Sadly enough, too many women see a minute or less of actual in-out-in-out intercourse as the norm, and they accept it.
Likewise, just as many women, maybe even more, think that bad sex is the best they can get. I, too often, hear other women saying that their man lasts way too long, and they are talking like 5 minutes or so. Premature ejaculation, so says WebMD, may be largely in the eye (or mind) of the beholder, and depends on a man's sexual satisfaction and his perception of his ability to control when ejaculation occurs. Yet, too often, many fail to take into consideration that the perception that a man has of premature ejaculation and a woman's perception of premature ejaculation are going to be different.
A co-worker of mine told me about her husband, and that she has always considered him a "minute-man." And she claims that this other guy she dates is quite the stud because he last 3-5 minutes. In my mind both of these guys are losers, sexually, because she never talks about what else these men do for her, sexually. One of my lovers is a "natural" when it comes to oral sex. He is very romantic, caring, compassionate and passionate. Yet, this same lover only lasts a few thrust before he ejaculates. Why do I consider this lover to still be a good lover?, The reason is because he massages me, kisses me, fingers me, and gets me off, orally, more than a coupe times. In essence, this lover makes up for his premature ejaculation by pleasing me in other ways before we have intercourse.
My husband makes up for his lack of size by using toys when we play with each other. My husband is too small, anymore, to please me vaginally, with his penis, but he is really good when he uses toys on and in me. Although there are many times when my husband has had the stamina that most men would envy, my inability to feel him anymore has made his ability to hold back from cumming useless. Therefore, my husband is a good lover because he knows how to please me other than by having actual intercourse with me.
I have heard women say that they get raw or sore because men last too long. I have found that to be the case when a man doesn't excite me, or hasn't brought me to a mental point of wanting him. I have had gang bangs that have lasted for hours and not gotten sore or raw, and that has largely been because the men excited me and were able to keep me moist, either by their cum or their saliva or simply turning me on. The way I see it is that if I am going to suck a man's cock for 30 minutes or more, he better be able to fuck me even longer than that, or have a back up plan that is going to get me off, more than once or twice.