Ummmm,sorry fellas but a sexual act commited by two people of the same gender Is defined as homosexual, ....
Nothing to be sorry about, we've already established that the
acts are homosexual in nature.
However, simple commission of the
act does not make the person homosexual any more than being celibate or having sex with a woman would make a homosexual straight. Eating my Wife's pussy doesn't make either of us lesbian even though it is a homosexual
act.
If we are to assume that it is only the
act that determines ones sexuality, then virtually every one is at least bi-sexual assuming that at sometime in their sexual life they have enjoyed or performed oral sex or anal intercourse. These are homosexual
acts defined as sodomy. The only purely hetrosexual
act is male penis in female vagina.
However, even that as an
act doesn't define ones sexuality as many lesbian couples have enlisted homosexual men to act as sperm donors with the sperm being inject via the traditional method.
So if sexuality is not simply defined by the
acts one enjoys, what does?
How about
emotional attraction and attachment?
I think it would be safe to say that if one is attracted to and desires to be with someone of the same sex as a pleasurable and emotionally bonding experience, whether they engage in sex or not, that that would be a pretty good indication that one is at least bi-sexual, if not actually homosexual.
How about the
intent with which the act is being committed?
If one is performing oral sex on a member of the same sex with a true desire to share a pleasurable experience with them it could very well be homosexual.
However, if one is using some sort of coercion or ******* to perpetrate the act on or have the other perform the act, is this still sex or has it crossed into the realm of power exchange similar to *******? Virtually all professionals in the related fields would say that a hetrosexual ******* is not about the sex act in as much as it is about using the act to express control and exert dominance over the victim.
A bull using his alpha status over a submissive cuckold in a D/s oriented relationship would be no different. The two men aren't attracted to each other, nor desirous of sex with each other as a pleasurable bonding experience. The alpha is simply using the act as a way to exert his dominance and control over the beta male and using the humiliation experienced by the beta male to cement their respective positions within the relationship with regard to the cuckolds wife.
...and as far as far as dominance goes if the situation was with a black cuckold couple "and they do exist "trust me,would you make the black man suck yuor cock? If not ,why?
If the relationship warranted it, absolutely.
Keep in mind that we are talking about D/s relationships that are more on a "fringe" of the cuckolding world. Most cuckolding relationships tend to be more of a friendly, mutual pleasure based affair.
The D/s style relationships also come in various flavors (dominant cuckold/submissive wife, submissive cuck/dom wife, both cuck and wife sub) and each variation will have personal differences as well.
Regardless of race, it is the specific needs and desires of ALL of the parties involved that need to be considered, addressed and, hopefully, satisfied.
So if in discussion it was determined that the cuckold (white, black, yellow or green with polka dots) had a deep need and desire to experience total submission and to be humiliated and his wife and her bull were comfortable with the bull using homosexual acts on her husband to achieve this, then there is no reason why it should not be used.
Someone being "******" to perform oral sex on another is a very submissive and potentially humiliating act. It becomes even more so when causing one to do so on a member of their own sex.
It can also be a much safer thing to do, assuming all have taken reasonable precautions such as STI/STD testing, than many of the other things I have heard of people doing to subjugate and humiliate others. This also assuming that consideration of possible emotional psychological triggers are made and cared for.
So in this context, it is not only the bull experiencing a higher level of dominance and control, but also the cuckold exploring the depths of his submissive emotional needs as well and, if the wife enjoys all that having two men to love and satisfy her sexually can offer, this becomes a mutually satisfying relationship for all.
Win-win-win.
No?
