If he legitimizes himself for POTUS, then he's not a naturalist, and that puts a whole bunch of ISSUES that Cruz has argued against because he said he WAS a naturalist ... like "same sex marriage" back on the table.

It is amazing how widely you define Natural-Born Citizen when it is your man, Obama and how narrowly you define it when it is someone you are afraid of, like Ted Cruz. You can't have it both ways, Mac. People are waking up to your BS.

 

[MacNfries]

It is amazing how widely you define Natural-Born Citizen when it is your man, Obama and how narrowly you define it when it is someone you are afraid of, like Ted Cruz. You can't have it both ways, Mac. People are waking up to your BS.

Last time I heard, Obama was born in Hawaii which is a part of the US ... you have PROOF ... FACTS that dispute that? Not fabrications ... but real facts? Because if you did, the Republicans would have it as well, and Obama wouldn't even be the President right now.

 

[Angiebaby8]

He is naturalized by virtue of his mothers birth in America. It's no different than if you were born in Germany while your parents were in the military. You would have dual citizenship.