Utah senator proposes bill to ban internet porn in US

Carl Franklin

Male
Real Person
Gold Member
From
Canada
TAMPA, Fla. (WFLA) — Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee has proposed legislation to officially define obscenity, as it relates to free speech, in a move that would essentially make internet pornography illegal in the United States.

For legal purposes, obscenity is one of few types of speech not protected by the First Amendment, and blocked from interstate or foreign transmission by current federal law.


According to a one-page explanation by the Utah senator, the new legislation would modify the Miller test, a U.S. Supreme Court precedent from 1973 which set a way of defining material as sexual or obscene content, affecting the “prurient interest” precedent by an earlier SCOTUS ruling.

Prurient means that something either has or encourages an excessive interest in sexual matters.

The Miller test used ruled that if the average American would find content that appeals to the prurient interest, it is considered obscene.

When announcing his proposed bill, Lee said SCOTUS has “struggled to define obscenity” as it relates to free speech, and that the internet presented “serious challenges” to the Miller test.


 
That's kinda what net neutrality did to porn when it was passed ... drove the illegal porn and other types of porn into the dark web as web providers started restricting the porn due to the new legislation.
Bullshit! You've been schooled on this before...slow learner huh?

Net neutrality (passed or not) means nothing in regard to a web provider's potential restricting of porn. Web providers have had the legal right to restrict porn for decades...due to the Telecommunications Act of 1995, ironically signed into law by Bubba Blow Jobs From Interns Clinton.

47 U.S. Code § 230 grants ISPs and websites the legal right to remove any objectionable material. Specifically section (c) (2) (A) protects a provider for:

(A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected;

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996
 
Back
Top