Trump lost moving on with new year go Biden

[TnC93]

you didn't say "born with" earlier.

where do we put intersex babies that are born with both?

Oh yeah, that's a common occurrence.... You really aren't very good at anything but being wrong.

i didn't call you racist, I said it was "fucked up"

because it is fucked up to assume that she's not qualified. if biden had said he was going to nominate a white man, would you have assumed that the candidate must necessarily be unqualified? there are a lot of very qualified judges, and Jackson is one of them

You claimed that I said she's not qualified because of her race, that's tantamount to calling me racist.... Once corrected, you continue with the mantra, no one Biden would have nominated would have been qualified, most likely. This person is clearly not qualified.

 

[ridgelyfan]

Oh yeah, that's a common occurrence.... You really aren't very good at anything but being wrong.

well are they men or women?

You claimed that I said she's not qualified because of her race, that's tantamount to calling me racist.... Once corrected, you continue with the mantra, no one Biden would have nominated would have been qualified, most likely. This person is clearly not qualified.

you said she was "only" nominated because she was a black woman.

as in, not because she is also a highly qualified and well-respected judge

 

[TnC93]

well are they men or women?

What is the percentage of people born that way?

you said she was "only" nominated because she was a black woman.

as in, not because she is also a highly qualified and well-respected judge

According to Joe Biden, yes, he only nominated her because she's a black woman, and no, she's not respected as a judge by anyone with intelligence and merit.

 

[ridgelyfan]

What is the percentage of people born that way?

Not XX and not XY one in 1,666 births
Klinefelter (XXY) one in 1,000 births
Androgen insensitivity syndrome one in 13,000 births
Partial androgen insensitivity syndrome one in 130,000 births
Classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia one in 13,000 births
Late onset adrenal hyperplasia one in 66 individuals
Vaginal agenesis one in 6,000 births
Ovotestes one in 83,000 births
Idiopathic (no discernable medical cause) one in 110,000 births
Iatrogenic (caused by medical treatment, for instance progestin administered to pregnant mom) no estimate
5 alpha reductase deficiency no estimate
Mixed gonadal dysgenesis no estimate
Complete gonadal dysgenesis one in 150,000 births
Hypospadias (urethral opening in perineum or along penile shaft) one in 2,000 births
Hypospadias (urethral opening between corona and tip of glans penis) one in 770 births

Total number of people whose bodies differ from standard male or female one in 100 births

 

[TnC93]

Not XX and not XY one in 1,666 births
Klinefelter (XXY) one in 1,000 births
Androgen insensitivity syndrome one in 13,000 births
Partial androgen insensitivity syndrome one in 130,000 births
Classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia one in 13,000 births
Late onset adrenal hyperplasia one in 66 individuals
Vaginal agenesis one in 6,000 births
Ovotestes one in 83,000 births
Idiopathic (no discernable medical cause) one in 110,000 births
Iatrogenic (caused by medical treatment, for instance progestin administered to pregnant mom) no estimate
5 alpha reductase deficiency no estimate
Mixed gonadal dysgenesis no estimate
Complete gonadal dysgenesis one in 150,000 births
Hypospadias (urethral opening in perineum or along penile shaft) one in 2,000 births
Hypospadias (urethral opening between corona and tip of glans penis) one in 770 births

Total number of people whose bodies differ from standard male or female one in 100 births

So basically, you want to know how to deal with something that almost never happens? Even in the almost invisible percentage of this, you fail to mention the infinite amount of possible variables that are in play in these situations.

To put it in layman's terms, you're grasping at straws.

 

[ridgelyfan]

So basically, you want to know how to deal with something that almost never happens? Even in the almost invisible percentage of this, you fail to mention the infinite amount of possible variables that are in play in these situations.

To put it in layman's terms, you're grasping at straws.

I guess you would consider 1 out of 100 as "invisible"

like you did with the million americans who died of covid

 

[ridgelyfan]

missouri's population is just under 1% of the US, for reference

maybe we don't really need them either...

 

[C&J Morton]

I do have to say, your gibberish and lack of sentence structure would be hilarious, if you weren't fully in support of this person who doesn't know what a woman is, but is in favor of very light penalties for pedophiles... Nice to see you expose the type of person that you are... Of course, I expect nothing less from a man who identifies as a woman on an internet porn site...

Well, Clem - that is appropriate from your empty skull perspective as those are daily quotes from you and GQP (Grand QAnon Party) … lol. “duh, yah and umm, our sentence structure too … “. Dumbass.

 

[TnC93]

Well, Clem - that is appropriate from your empty skull perspective as those are daily quotes from you and GQP (Grand QAnon Party) … lol. “duh, yah and umm, our sentence structure too … “. Dumbass.

Who is Clem? What's the "Grand QAnon Party" ?

 

[SCBlknNsty]

if you weren't fully in support of this person who doesn't know what a woman is, but is in favor of very light penalties for pedophiles...

Both sides of this comment is derived from the worst of Republican gutter politics. For a man to ask a woman "What is a woman?" from the start was insulting, demeaning and condescending. It was obvious as it came out of his mouth it was a trap question, and as it is obvious from numerous Republican laws both enacted and proposed this issue will wind it's way through the courts. Justice Brown Jackson was polite in her not answering, so now Republicans smear her as "not knowing". As a *******, wife, and mom it should be blindingly obvious she's known since the first time she looked in a mirror.

"Very light penalties for pedophiles"-this pile of manure is based on exactly ONE of the rulings on sexual impropriety that she made, and that ruling was within the guidelines as written by the Republican congress, but once again the Republicans choose to ignore the FACTS of the case in order to slander her. The 18yo defendant (at trial, ******* when charged) was charged on law violations based on pornography through the mail, and allowed charges on each mailing. This young man was one of the first charged for downloading from the internet, and both the defense and the prosecution acknowledged that many of them were produced before he was born, and many others were comparatively same age as he grew older. The guidelines required that she factor in what he was doing with his life otherwise, and the young man was an honors student with multiple college acceptances. She only gave him a 3 month jail sentence, but required he comply with ALL other sex crime conditions-sex offender registration, mandatory counseling/therapy as well as mandatory monitoring and restricted internet access. You can call it light but I see it as corrective and not punitive.

 

[SCBlknNsty]

She's not constitutionally sound, plus, her nomination was based solely on her race/gender, making her nomination bigoted.

No, bigoted is still insisting the Court, and many other institutions have to get back to being White Men's Clubs.

 

[SCBlknNsty]

So, calling out the bigoted, racist comment that Biden made, saying that he was going to nominate a black woman, thus disqualifying any other possible nominee based solely on their race/gender makes me "racist"?

Truly takes some mental gymnastics to promote such a thought...

Why do you insist on seeing what he said as "bigoted and racist" instead of as inclusive of a section of the American populace that wasn't just underrepresented, but NEVER represented?

 

[TnC93]

Why do you insist on seeing what he said as "bigoted and racist" instead of as inclusive of a section of the American populace that wasn't just underrepresented, but NEVER represented?

Because of the racism of Joe Biden... This nomination was not made because of this person's qualifications.

 

[TnC93]

No, bigoted is still insisting the Court, and many other institutions have to get back to being White Men's Clubs.

What is it with you guys insisting that's what I want? Nothing I've said has given that indication.

 

[TnC93]

Both sides of this comment is derived from the worst of Republican gutter politics. For a man to ask a woman "What is a woman?" from the start was insulting, demeaning and condescending. It was obvious as it came out of his mouth it was a trap question, and as it is obvious from numerous Republican laws both enacted and proposed this issue will wind it's way through the courts. Justice Brown Jackson was polite in her not answering, so now Republicans smear her as "not knowing". As a *******, wife, and mom it should be blindingly obvious she's known since the first time she looked in a mirror.

"Very light penalties for pedophiles"-this pile of manure is based on exactly ONE of the rulings on sexual impropriety that she made, and that ruling was within the guidelines as written by the Republican congress, but once again the Republicans choose to ignore the FACTS of the case in order to slander her. The 18yo defendant (at trial, ******* when charged) was charged on law violations based on pornography through the mail, and allowed charges on each mailing. This young man was one of the first charged for downloading from the internet, and both the defense and the prosecution acknowledged that many of them were produced before he was born, and many others were comparatively same age as he grew older. The guidelines required that she factor in what he was doing with his life otherwise, and the young man was an honors student with multiple college acceptances. She only gave him a 3 month jail sentence, but required he comply with ALL other sex crime conditions-sex offender registration, mandatory counseling/therapy as well as mandatory monitoring and restricted internet access. You can call it light but I see it as corrective and not punitive.

I respect your opinion, but the fact remains that she is not qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice... The flip side is that the Democrats haven't gained anything, they replaced one radical judge with another. Y'all smear Clarence Thomas, and he's the most constitutionally sound justice currently serving on the court.

 

[SCBlknNsty]

What is it with you guys insisting that's what I want? Nothing I've said has given that indication.

IN YOUR OPINION.

 

[SCBlknNsty]

I respect your opinion, but the fact remains that she is not qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice... The flip side is that the Democrats haven't gained anything, they replaced one radical judge with another. Y'all smear Clarence Thomas, and he's the most constitutionally sound justice currently serving on the court.

Again, in your opinion, and because YOU think so doesn't make it 'fact' for anyone else. I think Joe Manchin is the only person affiliated with the Democratic party that you haven't called radical. And I'll thank you to retract that Clarence Thomas statement-I've never mentioned him so don't know where you get that "y'all" ******* from...

 

[TnC93]

IN YOUR OPINION.

Actually in fact..

 

[C&J Morton]

I respect your opinion, but the fact remains that she is not qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice... The flip side is that the Democrats haven't gained anything, they replaced one radical judge with another. Y'all smear Clarence Thomas, and he's the most constitutionally sound justice currently serving on the court.

Lol, TardisConfused ... all the time. This douche is another "definitive" RepTard fart in the wind. "duh, me knows stuff and she's not qualified and Imma know dis, because she is an African sumtin' and Biden is a big fat racist ... oh, and Imma from MooseZoo, so I suck off Hee-Hawley often to get my brain juice ... umm, and she is justa a rabical Justice" Dumb as stone and shows it here everyday.

 

[TnC93]

Lol, TardisConfused ... all the time. This douche is another "definitive" RepTard fart in the wind. "duh, me knows stuff and she's not qualified and Imma know dis, because she is an African sumtin' and Biden is a big fat racist ... oh, and Imma from MooseZoo, so I suck off Hee-Hawley often to get my brain juice ... umm, and she is justa a rabical Justice" Dumb as stone and shows it here everyday.

I so look forward to your posts of complete gibberish, sir.