Me with our guide in Rome
White ladies show me your..... enough already
- Thread starter James Again
- Start date
Maybe you didn't actually READ my post? I clearly stated that I enjoy imagery as much as the next guy however when people just fish for show me your pussy... show me your tits... That is just someone out to collect pics. If you take the time to actually read a lot of these threads, people with offer pics if they want to without the fishing. That is my point.
If you want to find porno shots, they are free all over the web. For those people that are actually into this lifestyle, they will share with those that they want to.
J
Awww man, you got snarky. That's disappointing because I give people on the internet the benefit of the doubt when any ambiguity exists. A better response would have been to suggest that I misinterpreted your post. But to suggest that I didn't read your post when my answer was responsive as indicated by its detail is wrong. I could pull the same move on you by suggesting that you didn't read my message, but I'll point to the ending portion of my message in which I complimented you despite my criticism. Perhaps you operate differently. Enough of the prefatory statement; on to the meat.
The opening line of your post that "I know I’m probably the exception but does anyone else get tired of the same old pic collecting questions of Show me your tits... [sic] Show me your ass... [sic] Show me your pussy... [sic] Show me show me show me..." was confusing. First,your examples of "pic-collecting questions" aren't questions but clearly commands. Also, your post was vague and ambiguous as to what constitutes "pic collecting questions". Did you mean a general, i.e., command to all members for pics, e.g., https://www.blacktowhite.net/threads/show-off-your-g-string-swallower-type-of-ass.40497/, or a specific, i.e., command to an individual member, for pics? I assumed the former but my initial response still applies to the latter. Members, including Gold members, have commanded individual members, including females, to show off various parts of the anatomy or sexual acts and have attained compliance. Just like with the general command, the specific command keeps up the energy of this site and taps into the tradition of pic-trading over the internet.
So, I stand by my answer being responsive to your post.
Furthermore, you switched your argument between your post and response to my reply. In first post, you wrote "f you are actually curious as to what other people do in this lifestyle or maybe [sic] some tips on how to be successful and enjoy the experience, take some time to actually add something that requires some thought." So the focus of first post was that people should make posts with more content. In your response to my reply you wrote, "f you take the time to actually read a lot of these threads, people with offer pics if they want to without the fishing. That is my point." So the focus of your response was people should not pressure members to post pics. That interpretation is substantiated by the last sentence of your response, namely "[f]or those people that are actually into this lifestyle, they will share with those that they want to." So your response is deceptive in coming up with a basis for denouement that was not presented in your post.
Despite all that, the most important aspect of my responses in this thread is from my first answer in this thread, namely "[y]ou seem cool and I'm not trying to berate you but get you to shift your paradigm." I stand by that. You posted twice to this thread (of course you started the thread) and I posted twice. We had an exchange of words. All good, no hard feelings. My main goal was not to attack you or embarrass you but show my support for the pic-askers and pic-senders. Be well.
Gay.
I like imagery as well and I notice you dont have any? There are not too many forums like this that rely solely on printed word and stories. Humans are visual animals.
shawfelix007
Male
God damn, read three and a half pages of this thread, Is it just me or "white ladies" are NOT talking about their desires or their turn ons, or shared an interesting sexual experience.....!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wasn't this thread meant to be about sharing of "THAT".
Sad to see it get reduced to just a place of lament...., would have, should have, could have.....!!!!!
Come on girls, will be all eyes to read about your desires, turn on and the story you want to share.
Some men do listen... Just saying.
no offense taken. It's just an opinion. You do you man, not judging. The issue is not with people actually sharing pics. I myself am private. As I've stated in my profile. I don't offer pics very often and I don't ask for them for the same reason.
I mean more so for the random individuals with no profile explanation or any real history to drop in and do a claim of show me your whatever.
The people who have been around for a while typically don't pull that kind of *******.
I know I'm one of the exceptions, Which is why I stated that. I'm open for conversation about it. It doesn't take long before someone gets all pissy (not you) but it's starting already. I believe I've been called 'gay' already by a real winner here that can't vocalize but hey that's his issue.
Yes you notice that I don't have any. The reason for that is I am very private and don't normally share to much. In addition to that, if you happen to read in some of the other threads, I have some sort of 'special' ban where I cannot add pics to private chats or create my own media to share. Something that the admins will not remove. I apparently made a reference or posted a pic that was against policy (still not clear on exactly what that was) but it is what it is.
And I agree, humans are very visual. That is cool and I get that. I also know that humans like to steal pics and post them elsewhere as their own with no regard to personal privacy. Nothing easier than putting a 'show me your whatever post' out there and then collecting pics and dumping them somewhere else.
People are gonna do what they are gonna do. ******* happens.
Thanks for your response though, I truly appreciate it.
J
It's a thread, some likes, some hates, whatever. Is what it is. An attempt to start a new thread with different topics is hit or miss.
I stepping back in because I read the messages after my last message and I believe the original poster James Again ("JA") is missing an opportunity to learn from the other members. Hopefully other can benefit. I'll try to be brief. Distilling JA's post, it's as follows: I don't like X, let's do Y instead. The problem is that JA upset so many people that like X that it diverted attention away from Y. Even though JA put a few disclaimers, e.g., "I like imagery just as much as the next guy", they were largely ignored. That makes sense because people were offended. One of the flaws with the post is that offends a lot of people and is even contrary to the site (I'll get to that soon) plus it tries to promote something, namely Y, at the expense of X. If the post was simply "hey guys, let's do Y more", I don't believe JA would have received the backlash he did.
In attacking X, JA indirectly attacked the people who engage in X. For example, member AnnieS has a lot of media on this site and engages in X by responding with pics to the "show me" posts (sidenote: AnnieS, your media is hot! Please keep uploading them). When JA attacked X, he indirectly attacked AnnieS. That's most likely why she shot back at JA and called him out for having no pics. If you check out AnnieS's page (go on, check her out, I'll wait), you can tell she's gorgeous and sexually liberated. Presumably she would be the type of person to "how [her] . . . desires[,] [t]ell [her]. . . history . . . share a secret... what turns [her] on?" as written by JA in his original post as Y. You think she wants to have sexy storytime with JA when she feels insulted? I'm speculating, but I think a lot of women who post pics, especially in response to "show me" posts, will feel similar. When JA attacked X to promote Y, he alienated the audience that likes X.
Let's go on the the next member who wrote that JA was gay. I don't agree with his response BUT I understand why he did it. This site is like adult Disneyland. There's a slew of sexy pics and vids. You don't have to worry about viruses. The media is categorized for convenience. Women who are sexually liberated are here to get a convo and will post on command. There's even porn stars on here (Harmoni, what's up girl!) There's probably guys who come here mainly to see the media in the "show me "posts. Even if the pic-askers are "random individuals with no profile explanation or any real history to drop in and do a claim of show me your whatever" as elaborated by JA, the COMMUNITY benefits. In fact, this site is designed for that. If you want to message another member, when you go to the camera icon, video recorder icon, or gallery icon, you can send pics from other members AND from a website. I've been on G-rated and X-rated sites and never seen that option. So the member who wrote that one-word response to JA may look forward to watching some sexy pics and here's JA kicking him in the shins or at least the person who helps provide those pics. (Pardon me for assuming and typing on your behalf fellow member. I'm trying to interpret your response in the best light and give you the benefit of the doubt). JA is messing with his plug by making members like AnnieS feel upset and they may not post any more sexy pics. Of course, male members post pics of women too, but if we lose the women the male members lose in 2 ways: less sexy pics per basic arithmetic unless male members increase uploads to compensate; and possibly less participation by women. Women are the life-******* of social events. Bars and clubs know it, that's why they tend to have free admission or amenities for women. Where the women go, the men will follow. Women also want to feel safe usually, both physically and emotionally. When women don't feel safe, they bounce. Once the women leave and the place turns into a sausage-fest, the place is usually dead unless it turns guy (not criticizing, just stating). Maybe that's what the member was getting at, e.g., "how can JA complain about sexy pics of women? he must be funny."
Last member - shawfelix007. His message is good; he's asking "don't talk about it, be about it." "You want desires, history, and secrets JA, manifest that" is what I got from his post. The problem is that JA's post upset people and people are unwilling to get caught in the cross-fire while they share a desire, history, or secret. I only see one member not attacking or defending JA and he posts sexy pics (I see you! That guide in Rome was bad . . . and I only saw her from the back) Women want to feel safe and this post isn't a safe place. Shawfelix007 appears (once again, pardon me for appearing to speak for you. I'm just trying to ameliorate the situation) to try to shift focus to Y. On top of that, he points out that's it's a bad look to lament. He's right; how can you complain while at adult Disneyland? Enjoy yourself, get on a woman . . . I mean ride.
Making a post is different from making a message. In a message you can be selfish as you wanna be. In a post you need to consider other people's feelings because you are presumably looking for a response unless you're just venting. Which is why I wrote as the first sentence of my first message "I'm not sure if you're looking for a response or engaging in catharsis." Plus, be the change you want to see. JA made this post about wanting to see desires, history, and secrets but didn't supply any of his own. When you give, that makes people relax so that they too can give. The "show me" posters know that; they start the post with the pics that they want to see. When JA started a post by attacking X and addressing Y without participating in Y, he prevented the post from growing in a positive manner.
I'm getting tired, so I'll end with this recommendation for JA and the community. I recommend when making a post that you not attack anybody or anything unless that's the point of the post (e.g., this post is about why I detest anti-miscegenation laws); instead, just promote your interest and then be the first person to serve that interest. So if you make a post asking members when the first time they had IR sex, start first. That creates a good vibe.
Man, another long post. I tried to avoid it, I promise. This is it for me guys. Be safe.
In attacking X, JA indirectly attacked the people who engage in X. For example, member AnnieS has a lot of media on this site and engages in X by responding with pics to the "show me" posts (sidenote: AnnieS, your media is hot! Please keep uploading them). When JA attacked X, he indirectly attacked AnnieS. That's most likely why she shot back at JA and called him out for having no pics. If you check out AnnieS's page (go on, check her out, I'll wait), you can tell she's gorgeous and sexually liberated. Presumably she would be the type of person to "
Let's go on the the next member who wrote that JA was gay. I don't agree with his response BUT I understand why he did it. This site is like adult Disneyland. There's a slew of sexy pics and vids. You don't have to worry about viruses. The media is categorized for convenience. Women who are sexually liberated are here to get a convo and will post on command. There's even porn stars on here (Harmoni, what's up girl!) There's probably guys who come here mainly to see the media in the "show me "posts. Even if the pic-askers are "random individuals with no profile explanation or any real history to drop in and do a claim of show me your whatever" as elaborated by JA, the COMMUNITY benefits. In fact, this site is designed for that. If you want to message another member, when you go to the camera icon, video recorder icon, or gallery icon, you can send pics from other members AND from a website. I've been on G-rated and X-rated sites and never seen that option. So the member who wrote that one-word response to JA may look forward to watching some sexy pics and here's JA kicking him in the shins or at least the person who helps provide those pics. (Pardon me for assuming and typing on your behalf fellow member. I'm trying to interpret your response in the best light and give you the benefit of the doubt). JA is messing with his plug by making members like AnnieS feel upset and they may not post any more sexy pics. Of course, male members post pics of women too, but if we lose the women the male members lose in 2 ways: less sexy pics per basic arithmetic unless male members increase uploads to compensate; and possibly less participation by women. Women are the life-******* of social events. Bars and clubs know it, that's why they tend to have free admission or amenities for women. Where the women go, the men will follow. Women also want to feel safe usually, both physically and emotionally. When women don't feel safe, they bounce. Once the women leave and the place turns into a sausage-fest, the place is usually dead unless it turns guy (not criticizing, just stating). Maybe that's what the member was getting at, e.g., "how can JA complain about sexy pics of women? he must be funny."
Last member - shawfelix007. His message is good; he's asking "don't talk about it, be about it." "You want desires, history, and secrets JA, manifest that" is what I got from his post. The problem is that JA's post upset people and people are unwilling to get caught in the cross-fire while they share a desire, history, or secret. I only see one member not attacking or defending JA and he posts sexy pics (I see you! That guide in Rome was bad . . . and I only saw her from the back) Women want to feel safe and this post isn't a safe place. Shawfelix007 appears (once again, pardon me for appearing to speak for you. I'm just trying to ameliorate the situation) to try to shift focus to Y. On top of that, he points out that's it's a bad look to lament. He's right; how can you complain while at adult Disneyland? Enjoy yourself, get on a woman . . . I mean ride.
Making a post is different from making a message. In a message you can be selfish as you wanna be. In a post you need to consider other people's feelings because you are presumably looking for a response unless you're just venting. Which is why I wrote as the first sentence of my first message "I'm not sure if you're looking for a response or engaging in catharsis." Plus, be the change you want to see. JA made this post about wanting to see desires, history, and secrets but didn't supply any of his own. When you give, that makes people relax so that they too can give. The "show me" posters know that; they start the post with the pics that they want to see. When JA started a post by attacking X and addressing Y without participating in Y, he prevented the post from growing in a positive manner.
I'm getting tired, so I'll end with this recommendation for JA and the community. I recommend when making a post that you not attack anybody or anything unless that's the point of the post (e.g., this post is about why I detest anti-miscegenation laws); instead, just promote your interest and then be the first person to serve that interest. So if you make a post asking members when the first time they had IR sex, start first. That creates a good vibe.
Man, another long post. I tried to avoid it, I promise. This is it for me guys. Be safe.
I don't know why most of the text in my message was striked-through; it was not intentionally done by me.
Well said, i especially like the fact you didn't say all . There are those who are what you describe, others who are real . To be totally honest you should have included the black males who push the we all have bigger cocks also a unreal fantasy. I've had my share and they were not all hung like mules. Some of the best black lovers I've had were under eight inches, The worst was almost twelve, a blowhard who was in love with his own cock but didn't know how to use it. Convinced mere insertion would get women off, WRONG. I found those who were best didn't mention size unless asked. The size thing has always confused me, are those women who rant over that unable to get off with a single finger. How sad is that.
I think we covered this pretty well. Open conversation is good and welcomed.
So let's sum up to make things more clear.
Images = good.
People who log in, make a profile, don't fill it out and immediately ask for pics = bad.
Call me names if that makes you feel better, whatever works for you, I just laugh at the depths of those responses.
I know who I am, I'm fine with it.
J
So let's sum up to make things more clear.
Images = good.
I enjoy pics, yes I look at them, yes some of them are incredibly hot.
I am not knocking anybody who post pics at all, it's up to you and your level of comfort.
I do not post many in general forums because I am very private with my identity and I do not want to risk being recognized and risking my job, home, etc..
I do not ask for pics for the same reason, I don't want to put people on the spot.
It's a choice and I'm not saying either choice is right or wrong, was just voicing my opinion about collectors.
People who log in, make a profile, don't fill it out and immediately ask for pics = bad.
Take a look at a lot of the requests for pics and who asks for them. It's usually (not always) someone who joins, fills out nothing, and starts asking almost immediately.
Now I realize this is an open forum and I do appreciate that. Call me out with your opinion that is fine.Call me names if that makes you feel better, whatever works for you, I just laugh at the depths of those responses.
I know who I am, I'm fine with it.
J
norton7382
New Member
Isn't this why you are here as well? If not then please explain fantasy "cuckold", "hotwife", and so on ? Its forums such as this for such fantasies that exemplify humiliation and degradation to expect a meaningful conversation is beyond humorous. Don't get me wrong I understand the want/need to try and connect with someone/thing real I just would pick a better realm, stance, world which ever you choose to call it this is an unfortunate outcome for all but not expected with things like this. This is of course is my observation and my opinion.
norton7382
New Member
Can you imagine if there was a site just for guys to find the "perfect" woman using stereo types for instance only Asian women have tight vaginas and white and other color women have loose or wide vaginas because of their size and color. You and all the others would be in an outrage rightfully so however that is exactly what is here on this site as well as many many more. If you don't believe me just look at the topics on this forum. This again is in my opinion as well as in this forum its very unfortunate to be separated by the color of your skin on the internet as well as in real life again done by the media and medians such as this. This is in my opinion
And here you are too
Well I don't see anything wrong with that? What do you have against white men who want to jerk off? Is it unnatural or something guy?
I used to get frustrated with this community but that was my own bullshit and expectations, it's frustrating sometimes when you have a big black cock and giant balls that need draining. No reason to take that out on others though. Lol. I'm just happy to be here. You hot little fucker you! Love your content
