Cuck in cage at the beach

When I had a metal cage (a BON 4) and would be outside in my own yard with a thong swimsuit on, the cage did heat up badly even though the cage itself was not directly exposed to the sun (I live in Florida, so the sunlight is pretty strong). So my GF allowed me to switch to a plastic cage when I'd go lay out. I can't begin to imagine what a metal cage would feel like in the direct sunlight at Haulover Beach, for example.
I still have hubby in a metal cage at the beach. It forces him to get up and go in the water to cool off. Sometimes I take ice from the cooler and apply it to his marbles.
 
@LockedHubbyTX ; (Actually to anyone who can answer my question). We are new to the B2W site, so I want the get clarification before I take any action.

It appears that this site allows the posting of media material that is not owned by the person posting it. Is that a correct statement?

The reason I ask is because you posted a copy righted photo (above) that has been taken from our blog on another site. I am the owner of that media.
Curious whether this was resolved privately or @LockedHubbyTX just ignored it kept on reposting your photo, @MM and PK ?

Obviously he's posting a lot of pics that aren't his or of him, which happens all over this site and I believe is nearly impossible to prevent, if it's even against any rule. But I would think anytime someone makes it known that a picture is theirs and being used without their permission, that the polite thing to do would be to offer to take it down.

As someone who's found pictures of my wife and I posted on sites we don't even use, sometimes with captions that mislead or alter the way a viewer might interpret the content, I am just curious where this issue went, if anywhere.
 
Last edited:
Curious whether this was resolved privately or @LockedHubbyTX just ignored it kept on reposting your photo, @MM and PK ?

Obviously he's posting a lot of pics that aren't his or of him, which happens all over this site and I believe is nearly impossible to prevent, if it's even against any rule. But I would think anytime someone makes it known that a picture is theirs and being used without their permission, that the polite thing to do would be to offer to take it down.

As someone who's found pictures of my wife and I posted on sites we don't even use, sometimes with captions that mislead or alter way a viewer might interpret the content, I am just curious where this issue went, if anywhere.
The internet is open domain. If you post something, even if it's copyrighted, someone can post that image elsewhere. The only thing they can't do is make money or promote their business using someone else's copyrighted image.
I made a bunch of cuckold artwork pieces in the mid 2000's with the knowledge that it would be used by others on the internet, modified by others, made into tattoos by others, and even monetized by some people. I wanted to create something that others could identify with. A labor of love, basically.
So if you share a hot/sexy/interesting pic on the internet, especially something that is more rare like a sexy chastity photo, expect it to be spread around.
 
The internet is open domain. If you post something, even if it's copyrighted, someone can post that image elsewhere. The only thing they can't do is make money or promote their business using someone else's copyrighted image.
I made a bunch of cuckold artwork pieces in the mid 2000's with the knowledge that it would be used by others on the internet, modified by others, made into tattoos by others, and even monetized by some people. I wanted to create something that others could identify with. A labor of love, basically.
So if you share a hot/sexy/interesting pic on the internet, especially something that is more rare like a sexy chastity photo, expect it to be spread around.
Sure. As I said, I'm not sure there's even a site rule against it, but it's not really something you can stop over the vast internet anyway. Mostly just curious about the etiquette people encounter here. Even if you have no intention of crediting anyone or worrying about who owns the stuff you post, ignoring someone completely when they say, "hey, that's mine," and then posting the same image again, further into the thread, just seemed like an interesting choice to me. It's not illegal and it may not violate any site rules, but I mean, it's a strange way to treat others on a social site you appear to enjoy using, imho.
 
Sure. As I said, I'm not sure there's even a site rule against it, but it's not really something you can stop over the vast internet anyway. Mostly just curious about the etiquette people encounter here. Even if you have no intention of crediting anyone or worrying about who owns the stuff you post, ignoring someone completely when they say, "hey, that's mine," and then posting the same image again, further into the thread, just seemed like an interesting choice to me. It's not illegal and it may not violate any site rules, but I mean, it's a strange way to treat others on a social site you appear to enjoy using, imho.
If that's something that bothers you, you can watermark your pictures in the future. That still won't stop it entirely, but it may make people respect your request a little more.
 
If that's something that bothers you, you can watermark your pictures in the future. That still won't stop it entirely, but it may make people respect your request a little more.
Yep. I don't get upset anymore when I find some of our pictures out there from time to time. I'm not looking to have our private life made public or have profile pics wind up on porn sites, but when I see something I've blogged show up on a feed somewhere with its own caption, I've come to be flattered by it. It's fun knowing that images of us are what people who are into this kind of thing want to see and share. It's fun to know that others look at what we do and think it's hot, and have given our media its own life in the femdom/chastity/cuckold culture (depending on which media they share). And you're absolutely right, I do watermark the stuff I hope will lead people back to my blog, for example.

Again, not talking about recourse options, or how to prevent having your stuff shared once you put it on the internet. I don't think the guy whose pics were posted here has any legal recourse. I'm just fascinated by the basic human behavior he brought to light. I'm never surprised to see people post stuff they found online in the open domain. I'm just surprised when someone is approached directly, and their response is to both ignore the person claiming ownership, and to post the same person's stuff again in the same thread. It's not that I wonder what should be done about it. If you need me to say it in plain terms, I just think it's kind of a dick move. How hard is it to say, "oh, this is your picture? Looks like a hot vacation you and your keyholder took! Do you want me to take it down or leave it here giving you credit?" But acting like dude never said anything at all and posting it again? I guess that's one way to act, if basic human interaction and decency just aren't your thing or whatever.
 
Last edited:
Curious whether this was resolved privately or @LockedHubbyTX just ignored it kept on reposting your photo, @MM and PK ?

Obviously he's posting a lot of pics that aren't his or of him, which happens all over this site and I believe is nearly impossible to prevent, if it's even against any rule. But I would think anytime someone makes it known that a picture is theirs and being used without their permission, that the polite thing to do would be to offer to take it down.

As someone who's found pictures of my wife and I posted on sites we don't even use, sometimes with captions that mislead or alter the way a viewer might interpret the content, I am just curious where this issue went, if anywhere.
i just post things. I don't make money on it, I don't take credit for any of it. It's simple reposts of things that are flying around on either Twitter, Reddit, Tumblr or BDSMLR - those the souces for anything I post here. I haven't gone onto any paid site and extracted copyrighted material for any sort of monetary or artistic gain.

That said, if you want that and any other posts that come from you (it is stuff tagged as " @justus " ?) to be deleted, I'll zap it and avoid posting anything that belongs to you.
 
@LockedHubbyTX ; (Actually to anyone who can answer my question). We are new to the B2W site, so I want the get clarification before I take any action.

It appears that this site allows the posting of media material that is not owned by the person posting it. Is that a correct statement?

The reason I ask is because you posted a copy righted photo (above) that has been taken from our blog on another site. I am the owner of that media.
putting a simple post of a thread did not result in any direct notification that I might notice (i tend to get a LOT of notifcations - every like, etc generates one, so a someone replied to the thread notification just gets caught up in the dozens of other, it was not a deliberate ignoring of your concern). The best way to contact someone is actually send them a msg. I believe I addressed this in something I just posted, and deleted both the posts because honestly I couldn't tell which one was yours.
 
Yep. I don't get upset anymore when I find some of our pictures out there from time to time. I'm not looking to have our private life made public or have profile pics wind up on porn sites, but when I see something I've blogged show up on a feed somewhere with its own caption, I've come to be flattered by it. It's fun knowing that images of us are what people who are into this kind of thing want to see and share. It's fun to know that others look at what we do and think it's hot, and have given our media its own life in the femdom/chastity/cuckold culture (depending on which media they share). And you're absolutely right, I do watermark the stuff I hope will lead people back to my blog, for example.

Again, not talking about recourse options, or how to prevent having your stuff shared once you put it on the internet. I don't think the guy whose pics were posted here has any legal recourse. I'm just fascinated by the basic human behavior he brought to light. I'm never surprised to see people post stuff they found online in the open domain. I'm just surprised when someone is approached directly, and their response is to both ignore the person claiming ownership, and to post the same person's stuff again in the same thread. It's not that I wonder what should be done about it. If you need me to say it in plain terms, I just think it's kind of a dick move. How hard is it to say, "oh, this is your picture? Looks like a hot vacation you and your keyholder took! Do you want me to take it down or leave it here giving you credit?" But acting like dude never said anything at all and posting it again? I guess that's one way to act, if basic human interaction and decency just aren't your thing or whatever.
speaking of the fascination of basic human behavior, color me intrigued by the consideration that writing about another supposed motivation of another member on the site without actually sending them a direct message (ya know that little envelope) is somehow considered approaching someone directly? There are two methods for direct interaction on this site, CHAT, and conversations, neither of which were employed. You relied on assumption that I might scan each and every notification or scroll back into a chat.

So if you need me to say it more plainly - I think it bit of an ASSHOLE move to have these types of conversations within the thread itself, and take away from the general enjoyment of the topic rather than do it in the private ways the site provides for. But that's just me.

Again - let me be clear -- I will respect all request to delete and avoid posting any content that any owner does not want posted. if I know it belong to someone's particular site and they WANT me to refer to that originating blog/twitter/onlyfans, etc....I can do that too.
 
Back
Top