Can I have an opinion.
Lets say a Bull enters into an arraignment with a sub/slave or other fetishist. The sub becomes the Bull's de facto slave or servant. The arraingment specifically entails that any single woman he knocks up, it is expected of the slave to support the woman and baby. This may involve even living together. but the woman is not the slaves boyfriend or what have you. She is still the Bull's possession, lover, or at the very least an interested person. The slave financially, and if is called for emotionally supports her and her Bull's baby. However it is left up to the Bull to enforce discipline and maintain the status quo of the arraignment.
Thoughs anyone?
Lets say a Bull enters into an arraignment with a sub/slave or other fetishist. The sub becomes the Bull's de facto slave or servant. The arraingment specifically entails that any single woman he knocks up, it is expected of the slave to support the woman and baby. This may involve even living together. but the woman is not the slaves boyfriend or what have you. She is still the Bull's possession, lover, or at the very least an interested person. The slave financially, and if is called for emotionally supports her and her Bull's baby. However it is left up to the Bull to enforce discipline and maintain the status quo of the arraignment.
Thoughs anyone?