That's an accurate observation. The LGBT national agenda may not actively seek to destroy families, but it does by default. In the heyday of wild gay abandon before AIDS, thousands of males were having completely anonymous, all-night, multi-partner, bodily fluid sex in the trucks at Christopher St piers in NYC. That is certainly not a prescription for family stability. Very few gay men are content to have only one long-term partner -- at least not before they turn about 50. The spirit of Christopher St lives on. (ps, I'm only 23, but I study history.)
The feminist movement is much more outspoken in their intention to destroy both men and the nuclear family -- and they have had measurable success. White women are taught from youth to disregard and disrespect men in the pursuit of feminism. Most white women are now foregoing marriage and family until they make it in the glass tower world. Often by then it is too late. More and more Black women are participating in the same feminist plan also. They are earning more than Black male potential partners.
Historically, the Black family has had a different set of challenges; based on well-meaning but stifling government aid, which drives out the Black fathers.
There's no denying that, but aren't they people too? Try making those observations, but substitute Interracial Relations for LGBT, or Black people for feminists. Would you still support those statements?
I'm a totally passable trans-girl, so I don't have to deal with public bigotry, but I do promote feminization as a best choice for many young whitebois. Instead of trying to tear down someone else's platform, try building up your own. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯