@Jdingo619 You absolute included within your view not be considered as right or wrong.
I do respectfully disagree with it. There are dynamics not included. You started with "From the beginning of time....from just a nature (natural?) point of view. I'd like to substitute social>societal point of view. The male of the human race is bigger, and the image of the caveman dragging the woman off by the hair is not totally inaccurate. In an overwhelmingly physical world requiring physicality for survival, not only were men stronger, women had an additional vulnerability-pregnancy. I personally do not believe the percentile of men involved/engaged in baby care, raising or support has ever approached, let alone equal the percentile of women. In the physical world, truly a dependency within that goal.
All of human history includes war, and a very, very common thread included ******* the men and either ******* or take the women, and for the most part, any reference of children fell into the exact same categories-******* or enslave the boys, ******* and take the girls.
Next, there are many cultures of humans outside of the religions you named. Oriental cultures are predominately male driven, but the female perspective on sex is nowhere as suppressed as western cultures. I confess to not enough understanding of the Eskimos, but embrace individual sexuality as well as societally pretty much exorcised the jealousy/possessive aspect of life. If a man goes out for sex, their women don't trip. If a woman wants to fuck someone, she goes, does it and comes home and the men don't trip. They were ALL happy until the rest of those human jackasses showed up!
Tribal laws of the Native Americans, most of the African continent AND South America acknowledged, respected and included within their rules and laws just as high a place for female sexuality as a male's, avenues for adult single women and widows to properly get them some.
I may not get the religious dynamic quite right as I must tiptoe because I don't want to and don't intend to disrespect anyone's spiritual place/beliefs'.
In the Bible, God spoke to Sarah, Ruth and Miriam. I totally agree with you the perception applied to women as promiscuous and harlots comes from religion.....with one totally relevant important contradiction! Before I say who, let me point out a huge one outside of religion. I'll put up that same cashapp $1000 to anyone that can convince the majority here you didn't learn her name before you really thought about sex, and a different $100 for any significant reference to her as harlot, whore or slut. BUT (!) not only did she get hers, EVERY man she got it from lost his damned mind! The name is Cleopatra. Dead for thousands of years, what her pussy did to and for the world, never forgotten. I wish I knew what she put on them boys that they just could not let go. Even kings became her bitch. Damn!
@Jdingo619 How do you interpret the Apostle's insistence that Jesus cast out Mary Magdalene for being a slut and Jesus telling them don't go there, she and I are true loves?
In any case, it took the evolution and education of society combined with modernization, invention to remove the place women required/depended on men's physicality for survival. For the first time in human existence, women's sexuality is their own to explore, choose or discard, not a man's choice. Does anyone besides me notice the number of men on this or any other sex site asking if they should 'let' her, or how to get her to....? THAT'S her partner, best friend?
That leads to the real answer to the original question. Women learned eons ago learned NOT to tell men too much of their mental sexual consideration, overwhelmingly it brought negativity. Why should they talk about increased sex and sexuality when it always costs them when men found out? We still haven't figured out why the girls go to the ladies room together...so we don't hear it!!! How many Black men in here with Black women, and out of those, looking for anything other than adding a woman....hhmmm...
LOL
