Naked Cuck-Husband Window-Watching

Notwithstanding that my young black bisexual buddy and I and my ex-wife (now his wife) have lived together sharing the marital bed and each other sexually full-on for six years, once in a while I chance upon my buddy and my ex-wife relating intensely emotionally and erotically in ways that they are careful not to show or even hint at in my presence.

The impact on me of truly unintentionally and unpremeditately "catching" them in their strictly exclusive world of their wonderfully sexual loving of each other, including during intercourse, is always and instantly intensely lonelymaking for me because of the huge and permanently unbridgeable gulf I perceive between their intensely romantic, totally uninhibited and extremely fulfilling one-on-one loving compared to the perceivably cautious and restrictive way they share themselves emotionally with me, notably in our threesoming together.

At such times I identify strongly with the naked young man looking up into a bower where there are two lovers---a man and a woman oblivious of him watching them---portrayed by this very erotic and famous black-and-white woodcut. It is an illustration from a Victorian edition of the works of Oscar Wilde.

cuck husband watching .jpg

The beautifully yielded woman and her taller and much stronger lover are marvelously deftly portrayed as totally at one with each other, while the gloriously full-figured beautifully naked but curiously soft-dicked uncircumcised young watcher of them is shown to be wonderingly, perhaps agonisingly, on the Outer, lonely, visibly sexually unexcited and at a much lower physical level on the ground compared to the aptly elevated position of the embracing lovers seen through the open arch.

Can any other male members or watchers of this forum relate to this? From their direct experience I mean.
 
Last edited:
Notwithstanding that my young black bisexual buddy and I and my ex-wife (now his wife) have lived together sharing the marital bed and each other sexually full-on for six years, once in a while I chance upon my buddy and my ex-wife relating intensely emotionally and erotically in ways that they are careful not to show or even hint at in my presence.

The impact on me of truly unintentionally and unpremeditately "catching" them in their strictly exclusive world of their wonderfully sexual loving of each other, including during intercourse, is always and instantly intensely lonelymaking for me because of the huge and permanently unbridgeable gulf I perceive between their intensely romantic, totally uninhibited and extremely fulfilling one-on-one loving compared to the perceivably cautious and restrictive way they share themselves emotionally with me, notably in our threesoming together.

At such times I identify strongly with the naked young man looking up into a bower where there are two lovers---a man and a woman oblivious of him watching them---portrayed by this very erotic and famous black-and-white woodcut. It is an illustration from a Victorian edition of the works of Oscar Wilde.

View attachment 3842860

The beautifully yielded woman and her taller and much stronger lover are marvelously deftly portrayed as totally at one with each other, while the gloriously full-figured beautifully naked but curiously soft-dicked uncircumcised young watcher of them is shown to be wonderingly, perhaps agonisingly, on the Outer, lonely, visibly sexually unexcited and at a much lower physical level on the ground compared to the aptly elevated position of the embracing lovers seen through the open arch.

Can any other male members or watchers of this forum relate to this? From their direct experience I mean.
It’s learnt that most wives will want to spend her time alone with her lover banishing hubby from their room. Hubbies too get an erotic high when she does that.

What’s the psychology behind that Michael??
 
It’s learnt that most wives will want to spend her time alone with her lover banishing hubby from their room. Hubbies too get an erotic high when she does that.

What’s the psychology behind that Michael??
[/QUOTE,
I'm preparing as full as possible answer to your question.

In the meantime I venture to say that the erotic high that the excluded husband experiences is caused by his knowing, or hoping, that his wife has been drawn into and is privately intensely focussed on and going to open herself up to and be powerfully pleasured by a lover almost certainly much more physically desirable and potent than you.

The intensely erotic irony in that is that you have either tacitly or explicitly agreed to him taking her from you.

The lovers' banishing you from their (previously your) bedroom in which they are going to ravish each other is aphrodizzying is the extreme because of, firstly, your voluntarily relinquishing your "ownership" of your wife to an obviously vastly more attractive and sexually superior man and, secondly, because of you having no say or control at all over the outcome of your passive aquiescence to their mating; namely the vigor verging on the mutual ******* of it and whether or not the lover of your wife fucks her bareback and ejaculates in her, and of course whether she falls in love with him on your marriage bed.

The total unknowability of those things to the excluded husband is deeply, often subconsciously, so anxiety-provoking that he actively suppresses his natural responses of envy and jealousy and even hatred towards his wife's sexual ecstasisings beneath her presently, going onto possibly permanently, preferred lover.

The giving-up, even once, of one's wife to a physically superior and unknowably vastly more sexually-satisfying and likely more romantic male rival to fuck her in private, always brings with it a greater or lesser payload of intense anxiety of being summarily and permanently dispossessed of her in favour of her chosen lover of the moment.

That anxiety is often denied by the husband despite amounting to overwhelming fear through its being unexpressed by him in the process and heartstopping drama of his wife being taken by another man, and paradoxically engenders intense sexual arousal by an automatically-operating survival-defense subconsciously operating conversion mechanism; which naturally makes the thought of or actual sexual and spousal dispossession by one's rival bearable, or in the best-case scenario able to be orgasmically got off on.

It's actually masochism-in-action and as such so highly addictive sexually for the husband that he repeatedly, usually compulsively, encourages and succeeds in having his wife grandly fucked by other men more capable by far in satisfying her sexually than he is.

The intensity of the sexual excitement of the husband engendered by his offering up the love of his life to superior lovers is in direct proportion to the emotional pain his aquiescence to her being fucked more pleasurably by other men.

In the best/worst case scenario the husband's actually self-inflicted emotional pain at being supplanted sexually and his anxiety over spousal deprivation becomes impossible for him to live without and his principal stimulant and intense excitant, usually for the rest of his life.
 
Wow.

How do wife see this though? I have heard wife too loves to banish their lesser husband from their bedroom while making love with her superior man.
 
Wow.

How do wife see this though? I have heard wife too loves to banish their lesser husband from their bedroom while making love with her superior man.
Why does she love to banish him, you ask?

Answer: Firstly to punish him for not being the man she needs, and secondly to allow her attention to be focused solely and heathily selfishly on her lover while she is being romanced and fucked by him.

In that scenario the husband's punishment is the denial of him of the awe and extreme personal and vicarious sexual pleasure of watching a woman, his wife, engaging in the aesthetically and erotically most beautiful act of human existence, namely sexual intercourse, with a man of her choice; her choice having being made on the ground that in her eyes and marital experience of him her husband does not meet the standard required to satisfy her personality-wise, romantically, visuo-aesthetically or in physical sexual performance, as against her lover who does.
 
Last edited:
Why does she love to banish him, you ask?

Answer: Firstly to punish him for not being the man she needs, and secondly to allow her attention to be focused solely and heathily selfishly on her lover while she is being romanced and fucked by him.

In that scenario the husband's punishment is the denial of him of the awe and extreme personal and vicarious sexual pleasure of watching a woman, his wife, engaging in the aesthetically and erotically most beautiful act of human existence, namely sexual intercourse, with a man of her choice; her choice having being made on the ground that in her eyes and marital experience of him her husband does not meet the standard required to satisfy her personality-wise, romantically, visuo-aesthetically or in physical sexual performance, as against her lover who does.
I guess women get that sexual high when she is all alone with her superior man so that she can completely give herself to him without the defeated presence of her hubby
 
How did you feel? Aroused?
Very aroused, also feelings of humiliation, confusion ect. It was a emotional storm. You would think after 10 or more years I would be over the emotions but they still persist. The feeling is like a high, its almost like a *******. Most times now, she is in the spare bedroom I am in our bedroom watching porn and when I hear the fucking hard across the house I run down the hall to listen at the door.
 
I have stood outside the door listenting Naked hard cock in hand. Also tried to watch in window at a hotel before, not naked.
"lisTENTING"? Lol!! A slight Freudian Slip there, or merely Stand-out Stand-up Honesty?

Whichever, I trust you got off deliciously wetly and wrenchingly on both occasions. I would have!
 
"lisTENTING"? Lol!! A slight Freudian Slip there, or merely Stand-out Stand-up Honesty?

Whichever, I trust you got off deliciously wetly and wrenchingly on both occasions. I would have!
Damn typos and work distractions.

Yes each time we both get off after the bull leaves.
 
Damn typos and work distractions.

Yes each time we both get off after the bull leaves.
Remember, if he has ejaculated into your wife, the bull never fully leaves. That is because the liquid and protein and fructose and minerals and prostaglandin hormones, not to mention the life-giving sperm in the 3 to 12 mls of semen he has spurted into her, once they have fulfilled their principal biological and reproductive functions, are absorbed into her bloodstream from her vagina and womb and become incorporated into her body, actually becoming part of it.

Pretty hot, eh?

In bareback sexual intercourse between a wife and her lover, what comes around inevitably goes around, always for the best, without her rightful husband being able to do anything about it.
 
Last edited:
Remember, if he has ejaculated into your wife, the bull never fully leaves. That is because the liquid and protein and fructose and minerals and prostaglandin hormones, not to mention the life-giving sperm in the 3 to 12 mls of semen he has spurted into her, once they have fulfilled their principal biological and reproductive functions, are absorbed into her bloodstream from her vagina and womb and become incorporated into her body, actually becoming part of it.

Pretty hot, eh?

In bareback sexual intercourse between a wife and her lover, what comes around inevitably goes around, always for the best, without her rightful husband being able to do anything about it.
I heard that semen contains some happiness hormones or chemicals. Is that the reason why woman feel contented when her man ejaculates inside her???
 
I heard that semen contains some happiness hormones or chemicals. Is that the reason why woman feel contented when her man ejaculates inside her???

You heard right.

The hormones in semen are called prostaglandins. They are secreted NOT by the prostate gland as origininally supposed, but by the much more capacious right and left twin seminal vesicles which are very muscular with their bulbous blunt ends located about 3 inches higher in the male pelvis than is the prostate gland.

On erotic stimulation of the man the seminal vesicles greatly increase their rate and volume of secretion, a thickish lumpy whiteish-yellow fluid that bulges them to sweetly aching fulness and which contributes about 60% of the total volume of the ejaculate and contains the feel-good prostaglandin hormones that soothe the vigorously stretched-up vagina as well as stimulate the muscle of the womb and egg-tubes to contract very pleasurably for the woman for an hour or two after she has been ejaculated into.

The secretion of the seminal vesicles also contains the sugar fructose which nourishes the sperm in their journeying up the woman's reproductive tract; and an enzyme, hyaluronidase, which causes the ejaculated semen to liquefy from its originally half-clotted state and into a much less viscous state in which the sperm are much freer to move in their upward journeying in the woman's womb and egg tubes.

It is mainly the upping in secretory activity of the seminal vesicles in response to the erotic mental and physical stimulation of the man that gets him horny to fuck.

Good system eh?
 
Last edited:
You heard right.

The hormones in semen are called prostaglandins. They are secreted NOT by the prostate gland as origininally supposed, but by the much more capacious right and left twin seminal vesicles which are very muscular with their bli located about 3 inches higher in the male pelvis than is the prostate gland.

On erotic stimulation of the man the seminal vesicles greatly increase their rate and volume of secretion, a thickish lumpy whiteish-yellow fluid which contributes about 60% of the volume of the ejaculate and contains the feel-good prostaglandin hormones that soothe the vigorously stretched-up vagina as well as stimulate the muscle of the womb and egg-tubes to contract very pleasurably for the woman for an hour or two after she has been ejaculated into.

The secretion of the seminal vesicles also contains the sugar fructose which nourishes the sperm in their journeying up the woman's reproductive tract; and an enzyme, hyaluronidase, which causes the ejaculated semen to liquefy from its originally half-clotted state and into a much less viscous state in which the sperm are much freer to move in their upward journeying in the woman's womb and egg tubes.

It is mainly the upping in secretory activity of the seminal vesicles in response to the erotic mental and physical stimulation of the man that gets him horny to fuck.

Good system eh?
No wonder why woman are all cozy and have that contented and flushed look after getting ejaculated by her man.. It’s not just the physical work but the chemicals in the bodily fluids also have their part.. right.. Amazing
 
It is our belief that regular seeding is vital to general and sexual health. There are studies of women who do not use condoms and it shows they have less depression and better balance.

Because her pussy is black only we have to find reliable visitors for twice weekly visits.
 
Back
Top