Where did you find that information? I'm genuinely curious!
Freuds theory of human sexuality and numerous other studies.
Where did you find that information? I'm genuinely curious!
Not saying it’s wrong but I wonder where the 7-1 ratio came from. Nonetheless this is well-stated and sensible.
I respect that opinion, and like I said I wasn’t disagreeing at all. And your paragraph leading with…its in various studies. Based of our extensive experience over 35 years in the lifestyle and the BDSM community I think 7-1 is about rigyt.
We found a lot of husbands struggled in swinging with performance, especially white husbands. Many couldn't get hard. I never had that problem, and was also able to fuck a guy's wife with him sitting right there.My husband didn't do well in swinging let alone attempt the status of a bull.
If you have a huge and hard cock to satisfy other women, swinging is the best. But if you have a small and soft penis like mine all you can be is a cuckold!Swinging is the best!
Yes, in my case I have wished again and again to be an alpha male since forever. I would have given anything to be one and be able to agree to have sex with a woman. Over the years I have learned to accept what I am, rather to resign myself. But that deep desire has not disappeared. i think that my small penis and also my insecurity with women, major factors of what i am.I have a question for the other cuckolds, doesn't matter if you are wanabee or not.
If you was attractive, long lasting in bed, well endowed and without any erectile disfunction or sexual troubles, would you want to be a bull instead of a cuck ?
Or is it like some other things once you go cuck you never come back ?
Joke aside, i would like to hear the different feelings about this, is being a cuckold a psychological thing without any link to any lower sexual capabilities, testosterone or even small penis.
Or is our small penis perception (no matter if it is true or not) or insecurities a major factor in choosing to be a cuck.