And Hugh didn't even have an educational mission. They did well though as compared to what's available today.
70% of young people (21+ for this forum
) these days say they got their sex ed off porn sites, and all they do that helps them "understand" what they are seeing is read thru the comments section.In Hugh's magazines everything that was printed had to pass their editorial office, and mind, from reading you could have learned something, unexpectedly. The comments on porn sites on the other hand don't go thru any process (other than an anaemic brain perhaps) and, if there's anything they are good at, it's to make people unlearn language skills they'd learned in school. - Oram I worng?
