What about Caribbean men?
I agree most women do not care where the cock is from but not all of you are hung lol and many of those who are hung do not know how to use their cocks let alone their fingers and tongues. It is a shame to have a dick and not know how to give pleasure with itI don't think most women care. African, American Black, Caribbean, we're all hung! Lol!
wife and I had several guys from the Islands and they were lots of funWhat about Caribbean men?
laid back, and just there to enjoy lifewife and I had several guys from the Islands and they were lots of fun
I agree most women do not care where the cock is from but not all of you are hung lol and many of those who are hung do not know how to use their cocks let alone their fingers and tongues. It is a shame to have a dick and not know how to give pleasure with it
Been to a few countries in Africa, and I am still calling bull *******.I would suggest you actually visit a few African countries and observe for yourself the difference between different regions
it is also about cuckolding and a bunch of other stuff , my wife had swx with 25 black men over time and if I never knew about it so what but because I was involved and got to know these guys and often suck them and other things it made it different. I would rather if people had conversations about what they did or wanted to do and how it worked out... Y'all really take stuff seriously on a website about Black men hooking up with White women, huh?
So what? I'm sure you are a very special little snow flake. Useless argument.Really? i don`t! Just because there are opinions in some groups of politics, the media or devised by someone`s upbringing doesn`t mean that`s ALL humans and we are ALL resistant to learning and EVERYONE has their eyes closed to the hard facts.
Again there is no misconception, you are just confused. There are just arbitrary in out out groups when you look at genetics only. But this social construct is not defined by genetics but by culture, skin color, class etc.Exactly. A social misconception then. But any social construct depends on society and society is constantly changing and depends on its individuals. It is not what it is, it`s what we make it.
Right. It was adjusted to the absence of different races within the human species.
Races are defined by groupwise genetic difference in a way that EACH individual member of one race group is genetically closer to ANY member of the same group than to ANY member of the other racial group.
Just because you think people should not see skin color does not mean pretty much everyone else does. If you think you have no subconscious stereotypes of people with a certain skin color, knock your socks off and pat yourself on the back, I don't care.An example from the ******* kingdom would be lions and tigers. They are capable of creating offspring "interchangeably", hence belong to the same species. Yet you would not find one tiger that is genetically closer to a lion than to any of the other tigers. (At least that`s what scientists assume at this point, as they haven`t found one tiger-lion pair yet that would break the race definition, and all of them show quite diverse genetic differences. )
With humans this is totally different. You will find many, many triples where two individuals belonging to supposed different groups are genetically more similar than another member of the same supposed group as one of the former two. For instance, you may observe two black men being genetically more different than one of them compared to a particular white man, taking the overall set of genes into account.
Of course the two black men will share a small set of genes that`s responsible for their type of skin complexion, but that`s only an insignificant small number. Would that be enough to call it a race, we could define an arbitrary number of race groups depending on what particular genetic portion we are looking at. This way we could "partition" the human species into different races simply by definition, for example...
- brown eyed race vs.
- blue eyed race;
- "black" skinned race vs.
- "white" skinned race vs.
- "yellow" skinned race;
- brunette haired race vs.
- blond haired race vs.
- redhead race;
- lactose intolerant race (if intolerance has genetic reasons) vs.
- lactose tolerant race;
This would lead to "overlapping races" what i think obviously makes no sense at all!
- ... (you can find many more examples, just be inventive! )
Regards.
Evidently you'be never been to the USAfor some reason my preference look like :
1. nigerian man
2. rest african man
3. amerikan black man
that is what many men think but if a man wants to please a woman he has to aks her and listen to heri see here very big discussion, and what interesting between man nothing from woman, exactly man better know what prefer woman, xa xa xa
yes you right but anyway they differentJust a little logical correction: Nigerian men are too African men.
that's pretty good... seems like the gals SHOULD be answering the question ... instead most of the input seems to be from someone... who really doesn't know... just has an idea.... I THINK I know what my wife likes.... but I'm sure I don't know all!i see here very big discussion, and what interesting between man nothing from woman, exactly man better know what prefer woman, xa xa xa
You are absolutely right. But if someone asks the question: a white woman prefers a Nigerian man or an African man, this dichotomy is a bit meaningless. Lack more accurately. Africa is a continent full of cultural and human diversity. It would be better to ask prefers a Nigerian, an Angolan, a black or white South African, and so on. Even within Nigeria there are various ethnic groups:Hausa, Fulani, Yoruba and Igbo, etcIf I was born in Nigeria would I be a Nigerian man, I know Libyans are African and so are Boers so Annslut could fuck an African man who is dutch descent