Thank you, Sir.
The origins of the BBC
- Thread starter MonicaV
- Start date
Thank you, Sir.
Beautiful and exciting gif. But the real experience is better when my wife has unprotected sex with her black boyfriend.
Monica, are you already working on "White extinction 5"?
My wife is doing her part to the white extinction. She is off the pill, trying to get pregnant by her black boyfriend. There is only one thing I can do, and I do that very intensely:
My wife is doing her part to the white extinction. She is off the pill, trying to get pregnant by her black boyfriend. There is only one thing I can do, and I do that very intensely:
Last edited:
You have GOT to be kidding.
ethnomasochist
Male
Have all the articles been wiped from the blog? I don't use tumblr often so I'm not sure if I'm navigating it wrongly...
I do my part to End Racism as often as I can!
MoonMan
New Member
You say that someone could easily be offended by your article. Well, I am certainly notI just enjoyed it. And if someone doesn't agree I would prefer them to say why they disagree. In a polite and grown up manner.
View attachment 1244589
I disagree...
MoonMan
New Member
******* mortality rate: total: 48.2 deaths/1,000 live births
male: 54.6 deaths/1,000 live births
female: 41.8 deaths/1,000 live births (2016 est.)
Definition: This entry gives the number of deaths of infants under one year old in a given year per 1,000 live births in the same year; included is the total death rate, and deaths by sex, male and female. This rate is often used as an indicator of the level of health in a country.
Source: CIA World Factbook - This page was last updated on July 9, 2017
male: 54.6 deaths/1,000 live births
female: 41.8 deaths/1,000 live births (2016 est.)
Definition: This entry gives the number of deaths of infants under one year old in a given year per 1,000 live births in the same year; included is the total death rate, and deaths by sex, male and female. This rate is often used as an indicator of the level of health in a country.
Source: CIA World Factbook - This page was last updated on July 9, 2017
MoonMan
New Member
"The clear example is the country of Haiti , one of the three first land to declare the independence of the former colonies from Europe (USA,HAITI and FRANCE) but was never recognized by the slave colonial powers in that times"
The only American colonization effort was to Africa, the country of Liberia; which is also a *******-hole. The idea was to send all the blacks back where they came from after slavery was abolished, and when the flotilla arrived they disgorged and promptly enslaved the local population..,
The only American colonization effort was to Africa, the country of Liberia; which is also a *******-hole. The idea was to send all the blacks back where they came from after slavery was abolished, and when the flotilla arrived they disgorged and promptly enslaved the local population..,
Monica, I love your writing and your line of reasoning. I think we have very similar views and analyses. Please contact me and we shall talk about it.Going to the cinema or having a beer could be a simple pastime. But for some people it is a crime against humanity: “With 6 Euros you can have a *******, or vaccinate 50 people in Ethiopia.” A high level of guilt is always necessary to get money. It begins with a careful presentation of Africans based on poverty and helpless goodness: sores, baby soldiers, droughts, refugee camps and vultures are very useful in marketing campaigns. NGOs have become the new therapists, psychoanalyzing our wealthy societies and restoring their well-being state through a catharsis based on payment.
This dialectic has created the ideological foundations of Western progressive narrative about Africans. Now arguments have shifted, mass migration is considered by the political elites as the solution of the European demographic decline and therefore the African migrant is portrayed as the noble savage. A literary character embodies the concept of the native who has not been “corrupted” by civilization, and therefore symbolizes humanity’s innate goodness. This attributes of romantic primitivism are merged with the black sexual superiority in white female’s minds with very logical consequences.
The human male has a drive to impregnate as many females as possible, to create as many offspring with his genes as possible. Males compete for breeding rights, females select the best available male. Sex is the foundation of any human society, since it determines its future. But a woman’s offspring is limited. Therefore, women are the limiting factor and the conquest of their wombs is an instinctive impulse when an ethnic conflict emerges.
This natural phenomenon is something that any white women perceive but political correctness forbids to mention. In any conversation, almost all of those women I know always negates black men are sexual predators, but, nevertheless, they all assume, in one way or another, that black men are sexually superior. We all know a big black cock is able to ejaculate semen directly to the top of our vaginas, making its seed to enter directly to the cervix. The massive black gonads allow them to generate a large enough load to both impregnate us and still leave a large sum behind to block rivaling sperm from entering. Black male’s ability to provide an enormous pleasure also means a constant desire to repeat this intercourse.
Though procreation is not on our minds, black man’s superior mating abilities are changing white women’s sexual habits. This compromises the white male’s primary mating strategy, which involves keeping “their” women sexually repressed to avoid sexual competition. But feminism has broken the chains of our uterus and the bad conscience created by European crimes in Africa adds an unexpected ingredient to this synergy. It does not matter how historical accurate is this perception, this bad conscience exists. And how does one discharge the bad conscience? Through punishment.
After centuries of slavery and colonialism, at last we can pay them back. Our Christian roots make it logic. For centuries, Westerners have been taught that every sin is a reason to repent, because it prevents us from eternal salvation. It is through submission that consequences of free will disappear and guilt is erased. Sadomasochism can be defined as the giving or receiving of sexual pleasure from the infliction or reception of damage or humiliation. The sadist may also show an ******* desire to punish the object of sexual attraction for having aroused his desire, or for having frustrated it. For the masochist, taking on a role of subjugation can offer a release from the burden of guilt, and he may derive pleasure from earning the approval of his master.
Among progressive women, these ideologies have created an overwhelming need to please. We do everything we can to gain black man’s approval and to make clear we are not racist… And when a black male finally empties his huge load of sperm in our bodies for the first time, it is the ultimate relief. Interracial Dominance/submission relationship becomes a power exchange in racial hierarchies. It is a metaphor of the ethnic struggles that are taken place in modern societies, and the black cock becomes a metonymy of the dark foreigner’s invasion in the most sacred space for a woman.
In The Phenomenology of Spirit, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel treats of the master/slave dialect. According to Hegel, the relationship between self and otherness is the fundamental characteristic of human awareness, being rooted in the emotion of desire for objects (in sexual terms, women). As other men have their own goals and desires, they become competitors. In this competition, one desire is stronger that other and so from this struggle emerges a relation of dominance and submission. The inequitable relation between master and slave creates a sort of provisional resolution of this primal struggle.
A common concern among the black bulls is the extinction of the white race would mean the end of this power exchange. It is easy to understand. The destruction of the adversary also destroys that witness and thus “recognition” is impossible. For this reason, the master does not ******* the vanquished but keeps him subjugated and working for his desire. The vanquished is not able to transcend its ******* desire by risking life for freedom. He prefers servitude, and in an attempt to justify this decision creates what Friedrich Nietzsche defined as “a slave morality”.
Nietzsche considered there are just two types of morality: Master morality and Slave morality. The first one values power and strength, while the latter values kindness and humility. Both are inseparable from characteristic social codes and sexual practices. Biblical principles of turning the other cheek, humility, charity, and pity are the outcome of universalizing the plight of the slave. Though political correctness pretended to create a secular ethics, it has evolved in a new slave morality that now it makes Western men joyfully support a process that only can lead to their own extinction. In the name of tolerance, they tolerate other males possess “their” women; to fight white supremacy, they proudly embrace their inferiority.
White Guilt and Black power dichotomy is just a new expression form of an existential struggle. But these modern morals did not eliminate, only redirect, sexual competition. Human instinct cannot be suppressed, it only acquires a socially acceptable form. Political correctness creates a soothing narrative by means of a semantic inversion, in which the decadence of a civilization becomes a symbol of progress. The sexual aspect of mass immigration and demographic decline, the racial struggle and outbreeding, all are redefined by the mainstream liberal ideology as essential requirements for a multicultural paradise, while interracial sex is rendered as a moral imperative.
This self-deception often includes the people involved in the interracial cuckoldry. In their refusing to admit the overtly asymmetrical power relationships between black bull and white cuckold, Caucasian man let his wife to be sexually (ab)used by the superior black male and this form of racial nihilism becomes a source of moral pride: they are fighting racism, or so they claim. All men are equal, right?
But this form of interracial sex only reenacts a primal power drama that summons the almost forgotten archetypes of the ancient mating ritual: the alpha and omega roles. For the Black side it means triumph, or revenge, and for the white side it means liberation of guilt. The cuckold discovers his place among his supposed peers, and the awareness of his place in this hierarchy also justifies his role in an inevitable process of population replacement and natural selection. But this ritual is based in an uniquely human behavior: the formal establishment of consent.
https://conqueredeurope.tumblr.com/phenomenology
same with me. I can't find anything on it at all
This thread is pure pseudo science. This is what happens when you try to project your fetish onto reality.
Let me elaborate.
Your core argument is that white people will become extinct because of white males sexually competing with black males. Your assumption is that the bigger cock size will determine the winner. It seems you think cock size is the only factor that drives sexual selection. This demonstrates a complete ignorance of biology. There are multiple factors in sexual selection: height, shoulder width, facial shape, voice pitch, behavior, etc. etc.
In fact, many different online dating statistics (such as okcupid and beautifulepeople.com) show that white men are the most desirable by all races of women:
Source: okcupid – race and attraction
Also, long term dating yields more offspring. Statistics show that white women overwhelmingly prefer white men (Hispanic men come second and black men come third). Only 10% of white women will marry out of their race. Of those women, only 30% will choose black men. White women interracially marry the least out of other women.
Also, out of interracial babies, only 10% are black-white babies. Ignore everything else I said and this one source blows your argument out of the water.
Another issue is that your argument implies that sexual selection is the only determining factor when you said "definitive extinction of the white race". This further demonstrates your ignorance about biology. You're completely forgetting about natural selection. Sexual selection is not the only thing that drives evolution- or extinction of a race.
Another issue is that that there are multiple mechanisms to override sexual selection. As you've said before, culture can dictate female mate choice. There is no guarantee that a mechanism like this can’t arise again in the future.
You overlooked many factors (some listed above) in evolution and only looked at ONE factor: penis size. This makes your argument very flawed.
"When they [females] chose sexual partners, considerations like wealth or social prestige had little to do, and it came from acknowledging her body’s desire in the face of true masculine strength." This statement can't be farther from the truth. The concept of the social dominance hierarchy is well supported by evolutionary scientists. Women tend to only reproduce with men that are higher up or across the social dominance hierarchy. This means social prestige, or status, is a huge factor in sexual selection. Wealth is another huge factor because it helps a woman support herself and her offspring, which increases her odds to pass on her genes. You said it yourself: sexual liberation occurred in western countries and women have mate choice. Guess who they demonstrate are attractive to them? Actors, millionaires, bosses, etc.
It's okay to have a fetish and fantasize, but don't project it onto science- you will only end up looking silly. But, don’t take my word for it. Present your theory to an evolutionary psychologist and see how it fares lol.
Sources:
http://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2013-41940-003.html
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0018506X05001704
http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-41940-004
http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/file...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3826203/
Let me elaborate.
Your core argument is that white people will become extinct because of white males sexually competing with black males. Your assumption is that the bigger cock size will determine the winner. It seems you think cock size is the only factor that drives sexual selection. This demonstrates a complete ignorance of biology. There are multiple factors in sexual selection: height, shoulder width, facial shape, voice pitch, behavior, etc. etc.
In fact, many different online dating statistics (such as okcupid and beautifulepeople.com) show that white men are the most desirable by all races of women:
Source: okcupid – race and attraction
Also, long term dating yields more offspring. Statistics show that white women overwhelmingly prefer white men (Hispanic men come second and black men come third). Only 10% of white women will marry out of their race. Of those women, only 30% will choose black men. White women interracially marry the least out of other women.
Also, out of interracial babies, only 10% are black-white babies. Ignore everything else I said and this one source blows your argument out of the water.
Another issue is that your argument implies that sexual selection is the only determining factor when you said "definitive extinction of the white race". This further demonstrates your ignorance about biology. You're completely forgetting about natural selection. Sexual selection is not the only thing that drives evolution- or extinction of a race.
Another issue is that that there are multiple mechanisms to override sexual selection. As you've said before, culture can dictate female mate choice. There is no guarantee that a mechanism like this can’t arise again in the future.
You overlooked many factors (some listed above) in evolution and only looked at ONE factor: penis size. This makes your argument very flawed.
"When they [females] chose sexual partners, considerations like wealth or social prestige had little to do, and it came from acknowledging her body’s desire in the face of true masculine strength." This statement can't be farther from the truth. The concept of the social dominance hierarchy is well supported by evolutionary scientists. Women tend to only reproduce with men that are higher up or across the social dominance hierarchy. This means social prestige, or status, is a huge factor in sexual selection. Wealth is another huge factor because it helps a woman support herself and her offspring, which increases her odds to pass on her genes. You said it yourself: sexual liberation occurred in western countries and women have mate choice. Guess who they demonstrate are attractive to them? Actors, millionaires, bosses, etc.
It's okay to have a fetish and fantasize, but don't project it onto science- you will only end up looking silly. But, don’t take my word for it. Present your theory to an evolutionary psychologist and see how it fares lol.
Sources:
http://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2013-41940-003.html
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0018506X05001704
http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-41940-004
http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/file...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3826203/
Perhaps because it's nothing but pseudo science?
always great to see black cock entering white pussy!I look forward to that. It's interesting to read.
View attachment 1243094
I can't believe this site allows posts that promote genocide. ....unbelievable! !!!!!
Similar threads
