Questions about black superiority

#1
I have recently gotten to know a black man who has been slowly educating me on some things that he says are the "new reality." First he has told me that white women are attracted to black men because of some attractant or chemical or something that is in black sperm and not in white sperm. Women are attracted to this and this is why women do not tend to go back with white guys once they have had a black lover and there is an instinct in white boys to try and prevent that first encounter because they know they are out of the picture once that happens. I have found some references to things like this but no absolute proof. It sounds crazy to me but on the other hand I have respect for this man who is telling me this stuff and in my opinion the black man does seem superior so maybe I should just accept what he says-? In addition, this man has told me that there is a "sexual evolution and a sexual revolution" going on. By this he means that black men and white women are adapted so that the black man fits into the white woman perfectly and this is another reason the pleasure is more intense with that combination. He feels that size is not what matters but "compatibility". He thinks that over time white men will become more like boys and get smaller and less capable. I might add that he thinks I am an example of this. Now this man believes that one of the most enjoyable acts in a sexual relationship is the total cuckolding of a white husband. So this goes beyond just sex and gets into other issues such as respect. I get that part, I guess. Although it is a one way street and likely to stay that way. Anyways he feels that the white race could be bred out of existence and this is his concern because he likes white women. So all of this is a bit deep for me but this is a serious man who knows more than me about things like this so ???

I thought I would post all of this to see if anyone out there knows if all of this stuff about biology and chemicals and so forth is true or partially true. If so I have to think the information is being withheld from people because of the fear of the white men out there who may just be a whole bunch inferior to the black men and are desparate to keep the white women from knowing.

Thanks to anyone who has any ideas or information. I think this could really help white cuckolds accept reality and become part of the solution instead of part of the problem.
 
#2
I think you are very likely right. Im comin closer and closer to the realization that Blk men r converting this lesbian back to bi. But only for blk dik. I cant eveb pretend to get turned on at the thot of lettin a tiby whitedick n me butbig Blk bull tbats rock hard ccan command me to open my legs like a mindless sex toyfor them. Its almost uncontrolable.
 

Dsoul

Male
Real Person
Gold Member
From
Nigeria
#3
There's a thing that a lot of white people fail to take into consideration, and that's History.

For years and years, right before the time of American Independence, all through the fight for abolution of slavery, the Jim Crow era and down to the fifties, white men have been wanting to protect the so-called sanctity of their white women, like that's something they think is worth more than gold. They fail to realise or come to the conclusion that a time has come when their women no longer wish to be held down due to their over-protectiveness which has only led to rampart racism all till this day. The tide has now turned on them when they realise their women are opting for emancipation, of wanting to get all those taboo stuff that's been locked away from them.

Such is the supremacy!
 

One Small Dick

Male
Gold Member
#4
I have heard quite a bit of the same things that you mentioned, or very similar things anyway.He may be hiting on something there for sure because there are definitely lots more white females now who have either went black or have the desire to, than say just a few years ago.
 
#7
Surprising how many uneducated people there are on this site. So far this entire thread is the biggest bunch of bullshit I have ever heard. You people that have posted this BS are not much different than all the gay folks who are firmly convinced that every other person on the planet is a closet homosexual. You all are living in a FANTASY world. Would be nice to see some posting from people who have their shit straight!
 
#10
Tired of the BS on this site. Time for a reality check.
I'm with on this, from a reality perspective, for sure. If you look at facts/statistics, you're right it's fantasy...but, that's also a big part of what this site is about...fantasy. And it's that fantasy, and the associated "rush" that comes with it for some, that drives so many of the postings.

For me, it gets to be BS when those same people lose the ability to differentiate between fantasy and reality.
 
#11
I posted these questions because they are just that- questions. I do not know if there is anything to this biology stuff but I was "educated" by a man about this and he believes it. What I see above is a great deal of anger that I don't understand. Again my questions are related to whether the differences between black men and white men are non-existent (as satyr seems to think) or real (as my mentor that I mentioned thinks). If there are real differences, are they related to "fantasy" and in the head (as wbfbm seems to believe) or are they related to some actual superiority that the black man has? If there are actual physical differences such as size or performance are there sites or articles or other information that explain it. I do not know the answers to these questions and the purpose of the thread was to see if anyone had ideas or answers. All I know is what I see around me and that is not some fantasy world. What I see are black men with white women.
 
#12
We see what we choose to see and believe what we choose to believe. Yes, I see black men with white women but I also see white men with black women, white men with Asian women, black men with Asian women, etc.

The BS I'm referring to is related to those that TRULY BELIEVE the "all" statements. All white men are wimp sissies, all whites should be slaves to blacks, all white women want BBC, all black men are bulls, all black men are superior, etc. Anyone that wants to keep it "real" and truly believes this needs to run, not walk to the nearest counselor.

Let's look at one other point...your "mentor" is black and is "educating" you on certain things about black superiority. Does the phrase 'conflict of interests' happen to come to mind? You are free to believe what you want and if it helps you get off so much the better and my previous statement would support you in this.
 
#14
Wow, this is an old thread but maybe you see now that things are sorta going the way your mentor said it would. If you look up black couple, you get a lot of pics of happy black people. If you look up white couple you get pics of race mixing couples. Of course there are black guys out there with small penises and white guys with big, however the majority of blacks are bigger. The average size of a black mans penis is much higher than the average of a white mans. Black semen is much more fertile than whites and contains high levels of dopamine which can actually act as a anti-depressant. Race mixing is being pushed by media so much more than before. I don't know where you are at now but I beleive everything your mentor said is true. Cuckold porn is one of the most top rated genres now. I for one accept it and wish other would too
 

Ted & Jenn

Couple
Gold Member
From
Canada
#15
"Human biodiversity" (HBD) is one of the more bogus fields of science and frequently slips over into outright racism, but even so there may something in it, taken with large shaker of salt. In fact, HBD has a reasonable explanation about how we got to where we are today with black and white sexuality.

We're still basically stone age people, blacks formed by the tropical environment of Africa, whites by the forests and tundra of Ice Age Eurasia. I don't have the patience to run through the whole hypothesis, but it suggest some plausible mechanisms why one environment might produce, on average, a more masculine, sexualized male and the other a more feminine, sexually attractive female.

None of that was terribly significant for the long stretches of time when the races were geographically separated. But in the modern period, when races live together, women have sexual autonomy, interracial relationships are accepted, then what we've got a formula for sexual nitroglycerin.

To be realistic, I don't know how big an effect this is gonna on society as a whole. It's huge for the people who frequent groups like this. It's become huge for me and my wife, when a year ago it was an interesting fantasy. And for a certain class of. attractive, socially adept black males, it's turning into a sexual paradise out there. Enjoy it, guys. Fortune has smiled on you.
 

Ted & Jenn

Couple
Gold Member
From
Canada
#17
Cock size is only part of it. What you might call sexual charisma is a bigger factor. Again, it's on average. Walk down the street, the first black guy you see is probably not moistening every white woman's panties. But wherever there's a racially mixed social scene, clubs, bars, well just open your eyes.
 
Last edited:
#18
I want to thank Robert Crest for responding to this post. I am surprised at how long ago I wrote it. I especially want to thank Ted and Jenn. The idea of the ultra feminization of the white woman and the ultra masculinity of the black man makes some sense. Much has happened since I wrote that post. First of all my "mentor" is now married to me ex wife. It is with my blessing as he is better. He is a man. It is just that simple. Secondly it seems to me that once a white male is "broken" and accepts his role things will change. He will go from fantasizing about his wife with other men to a desire to become s support person. To realize he is not and will never be a sexual partner again. I think there is a tendency for the boy to be more feminine. This could be either full out feminization or just a more submissive and sweet nature. It is really about respect and that requires an attitude adjustment. I am not sure that can happen until the white boy and white woman experience that first sexual experience. By that I mean the white woman with a black guy. Once that happens it is my feeling that the white woman will not want to have sex with the white boy. The white boy will find the desire to shift to masturbation or something else. Of course, relationships and habits count for something but I think the enormous number of fantasy stories and questions about this idea make me think this is what people really are wanting. So why not just make it real? As Ted and Jenn mentioned all you have to do is look around. That is why I continue to think there is some chemical or something that makes the black man and white woman pairing the most natural and most intense. Too much is made of cock size or looks or whatever. It is more than that. This is just an opinion and an observation. So thanks to all. I really think conversations like this are helpful for everyone to get on the same page.
 

Ted & Jenn

Couple
Gold Member
From
Canada
#19
I doubt it's anything as simple as a chemical. It's the whole personality as well as physical appearance. Our natural sexuality is formed by the sexual dynamics of our stone age ancestors. We were hunter-gatherers. The men were hunters, the women were gatherers.

The theory goes, that in the permanent summer of Africa, the livin' was easy, and a woman could support herself and her kids pretty much just from gathering. A bit of male-supplied meat (in both senses of the word!) was nice to have but not required. In this enviroment, women are the choosers. Men have to compete for women, and the ones who are sexier and more charming are the ones who will pass on their genes. Repeat for 2000 generations.

Now, go to the God-forsaken forests and tundra of north. There was nothing to gather here in the winter, and just to survive (not to enjoy herself) a woman had to attach herself to a man to supply meat for her and her children. That put women in the position of competing for men, and so it was the more attractive (eg, variety of hair & eye colours), more feminine women who were more successful at raising children (any woman can get laid, but landing a man who can get your family through the winter through his hunting is hard).

I'll mention another twist (there are several). If the stone age environment bred more masculine males in Africa and more feminine females in northern Eurasia, what happened to the African women and the northern males? An interesting point. Because they were the sexual choosers, evolution wasn't driving up their sexual attractiveness as much. They didn't need it so much. What you get instead is a spillover effect. If evolution is breeding northern women to be more delicate and feminine, northern men will become somewhat less muscular and masculine. Lower testosterone at puberty means smaller penises. Lump it, white girl, it's not like you have a choice. African women will be "thiccer" with higher testosterone and therefore higher sex drives, which in turn drives African males to become even more highly sexualized.

That, according to the theory, is the evolutionary setup we've inherited. It's not solid science yet, so we should be skeptical, but I think there may be something in it. Now, today, we're in a situation evolution never predicted: race mixing. Guess what? Those sexy white women and those sexy black men... click. Something we've got to live with.

Sorry for turning this thread into Reddit, as one contributorl put it. I despise Reddit, but I wanted express these ideas and maybe find out what y'all think of them.
 
Last edited:
#20
I doubt it's anything as simple as a chemical. It's the whole personality as well as physical appearance. Our natural sexuality is formed by the sexual dynamics of our stone age ancestors. We were hunter-gatherers. The men were hunters, the women were gatherers.

The theory goes, that in the permanent summer of Africa, the livin' was easy, and a woman could support herself and her kids pretty much just from gathering. A bit of male-supplied meat (in both senses of the word!) was nice to have but not required. In this enviroment, women are the choosers. Men have to compete for women, and the ones who are sexier and more charming are the ones who will pass on their genes. Repeat for 2000 generations.

Now, go to the God-forsaken forests and tundra of north. There was nothing to gather here in the winter, and just to survive (not to enjoy herself) a woman had to attach herself to a man to supply meat for her and her children. That put women in the position of competing for men, and so it was the more attractive (eg, variety of hair & eye colours), more feminine women who were more successful at raising children (any woman can get laid, but landing a man who can get your family through the winter through his hunting is hard).

I'll mention another twist (there are several). If the stone age environment bred more masculine males in Africa and more feminine females in northern Eurasia, what happened to the African women and the northern males? An interesting point. Because they were the sexual choosers, evolution wasn't driving up their sexual attractiveness as much. They didn't need it so much. What you get instead is a spillover effect. If evolution is breeding northern women to be more delicate and feminine, northern men will become somewhat less muscular and masculine. Lower testosterone at puberty means smaller penises. Lump it, white girl, it's not like you have a choice. African women will be "thiccer" with higher testosterone and therefore higher sex drives, which in turn drives African males to become even more highly sexualized.

That, according to the theory, is the evolutionary setup we've inherited. It's not solid science yet, so we should be skeptical, but I think there may be something in it. Now, today, we're in a situation evolution never predicted: race mixing. Guess what? Those sexy white women and those sexy black men... click. Something we've got to live with.

Sorry for turning this thread into Reddit, as one contributorl put it. I despise Reddit, but I wanted express these ideas and maybe find out what y'all think of them.
Your fourth paragraph summed it up well. That is a good reason why black woman are more curvy and black men are more endowed and athletic. If you look around, you notice a lot more "thicc" white woman than there were several years ago, that's because race mixing was a scary taboo thing, it was accepted, just not popular back then. Now, it's basically become the norm. I know several white girls who are with a black guy and use to be with a white. I work in a grocery store where everyday I'll see at least 2 Wwoman and Bmale couples, I'm almost thinking about counting them and writing it down lol. As what rocuck said, I agree and am somewhat of an example. I have completely shifted to masturbation (only had sex once, gf left me for a black guy a year ago). When I hear women talking about sex and what they want, it's pretty clear that size does matter so why bother? Not to mention, it explains why black woman tend to be more of a size queen than white woman, you can find that anywhere lol.