Black men conservative women
- Thread starter Jack Ward
- Start date
Because it’s the elegant, conservative white women that give Black Men play. This drives me wild with lust for them. Because it’s the high class looking white women that I’d never expect to look at me with lust.
that is an interesting view of things
Because real Bulls like me love a challenge. And who poses a greater challenge than your typical, conservative white soccer mom who is the most unlikely candidate for being a BBC slut?!
That is a hot pic !!!
I Agree...100000000%!!! I consider myself to be somewhat conservative, but in no way racist. It's sad that people are so penned into such stereotypes...isn't that what everyone "tries" to avoid doing?? Anyway, I make sure I treat everyone how I like being treated and that usually works out well.
Why do you consider these women a challenge?Because real Bulls like me love a challenge. And who poses a greater challenge than your typical, conservative white soccer mom who is the most unlikely candidate for being a BBC slut?!
You mean those same conservative women who will claim that they're not racist at all and that the civil war was about state's rights in the same sentence? I don't fetishize them at all. Turns me all the way off.
This is a great point. Being conservative in temperament is much different than being conservative politically. White women who are conservative in their temperament are another story. They're fun because I tend to write them off as being uninterested and not potentials. Finding out that they want it and then giving it to them is a sensational feeling
I love the fact that u said 1 of your bulls. I appreciate the fact you fuck multiple different black men. I don't follow politics but I'd follow any white woman who sucks black dick and let's me see. I only care about watching black men with huge dicks fuck white women. I like raceplay, I like when the girl degrades herself. Thx 4 the pic
Quite often because you can be certain they have racists in their family or amongst their friends, so it feels good to stick a time-bomb (a BBC slut) in their mix.
Humm, I see you met my sister.........She's the soccer mom.Because real Bulls like me love a challenge. And who poses a greater challenge than your typical, conservative white soccer mom who is the most unlikely candidate for being a BBC slut?!
She took a long time to come to the dark side. I don't know what triggered her to finally say yes, but when she did, the dam broke. She went all in having a great time.
I think the soccer moms have a repressed sexual fulfillment. Once you break that shell they are totally into it. I can only speak about my sis and one friend, but they both seem to go head first once that conservative persona was cracked
I'm an independent and not only do I like them conservative I love them devout religious too! They love feeling so dirty and slutty and I love feeling like the bad guy turning them out and making them whorish!
I tell them while I'm fucking them "it's ok you can blame it on me"!
I tell them while I'm fucking them "it's ok you can blame it on me"!
KaiAGi
Male
Neoliberal here—with inspiration from Bernard-Henri Levy especially after his debate with Aleksandr Dugin, Eric Kaufmann, Friedrich Hayek, Guy Verhofstadt, Karl Popper, Matthew Goodwin, Milton Friedman, Nassim Taleb, Peter Thiel, Talcott Parsons, and Thomas Sowell, among others; a realist school bent that I would like to see applied at a micro level to culture, economics, elites, high and main street, hegemonic and power blocs, and value systems, primarily their breadth/internal diversity, cross-links, origins, pressure points, and talk; and socially liberal tendencies—I guess I will finally make a semi-serious post on this forum.
First, we need to define conservatism. If I had to guess, OP likely used it in the political sense. When most people use this term—especially mainstream media outlets—it refers to on-brand center-right ideologies: conservative liberalism (like liberal corporatism, or even social democracy, but with socially conservative ethics; libertarian conservatism; and neoconservatism (excluding foreign policy, it is paternalistic, qualified market interventionism in the spirit of one-nation conservatism). These ideologies are, in my view, unexceptional and unremarkable and easier than other streams of the popularly conceived right to broker deals with. Adherents within the national-populist—not one to ignore as mere fascism and not necessarily far right—school of thought are who I would view as the main focus under such a definition.
As a purely idiosyncratic tendency, I would forego using the term conservative and opt for the following terms: aloof, assertive, headstrong, opinionated, politically incorrect, or posh. Personally, these are the terms that I think of when someone invokes conservative in this sexualized context.
One of my fantasies is to make love to a tall woman—i.e., ≥5'10" and primarily of white European ancestry, but could also be East Asian, Indian, or Middle Eastern/North African—who fits into the Amazonian ideal of strong thickness—wide hips, thick thighs and calves, and a ≥45" buttocks, while she breathily calls me a black buck or n----r. Indeed, this is quite controversial, but it is precisely so delightful because it occurs in a passionately romantic context. What an ego tease!
Raceplay of that sort is always hot because it is complete historical nonsense. Consider this: you are on a plantation as a fieldhand; a voluptuous female mistress or, even better for the sake of fantasy, plantation owner takes a liking to you, privately because she has to maintain appearances, and routinely rendezvouses with you at night for a pound-out session, while hurling verbal abuse during passionate
strokes. Of course, we cannot romanticize this too much as the price for such reckless behavior was a castration or lynching, BUT still.
To better put things in perspective, imagine a voluptuous white woman, like HarlotsWebb or Kalgirl_up, who explicitly identifies with white nationalism but has a black boytoy on the down-low for sensual meetups on the weekends. There is no way that can be right. However, the possibility of it is a bit erotic, granted you can tolerate the obvious inconsistencies. Officially, she holds you in complete contempt, yet, for a couple hours each week, she will kiss your neck, wrap her arms around your back, caress your hair, squeeze your buttocks, and lock her Amazonian legs around your pelvis when she knows you are about to bust, all in missionary. It is almost like you are cheating/subverting history.
Also, note that there are some liberal, in the popular sense, and socdem women who you can tell subscribe to critical race theory but privately, maybe even publicly, fetishsize black men; even more interesting are the ones who, in one way or another, intimate that they like black men and view support for BLM as a logical extension, sort of like peacocking. Fetishization is not a problem in my view as it is necessary for all desires; quick experiment, imagine something that you are very fond and then remove all of the likeable qualities it possesses to check if you would still care for it. It likely helps that sexual prowess is not the core of my identity—but I claim pornography, not the BDSM, hyper-humiliation, rough stuff, can be a source of romantic inspiration, work of June Lovejoy or Shay Thomas being good examples—so I can easily shrug off such views on grounds of indifference.
As a final note, and in the interest of self-awareness, such a fantasy probably stems from a desire to please and earn and nurture erotic sympathy, respect, and trust. I grew up on R&B, and happen to be millennial (Gen Y) or Gen Z depending on who you consult, so that could be why I am the way I am, lmao.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Question
