smallcock ... you're not a politician are you?
I specifically asked
HOW have you had conversation with her. Sending e-mails and typed personal messages is "conversation", but it doesn't determine any form of proof that you're in correspondence with a very young and cute, pregnant female. For all you really know, under those circumstances, it could just as well be ME you were corresponding with ... right?
Actually, the verification process, as applied here, can be photo shopped, but it limits it to those with the software and ability to do it. Regardless, we can get
verified and have all the casual conversations we wish, however, and no one really gets taken advantage of
until someone starts soliciting funds from others.
Let's put it in another scenario: I show you pictures of land partials and tell you there is unusually high oil/natural gas extraction potentials on them, but I need funding to do it. So, here's the deal ... investors pay me $5,000 front money, and I'll contract with investors at 30% of the profits. At this point, one can accept or decline this offer. However, if I know, (or have simply made my information up), that there is
no oil or natural gas on those properties, I've committed an illegal act. If I actually take your money, knowing what I know, I've committed fraud, a felony worth considerable prison time. There's a popular saying here ...
"Buyers beware!"
OK, enough "explaining my point"; you seem like an intelligent guy. Take care ...
Mac
