Moving away from cuckold into "stag/vixen?"

Nonsense. We are a S/V couple. First of all, we make sexual decisions in this area together, she is sub and I am Dom (not black owned), she isn't a QoS, I actively participate in the sex when I want, we have sex alone together, there is no cuck humiliation, and many more things. Dynamics are totally different.

See, you didn't look at the definition of "cuckold" before you wrote. A cuckold is the husband of an unfaithful wife. It doesn't matter whether you are dominant or not, or whether you're humiliated or not. By definition , you ARE a cuckold. The fact that you have added power exchange to your relationship doesn't change the fact that you're a cuckold.
Mainstream porn has made you believe that you have to be submissive or be humiliated to be a cuckold. You have been misled.
 
See, you didn't look at the definition of "cuckold" before you wrote. A cuckold is the husband of an unfaithful wife. It doesn't matter whether you are dominant or not, or whether you're humiliated or not. By definition , you ARE a cuckold. The fact that you have added power exchange to your relationship doesn't change the fact that you're a cuckold.
Mainstream porn has made you believe that you have to be submissive or be humiliated to be a cuckold. You have been misled.
Thats how i see it too. Everything else is just extra labeling. Some people think cuck = beta due to media and memes so they just came up with stag to distance themselves.
 
See, you didn't look at the definition of "cuckold" before you wrote. A cuckold is the husband of an unfaithful wife. It doesn't matter whether you are dominant or not, or whether you're humiliated or not. By definition , you ARE a cuckold. The fact that you have added power exchange to your relationship doesn't change the fact that you're a cuckold.
Mainstream porn has made you believe that you have to be submissive or be humiliated to be a cuckold. You have been misled.
Sorry, we can define ourselves the way we want. We explicitly do not identify with cuckoldry for us personally. She is not unfaithful to me ('engaging in sexual relations with a person other than one's regular partner in contravention of a previous promise or understanding'). We do not think of black men as her lovers, she doesn't kiss others, does not go on dates alone, and our specific promise and understanding explicitly has always been that we allow others to join us, because we see it as giving each other something extra for the other's pleasure and experience that we cannot give alone and adds to our healthy relationship we have. Our specific promise is to simply never do anything alone or in secret and that our romantic relationship is ours and not something we give or receive from others. That, to us, counts as unfaithfulness. The mainstream has its version of cuckoldry that it promotes, you have yours, but we define our relationship as we want and we do. For us personally (not saying this is right) a cuckold comes with a hotwife who adhere to a lifestyle. My wife is not in a lifestyle and we feel that cuckoldry in contemporary usage (not your use of the more historical and narrow definition) is more a fetish with aspects to it that we simply do not identify with at all. We respect hotwives, QoS, and cuckolds, but that is not for us.
 
you are are more right than what you realize. the whole interracial thing is winding down.

I think that's very possible. I went to high school in the 1980s, and I remember some of the girls searching for a black boyfriend, as it was the taboo thing to do. They were young enough that most of what happened was merely fooling around. It wasn't about sex or penis size, the black guys these girls dated played football with me, and they were, if I remember, most likely average in endowment.

So here were are, it's much more prevalent, and I can tell you, where I am, there are an ENORMOUS amount of multi-racial ******* from age 5 to age 18 (and up to about 25) due to all the interracial relationships. It feels, just from what I can tell, less of a thing now. I think it's still a thing with horny housewives, though.
 
This is why I hate labels, everyone seems to have such strict definitions. I’ve even had guys get mad and tell me I’m wrong when I say my husband doesn’t want to be humiliated or have gay sex with other guys. Can’t I just enjoy having sex with other guys, and turn on my husband at the same time without having to label it?
then you should definitely stay away from those guys. You are more into swinging and MFM with your husband. This puts you in the hot wife category.
 
then you should definitely stay away from those guys. You are more into swinging and MFM with your husband. This puts you in the hot wife category.
I wouldn’t call it exactly swinging, as my husband doesn’t see other women (I’m too jealous!!), but that doesn’t mean he is into guys just because he is confident enough to share me with other lovers.
 
I wouldn’t call it exactly swinging, as my husband doesn’t see other women (I’m too jealous!!), but that doesn’t mean he is into guys just because he is confident enough to share me with other lovers.
Ok! Fun with no labels makes everyone comfortable and of course have a lot of fun
 
I wouldn’t call it exactly swinging, as my husband doesn’t see other women (I’m too jealous!!), but that doesn’t mean he is into guys just because he is confident enough to share me with other lovers.
it means he thinks his wife is so beautiful, that other men should get to enjoy you as well!:giggle:
 
We are for sure stag/vixen. Hubby allows, does not partake, no clean-up, do not try to humiliate him as he will not put up with it. We never had that problem, most guys are not sure what to think of him as big muscular guy and ex-special forces Vin Diesel looking LOL. But only I can say stuff to him. But hubby is 100% straight and not into the guy or anything about him.
 
This is why I hate labels, everyone seems to have such strict definitions. I’ve even had guys get mad and tell me I’m wrong when I say my husband doesn’t want to be humiliated or have gay sex with other guys. Can’t I just enjoy having sex with other guys, and turn on my husband at the same time without having to label it?
Sure , but now let me ask you this,
Let's say one day down the road your having fun and your hubby wants to go the distance from where he is now to wanting to have sex with your bull .
Would you let it happen?
Cause you say you do it to turn on your husband and if he wants to have gay sex would you still claim you want to turn on your husband,

I'm not trying to get you mad or upset please don't get me wrong , it's about sex that's it not changing ones mindset or lifestyle for keeps just sex , ie sexually gratification not meaning he will be turning Gary but like I have learned a prostate orgasm is so much more powerful than regular orgasm any day of the week, so I can understand that I can get fucked by my wife with a strap on or I can ask for her permission to get that from her bull .
This is what I'm stating, and since its not like he is wanting to turn gay for the sake of being a gay man it's only for the anal pleasure and that powerful prostate orgasm.

After all if better sex is the goal why limit how much better sex goes around.
 
Sure , but now let me ask you this,
Let's say one day down the road your having fun and your hubby wants to go the distance from where he is now to wanting to have sex with your bull .
Would you let it happen?
Cause you say you do it to turn on your husband and if he wants to have gay sex would you still claim you want to turn on your husband,

I'm not trying to get you mad or upset please don't get me wrong , it's about sex that's it not changing ones mindset or lifestyle for keeps just sex , ie sexually gratification not meaning he will be turning Gary but like I have learned a prostate orgasm is so much more powerful than regular orgasm any day of the week, so I can understand that I can get fucked by my wife with a strap on or I can ask for her permission to get that from her bull .
This is what I'm stating, and since its not like he is wanting to turn gay for the sake of being a gay man it's only for the anal pleasure and that powerful prostate orgasm.

After all if better sex is the goal why limit how much better sex goes around.
I think you missed the point of my original post. If my husband was bisexual that would be one thing, but lots of potential bulls not only assume, but flat out tell me I’m wrong when I let them know what we’re into. It’s been nearly a decade since he started sharing me, so I have a pretty good idea of our preferences. It’s not about being anti-gay sex, it’s about not fitting the mold of your labels. We like what we like, and if you don’t like it, find someone else to play with.
 
I think you missed the point of my original post. If my husband was bisexual that would be one thing, but lots of potential bulls not only assume, but flat out tell me I’m wrong when I let them know what we’re into. It’s been nearly a decade since he started sharing me, so I have a pretty good idea of our preferences. It’s not about being anti-gay sex, it’s about not fitting the mold of your labels. We like what we like, and if you don’t like it, find someone else to play with.
That's the whole point of this, or any other lifestyle choice. You should "...like what (you) like, and if you don't like it, find someone else..."

The couple, and especially the woman, should set the tone for everything. Remember, it all revolves around her; she's the one being mounted, and she's the one being inseminated. She has ultimate decision-making rights.

The husband should work around that and together, they should find mutual ground. Once they find someone they BOTH agree holds promise, then they (especially the woman) establishes the rules for play. After all, they know what they are searching for, and if the other guy doesn't like it, he can find someone else.
 
That's the whole point of this, or any other lifestyle choice. You should "...like what (you) like, and if you don't like it, find someone else..."

The couple, and especially the woman, should set the tone for everything. Remember, it all revolves around her; she's the one being mounted, and she's the one being inseminated. She has ultimate decision-making rights.

The husband should work around that and together, they should find mutual ground. Once they find someone they BOTH agree holds promise, then they (especially the woman) establishes the rules for play. After all, they know what they are searching for, and if the other guy doesn't like it, he can find someone else.
Very well said 👏
 
Seems very very high.
i was thinking the exact same thing. But perhaps the question was about fantasies that would pop up every now and then and not about readiness to do it for real? 🤷‍♂️

Somehow reminds me of the survey carried out on an American college campus in which 87% of the female college students who took part claimed to have had sexual fantasies about Black men. It popped up in a thread in one of the forums here and people would comment the percentage was high, the women would prefer Black men or wanted to be sexually exclusive with Black men. No. That was not even the question of that survey. :LOL: TBH i think 87% is a rather low percentage actually because it means that the other 13% have never in their lives even had such a fantasy. Heck, when i think of my own sexual fantasies i am pretty sure i have gone through each and every ethnic you can imagine. :D Those include Women i know in real life, Women on TV screens, porn stars, fantasy creatioins, a.s.o. But back to the topic...

i think it can be empowering for Women who want to be shared to open up to their husbands/BFs about the subject when they know that a majority of men have a fantasy of sharing their Women even it might not be their top or most frequent one or they do not initially want to make it a reality. It means that the number of men in general fear of a wifesharing lifestyle might be (far) lower than most people would expect. ;)
 
Back
Top