Intact Foreskin Black Cock Respect!

Actually, circumcised cocks have less chance of catching things like HIV. And less horrible smelly / tasty.

I'm no Jew though, atheist here... like through and through.
 
Actually, circumcised cocks have less chance of catching things like HIV. And less horrible smelly / tasty.

I'm no Jew though, atheist here... like through and through.


the claim that circ have less chance for catching HIV are based on flawed african studies. the U.S where most men are cut have the highest rates of HIV. in malaysia 70% of HIV/AIDS cases there are muslims who circ for religious reasons. in 6 african nations the HIV rates for circs are higher than intact ones, etc
 
Actually, circumcised cocks have less chance of catching things like HIV. And less horrible smelly / tasty.

I'm no Jew though, atheist here... like through and through.

That’s not actually true. In fact a circumcised penis can be more likely to be subject to infections etc. The foreskin is nature’s way of protecting the head and opening to the penis. Foreskin secrets fluids that both lubricant and clean the head of the penis.

Circumcised penises of course do not have the lubricant and ability to self clean, so it is common for the delicate penial tissue to split causing *******. HIV is transferred through infected ******* entering the bloodstream of an unifected host.

Further, foreskin allows the penial shaft to increase in length and girth without causing over stretching and damage. It is common that foreskins are removed during childhood when the penis has not yet fully developed, so increasing the chances of too much skin being removed and thus overstretching in adulthood. Such Stretching causes splitting and *******.
 
Last edited:
Actually, circumcised cocks have less chance of catching things like HIV. And less horrible smelly / tasty.
I'm no Jew though, atheist here... like through and through.
....My wife and several of her lady friends would agree with you. That question was discussed at a pool party several years ago. Your observations were the very reason most ladies preferred the "circumcised" version. Of course, a down side to that is the sensitivity and orgasm control of the uncircumcised cock.
Rubbish. A clean intact cock smells an tastes great.
....I imagine it does, BUT, you made a very important observation ... a clean intact cock. The fact is, men often tend to not spend the necessary time to pull back that foreskin and clean the penis properly. And the foreskin tends to easily trap, accumulate, and nurture bacteria under that foreskin. Its probably a parent's responsibility (*******'s actually) to stress the importance and properly instruct his ******* on how to do just that. I'm circumcised and don't have that issue, BUT, my 14 year old ******* has not been circumcised and when he was around 4 and started taking his own baths, I specifically instructed him on cleaning the areas where smells often occurred.
 
Think about you evolved with it so it must give you a slight advantage. The Hiv thing is nonsense. Its there to keep the head moist.
 
....My wife and several of her lady friends would agree with you. That question was discussed at a pool party several years ago. Your observations were the very reason most ladies preferred the "circumcised" version. Of course, a down side to that is the sensitivity and orgasm control of the uncircumcised cock.

....I imagine it does, BUT, you made a very important observation ... a clean intact cock. The fact is, men often tend to not spend the necessary time to pull back that foreskin and clean the penis properly. And the foreskin tends to easily trap, accumulate, and nurture bacteria under that foreskin. Its probably a parent's responsibility (*******'s actually) to stress the importance and properly instruct his ******* on how to do just that. I'm circumcised and don't have that issue, BUT, my 14 year old ******* has not been circumcised and when he was around 4 and started taking his own baths, I specifically instructed him on cleaning the areas where smells often occurred.

The only thing that should’ve used is water to clean that area, soaps are bad in that area and cause infection....bad smells from the bacteria.

Recent studies show that intact penises are more likely to stimulate an orgasm in a woman and can also delay the orgasm (climax) for a man.
 
THE NEW ZEALAND
MEDICAL JOURNAL
Vol 116 No 1181 ISSN 1175 8716
shield.jpg
Effects of male circumcision on female arousal and orgasm
While vaginal dryness is considered an indicator for female sexual arousal disorder,1,2male circumcision may exacerbate female vaginal dryness during intercourse.3 O'Hara and O'Hara reported that women who had experienced coitus with both intact and circumcised men preferred intact partners by a ratio of 8.6 to one.4 Most women (85.5%) in that survey reported that they were more likely to experience orgasm with a genitally intact partner: `They [surveyed women] were also more likely to report that vaginal secretions lessened as coitus progressed with their circumcised partners (16.75, 6.88–40.77).' 4
Presence of the movable foreskin makes a difference in foreplay, being more arousing to the female.4 Women reported they were about twice as likely to experience orgasm if the male partner had a foreskin.4 The impact of male circumcision on vaginal dryness during coitus required further investigation.
We conducted a survey of 35 female sexual partners aged 18 to 69 years who had experienced sexual intercourse with both circumcised and genitally intact men.
Participants completed a 35-item sexual awareness survey. Women reported they were significantly more likely to have experienced vaginal dryness during intercourse with circumcised than with genitally intact men c 2 (df = 1, n = 20) = 5.0, p <0.05.5
Women who preferred a circumcised male sexual partner averaged 27.3 years of age (SD = 8.2), while those whose stated preference was for a genitally intact partner had a mean age of 36.4 years (SD = 13.7). Thus, the role of the male foreskin in preventing loss of vaginal lubrication during intercourse may become more discernible with increasing age among women. We reported:
`During intercourse, the skin of an intact penis slides up and down the shaft, stimulating the glans and the nerves of the inner and outer foreskin. On the outstroke, the glans is partially or completely engulfed by the foreskin with more skin remaining inside the vagina than is the case with the circumcised penis. This `valve' mechanism is thought to retain the natural lubrication provided by the female because the bunched up skin acts to block the lubrication escaping from the vagina, which results in dryness.'5
Our work, which supports the hypothesis of Warren and Bigelow3 and the findings of O'Hara and O'Hara 4 about the role of the male prepuce during coitus is fully reported in Denniston et al.5
Research generally has not considered possible adverse effects of male circumcision upon female sexual arousal and response. While Moynihan reported that vibratory thresholds, ******* flow and hormone levels were studied,1 there was no mention of circumcision status of the male partner. Likewise, Leiblum failed to control for male circumcision status.2 In light of published findings,4,5 this is a serious methodological omission.
Most likely, reported vaginal dryness and the related clinical designation `female arousal disorder' is but a normal female response to coitus with a man with an iatrogenically deficient penis.5
It is imperative that future studies of female arousal disorder record and control the circumcision status of male sexual partners.
Gillian A Bensley

Gregory J Boyle
Department of Psychology
Bond University, QLD, Australia
References:
  1. Moynihan R. The making of a disease: female sexual dysfunction. BMJ 2003;326:45–7.
  2. Leiblum SR. Arousal disorders in women: complaints and complexities. Med J Aust 2003;178:638–40.
  3. Warren J, Bigelow J. The case against circumcision. Br J Sex Med 1994;Sept/Oct:6–8.
  4. O'Hara K, O'Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:79–84.
  5. Bensley GA, Boyle GJ. Physical, sexual, and psychological effects of male ******* circumcision: an exploratory survey. In: Denniston GC, Hodges FM, Milos MF, editors. Understanding circumcision: a multi-disciplinary approach to a multi-dimensional problem. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2001. p. 207–39.
http://www.cirp.org/library/sex_function/bensley1/
 
the claim that circ have less chance for catching HIV are based on flawed african studies. the U.S where most men are cut have the highest rates of HIV. in malaysia 70% of HIV/AIDS cases there are muslims who circ for religious reasons. in 6 african nations the HIV rates for circs are higher than intact ones, etc
Actually no.
The skin of a cut dick is effectively hardened, when compared to a foreskin.
The foreskin is a "soft tissue" so any whatever disease has a larger area to infect, when the dick goes soft then EVERYTHING inside that skin will eventually seep into the penis japs-eye.

The "hardened" skin of a circumcised dick is... literally, just hardened - the ONLY soft tissue of the exterior of the penis is the japs-eye.

Think of it like a military tank? The only way ANY infection/disease has a chance of defeating it is by getting inside the tank - aka by the japs-eye. Otherwise that tank is just going to power through everything thrown at it because it has minimal amounts of penetration points.

In terms of sexual performance. Circumcised vs natural skin = zero difference. It ALL depends on how regular the penis is getting pussy.
 
Last edited:
Actually no.
The skin of a cut dick is effectively hardened, when compared to a foreskin.
The foreskin is a "soft tissue" so any whatever disease has a larger area to infect, when the dick goes soft then EVERYTHING inside that skin will eventually seep into the penis japs-eye.

The "hardened" skin of a circumcised dick is... literally, just hardened - the ONLY soft tissue of the exterior of the penis is the japs-eye.

Think of it like a military tank? The only way ANY infection/disease has a chance of defeating it is by getting inside the tank - aka by the japs-eye. Otherwise that tank is just going to power through everything thrown at it because it has minimal amounts of penetration points.

In terms of sexual performance. Circumcised vs natural skin = zero difference. It ALL depends on how regular the penis is getting pussy.


The Foreskin contains Langerin. The skin that covers th body also contains langerin



https://www.nature.com/articles/nm1541


Langerin is a natural barrier to HIV-1 transmission by Langerhans cells.

Abstract
Human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) is primarily transmitted sexually. Dendritic cells (DCs) in the subepithelium transmit HIV-1 to T cells through the C-type lectin DC-specific intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-3-grabbing nonintegrin (DC-SIGN). However, the epithelial Langerhans cells (LCs) are the first DC subset to encounter HIV-1. It has generally been assumed that LCs mediate the transmission of HIV-1 to T cells through the C-type lectin Langerin, similarly to transmission by DC-SIGN on dendritic cells (DCs). Here we show that in stark contrast to DC-SIGN, Langerin prevents HIV-1 transmission by LCs. HIV-1 captured by Langerin was internalized into Birbeck granules and degraded. Langerin inhibited LC infection and this mechanism kept LCs refractory to HIV-1 transmission; inhibition of Langerin allowed LC infection and subsequent HIV-1 transmission. Notably, LCs also inhibited T-cell infection by viral clearance through Langerin. Thus Langerin is a natural barrier to HIV-1 infection, and strategies to combat infection must enhance, preserve or, at the very least, not interfere with Langerin expression and function.
Comment in



https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nat...fferers-in-malaysia-are-muslims-aids-council/


Benefits enjoyed by males who are intact (not circumcised)
1. Full penis length and circumference. The "prepuce" (foreskin) constitutes 50% or more of the skin system of the penis [1]. If unfolded and spread flat, the average adult foreskin measures 60-90 square centimeters (10-14 square inches) [2], or about the size of an index card [see illustration]. The foreskin creates a visibly longer penis, especially when the foreskin extends beyond the head of the penis. Also, the double-layered tissue of the foreskin engorges with ******* during erection and creates a visibly and sensually thicker shaft and glans.When the engorged foreskin retracts behind the coronal ridge of the glans, it often creates a wider and more pronounced "ridge" that many partners find especially stimulating during penetrative intercourse. The circumcised penis appears truncated and thinner than a full-sized intact penis.
2. Protection. The sleeve of tissue known as the foreskin normally covers the glans and protects it from abrasion, drying, callusing (keratinization), and environmental contaminants. The glans is intended by nature to be a protected internal organ, like the female clitoris [see illustration]. The effect of an exposed glans and resulting keratinization on human sexual response has never been studied. Increasing reports by circumcised men indicate that keratinization causes a loss of sexual sensation, pleasure and fulfillment [3, 4].
3. Ridged bands. The inner foreskin contains bands of densely innervated, sexually responsive tissue [1]. They constitute a primary erogenous zone of the human penis and are important for realizing the fullness and intensity of sexual response [5].
4. Gliding action. The foreskin is the only moving part of the penis. During any sexual activity, the foreskin and glans work in unison; their mutual interaction creates a complete sexual response. In heterosexual intercourse, the non-abrasive gliding of the penis in and out of itself within the vagina facilitates smooth and pleasurable intercourse for both partners [
Blue_ArrowD096.gif
see illustration]. Without this gliding action, the corona of the circumcised penis can function as a one-way valve, dragging vaginal lubricants out into the drying air and making artificial lubricants essential for non-painful intercourse [6].
5. Specialized sensory tissue. In addition to the "ridged bands" mentioned above, thousands of coiled fine-touch receptors (Meissner’s corpuscles) constitute the most important sensory component of the penis [1]. The foreskin contains branches of the dorsal nerve and between 10,000 and 20,000 specialized erotogenic nerve endings of several types, which are capable of sensing slight motion and stretch, subtle changes in temperature, and fine gradations in texture [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12].
6. The frenulum. This is a highly nerve-laden web of tissue that tethers the inner foreskin to the underside of the glans [see photo]. It is similar to the frenula found under the tongue, the upper lip and the clitoral hood (female foreskin). For many intact men, the penile frenulum is a male "G-spot" that is highly pleasurable when repeatedly stretched and relaxed during sexual activity [13]. Depending on the surgical method used, the frenulum is partially to completely destroyed by circumcision.
7. Proper ******* flow. The foreskin contains several feet of ******* vessels, including the frenular artery and branches of the dorsal artery. The loss of this rich vascularization interrupts normal ******* flow to the shaft and glans of the penis, damaging the natural function of the penis and altering its development [1].
8. Immunological defense. The soft mucosa of the inner foreskin produces plasma cells, which secrete immunoglobulin antibodies, and antibacterial and antiviral proteins [7, 14], such as the pathogen-killing enzyme called lysozyme [15 and
Blue_ArrowD096.gif
see explanation]. All of the human mucosa (the linings of the mouth, eyelids, vagina, foreskin and anus) are the body's first line of defense against disease. This benefit of the foreskin could be one possible explanation why intact men are at lower risk of chlamydia and other sexually transmitted diseases [16-21].
9. Langerhans cells. These specialized epithelial cells are a component of the immune system and may play a role in protecting the penis from sexually transmitted infections such as HIV (AIDS) [
Blue_ArrowD096.gif
see explanation and 14-16, 18].
10. Proper lymph flow. The foreskin contains lymphatic vessels, which are necessary for proper lymph flow and immunological functioning.
11. Estrogen receptors. The foreskin contains estrogen receptors, whose purpose is not yet fully understood and needs further study [22].
12. Apocrine glands. These glands produce pheromones, nature’s invisible yet compelling signals to potential sexual partners. The effect of their absence on human sexual behavior has never been studied [23].
13. Sebaceous glands. The oils produced by these glands lubricate and moisturize the foreskin and glans, so that the two structures function together smoothly.
14. Dartos fascia. This is a smooth muscle sheath that underlies the scrotum, the entire penis and the tip of the foreskin. It is necessary for proper temperature regulation of the genitals (causing these structures to elongate in the heat and shrink in the cold). Approximately half of the Dartos fascia is destroyed by circumcision [7].
15. Natural texture and coloration of the glans. In the intact penis, the glans normally appears moist, shiney, and pinkish-red to dark purple. These visual cues often attract and excite a sexual partner. The glans of a circumcised penis is dry, rough and often light pink to bluish-gray in color [see photos].
16. Zero risk of serious infection or surgical injury. Unfortunate boys who suffer botched circumcisions lose part or all of their penis from surgical mishap or subsequent infection. They are often "sexually reassigned" by castration and "transgender surgery." They are relegated to a life of hormone therapy and are compelled to live their lives as pseudo-females, the success of which has never been fully assessed [24-46].
17. Zero risk of death from surgery. Every year boy die from the complications of circumcision, a fact that the American circumcision industry ignores, obscures, or downplays [29-31].
18. Zero risk of delayed or diminished maternal bonding. Circumcision, even if anesthesia is used, causes unavoidable operative trauma and post-operative pain that has been shown to disrupt bonding with the mom, which in turn interferes with the first developmental task of every human, that of trust (trust in human contact, in personal safety, etc) [47-51].
19. Electromagnetic "cross-communication." Anecdotal reports suggest that, without the mucosa of its foreskin, the penis lacks the capacity for the subtle electromagentic energy transfer that occurs during contact between two mucous membranes (the vaginal walls and the exposed inner lining of the foreskin). Such contact contributes to the full experience of sexual pleasure. These reports deserve further scientific study.
20. The foreskin is necessary for optimal health and well-being of the male, as well as contributing to fulfillment
in his sexual relationships.

Adapted for use by NOHARMM from a list compiled by
Gary L. Harryman (NORM/Southern California) glharryman@aol.com


http://www.noharmm.org/advantage.htm
 
Back
Top