HISTORY OF INTERRACIAL RELATIONSHIP

Do you see interracial relationship take over same race relationship in Near future?


  • Total voters
    615
Because that is what sells the most porn. Follow the money.

Damn, the first person that's made sense all day ... lol :bounce: Hey, it's ALWAYS about the money. You can polish your egos all day if that makes you feel good, but facts are facts. That's what capitalism does to you ... greed, baby, greed!
I can agree that black on white is a popular trend. So are a lot of other things. And trends eventually change.
As a salesman by trade, I can tell you the one factual thing about selling anything ... "You have to either excite or disturb the customer into buying what you're selling. They either got to WANT it or be CONCERNED for not having it" ... othewise, you have NO SALE!
As far as the white race disappearing, if every black male fucks every white female and produces an offspring, the black race has been diluted just as much as the white race. So drop your ego trips & hate and just enjoy what's going on. ;)
 
True, it was built on greed, just like most civilizations were.

Wrong. It was built on marriage, monogamy, sexual restraint, and same-race pairings. The reality is that civilization was built on "beta male" values. When you lose beta males, you lose civilization.

This differs in what manner than the way Blacks, Native Americans (North and South), Asians and Pacific Islanders were treated by white Europeans exactly?

In every way. Whites never raped and murdered any of those groups en masse (unless they were both at war). White-on-black ******* is so miniscule that it is practically non-existent. Look up the statistics. The only reason those groups even have "basic" necessities like running water, indoor plumbing, cars, motor boats, airplanes, roads, electricity, etc...is because White Europeans gave those things to them. Why are there skyscrapers in Asia? Why is there air conditioning in Africa? Why are there TV sets in India? Same answer to all questions: Because of white people.

You can bitch about it all day but it's 100% true and nothing you say is going to make it any less true.
 
If this happens it will mean the end of white race. It will mean the end of interracial relationships/sex between whites and any other race. Extinction of a race is never a good thing. We have almost experienced that with the Native Americans, I hope it will never happen.

Gee, ya think? Extinction of the race which gave the world the technology used to create this board and the network on which it operates could possibly, maybe, kind of...be a bad thing?

Ya think?

Wake up. It IS a bad thing. And anyone who advocates it is one sick, demented fuck. And a vicious racist, too.
 
Wrong. It was built on marriage, monogamy, sexual restraint, and same-race pairings. The reality is that civilization was built on "beta male" values. When you lose beta males, you lose civilization.



In every way. Whites never raped and murdered any of those groups en masse (unless they were both at war). White-on-black ******* is so miniscule that it is practically non-existent. Look up the statistics. The only reason those groups even have "basic" necessities like running water, indoor plumbing, cars, motor boats, airplanes, roads, electricity, etc...is because White Europeans gave those things to them. Why are there skyscrapers in Asia? Why is there air conditioning in Africa? Why are there TV sets in India? Same answer to all questions: Because of white people.

You can bitch about it all day but it's 100% true and nothing you say is going to make it any less true.[/quote

INDIA is the 4th country in the world as per no. TV sets (after china,usa,n japan)and 3rd country in the world(after china and usa) as per internet connections n usage-.all donated by whites.
stop posting bullshit.
 
Wrong. It was built on marriage, monogamy, sexual restraint, and same-race pairings. The reality is that civilization was built on "beta male" values. When you lose beta males, you lose civilization.

Really? The Caesars, the Catholic church and the various European monarchies were all "beta" males and all practiced monogamy and sexual restraint? I suppose the founding fathers of the United States were all beta males who practiced monogamy, sexual restraint, and never paired with their slaves either.


In every way. Whites never raped and murdered any of those groups en masse (unless they were both at war). White-on-black ******* is so miniscule that it is practically non-existent. Look up the statistics.

Whites never raped and murdered the Native Americans en masse? Whites didn't ******* and ******* black slaves? What is this nonsense about it only occurring when at war? The whites came to the Americas and raped and pillaged them. The natives tried to defend themselves, they didn't declare war. The blacks didn't declare war. They were kidnapped and enslaved for the monetary benefit of the whites.

The only reason those groups even have "basic" necessities like running water, indoor plumbing, cars, motor boats, airplanes, roads, electricity, etc...is because White Europeans gave those things to them. Why are there skyscrapers in Asia? Why is there air conditioning in Africa? Why are there TV sets in India? Same answer to all questions: Because of white people.

You can bitch about it all day but it's 100% true and nothing you say is going to make it any less true.

Right and I suppose the white Europeans built the pyramids, the great wall of China and invented all of the technologies that were used to do it.

No need to bitch about it because it's bullshit. White European culture may have been responsible for making great strides in the latter part of mankind's history, but much of what it accomplished was directly linked to improvements it made upon inventions and knowledge gleaned from other cultures and races.

Ponder as well that along with all the wonderful stuff you want to give total credit to the white race, it also is responsible for the advent of nuclear war, chemical and biological weaponry, psychiatric procedures such as lobotomy and electrical shock treatment, toxic waste, air pollution and a myriad of other joys.

The white race is no better nor worse than any other. Each has had it's moments in history to both shine and disgrace itself.

The future and the achievements it holds, whether we like it or not, belongs to a more color blind human race as interracial coupling of all types becomes more accepted and eventually common place. It won't happen overnight, but it will happen just as it took a few thousand years of mankind fumbling it's way to where it is now through the combined contributions of all of it's "pure races".
 
Wrong. It was built on marriage, monogamy, sexual restraint, and same-race pairings. The reality is that civilization was built on "beta male" values. When you lose beta males, you lose civilization.

In every way. Whites never raped and murdered any of those groups en masse (unless they were both at war). White-on-black ******* is so miniscule that it is practically non-existent. Look up the statistics. The only reason those groups even have "basic" necessities like running water, indoor plumbing, cars, motor boats, airplanes, roads, electricity, etc...is because White Europeans gave those things to them. Why are there skyscrapers in Asia? Why is there air conditioning in Africa? Why are there TV sets in India? Same answer to all questions: Because of white people.

You can bitch about it all day but it's 100% true and nothing you say is going to make it any less true.

sry, but i jsut have to put my foot into this bs.

"unless they were at war"? so that makes it okay? declaring war makes mass ******* of okay?

sad to think that u think that way. :( i wonder if u'd maintain your ethnocentric bias and illusion of supremacy if u walked the great pyramids of egypt, or admired 6,000 year old intricate sculptures from china, or if u'd ever read of the life of the Budda. the best doctors come from india. our best phamacists are from eastern europe. china is racing ahead of the rest of the world in genetic research and practical applications. The mayan's had calendaring and number systems that rival today's western science.

technology is not the most valuable aspect of life. u probably tthink art and painttings like mine have no value:eek:

u probably speak only one language. english. u probably think your culture and religion r best and the rest of the world is inferior. in a previous era u'd eagerly believe the earth is at the center of the universe and u'd stand by whille heretics were burned at the stake. in this era u'r probably against gay marriage but for racial profiling laws and againstt a woman's right to equal pay and health care. ur probably happy to approve wars against brown people and trade laws that strangle entire countries and lead to war. u probably ALWAYS blame those wars on others and consider urself the innocent one dragged unwillingly to war. ur probably going to vote for romney/ryan even though their entire platform is based on a tissue lies and half truths. u'l do it because u couldn't stand to lose ur illusion of innocence. u'l do it because u lackk empathy and lackunderstanding of the complexities of life.

we can ALL trace our ancestry back to africa. ALL of us. our racial differences are minuscule compared to our common traits

western europe developed as it did for some very clear reasons. NONE of those reasons have anytthing to do with racial differences. read a few books. learn something:(
 
Really? The Caesars, the Catholic church and the various European monarchies were all "beta" males and all practiced monogamy and sexual restraint? I suppose the founding fathers of the United States were all beta males who practiced monogamy, sexual restraint, and never paired with their slaves either.

The Caesars, the Catholic church and the various European monarchies were less than 1% of 1% of the entire population. Why are you talking about them instead of the other 99.9% of society? And yes, as the leaders of society, those groups endorsed all the values mentioned previously.

Whites never raped and murdered the Native Americans en masse? Whites didn't ******* and ******* black slaves? What is this nonsense about it only occurring when at war? The whites came to the Americas and raped and pillaged them. The natives tried to defend themselves, they didn't declare war. The blacks didn't declare war. They were kidnapped and enslaved for the monetary benefit of the whites.

1) Never in history did whites ******* or ******* blacks, slaves or not, to anywhere near the same level that blacks routinely perpetrate these crimes against whites in modern day America. We are talking about comparing a few isolated cases versus a massive, ongoing, national trend.

http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html

2) The only time that whites killed blacks en masse was when white nations went to war with black nations, such as during the colonization of Africa by the British. In these instances, the black deaths brought about were the result of superior white military tactics and technology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Zulu_War

3) In regards to native Americans: yes, there were instances of pillaging and ******* perpetrated against them by whites. However, the reverse happened as well. They were not just poor sheep who sat there waiting to be slaughtered by whites. They had their own armies and they tried (unsuccessfully) to attack whites.

4) Blacks who were kidnapped and ****** into slavery were sold there by OTHER Blacks, NOT Whites. Whites literally never went out and captured their own African slaves. They simply bought Black slaves from other Blacks, who were more than happy to sell their own people into slavery, enriching themselves in the process. Read and learn:
Several nations such as the Ashanti of Ghana and the Yoruba of Nigeria were involved in slave-trading. Groups such as the Imbangala of Angola and the Nyamwezi of Tanzania would serve as intermediaries or roving bands, waging war on African states to capture people for export as slaves. Historians John Thornton and Linda Heywood of Boston University estimate that 90 percent of those shipped to the New World were enslaved by Africans and then sold to European traders. Without the complex business partnerships between African elites and European traders and commercial agents, the slave trade to the New World would have been impossible, at least on the scale it occurred.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_slave_trade#Slavery_within_Africa

Woops. There goes your white guilt/anti-whitey hate mongering. Maybe it's time blacks AND whites started hating...blacks?

Furthermore, many nations and peoples throughout history had their own slave trades involving blacks. That includes African Kings and especially Muslims/Arabs, who practiced slavery for far longer than the West. Yet the only people who continue to get flak for it today are Whites, because everyone just has to hate Whitey, don't they?

Here's a black man talking about why black people make such good slaves:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pRcr2uCbvw

It's important to remember that even at the very HEIGHT of slavery in the US, the practice was still followed in only about half the states in the Union. So all this talk that every black in the US is somehow a descendant of slaves is pure nonsense.

Right and I suppose the white Europeans built the pyramids, the great wall of China and invented all of the technologies that were used to do it.

The great wall of China and the Ancient Pyramids have not been used for thousands of years. The technology used to build them did NOT contribute to modern-day Western inventions. White people knew how to build walls and roads thousands of years ago. The Roman Empire famously had a network of roads stretching all over Europe and even into modern-day Britain. Now, how much do you want to bet that thousands of years from now, if humans still exist, people will still be using the white, western inventions of the internal combustion engine, the semiconductor, the electrical generator, and everything else that forms the basis of modern civilization? I'd bet a high amount that those inventions will continue to be used so long as humanity exists.

No need to bitch about it because it's bullshit. White European culture may have been responsible for making great strides in the latter part of mankind's history, but much of what it accomplished was directly linked to improvements it made upon inventions and knowledge gleaned from other cultures and races.

Nonsense. Provide specific examples or get out. You gave two and they were laughable.

Ponder as well that along with all the wonderful stuff you want to give total credit to the white race, it also is responsible for the advent of nuclear war, chemical and biological weaponry, psychiatric procedures such as lobotomy and electrical shock treatment, toxic waste, air pollution and a myriad of other joys.

Of course, it goes without saying that the race with the most advanced technology invented the deadliest weapons. As for pollution, ever visited a third world slum? Hint: environmental conservation is NOT their 1st priority. Or their 2nd. Or their 3rd. People ******* in streets and dump anything, anywhere. Environmentalism is yet another gift conceived and brought to the world by white people. You do not see non-whites crying that we need to save the whales and save the trees, etc...Only white people are into that stuff.

The white race is no better nor worse than any other. Each has had it's moments in history to both shine and disgrace itself.

If that is the case, then stop living under and using White, Western technology and White, Western systems of law, and White, Western systems of government. Your ethno-centric bias is showing. Give up your car, your house, your plumbing, etc...and go live in a hut somewhere with African technology since "we're all equal". Everyone is interchangeable. The race that produced men who went to the moon is totally, 100% interchangeable with the race whose greatest architectural achievement has been...a mud hut.

Oh by the way, if we're all interchangeable and equal then what is all this "black supremacy" bullshit for on this website? How come it's fine to bash whites and call for their extinction (genocide), but suggesting that blacks are anything less than the full equal of whites in any area makes you a vicious racist?

The future and the achievements it holds, whether we like it or not, belongs to a more color blind human race as interracial coupling of all types becomes more accepted and eventually common place. It won't happen overnight, but it will happen just as it took a few thousand years of mankind fumbling it's way to where it is now through the combined contributions of all of it's "pure races".

Mankind has absolutely no future when the people who went to the moon breed with people who were eating each other well into the 20th century.

http://www.heretical.com/cannibal/congo1.html
 
sry, but i jsut have to put my foot into this bs.

"unless they were at war"? so that makes it okay? declaring war makes mass ******* of okay?

sad to think that u think that way. :( i wonder if u'd maintain your ethnocentric bias and illusion of supremacy if u walked the great pyramids of egypt, or admired 6,000 year old intricate sculptures from china, or if u'd ever read of the life of the Budda. the best doctors come from india. our best phamacists are from eastern europe. china is racing ahead of the rest of the world in genetic research and practical applications. The mayan's had calendaring and number systems that rival today's western science.
China is racing ahead of the world in intellectual property theft. Ripping off others' work and mass-reproducing it is a way of life for them. They have been doing it for years and years. It's what Asians do best: Copy an idea created by Whites and reproduce it.

The best doctors come from a country where people bath in a river filled with raw sewage? How do you figure that? On the contrary, the best doctors come the England, the country whose institutions train all Indian doctors. Mayans weren't too accurate about that whole 2012 thing, were they?

technology is not the most valuable aspect of life. u probably tthink art and painttings like mine have no value:eek:

K then, I propose a simple experiment: You give up your running water, your indoor plumbing, your electricity, your automobiles, and all other Western-invented technology, and I'll give up all art. We'll see which one of us lasts longer and has a more pleasant existence, mmmkay? Want to try it?

It's Western technology that allows you to go online and post bullshit like "technology is not the most valuable aspect of life" from the comfort of your heated/air conditioned home in an American suburb.

u probably speak only one language. english. u probably think your culture and religion r best and the rest of the world is inferior. in a previous era u'd eagerly believe the earth is at the center of the universe and u'd stand by whille heretics were burned at the stake. in this era u'r probably against gay marriage but for racial profiling laws and againstt a woman's right to equal pay and health care. ur probably happy to approve wars against brown people and trade laws that strangle entire countries and lead to war. u probably ALWAYS blame those wars on others and consider urself the innocent one dragged unwillingly to war. ur probably going to vote for romney/ryan even though their entire platform is based on a tissue lies and half truths. u'l do it because u couldn't stand to lose ur illusion of innocence. u'l do it because u lackk empathy and lackunderstanding of the complexities of life.

And you write as if you don't even speak English at all. Why is that? I see that you're perfectly happy and willing to swallow liberal/anti-White talking points without any critical examination whatsoever. Speaking of complexities and ignoring them...

we can ALL trace our ancestry back to africa. ALL of us. our racial differences are minuscule compared to our common traits

What common traits, exactly? Two arms and legs? And the fact that all people may have originated in Africa millions of years ago (a discovery made possible through white, western science...thank you very much) is relevant to this discussion...how?

western europe developed as it did for some very clear reasons. NONE of those reasons have anytthing to do with racial differences. read a few books. learn something:(

LOL. Are you sure about that? I mean, racial differences played absolutely no part? I suppose it's a pure coincidence then, that whites "just happened" to discover electricity, and build airplanes, and motor cars, and skyscrapers, and the internet, and mass farming, and media, and...

No other race on earth has ever produced anything comparable to those achievements. No, the great pyramids and some cave paintings made 5,000 years ago don't count. Yet according to you, there is absolutely no basis for suggesting that there might -- just MIGHT -- be a slight difference between Whites and other races. No reason at all. Hum dee do, hum dee dee. Nothin' to see here folks.

LOL. You've got your head so far in the sand that any minute now you'll be popping out somewhere in China. I have some news for you: The real heretics today are the people who reject multi-culti, one-world propaganda the likes of which you've swallowed wholesale and bravely dare to believe that differences between races exist. I've obviously read more books than you and I can tell you that there is no book in existence which makes a convincing case for what you're claiming. Furthermore, just because something is written in a book doesn't make it true. Communists had their own books. So did the Nazi's. Anybody can write a book and put anything they want in it.
 
China is racing ahead of the world in intellectual property theft. Ripping off others' work and mass-reproducing it is a way of life for them. They have been doing it for years and years. It's what Asians do best: Copy an idea created by Whites and reproduce it.

The best doctors come from a country where people bath in a river filled with raw sewage? How do you figure that? On the contrary, the best doctors come the England, the country whose institutions train all Indian doctors. Mayans weren't too accurate about that whole 2012 thing, were they?



K then, I propose a simple experiment: You give up your running water, your indoor plumbing, your electricity, your automobiles, and all other Western-invented technology, and I'll give up all art. We'll see which one of us lasts longer and has a more pleasant existence, mmmkay? Want to try it?

It's Western technology that allows you to go online and post bullshit like "technology is not the most valuable aspect of life" from the comfort of your heated/air conditioned home in an American suburb.



And you write as if you don't even speak English at all. Why is that? I see that you're perfectly happy and willing to swallow liberal/anti-White talking points without any critical examination whatsoever. Speaking of complexities and ignoring them...



What common traits, exactly? Two arms and legs? And the fact that all people may have originated in Africa millions of years ago (a discovery made possible through white, western science...thank you very much) is relevant to this discussion...how?



LOL. Are you sure about that? I mean, racial differences played absolutely no part? I suppose it's a pure coincidence then, that whites "just happened" to discover electricity, and build airplanes, and motor cars, and skyscrapers, and the internet, and mass farming, and media, and...

No other race on earth has ever produced anything comparable to those achievements. No, the great pyramids and some cave paintings made 5,000 years ago don't count. Yet according to you, there is absolutely no basis for suggesting that there might -- just MIGHT -- be a slight difference between Whites and other races. No reason at all. Hum dee do, hum dee dee. Nothin' to see here folks.

LOL. You've got your head so far in the sand that any minute now you'll be popping out somewhere in China. I have some news for you: The real heretics today are the people who reject multi-culti, one-world propaganda the likes of which you've swallowed wholesale and bravely dare to believe that differences between races exist. I've obviously read more books than you and I can tell you that there is no book in existence which makes a convincing case for what you're claiming. Furthermore, just because something is written in a book doesn't make it true. Communists had their own books. So did the Nazi's. Anybody can write a book and put anything they want in it.
wow. u sure seem to like the sound of ur own voice.:bounce:

i never suggested that technology has no value or that i'd be happy to give it up. i said technology is not the most important aspect of living a good life. ever heard of maslow? if u have u've probably discounted his theories since they don't agree with urs. isn't it interesting the of all the peoples of the world and of all the centuries past that THIS moment in time, and YOUR culture has the one superior way? it's nothing new. ur nothing new. people used to believe the earth was the center of the universe. many people believe that they were created in god's image (their god). they believe all other gods are false. people all down tthrough the ages have exalted themselves and diminished others. ur no different. u worship the god of technology and that single minded focus blinds u to so much richness and beauty surrounding u. as i said in the beginning, very sad for u

i have to admit u tired me out. sry, but i didn't finish reading ur diattribe. too boring but that's probably because i'm too brainwashed and stupid to understand. us liberals r stupid u know. i heard that on a talk show a few times! :bounce: ur obviously out of my intelligence league so i'll leave the big thoughts to u. i'm going to work on getting laid and having fun cause that's what us lesser creatures do :)
 
I am a white cuckold husband that encourage his wife to service black men. That was three years ago, she is now excusivley black. I think it is necessary for a small % of white bulls be maintained to keep producing white female children. White boys should be castrated at birth and raised to serve the superior black race.
 
I am a white cuckold husband that encourage his wife to service black men. That was three years ago, she is now excusivley black. I think it is necessary for a small % of white bulls be maintained to keep producing white female children. White boys should be castrated at birth and raised to serve the superior black race.

Just to play devil's advocate because I do not in any way espouse your opinion, but how would you determine which white male children to castrate and which ones not too?
 
The Caesars, the Catholic church and the various European monarchies were less than 1% of 1% of the entire population. Why are you talking about them instead of the other 99.9% of society? And yes, as the leaders of society, those groups endorsed all the values mentioned previously.


Because as the leaders of society it was their greed and desire to expand their empires that led to modern man inhabiting areas he hadn’t previously and which drove the necessity of many of the inventions to overcome the problems that were encountered. It is the greed of that .01% that have the power, which motivates them to propel the other 99.9% to do their bidding and sometimes achieve greatness in the course of doing so. I’m pretty sure Caesar didn’t have his legions march across Europe due to an altruistic desire to bring indoor plumbing to the Brits.


1) Never in history did whites ******* or ******* blacks, slaves or not, to anywhere near the same level that blacks routinely perpetrate these crimes against whites in modern day America. We are talking about comparing a few isolated cases versus a massive, ongoing, national trend.
http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html


Just because fucking “sub-human” property wasn’t considered to be a crime doesn’t mean it didn’t happen, nor that it wasn’t *******.

Just because whites were routinely found innocent by juries of their white peers, of ******* and murdering blacks doesn’t mean it did not happen.

Just because many black women didn’t report being raped by whites because they knew nothing would be done about it, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.

Just because no one bothered to make an accurate count of the black bodies hanging from trees or left rotting in the fields after being mutilated, doesn’t mean it didn’t occur.

However, that these were not reported, not investigated, not considered crimes or that the charges were not upheld, does affect the true accounting of the frequency of occurrence.



2) The only time that whites killed blacks en masse was when white nations went to war with black nations, such as during the colonization of Africa by the British. In these instances, the black deaths brought about were the result of superior white military tactics and technology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Zulu_War

3) In regards to native Americans: yes, there were instances of pillaging and ******* perpetrated against them by whites. However, the reverse happened as well. They were not just poor sheep who sat there waiting to be slaughtered by whites. They had their own armies and they tried (unsuccessfully) to attack whites.

4) Blacks who were kidnapped and ****** into slavery were sold there by OTHER Blacks, NOT Whites. Whites literally never went out and captured their own African slaves. They simply bought Black slaves from other Blacks, who were more than happy to sell their own people into slavery, enriching themselves in the process. Read and learn:

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_slave_trade#Slavery_within_Africa


That blacks were enslaved by other blacks to be sold to the European slave traders has no bearing on what happened to them once they were under the control of those white Europeans.
The slave traders routinely dumped their “cargo” overboard en masse to avoid being caught and have their ships confiscated while traveling through waters controlled by the nations that declared slave trade illegal.
Those that did manage to be brought to the American colonies to be bought by whites had no protections. There was no American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Black Slaves. Beatings, breaking of bones in feet or legs to prevent escape, *******, and even ******* were acceptable as these weren’t considered people, they were property. Why would anyone keep a record of how often a slave owner fucked his favorite black bitch? How about his not so favorite ones as well?
Why would anyone bother to keep track of how often a slave died while being whipped to teach him a lesson?
Is there an accurate accounting of how many dogs and cats die each year from be malnourished or just tossed off of bridges because their owners are tired of them? Why would black sub human animals from Africa be accounted for any differently than these?
You can quote all the studies and statistics you want, but until and unless you can verify all of the information they are based on as being correct and factual, they are just someone’s attempt to justify their beliefs.


Woops. There goes your white guilt/anti-whitey hate mongering. Maybe it's time blacks AND whites started hating...blacks?

I don’t understand how you figure that I hate whites or have any “white guilt” simply because I point out that ALL races and cultures have had their high points and their lows. I have specifically said that whites are no better, nor worse than any other race.


Furthermore, many nations and peoples throughout history had their own slave trades involving blacks. That includes African Kings and especially Muslims/Arabs, who practiced slavery for far longer than the West. Yet the only people who continue to get flak for it today are Whites, because everyone just has to hate Whitey, don't they?

Here's a black man talking about why black people make such good slaves:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pRcr2uCbvw


That slavery was practiced throughout history is true and not only perpetrated on blacks. Slavery has been subjected upon, and by, virtually every race and culture that has existed. The African Tribes, Native American Tribes, the Greeks, the Romans, the German Nazis, and so on, all took slaves and used them for ****** labor and took other liberties with them as well.
The reason the modern European white man is especially reviled for it more than others is because, by your own admission and insistence, he is the most advanced intellectually and spiritually. He above all others knew it was a sin, a crime, but freely chose to perpetrate it on another race just so he could try to justify that he wasn’t really enslaving humans, he was just using “human like animals” as beasts of burden no different than he would a horse or ox.
Worse, even after the rest of the “enlightened” modern white cultures did away with this abomination, the American slave owners, and the politicians who represented them, sought to continue the barbaric practice.
The modern white man didn't simply commit slavery, he tried to deny an entire race it's humanity.



It's important to remember that even at the very HEIGHT of slavery in the US, the practice was still followed in only about half the states in the Union. So all this talk that every black in the US is somehow a descendant of slaves is pure nonsense.


Of course not every black is a descendant of a slave owned by an American slave owner, anymore than every white American is a descendant of a slave owner.
I’m certainly not. My family was being alternately enslaved by the various European countries that continually fought over adding land area to their empires in Europe. The last being the Russians, so I can thank my lucky Tsars (or Czars if you prefer) that Granddad decided to take Grandma to see the Statue of Liberty and park their asses behind hers.
Do I feel white America owes all the blacks in America something because of it’s history of slavery? No more than I feel any other nation or culture necessarily owes a debt to others for their histories of slavery in the past.
Children are not responsible for the sins of their fathers. Only their own.
However, I do believe that humanity as a whole owes it to all of those who suffered the evils of what happened before to accept its responsibility to end it and keep it from happening again.


The great wall of China and the Ancient Pyramids have not been used for thousands of years. The technology used to build them did NOT contribute to modern-day Western inventions. White people knew how to build walls and roads thousands of years ago. The Roman Empire famously had a network of roads stretching all over Europe and even into modern-day Britain. Now, how much do you want to bet that thousands of years from now, if humans still exist, people will still be using the white, western inventions of the internal combustion engine, the semiconductor, the electrical generator, and everything else that forms the basis of modern civilization? I'd bet a high amount that those inventions will continue to be used so long as humanity exists.


Of course those technologies were used in building the modern world and are still used today. Just because you see no recorded evidence of the methods that were used as there are no historical documents, doesn’t mean that the knowledge wasn’t passed down from ******* to ******* just as most things have been since man first arrived on the scene. Did the cavemen write out a tech paper on how to make a spear and how to use it? A couple of pictures on a cave wall maybe, but come on.

The Greeks and Romans were especially good at learning from other cultures and employing foreign craftsmen (usually enslaved) to help them build much of what we see left of their achievements. That is one of the reasons they were as prolific as they were. Gee, I wonder if any Romans spent time vacationing in Egypt.

Seems to me that, even with the rate of erosion they are enduring, the Great Wall and the Pyramids will be around a lot longer than most structures that have been built by European white men. They have already been around longer than anything we’ve built. Even longer than most of the Roman stuff that's in ruins.

But it is nice to know that you agree white culture was developing alongside others. Interesting how many cultures developed similar methods of farming, irrigation, canal building and such, parallel to each other. Good thing too since it was the cultivation of crops by Native Americans that keep the first white settlers from starving their asses off when they got here.
Bet the Indians are still kicking their own butts over that first Thanksgiving.


Nonsense. Provide specific examples or get out. You gave two and they were laughable.


Of course to you they would be laughable, otherwise you would have to admit that cultures that existed long before your hallowed white gods of modern technology were able to do things that still have scientists of today confounded.
Oh, and they did all of it without computers, cell phones, steam engines or even electricity.


Of course, it goes without saying that the race with the most advanced technology invented the deadliest weapons. As for pollution, ever visited a third world slum? Hint: environmental conservation is NOT their 1st priority. Or their 2nd. Or their 3rd. People ******* in streets and dump anything, anywhere. Environmentalism is yet another gift conceived and brought to the world by white people. You do not see non-whites crying that we need to save the whales and save the trees, etc...Only white people are into that stuff.


Beg to differ. Many cultures have protested our plundering of the planet in order to sate our greed for its resources. Just because today’s “Green Freeks” and “Tree Huggers” have the means to put their causes in front of the world by using the internet and other means doesn’t make the modern white man the only or even the first environmentally conscious culture.
While you are running down the rest of the third world slums, why not talk about Appalachia? Right here in your modern white American Mecca you have modern white men living just like those in all the other slums of the world.
POINT? Simple, as I have said and will keep saying: whites are no better and no worse than any other race.

If that is the case, then stop living under and using White, Western technology and White, Western systems of law, and White, Western systems of government. Your ethno-centric bias is showing. Give up your car, your house, your plumbing, etc...and go live in a hut somewhere with African technology since "we're all equal". Everyone is interchangeable. The race that produced men who went to the moon is totally, 100% interchangeable with the race whose greatest architectural achievement has been...a mud hut.


Actually, even though I find black women exceptionally beautiful and desirable, I would prefer one of the Asian countries, ancient Japan would be especially enticing.
What does living anywhere that uses whatever technologies that are available and systems of law (which are all based on ancient tribal social behavior) have to do with the belief that all men are equal as it pertains to humanity? Equal in that context does not mean they are all exactly the same. No two white men are exactly the same any more than any other two individuals regardless of race or gender. Some whites are smarter than others, some stronger, just like all races.
If you want to go with that nonsense, take down all the automated traffic lights (as they were invented by a black man) so you and the rest of the white technophiles can go back to flapping your arms about to direct traffic. Or just go back to crashing into each other as they did prior. Oh, get rid of all the electric trains, subways and trolley car systems as well as they couldn’t operate without the ideas patented by a black man.
Is it really that difficult for you to accept that an individual of a race other than "white" is capable of building or inventing something of significance or value?

Oh by the way, if we're all interchangeable and equal then what is all this "black supremacy" bullshit for on this website? How come it's fine to bash whites and call for their extinction (genocide), but suggesting that blacks are anything less than the full equal of whites in any area makes you a vicious racist?
First, this is a sexually oriented site which caters to a specific sexual theme. Many of those who participate have extreme fantasies as well as deep seated desires which they exhibit by expressing those fantasies here. This, for many, is an extension of their bedroom or at least as they wish their bedroom to be. There are many who fantasize the black man as being “super human” as a sexual entity.
It is also a fantasy for many (mostly white men) to portray the white man as sexually inferior because they have a perverse enjoyment of being humiliated.
Why would you come to a website devoted to interracial sex and cuckolding along with the fantasies that are part of it and try to equate it to reality?

Second, who is doing the bashing? Primarily it is the white males that go off the deep end about blacks being superior and how the white male should be eradicated by having all white women impregnated by black men only.
The blacks certainly don’t want that as it would mean the end of white pussy as well. Wow! Looks like the blacks are smarter than the white boys!
The white women that get into degrading the white men over their lack of endowment or inability to maintain an erection or provide satisfying sex, generally do so at the request of those very same white men.
I don’t think I have ever read anything degrading to a white man written by a black man that wasn’t part of a thread either started by a white man or in which a white man steered the conversation in that direction for the express purpose of having the black man and the white women involved in the discussion give him the humiliation he was intentionally seeking.

Third, if all you do is come on here pushing white supremacy or any race supremacy, it is racist. Even the nonsense about black men being better lovers or all having huge dicks. Most of the black guys on here will agree it’s all about individuality and individual desires.
However, coming on a site dedicated to people who are looking for a specific type of sexual experience, wouldn’t it seem rational to expect that individuals having an affinity toward a particular type of sexual partner to consider them “superior” to all others?
If the best sexual experiences you’ve ever enjoyed were with Japanese women, wouldn’t you be thinking they are better lovers compared to women of other races or even other Asian cultures?

I don’t understand why some of my fellow white men feel so inadequate or threatened by the idea of white women enjoying black sexuality so much that they feel a need to justify their existence by quantifying white achievements and denigrating other races. It is equally ridiculous as the white men who proclaim whites to be totally devoid of value and worthy of extermination.


Mankind has absolutely no future when the people who went to the moon breed with people who were eating each other well into the 20th century.

http://www.heretical.com/cannibal/congo1.html


Actually, I would think those with a more adventurous appetite would survive longer than those who have difficulty bring themselves to eat worms or bugs, both of which are excellent sources of protein.

After the ten years I spent working at JPL in Altadena, as well as the few years I worked at Cal Tech, I can guarantee that the space program is made up of quite a “colorful” group of people. It’s rather odd how you wish to give total credit for going to the moon to the “white” race when it was a culmination of the efforts of people of many races and national descent. Including some whites who grew up believing they were the only humans well into the 20th century.

Its a good thing a black guy figured out how to make Edison's light bulb viable or it would have taken a lot longer to get to the moon trying to plan it all by candle or gas light.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wit
Just to throw my few words into the ring as I do not condone slavery and find the whole history of it appalling and a blight on the history of humanity. The trade from Africa was of course of a much higher density but it wasnt always the blackman that ended up in slavery.

One of the least-known episodes in European history is the age of the Barbary Pirates. From the 16th century down to the early 19th century, pirates from the Barbary Coast - modern Morocco and Algeria - terrorised the Mediterranean Sea, and the Atlantic coasts as far north as the British Isles. There were many raids on the south west coast of England and Ireland, and whole seaside village populations were some times carried off. The pirates captured many Europeans and carried them back to North Africa, where they were sold as slaves. Many of them were sailors and fisherman captured at sea, but the pirates also raided on-shore and took male and female captives.
Some historians have estimated the number of captives at over a million. While this might seem high, over a period of 300 years a million is less than 4,000 a year.

The wealthier captives were often ransomed by their relatives, and even the poorer ones were sometimes bought by Christian philanthropists and returned to Europe, in Britain funds were set up for this purpose. Of those who stayed behind, the men were mostly worked to death as galley slaves, while the younger boys might be castrated.
For women and girls, it was a different matter. European women were much in demand for the harems of wealthy Arabs and Turks. It wasn’t always a fate worse than death. One captured English girl became the Queen of Morocco.
 
I think it is necessary for a small % of white bulls be maintained to keep producing white female children. White boys should be castrated at birth and raised to serve the superior black race.
Here's what your statement looks like with the racial roles reversed:

"I think it is necessary for a small % of black bulls be maintained to keep producing black female children. Black boys should be castrated at birth and raised to serve the superior white race."

Racist? Yep. Just the same as when you wrote it your way. But oh wait, I forgot, only white people can be racist and only black people can be the victims of racism. Blatant racial hatred directed against whites (calling for their genocide as a people and the physical ******* of their menfolk) is not only shrugged off, but actively encouraged on this forum. Therefore, this is one of the most racist places on the entire net. Even on KKK sites you do not find people advocating the types of hatred against blacks that you find advocated against whites here.

Tell me something you sick, degenerate, criminal fuck, what is it about the black race that you think makes it so superior?
Is it their numerous technological inventions? The wars they won? The countries and continents which they conquered?
The high standard of living which they manage to produce in their native countries (e.g. Africa)?

You are the one who deserves to be castrated, buddy. But first, your hands and legs should each be tied to a different horse. Then the castration procedure should be performed. And as a final treat, someone should fire a ******* into the air...

That would cure you of your pathology, guaranteed. You sick, sick fuck.
 
Just to throw my few words into the ring as I do not condone slavery and find the whole history of it appalling and a blight on the history of humanity. The trade from Africa was of course of a much higher density but it wasnt always the blackman that ended up in slavery.

One of the least-known episodes in European history is the age of the Barbary Pirates. From the 16th century down to the early 19th century, pirates from the Barbary Coast - modern Morocco and Algeria - terrorised the Mediterranean Sea, and the Atlantic coasts as far north as the British Isles. There were many raids on the south west coast of England and Ireland, and whole seaside village populations were some times carried off. The pirates captured many Europeans and carried them back to North Africa, where they were sold as slaves. Many of them were sailors and fisherman captured at sea, but the pirates also raided on-shore and took male and female captives.
Some historians have estimated the number of captives at over a million. While this might seem high, over a period of 300 years a million is less than 4,000 a year.

The wealthier captives were often ransomed by their relatives, and even the poorer ones were sometimes bought by Christian philanthropists and returned to Europe, in Britain funds were set up for this purpose. Of those who stayed behind, the men were mostly worked to death as galley slaves, while the younger boys might be castrated.
For women and girls, it was a different matter. European women were much in demand for the harems of wealthy Arabs and Turks. It wasn’t always a fate worse than death. One captured English girl became the Queen of Morocco.

Congrats, you're probably the only person on this forum besides myself who knows their history. It is an indisputable, historical fact that WHITES were *ALSO* ****** into slavery in times past. Is is therefore accurate to state that some living white people are the descendants of slaves, just the same as some black people are.

Here is a good book on the subject:
Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast and Italy, 1500-1800
http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Slaves-Muslim-Masters-Mediterranean/dp/1403945519

All of the above goes to demonstrate that this "Evil Whitey" and corresponding "White Guilt" narrative pushed by the left and minority groups is pure fiction. It's simply anti-White garbage designed to enrich minorities at the expense of Whites.

The facts are:
  • White people have been enslaved before, just as Blacks have.
  • Of those Blacks who were enslaved by Whites, the vast majority were captured and sold by other Blacks.
  • Whites did not invent slavery. It has been practiced for thousands of years by cultures all over the world, INCLUDING Blacks, who readily enslaved and slaughtered their own people during African tribal warfare.
  • During the time that slavery was practiced by Whites, the vast majority of Whites were NOT slave owners. Therefore, the vast majority of White people today are NOT descended from slave owners. Thus, they have NOTHING to be guilty or ashamed of, and they owe nothing to the black race, even in some theoretical "cosmic karma" sense.
If you are a white man who continues to believe this "White Guilt" nonsense, then you should be fucking ashamed of yourself. You're a pathetic fuck. And you are wrong.

And if you are a black man who believes in it, then learn the truth, man the fuck up, take some responsibility, stop blaming whitey for all your problems and start looking at your own house. Alpha males don't blame their problems on other people. They step up.

Pastor James Manning (a black man) tells it like it is:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2DB4WTgFQU
 
Why is it that virtually every supremacist that spouts their stuff here feels a need to resort to cursing and name calling? :unsure:
If you truly believe your arguments to be valid and worthy, why lower the intellectual level of the discussion into a crude cesspool of personal attacks and rudeness? :(
 
Why is it that virtually every supremacist that spouts their stuff here feels a need to resort to cursing and name calling? :unsure:
If you truly believe your arguments to be valid and worthy, why lower the intellectual level of the discussion into a crude cesspool of personal attacks and rudeness? :(

"Supremacist". Are you talking about this guy?

I am a white cuckold husband that encourage his wife to service black men. That was three years ago, she is now excusivley black. I think it is necessary for a small % of white bulls be maintained to keep producing white female children. White boys should be castrated at birth and raised to serve the superior black race.

He just explicitly stated that the black race is superior. That makes him a supremacist, by definition. What other supremacists are you talking about?

I have a question of my own: How come every White Guilt proponent and race-denier feels the need to resort to writing and arguing like a baby? Or is that not a conscious decision on their part?

By the way, does advocating the physical extermination of an entire race count as a "personal attack" in your book? Because it does in mine. And that goes on here all the time. And when it happens, it is always - always - directed against Whites.
 
This is my boyfriends favorite article and he says that this actually made him accept cuckold lifestyle. So I wanted to share with the rest of you.

HISTORY OF INTERRACIAL RELATIONSHIP
Slavery – 1865
White women having sex with black men is non-existent. Blacks are thought of as sub-human and treated like animals.
RV1618-7.jpg

1865 – 1940′s
Black men were lynched for as little as looking at a white woman. Flirting between black men and white women was strictly prohibited. White men would cut off the black man’s penis and hang them.
Slave-hung-on-ship-1.jpg

1947 – 1950′s
Black men begin competing in major league sports such as baseball and football. Blacks begin to dominate these sports and their physical superiority over whites becomes obvious. Interracial relationships still extremely rare.
ali1.jpg


1970′s – 1980′s
Blacks begin working in pornography. Also they start to get Main roles against white women in Movies. Many white women refused to work with them. Interracial was a very taboo genre. Interracial relationships begin to occur more frequently, but still very rare and looked down upon.
guess-whos-coming-to-dinner-DVDcover.jpg


1990-1998
Interracial goes from being taboo to having it’s own little niche market. Interracial relationships still relatively rare. Most white women who had sex with black men were overweight or low class. White men would make fun of white women who had sex with blacks for being “black man diggers” or having “Jungle Fever”.

1998 – Early 2000′s
The internet explodes in popularity. Internet Porn changes everything. The secret is out. The black cock “myth” is exposed as real and people begin seeing the truth about black male sexuality. Interracial becomes an underground hit. Dogfart begins, which featured many beautiful white women in interracial gangbangs or scenes with Lexington Steele and his 11″ Black Cock. Many scenes depicted reluctant white women being seduced by the big black cock, or even kidnapped and forcefully taken by a gang of blacks. Films titled Black Dicks on White Chicks and White Wife Black Cock are distributed. John Person’s legendary interracial comics are spread on the internet, featuring comics of a white women being raped by black men. Hip Hop music also becomes mainstream and it’s now cool to be black. Suburban white ******* idolize black rappers and hip hop culture becomes commercialized. Many WW/BM relationships were with white women who were thought of as ghetto. Interracial porn is thought of as degrading. White men are jealous of the black mens huge penis, but can’t help but be turned on by watching them fuck white women.


2000-2006
Interracial Porn is now popular and very common. Dogfart pushes the Cuckold genre in interracial. Humiliation of white males begins. Many scenes depict white women cheating on their husbands with black men. Spring Thomas takes interracial cuckolding to a new level, showing white men caged and teased for having small dicks. Lex Steele and Mandingo become 2 of the most famous male porn stars. White wives cheating with a black man goes from being a sin, to now something many husbands secretly desire. White women begin showing total submission and admitting in videos that they “love black cock” and are “black cock sluts”.
tumblr_m75czlUWiM1qh59bpo1_1280.jpg

2007-2010
Interracial becomes MAINSTREAM. The media is crazed with black male/white female relationships and sex scenes. Many prime time TV programs depict interracial relationships. Real life interracial relationships become more common and are generally more accepted. Black male/White Female is very common. It’s no longer just trashy and overweight white women that date black men. Now the most beautiful white women and suburban white women are having sex with black men. Interracial marriages are at an all time high.
tumblr_m97qmghOX11rai1tko1_1280.jpg

Current:
White women all around America are fantasizing about big black cock. Traditional all-white porn sites begin shooting interracial scenes. Some of the most popular female pornstars are now doing interracial. Interracial Pornography becomes one of the most popular genres. Cuckold went from a quiet underground scene, to having massive websites dedicated to it. Many scenes depict complete humiliation and sissification of white males. Pictures of small dicked white men standing next to monster black cocks are common, with white females laughing at the white male. Straight white men begin fantasizing about sucking big black cock. They become addicted to watching white women have sex with blacks. White men are now basically begging their wives to fuck black men and let them watch.


2015-2020
Interracial becomes the #1 genre in porn. All white men are now jacking off to videos and photos of black men fucking their women. Cuckolding goes from secret fetish to being more accepted and common. Interracial sex is now the norm. Black men are now the most desired males and having a big black cock is like having a Ferrari. Black men no longer have to pursue white women, as white women openly pursue them. White males know they can’t compete, and accept roles as cuckolds. White males start going “bi for black only”.
tumblr_m16sck3hkW1r8ukhqo1_500.jpg


2020-2030
Cuckolding becomes a norm that all older white couples engage in. It’s now common knowledge that white men are physically and sexually inferior to blacks. White men performing oral sex on black men is more and more common. All older white wives have sex with black men while their husbands watch. Younger white females stop taking white men seriously and don’t even consider dating them. White females only have sex with black men. The only way white men ever see a white female naked is by looking at interracial porn.
tumblr_m8c4v4uegJ1r766g2o1_1280.jpg


2030 and Beyond
White male/White female relationships are now completely non-existent. Majority of white men become impotent from masturbating to interracial porn. All white men are now submission to blacks. They begin wearing panties and become black men’s bitches. Slavery is essentially reverse and Blacks rule America. The Golden Age of Human Evolution.
tumblr_m5v7yw3nar1r766g2o1_400.jpg


Sana Alam, what kind of fucking fantasy world do you live in?
 
Because as the leaders of society it was their greed and desire to expand their empires that led to modern man inhabiting areas he hadn’t previously and which drove the necessity of many of the inventions to overcome the problems that were encountered. It is the greed of that .01% that have the power, which motivates them to propel the other 99.9% to do their bidding and sometimes achieve greatness in the course of doing so. I’m pretty sure Caesar didn’t have his legions march across Europe due to an altruistic desire to bring indoor plumbing to the Brits.

Yes. What's your point? You sound like a sissy. Only sissies get their panties in a bunch over things like greed. What are you trying to be, some kind of Catholic Nun? Greed is a human universal. Without it, we'd still be living in caves. But human achievement is not universal. Not all groups have made equal contributions on that front.

Just because fucking “sub-human” property wasn’t considered to be a crime doesn’t mean it didn’t happen, nor that it wasn’t *******.

Just because whites were routinely found innocent by juries of their white peers, of ******* and murdering blacks doesn’t mean it did not happen.

Just because many black women didn’t report being raped by whites because they knew nothing would be done about it, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.

Just because no one bothered to make an accurate count of the black bodies hanging from trees or left rotting in the fields after being mutilated, doesn’t mean it didn’t occur.

However, that these were not reported, not investigated, not considered crimes or that the charges were not upheld, does affect the true accounting of the frequency of occurrence.

Did I say it didn't happen? No. I said it didn't happen with nearly the same frequency as that which blacks commit crimes against whites today. Did you post anything to refute that? No. In any case, everything you mention took place at LEAST 60 years in the past, but in most cases well over 100. Do you know where the Jews were roughly 60-70 years ago? Do you know where they are today? Explain to me why, if all races are perfectly equal, the Jews made ten times more progress in 50 years than Blacks made in 150? How much do you want to bet that in another 50 years, Blacks will still be in essentially the same place?

White-on-black ******* is practically non-existent. One reason for this, among others, is that most white men do not find black women attractive. Such is the case today, and so it was, undoubtedly, 150 years ago as well. On the other hand, most black men DO find white women attractive. Quite a few of them prefer white women far above their own women, as can be readily verified by reading this site. Facts are facts.

That blacks were enslaved by other blacks to be sold to the European slave traders has no bearing on what happened to them once they were under the control of those white Europeans.
The slave traders routinely dumped their “cargo” overboard en masse to avoid being caught and have their ships confiscated while traveling through waters controlled by the nations that declared slave trade illegal.

Sounds extremely costly to the traders. Literally throwing their money overboard. Got any sources for that?

Those that did manage to be brought to the American colonies to be bought by whites had no protections. There was no American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Black Slaves. Beatings, breaking of bones in feet or legs to prevent escape, *******, and even ******* were acceptable as these weren’t considered people, they were property. Why would anyone keep a record of how often a slave owner fucked his favorite black bitch? How about his not so favorite ones as well? Why would anyone bother to keep track of how often a slave died while being whipped to teach him a lesson?

And do you think those slaves would have been treated better had they stayed in Africa in the 1850's, when cannibalism was still widely practiced? Remember: Slaves are slaves. If they became slaves in America, they would have been slaves in Africa, too. Their life conditions in America, while rough, were almost certainly better than what they would have experienced in Africa. At least in America they had some access to Western technology, if only for the purpose of keeping them alive to work the fields.

I don’t understand how you figure that I hate whites or have any “white guilt” simply because I point out that ALL races and cultures have had their high points and their lows. I have specifically said that whites are no better, nor worse than any other race.

Maybe you haven't noticed that there are a ton of people on this site who openly project vicious racism against whites, who attribute all negative things to Whites and all positive things to Blacks? Maybe you haven't noticed that "White Guilt" is rampant among people into the "cuckold" lifestyle? Well, consider this your wake up call.

The reason the modern European white man is especially reviled for it more than others is because, by your own admission and insistence, he is the most advanced intellectually and spiritually. He above all others knew it was a sin, a crime, but freely chose to perpetrate it on another race just so he could try to justify that he wasn’t really enslaving humans, he was just using “human like animals” as beasts of burden no different than he would a horse or ox.

Yes. I'm glad you can admit the double standard. "Whitey" is hated PRECISELY because of his undeniable greatness and achievements. Whites are necessarily held to a HIGHER STANDARD than any other race on earth. That is where all this White Guilt and racial hypocrisy originates from. I do not agree with you, however, that all Whites knew that slavery was a "sin". There were people on both sides of the issue.

Worse, even after the rest of the “enlightened” modern white cultures did away with this abomination, the American slave owners, and the politicians who represented them, sought to continue the barbaric practice.
The modern white man didn't simply commit slavery, he tried to deny an entire race it's humanity.

And which other races, pray tell, did NOT "deny [Blacks] their humanity"? You do realize that Blacks are still almost universally despised by every race throughout the world today...EXCEPT Whites? Other minorities are almost always racist against them. Think Indians like Blacks? Think Arabs like Blacks? Think Asians like Blacks? Think again. ALL of them hate Blacks and they're not the least bit ashamed to admit it because they don't have that "White Guilt" nonsense hanging over their heads. Even many Blacks hate other Blacks. I know, for example, that African and American Blacks do not get along at all. The real Africans hate the Afro-Americans.

So, once again, we have a double standard where every group in the world is "guilty" of something. Whites are probably the LEAST guilty of it, among all other groups, yet they get the MOST negative publicity for it. Why? Because superior people get held to a higher standard than others. That is the ONLY viable explanation.

Of course not every black is a descendant of a slave owned by an American slave owner, anymore than every white American is a descendant of a slave owner.
I’m certainly not. My family was being alternately enslaved by the various European countries that continually fought over adding land area to their empires in Europe. The last being the Russians, so I can thank my lucky Tsars (or Czars if you prefer) that Granddad decided to take Grandma to see the Statue of Liberty and park their asses behind hers.
Do I feel white America owes all the blacks in America something because of it’s history of slavery? No more than I feel any other nation or culture necessarily owes a debt to others for their histories of slavery in the past.
Children are not responsible for the sins of their fathers. Only their own.
However, I do believe that humanity as a whole owes it to all of those who suffered the evils of what happened before to accept its responsibility to end it and keep it from happening again.

Good for you for admitting it, but plenty of people on sites like this would could never make that leap.

Of course those technologies were used in building the modern world and are still used today. Just because you see no recorded evidence of the methods that were used as there are no historical documents, doesn’t mean that the knowledge wasn’t passed down from ******* to ******* just as most things have been since man first arrived on the scene. Did the cavemen write out a tech paper on how to make a spear and how to use it? A couple of pictures on a cave wall maybe, but come on.

The Greeks and Romans were especially good at learning from other cultures and employing foreign craftsmen (usually enslaved) to help them build much of what we see left of their achievements. That is one of the reasons they were as prolific as they were. Gee, I wonder if any Romans spent time vacationing in Egypt.

Seems to me that, even with the rate of erosion they are enduring, the Great Wall and the Pyramids will be around a lot longer than most structures that have been built by European white men. They have already been around longer than anything we’ve built. Even longer than most of the Roman stuff that's in ruins.

But it is nice to know that you agree white culture was developing alongside others. Interesting how many cultures developed similar methods of farming, irrigation, canal building and such, parallel to each other. Good thing too since it was the cultivation of crops by Native Americans that keep the first white settlers from starving their asses off when they got here.
Bet the Indians are still kicking their own butts over that first Thanksgiving.

You can drag this discussion on into infinity but the bottom line, to keep it simple, is that Blacks never invented anything which significantly contributed to Western civilization. I'm not only speaking of technology. I'm also speaking of philosophy, writing, civics, and law. Arguably their only contributions have been to a few genres of music and mass entertainment.


Of course to you they would be laughable, otherwise you would have to admit that cultures that existed long before your hallowed white gods of modern technology were able to do things that still have scientists of today confounded.
Oh, and they did all of it without computers, cell phones, steam engines or even electricity.

This is a bullshit argument. There's no evidence, only pure speculation, so what's the point in going there?

Beg to differ. Many cultures have protested our plundering of the planet in order to sate our greed for its resources. Just because today’s “Green Freeks” and “Tree Huggers” have the means to put their causes in front of the world by using the internet and other means doesn’t make the modern white man the only or even the first environmentally conscious culture.
While you are running down the rest of the third world slums, why not talk about Appalachia? Right here in your modern white American Mecca you have modern white men living just like those in all the other slums of the world.
POINT? Simple, as I have said and will keep saying: whites are no better and no worse than any other race.

The implication of your last statement is that all races are the same. This is bogus. It is demonstrably false. Pick any measurable criteria and I can point out the differences to you in objective terms.

Tell me something: Why would all races be the same if they evolved over thousands of generations in radically different environments? Your assertion contradicts the most fundamental principles of evolutionary biology. You're basically tossing evolution aside and claiming that it's irrelevant. Needless to say, this is a highly anti-scientific view. You *are* aware of what the founder of genetic science, James Watson, said about racial differences?

"There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so."

So, do you think that Nobel prize-winning scientist has no idea what he's talking about? And what he said about intelligence is equally applicable to ANY genetically heritable trait, by the very definition of evolutionary theory.

What does living anywhere that uses whatever technologies that are available and systems of law (which are all based on ancient tribal social behavior) have to do with the belief that all men are equal as it pertains to humanity? Equal in that context does not mean they are all exactly the same.

Doesn't it make sense that the people who invented a particular system of government/law/social organization would be the people best suited to live under, maintain, and expand that very system? Well, guess what: White people invented democracy (in its modern form), representative government, constitutions, modern law, the English language, etc..

The fact that it's all "based on ancient tribal social behavior" is exactly the point. Whose tribal customs is Western Civilization based on? African tribal customs? No! Asian tribal customs? No! Hispanic tribal customs? No! The correct answer is: The ancient, tribal customs of White Anglo-Saxons originating in Northern Europe. So what would make you think that such a system would be suitable or compatible with different groups? Do you think that Whites or Asians would be equally compatible with African tribal customs? That you could just drop a Chinese person into Africa and have them expand that African heritage? Of course not. So what on earth makes you think that Africans are capable of expanding or sustaining White-originated systems of government and social organization? Where's the proof? Show me the evidence.

"No two white men are exactly the same any more than any other two individuals regardless of race or gender. Some whites are smarter than others, some stronger, just like all races."

You're almost there. Here's what you should have written to be correct: No two races are exactly the same any more than two individuals of any given race are exactly the same. Some races are smarter than others, some stronger, just like individuals of any particular race.

"Is it really that difficult for you to accept that an individual of a race other than "white" is capable of building or inventing something of significance or value?"

Of course not. I'll just believe it when I see it. I am not going to attach value to them just because political correctness dictates that it's the "proper" thing to do. Is it really that difficult for you to understand that?

"If you want to go with that nonsense, take down all the automated traffic lights (as they were invented by a black man) so you and the rest of the white technophiles can go back to flapping your arms about to direct traffic. Or just go back to crashing into each other as they did prior. Oh, get rid of all the electric trains, subways and trolley car systems as well as they couldn’t operate without the ideas patented by a black man. "

Ah, glad you brought this up so that I could debunk it. Have a read, chap, and hold onto your hat because you're in for a surprise:
http://tightrope.cc/Black-Invention-Myths.htm#trafficsignal
 
Back
Top